J Med Microbiol Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online ahead of print on 15 June 2009 as doi:10.1099/jmm.0.009720-0
Journal of Medical Microbiology 2009;58:1067.

J Med Microbiol (2009), DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.009720-0
© 2009 Society for General Microbiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Papers in Press[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jmm.0.009720-0v1
58/8/1067    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Singh, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, M.

Role of persisters and small colony variants in antibiotic resistance of planktonic and biofilm-associated Staphylococcus aureus: an in vitro study

Rachna Singh1, Pallab Ray2,3, Anindita Das1 and Meera Sharma1

1 Dept of Medical Microbiology, PGIMER, Chandigarh. India;

2 PGIMER

3 E-mail: drpallabray{at}gmail.com

Received January 20, 2009
Accepted April 10, 2009

The presence of persister cells and small colony variants (SCVs) has been associated with enhanced antibiotic resistance of many organisms in biofilms. We investigated whether persisters and/or SCVs contribute to antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. A detailed dose-dependent killing of biofilms and planktonic cells with five antibiotics (oxacillin, cefotaxime, amikacin, ciprofloxacin and vancomycin) was analyzed by treating them with each antibiotic at a concentration of 0-100 µg ml-1 at 37 °C for 48 h. The killing of biofilm cells by all the antibiotics indicated the presence of persister cells - most cells in the population died, leaving a fraction that persisted even at higher concentrations of the antibiotics. These persisters represented a transient resistant phenotype and reverted to a killing curve resembling the wild type parent upon re-exposure to the antibiotics. SCVs were observed in biofilms after treatment with ciprofloxacin only and these SCVs were of a transient nature. The treatment of planktonic cells with oxacillin, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and vancomycin killed the entire population and no persisters were detected. Transient SCVs, observed in planktonic cells following exposure to these antibiotics, were killed at higher antibiotic concentrations. The treatment of planktonic cells with amikacin yielded a small sub-population of survivors that included persisters (at numbers significantly lower than the biofilms) and the highly resistant, stable, small colony variants with an increased biofilm forming capacity in comparison to the wild type parent. Thus, the high resistance of S. aureus biofilms to multiple unrelated antibiotics is largely dependent on the presence of persister cells. Biofilms harbor a large number of persisters in comparison to planktonic cultures that either do not harbor persisters or harbor only a small number. Small colony variants, though not specifically associated with S. aureus biofilms, have an increased biofilm forming capacity and this may explain the frequent isolation of SCVs from biofilm-associated infections. The intrinsic resistance of these variants may in turn contribute to the enhanced antibiotic resistance of the biofilms so formed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 Society for General Microbiology.