J Med Microbiol NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOOKEY, J.V.
Right arrow Articles by ARNOLD, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HOOKEY, J.V.
Right arrow Articles by ARNOLD, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by HOOKEY, J.V.
Right arrow Articles by ARNOLD, C.
J. Med. Microbiol. -- Vol. 50 (2001), 991-995
© 2001 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615


MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY

A comparison of multilocus sequence typing and fluorescent fragment-length polymorphism analysis genotyping of clone complex and other strains of Neisseria meningitidis

J.V. HOOKEY and C. ARNOLD

Molecular Biology Unit, Sexually Transmitted and Blood Borne Virus Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT

Corresponding author: Dr J. V. Hookey.

Received 20 March 2001; revised version accepted 1 May 2001.

Abstract

Five National Collection of Type Culture (NCTC) strains and 14 isolates of Neisseria meningitidis, representing 13 outbreak isolates from within the UK, were examined by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) for seven house-keeping genes. The results were compared with those of fluorescent amplified fragment-length polymorphism (FAFLP) analysis. Phylogenetic inferences were made from 3284-nucleotide lengths of sequence for the 19 isolates, by distance and parsimony methods. Two clusters of isolates were delineated. The larger, comprising eight isolates – S1, S3, Ironville, P9, ET-37 (M99-241951), P7, P10 and P60 – shared 100–99.2% similarity and varied in only 40 nucleotides (~1.22% variation) from the consensus sequence alignment. This cluster could be equated to the ET-37 complex because it had allelic signatures identical to MLST sequence types 11 and 50. These eight isolates were also assigned to one group by FAFLP. The reference ET-5 complex isolate ‘ET-5 (NG144/82)’ and an isolate (X9) from an outbreak in the north of England were also grouped together by MLST. They shared 99.2% similarity and differed within the aroE and fumC genes by 4 and 17 nucleotides, respectively. Their MLST sequence types were 32 and 661 and, therefore, these two isolates could be equated to the ET-5 complex. They also grouped together by FAFLP. A comparison of the resources required to apply MLST to the 19 isolates examined with those needed to characterise them by FAFLP indicated that FAFLP (a fragment-based genotyping method) is more cost-effective than the partial sequencing approach, MLST.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
K. H. Dyet, R. S. Simmonds, and D. R. Martin
Multilocus Restriction Typing Method To Predict the Sequence Type of Meningococci
J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2004; 42(4): 1742 - 1745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
D. E. Bennett and M. T. Cafferkey
Multilocus restriction typing: a tool for Neisseria meningitidis strain discrimination
J. Med. Microbiol., September 1, 2003; 52(9): 781 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
M. A. Diggle and S. C. Clarke
What a Load of Old Sequence!!!
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2002; 40(7): 2707 - 2707.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 Society for General Microbiology.