|
|
||||||||
Case Report |
1 Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City, Mexico
2 Departamento de Microbiologia, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico
3 Instituto Nacional de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológicos, Mexico City, Mexico
Correspondence
Araceli Contreras-Rodríguez
cora29{at}hotmail.com
Received June 20, 2008
Accepted October 14, 2008
An unusual case of a 3-year-old girl with a brucellar foot abscess is reported. Although direct microscopic examination of samples from the lesion did not reveal micro-organisms of any kind, a 7 day culture of caseous material yielded small colonies of Gram-negative cocobacilli in Löwenstein–Jensen medium. These were biochemically and molecularly identified as Brucella melitensis. The possibility of foot abscess being caused by Brucella should be considered in countries where brucellosis is endemic.
Introduction
The genus Brucella consists of alpha-proteobacteria that cause a zoonosis known as brucellosis, acquired mainly through direct contact with infected animals, or the ingestion of raw milk and unpasteurized dairy products. Brucellosis is a major infectious disease distributed throughout the world. Brucella is an intracellular facultative pathogen able to persist for long periods of time within the host and establish a chronic disease (Pappas et al., 2005). Ingestion of unpasteurized dairy products is the most common way to acquire Brucella in Mexico (López-Merino, et al., 1992; Luna-Martínez & Mejía-Terán, 2002). During the last 5 years a total of 12 447 human cases have been recorded in Mexico (according to the Direccion General de Epidemiologia, Secretaría de Salud, Mexico, http://www.dgepi.salud.gob.mx/), 14.6 % affecting children <1–14 years old and 41 % affecting people 25–44 years old. In Mexico, 93 % of human brucellosis cases are due to Brucella melitensis acquired from goats, and a further 5 % are of bovine origin (Luna-Martínez & Mejía-Terán, 2002). B. melitensis has been isolated in a large number of paediatric cases of brucellosis in different countries: reports from Iran, Greece and Saudi Arabia indicate that the ingestion of raw milk or dairy products is the main source of infection (Nabi & Mir, 1992; Feiz et al., 1978; Giannakopoulos et al., 2006; Al-Eissa et al., 1990). In this report we present a case of B. melitensis isolated from an abscess of the left foot from a child of 3 years old.
Case report
A 3-year-old girl was admitted to the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez in July 2001 with a painful lesion on the skin of the interior side of her left foot (Fig. 1
, Supplementary Fig. S1 available with the online journal). Forty-five days before, without any medical attention, the girl suffered a trauma with an unidentified object that caused the lesion. She lived on a ranch in contact with cattle and had been drinking unpasteurized cows' milk since the age of 1 year. It is likely that the original lesion became contaminated with manure or other animal material. The patient was initially treated in the hospital as an outpatient (18 June 2001). At that time, the lesion exhibited inflammation and erythema, and was causing pain. Hepatomegaly and splenomegaly were not observed. The first diagnosis was pyomyositis, and the patient received 100 mg dicloxacilin kg–1 orally daily for 7 days. On 25 June, the girl was checked again and the lesion showed caseous material as found in an abscess produced by mycobacteria. A sample of the caseous material was cultured on Sabouraud, blood and chocolate agar plates; Löwenstein–Jensen medium (with 2 % malachite green) was also included to look for mycobacteria. A biopsy was taken from the lesion and examined by differential staining. On 29 June, the girl was checked out and results of cultures were analysed. As clinicians were expecting fast-growing bacteria, blood and chocolate plates were discarded after 24 h of incubation. Sabouraud plates were negative after 30 days of incubation at 28 °C. Periodic acid–Schiff, haematoxylin–eosin, Grocott, acid-fast and Gram stains did not reveal any micro-organism in the biopsy specimen. Localized chronic inflammation and ulceration, typical of a fungal infection, were observed at the site of the lesion. The biopsy specimen showed infiltration of lymphocytes, polymorphonuclear leukocytes and eosinophils in the dermis and hypodermis layers. At this time the patient received 100 mg cefalexin kg–1 daily for 5 days.
|
|
Discussion
A skin infection caused by B. melitensis, most likely traumatically inoculated (as the signs and symptoms normally present in brucellosis caused by B. melitensis were absent) has been reported here. Fever has been the predominant presenting feature in most reports of childhood brucellosis; in this context, Benjamin & Annobil (1992) studied 157 children with brucellosis and 100 % of them had a history of fever, while in another report 82.4 % from 114 paediatric brucellosis cases presented with fever (Nabi & Mir, 1992). In our case, the infection was clearly localized to the abscess, and the occurrence of hepatomegaly, splenomegaly or ostearticular complications was not observed. This case denotes the potential for this pathogen and related bacteria to cause infections that are overlooked. In this case, the unexpected growth on Löwenstein–Jensen medium led to the detection and identification of a pathogen that was not suspected. Although it is known that cattle dealers, butchers, veterinarians and farmers have the occupational risk of acquiring brucellosis through broken skin if in contact with infected animals (Madkour, 1989), skin infections are not contemplated. Metin et al. (2001) reported 5.71 % cutaneous manifestation in 103 adults with brucellosis, while Akcali et al. (2007) observed 13.59 % from 140 cases of adults with brucellosis. Mantur et al. (2004) observed complications by skin lesions in 3 children aged 14 years and younger from a total of 93 brucellosis cases (3.23 %). In areas where brucellosis is endemic, it is important to take account of Brucella spp. as a potential causative agent of cutaneous abscesses, when other, more common, aetiologies have been discarded.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A. C. R. and A. L. M. were supported by fellowships from COFAA, SIP-EDI and CONACYT. This work was partially supported by SIP-IPN grant no. 20080733 and CONACYT repatriation grant no. 76395.
References
Akcali, C., Savas, L., Baba, M., Turunc, T. & Seckin, D. (2007). Cutaneous manifestations in brucellosis: a prospective study. Adv Ther 24, 706–711.[CrossRef][Medline]
Al-Eissa, Y. A., Kambal, A. M., Al-Nasser, M. N., Al-Habib, S. A., Al-Fawaz, I. M. & Al-Zamil, F. A. (1990). Childhood brucellosis: a study of 102 cases. Pediatr Infect Dis J 9, 74–79.[CrossRef][Medline]
Alton, G. G., Jones, L. M., Angus, R. D. & Verger, J. M. (1988). Techniques for the Brucellosis Laboratory. Paris: Institute National de la Recherche Agronomique.
Baily, G. G., Krahn, J. B., Drasar, B. S. & Stoker, N. G. (1992). Detection of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus by DNA amplification. J Trop Med Hyg 95, 271–275.[Medline]
Benjamin, B. & Annobil, S. H. (1992). Childhood brucellosis in southwestern Saudi Arabia: a 5-year experience. J Trop Pediatr 38, 167–172.
Bricker, B. J. & Halling, S. M. (1994). Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 32, 2660–2666.
Feiz, J., Sabbaghian, H. & Miralai, M. (1978). Brucellosis due to B. melitensis in children. Clinical and epidemiologic observations on 95 patients studied in central Iran. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 17, 904–907.
Giannakopoulos, I., Nikolakopoulou, N. M., Eliopoulou, M., Ellina, A., Kolonitsiou, F. & Papanastasiou, D. A. (2006). Presentation of childhood brucellosis in western Greece. Jpn J Infect Dis 59, 160–163.[Medline]
Keness, J., Friedrich, I., Banai, M. & Schonfeld, S. (1993). Brucella melitensis growth on Loewenstein-Jensen egg medium from a case of Brucella meningitis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 17, 271–273.[CrossRef][Medline]
López-Merino, A., Migranas-Ortiz, R., Pérez-Miravete, A., Magos, C., Salvatierra-Izaba, B., Tapia-Conyer, R., Valdespino, J. L. & Sepulveda, J. (1992). Seroepidemiologia de la brucellosis. Salud Publica Mex 34, 230–240.[Medline]
Luna-Martínez, J. E. & Mejía-Terán, C. (2002). Brucellosis in Mexico: current status and trends. Vet Microbiol 90, 19–30.[CrossRef][Medline]
Madkour, M. M. (1989). Skin manifestations. In Brucellosis, pp. 180–184. Edited by M. M. Madkour. London: Butterworths.
Mantur, B. G., Akki, A. S., Mangalgi, S. S., Patil, S. V., Gobbur, R. H. & Peerapur, B. V. (2004). Childhood brucellosis a microbiological, epidemiological and clinical study. J Trop Pediatr 50, 153–157.
Metin, A., Akdeniz, H., Buzgan, T. & Delice, I. (2001). Cutaneous findings encountered in brucellosis and review of the literature. Int J Dermatol 40, 434–438.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nabi, G. & Mir, N. A. (1992). Brucellosis in pediatric patients: a review of 114 cases from Asir region. Ann Saudi Med 12, 286–288.[Medline]
Pappas, G., Akritidis, N., Bosilkovski, M. & Tsianos, E. (2005). Brucellosis. N Engl J Med 352, 2325–2336.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | J MED MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL | ALL SGM JOURNALS |