|
|
||||||||
Case Report |
1 Microbiology Service, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Spain
2 Taxonomy Laboratory, Bacteriology Service, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
3 Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain
Correspondence
Victoria Ortiz de la Tabla Ducasse
ortiz_vic{at}gva.es
Received 29 March 2008
Accepted 30 April 2008
Abbreviations: ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
| Case report |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Blood samples were inoculated in aerobic and anaerobic blood culture vials (Bactec Plus; BD Diagnostics Systems). Two aerobic vials were positive and were subcultured on chocolate and 5 % horse blood agar plates (bioMérieux). After 24 h incubation, colonies were 1–1.5 mm in diameter, circular and convex. No haemolysis was produced on 5 % horse blood agar. The isolate was a strictly aerobic Gram-negative coccobacillus, with positive catalase and negative oxidase reactions. It did not grow on MacConkey agar (bioMérieux).
Phenotypic identification was made using the NegCombo 36 panel MicroScan (Dade Behring) and the API 20 NE strip (bioMérieux) in accordance with the manufacturers' instructions. The strain was identified as Acinetobacter lwoffii. With API 20 NE, the percentage of identification obtained was 86.9 % (code no. 0040000). According to the MicroScan system database, the only identification obtained was A. lwoffii (biotype 00000400).
Antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolate was determined using the NegCombo 36 panel (MicroScan). The strain was resistant to cephalotin and cephazolin (MIC >16 µg ml–1), and susceptible to ampicillin (MIC
8 µg ml–1), amoxicillin–clavulanate (MIC
8 µg ml–1), cefuroxime (MIC
4 µg ml–1), cefoxitin (MIC
8 µg ml–1), cefotaxime (MIC=4 µg ml–1), ceftazidime (MIC
1 µg ml–1), cefepime (MIC=4 µg ml–1), imipenem (MIC
2 µg ml–1), aztreonam (MIC
1 µg ml–1), ciprofloxacin (MIC=1 µg ml–1) and aminoglycosides (MIC
4 µg ml–1).
For genotypic identification, the isolate was sent to the Microbiology National Center (Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain) to determine the 16S rRNA gene sequence. A total of 1477 bp of 16S rRNA was determined using a method previously described (Drancourt et al., 2000). The sequence obtained was compared to bacterial sequences available from the GenBank database using the BLAST program (National Center for Biotechnology Information). The strain was identified as Acinetobacter ursingii and showed 99 % similarity to the type strain of A. ursingii.
The patient had a favourable clinical course. She received therapy with intravenous cefotaxime for 1 week and oral cefuroxime for another week.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The taxonomy of the Acinetobacter genus has undergone extensive revision since 1986 (Juni, 2005); the genus currently includes 32 genomic species, 17 of which have been validated. Since its recent description in 2001 as a novel species (Nemec et al., 2001), A. ursingii has been isolated in a few human cases (Loubinoux et al., 2003; Romero-Gómez et al., 2006; Dortet et al., 2006). Apart from the strains reported in the taxonomic description of the species, only five cases of bacteraemia caused by A. ursingii have been reported, and all of them occurred in patients with severe underlying comorbidities, most of them immunocompromised patients (Loubinoux et al., 2003; Romero-Gómez et al., 2006; Dortet et al., 2006). Most of the strains were isolated from blood or other sterile body site cultures in seriously ill hospitalized patients (Nemec et al., 2001; Loubinoux et al., 2003; Romero-Gómez et al., 2006; Dortet et al., 2006). To our knowledge, only one previous strain of A. ursingii has been recovered from a patient considered to have cholangitis (Dortet et al., 2006). However, in that patient, A. ursingii was isolated in a single blood culture and only a possible causality relationship could be established. In the present case report, the bacterium was isolated from two different blood cultures and cholangitis was evident by ERCP, thus confirming that this species can cause bacteraemic biliary tract infection. The case is also unique because, unlike in previous reports, our patient was a healthy woman with no comorbidities who presented with cholelithiasis, choledocholithiasis and cholangitis. The performance of ERCP was, in this patient, the most likely trigger for A. ursingii bacteraemia.
This report highlights the inadequacies of conventional phenotypic tests usually available in clinical microbiology laboratories for the identification of Acinetobacter species. At present, no rapid and accurate commercial phenotypic identification exists for new Acinetobacter species (Dortet et al., 2006). Genotypic methods are needed for definitive identification confirmation since accurate identification of Acinetobacter species may have epidemiological and therapeutic implications.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. J. van den Broek, T. J. K. van der Reijden, E. van Strijen, A. V. Helmig-Schurter, A. T. Bernards, and L. Dijkshoorn Endemic and Epidemic Acinetobacter Species in a University Hospital: an 8-Year Survey J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2009; 47(11): 3593 - 3599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | J MED MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL | ALL SGM JOURNALS |