J Med Microbiol Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online ahead of print on 15 June 2009 as doi:10.1099/jmm.0.007906-0
Journal of Medical Microbiology 2009;58:1106.

J Med Microbiol (2009), DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.007906-0
© 2009 Society for General Microbiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Papers in Press[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jmm.0.007906-0v1
58/8/1106    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wellinghausen, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gebert, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wellinghausen, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gebert, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wellinghausen, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gebert, S.

Rapid diagnosis of candidaemia by real-time PCR detection of Candida DNA in blood samples

Nele Wellinghausen1,3, Dunja Siegel2, Juliane Winter2 and Susanne Gebert2

1 Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene;

2 Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Ulm, Germany

3 E-mail: nele.wellinghausen{at}labor-gaertner.de

Received November 9, 2008
Accepted April 15, 2009

We prospectively evaluated a 18S rRNA gene targeted real-time PCR approach in comparison to standard blood culture diagnostic for rapid diagnosis of candidemia in a large study population of 384 patients, including 902 whole blood samples from 468 infectious episodes of 329 adults and 55 children with hematological malignancies, various forms of immunodeficiency, and ICU patients. Seven out of eight blood culture proven cases (87.5%) of candidemia and seven out of 12 blood culture-positive samples (58.3%), respectively, were positive by the Candida-specific PCR. A positive PCR result was also obtained in 28 of 460 blood culture-negative infectious episodes, including eight patients with culture-confirmed Candida infection at primary sterile body sites. Out of the PCR-positive, culture-negative patients more than 50% received systemic antifungal therapy. In 432 of 460 BC-negative infectious episodes, the Candida specific-PCR was negative, resulting in a negative predictive value of 99.8%. In conclusion, the Candida specific-PCR approach facilitated rapid detection of Candida DNA in blood samples of patients with risk for candidemia within a few hours. Although standard BC diagnostic appears still indispensable for detection of all cases of candidemia, the PCR assay allowed detection of candidemia at an average of three days earlier than BC diagnostic. Thereby, it enables earlier antifungal therapy of patients with suspected candidemia and may prevent further complications of candidemia.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 Society for General Microbiology.