|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 845 19th Street South, BBRB 614, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
2 Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
Correspondence
M. H. Nahm
nahm{at}uab.edu
Received 1 August 2007
Accepted 30 September 2007
90 %). In addition, the assay validation study suggests the presence of serological subtypes within serotype 11A.
Abbreviations: CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; DMTMM, 4-(4,6-dimethoxy[1,3,5]triazin-2-yl)-4-methyl-morpholinium; EDC, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride; PLL, poly-L-lysine; PS, polysaccharide; RT, room temperature; UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Classically, pneumococci are serotyped by the quellung reaction (Henrichsen, 1995; Lund, 1960). Since the quellung reaction is very labour-intensive and requires a complex array of expensive typing sera, new typing systems have recently been developed to meet the large serotyping needs of vaccine studies. Several groups developed DNA-based typing systems following the determination of the DNA sequence of the capsular biosynthetic gene (cps) loci from strains representing 90 pneumococcal serotypes (Batt et al., 2005; Brito et al., 2003; Kong et al., 2005; Lawrence et al., 2003; O'Halloran & Cafferkey, 2005; Rubin & Rizvi, 2004). Using extracted DNA, Pai et al. (2006) developed a multiplex PCR for 29 of the pneumococcal serotypes. Other groups developed improved serological assays such as latex agglutination assays (Slotved et al., 2004) and dot-blot assays using intact pneumococci (Fenoll et al., 1997). We developed a multiplex immunoassay for capsular polysaccharides (PSs) using pneumococcal lysates and described an assay employing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for 14 common serotypes and polyclonal antibodies for 10 additional serotypes (Yu et al., 2005).
Experience with our multiplex immunoassay (named the multibead assay) showed that PS-coated latex particles are unstable and polyclonal antibodies have limitations in serotype specificity. To extend the usefulness of our multibead assay, we have covalently coupled PS to latex particles and have now developed mAbs to 10 additional serotypes and have characterized them. Additional serotype coverage is important for more detailed coverage, and is potentially of critical importance for serotype surveillance in developing countries. Compared with developing a mAb, developing a PCR for a new serotype is simple. We therefore investigated the new mAbs for the multibead assay method and also investigated combining a PCR method with the multibead method to identify additional serotypes.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
PCR. To identify capsule genes by PCR, bacterial lysates were diluted 10–100-fold in water and then subjected to PCR using primers and previously described reaction conditions (Pai et al., 2006). The capsule-specific PCR also included primers for part of the cpsA gene, to serve as a positive control for the presence of pneumococcal capsule genes from most pneumococcal strains (Bentley et al., 2006). The reaction products were separated by agarose electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under UV light.
Production of mAbs.
mAbs were produced as previously described (Yu et al., 2005). Briefly, mice were immunized with a PS conjugated to a protein, and splenocytes were harvested from immune mice for hybridization with fusion partner cells (SP2/0-Ag14). Primary wells containing antibodies to capsular PS were identified using ELISA (Yu et al., 2005). Hybridoma cell lines were established by subcloning the cells in the primary wells twice by limiting dilution. The hybridoma cell lines are listed in Table 1
.
Inhibition ELISA for 11A subtypes.
While most isolates typed as 11A by the quellung reaction were reactive with the Hyp11AM2 mAb, some were not (Table 2
). To distinguish between the two subtypes, we named the isolates typed as 11A by both methods as 11A
and those typed by the quellung reaction alone as 11Aβ. To investigate this serological phenomenon, we established 11A
- or 11Aβ-specific inhibition ELISAs, as previously described (Park et al., 2007). For the 11A
inhibition ELISA, microwells of ELISA plates were coated with 11A
PS, which was purchased from the ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA) as 11A PS. To each microwell, variably diluted bacterial lysates and Hyp11AM2 mAb were added. After incubation, unbound mAb was removed, and bound mAb was determined using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody and nitrophenyl phosphate substrate. For the 11Aβ inhibition ELISA, another 11A-specific mAb, Hyp11AM1, was used and the ELISA microwells were coated with 11Aβ PS, which was prepared as described below.
Purification of 11Aβ PS. 11Aβ PS was purified from a 2 l culture of pneumococcal strain CDC3455-06, as previously described (Park et al., 2007). Briefly, the PS in the bacterial culture supernatant was precipitated with 70 % ethanol and then purified over an ion-exchange column (DEAE-Sepharose) and a molecular mass sizing column (Sephacryl S-300). The fractions containing PS were identified by the anthrone reaction (Ashwell, 1957) and inhibition ELISA for 11Aβ PS.
Conjugation of PS to latex beads. Two sets of latex beads conjugated with PS were prepared using PSs purchased from the ATCC, except for the 6A and 11Aβ PS. 6A PS was obtained from G. Schiffman (Brooklyn, NY, USA) and 11Aβ PS was purified as described above. The latex bead sets contained latex beads of different sizes and with different amounts of red fluorescence, which permits one to identify each bead type by flow cytometry. The latex beads included 10 different types of pre-labelled beads, which are available from Bangs Laboratory as the QuantumPlex latex bead set. Others were unstained latex beads with carboxy or amino groups and were also purchased from Bangs Laboratory. In some cases, the unstained beads were stained with DiD oil (an indodicarbocyanine dye from Molecular Probes), as we have previously described (Park et al., 2000).
The PSs were conjugated to the beads using one of the three methods described below. 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) was used to couple PSs of serotypes 6A, 10A, 19A, 19F and 20 to the beads with amino groups, as previously described (Zielen et al., 1996). Four hundred microlitres of water containing 1 % bead suspension, 10 µg PS ml–1 and 10 mg EDC ml–1 was incubated overnight at 37 °C with shaking. To the reaction mixture was added 100 µl water containing glycine (250 mM) and glucose (250 mM). After 30 min at room temperature (RT), the beads were washed with PBS containing 0.1 % Tween 20, suspended to 107 beads ml–1 in storage buffer (PBS, 0.01 % Tween 20, 1 % BSA, 0.02 % azide and 0.1 % glucose), and kept at 4 °C.
The PSs of serotypes 7F and 22F were conjugated using poly-L-lysine (PLL), as previously described (Pickering et al., 2002). These PSs were conjugated to PLL using cyanuric chloride, and the resulting PS–PLL conjugate was purified over a Sephadex G-25 column. The PS–PLL conjugate was then conjugated to latex beads with carboxy groups using a two-step carbodiimide reaction. Carboxylated microspheres (5x107) were mixed with 5 mg EDC ml–1 and 5 mg Sulfo-NHS ml–1. After 20 min, the beads were washed and mixed with 500 µl PS–PLL. After 1 h at RT with shaking, the reaction mixture was mixed with 125 µl water containing glycine (250 mM) and glucose (250 mM). After 30 min at RT, the beads were washed with PBS containing 0.1 % Tween 20, suspended to 107 beads ml–1 in the storage buffer, and kept at 4 °C.
The PSs of the remaining serotypes were conjugated using 4-(4,6-dimethoxy[1,3,5]triazin-2-yl)-4-methyl-morpholinium (DMTMM), as previously described (Schlottmann et al., 2006). Two and seven-tenths millilitres of water containing PS (1 mg ml–1) and DMTMM (15 mg ml–1) was kept at RT for 1 h with shaking. Activated PS was separated from free DMTMM by desalting chromatography, and the fractions containing the activated PS were identified by the anthrone reaction. Two millilitres of activated PS was mixed with 5x107 beads with carboxy groups and was incubated overnight at RT with mixing. To the reaction mixture was added 500 µl water containing glycine (250 mM) and glucose (250 mM). After 30 min at RT, the beads were washed with PBS containing 0.1 % Tween 20, suspended to 107 beads ml–1 in the storage buffer, and kept at 4 °C.
Multibead assay.
The assay was performed as described previously using the two sets of latex bead mixture (Park et al., 2000; Yu et al., 2005). Set 1 contained beads coated with PSs of serotypes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9N, 9V, 11Aβ, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F and 23F. Set 2 contained beads coated with PSs of serotypes 2, 6A, 8, 10A, 11A
, 12F, 15B, 17F, 20, 22F and 33F. Each set of bead mixture was incubated with a bacterial lysate and an appropriate mixture of mAbs. The bacterial lysate was diluted either 10-fold or 50-fold. After incubation, the reaction mixture was washed with PBS containing 0.1 % Tween 20 and mixed with fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin. After 30 min of incubation, the latex beads were washed and analysed for their fluorescence with a flow cytometer (FACSArray; Becton Dickinson).
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-PS-coated beads included in bead set 2 (11A PS from the ATCC is labelled as 11A
PS to avoid confusion). Hyp11AM1 is paired with the 11Aβ-PS-coated latex beads included in bead set 1. Cross-reaction patterns of the new mAbs suggest the existence of epitopes that have not yet been identified for pneumococcal PSs. The only epitope known to be expressed on serotypes 39 and 10A is epitope 10d (Henrichsen, 1995). However, 10d is known to be expressed on 10B, and Hyp10AM6 did not cross-react with 10B. Thus Hyp10AM6 may recognize a new epitope shared between only 10A and 39. In addition to this new epitope, we previously noted that Hyp18CM1 and Hyp23FG3 probably define new epitopes (Yu et al., 2005) since 18C- and 23F-specific epitopes were not described in the past (Henrichsen, 1995). Furthermore, we have recently described a new serotype, 6C, the discovery of which revealed the presence of several new serogroup 6 epitopes (Park et al., 2007).
In previous multibead assays, latex beads had a short shelf-life since PS was passively adsorbed to the beads. To prepare beads with a longer shelf-life, we covalently conjugated PS to the latex beads. Because one single method (the DMTMM method described above) of conjugating PS did not yield acceptable beads for all 25 different PSs, we examined two additional methods of conjugation (the EDC and PLL methods, also described above). Using these methods, we were able to produce PS-conjugated beads that were stable for more than 3 months. In many cases, the beads remained useful for more than 9 months. The sensitivity of the multibead assay was first investigated using purified PSs as inhibitors. Binding of all mAbs could be inhibited by more than 50 % with 0.1 µg homologous PS ml–1. This sensitivity was sufficient to allow the use of bacterial lysates diluted 10- and 50-fold for multibead assays.
While we were investigating the conjugation methods, we found that the optimal conjugation method was dependent on the mAb itself. For instance, the PLL conjugation method yielded higher binding signals than the EDC conjugation method for mAb Hyp9VM5. However, the EDC method was better than the PLL method for mAb Hyp9VG1 (Fig. 1
). Analogous differences were observed for mAbs to 22F (Fig. 1
). While these findings indicate that specific conjugation methods should be selected for each mAb, they also suggest that one conjugation method could preserve a specific epitope better than another conjugation method. PS-conjugated latex beads are increasingly used for measuring concentrations of pneumococcal antibodies to many different serotypes using a flow-cytometer-like instrument (e.g. Luminex) (Pickering et al., 2002). In view of our findings, before adopting a flow-cytometric bead array method for measuring pneumococcal antibody levels, one should carefully investigate the potential that the epitopes can be altered by the method used to conjugate PS to latex beads (Pickering et al., 2002).
|
The only exception to these unambiguous determinations was Hyp15BG5. With this mAb, all 15B isolates in the test panel inhibited more than 67 % and could be identified unambiguously, but its cross-reaction with 15C isolates was highly variable. For instance, many 15C isolates inhibited about 40–60 %, but some 15C isolates inhibited less than 30 %. When Hyp15BG5 was examined with the purified PSs, Hyp15BG5 could be inhibited only by 15B PS and not by 15C PS (data not shown). The contradiction in cross-reactions observed with 15C PS and pneumococcal isolates can be explained since pneumococci expressing 15C can spontaneously convert to the 15B serotype with an estimated frequency of approximately 1 in 250 bacteria (Venkateswaran et al., 1983) due to a genetically unstable acetylation enzyme gene in the cps locus (van Selm et al., 2003). Thus identification of 15C isolates with Hyp15BG5 is not based on a serological cross-reaction to 15C PS but is instead based on the spontaneous but variable conversion of 15C isolates to 15B isolates.
Use of bacterial lysates for PCR to identify additional serotypes
The multibead assay is limited by the number of available mAbs. Also, the multibead assay did not reliably identify serotype 15C due to variability in the observed cross-reactions. To supplement the multibead assay, we studied the usefulness of the bacterial lysates originally prepared for the multibead assays in a multiplexed PCR. We chose to adopt the PCR method for the five serotypes 15A, 15C, 16F, 35B and 38 because a recent CDC survey showed that these five serotypes are more common among the serotypes not covered by the multibead assay (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 2
, the lysates were useful for the multiplexed PCR (Pai et al., 2006) even with 100-fold dilutions. Serotype 15C could be identified with a PCR test for 15B and 15C serotypes (Fig. 2
) and its weak reaction with Hyp15BG5.
|
Validation of serotypic specificity of the new multibead assay with clinical isolates
To use clinical isolates to validate our multibead assay, we obtained a panel of 157 clinical isolates from the CDC, where they had all been typed by the quellung reaction. The panel was constructed to preferentially include the serotypes that are detected with the new mAbs, and included more than 10 isolates for each serotype in the multibead assay except for serotype 2. The isolates were analysed using the multibead assay. When the results were compared with the results of the CDC's quellung reaction tests, all the results were identical except for four discrepancies (Table 2
). Three discrepancies were observed for serotype 11A, and one discrepancy was found for a strain (sample 3069-06) that was non-typable at the CDC (Table 2
) but was found to be weakly positive for serotype 8 at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB). The non-typable strain (3069-06) was further investigated by deriving 20 isolated subcolonies from the parental stock. Fourteen of the subcolonies were non-typable, but six colonies expressed serotype 8.
Pneumococci expressing serotype 8 can spontaneously inactivate their initial transferase gene (cap8E) and lose capsule production by duplicating a large portion of the cap8E gene (Waite et al., 2003). This mechanism may have been responsible for some of the subcolonies of sample 3069-06 being typed as serotype 8 and others being non-typable. Therefore, we investigated both types of colonies for the size of the cap8E gene using PCR. Our study found that colonies expressing serotype 8 had a normal-sized cap8E gene but that the non-typable colonies did not have a cap8E gene even though they had the pneumococcal cpsA gene (data not shown). Thus this sample harbours two pneumococcal strains: one expressing a non-typable serotype and the other expressing serotype 8.
When the three discrepant 11A isolates were further investigated, they were repeatedly typed as non-typable at UAB (with Hyp11AM2) but were retyped as 11A by the quellung reaction. To investigate discrepancies in 11A serotyping, we labelled the 11A isolates reacting with Hyp11AM2 as 11A
and the three non-reactive isolates as 11Aβ. When we examined the panel of mAbs that we had prepared against 11A, we found that one mAb (Hyp11AM1) bound to the three 11Aβ isolates better than to the 11A
isolates. The three 11Aβ isolates inhibited the binding of Hyp11AM1 to 11Aβ-coated latex beads but did not inhibit the binding of any other mAbs. Also, no isolates expressing the non-11A serotype could inhibit the binding of Hyp11AM1 to 11Aβ-coated latex beads. Thus the multibead assay system based on 26 mAbs could correctly serotype all clinical isolates and also suggested the presence of subtypes among serotype 11A.
Discovery of subtypes among 11A isolates
To quantitatively study the 11A subtypes, we developed an 11A-subtype-specific inhibition ELISA using the two mAbs (Hyp11AM1 and Hyp11AM2) and two subtypes of 11A PS. The 11A PS from the ATCC was inhibitory in the 11A
assay but not in the 11Aβ assay (data not shown). Conversely, 11Aβ PS inhibited the 11Aβ assay but not the 11A
assay (data not shown). Consistent with multibead assay results, lysates of the 11D and 11F serotypes inhibited the 11A
assay, but lysates of 11B and 11C did not (data not shown). None of these lysates inhibited the 11Aβ assay (data not shown). When we examined all 12 CDC samples that were identified as 11A by the quellung reaction, six isolates inhibited the 11A
assay but not the 11Aβ assay and three isolates inhibited the 11Aβ assay but not the 11A
assay (Fig. 3
). Interestingly, three isolates could inhibit both the 11A
assay and the 11Aβ assay; an example is shown in Fig. 3
. These results suggest the presence of serological subtypes in serotype 11A. However, we will not propose these subtypes to be new serotypes until the biochemical and genetic bases for the subtypes of 11A are determined.
|
Operational experience with the hybrid serotyping assay using both multibead and PCR assays
We describe a hybrid serotyping system using both PCR and serological methods that shares the same sample (bacterial lysate). Since its development, our hybrid serotyping assay has already been used for typing more than 1000 samples. The multibead assay is well suited for primary screening since it has high throughput with reproducible results. Once one has appropriate instruments, the multibead assay costs less than PCR since it uses readily available latex particles, uses very small amounts of antibodies, and is highly automated. Indeed, the multibead assay alone is sufficient to determine the efficacy of current pneumococcal vaccines. Although we could serotype the majority of pneumococcal isolates with the multibead assay, the PCR method is a powerful complement in that it is readily adaptable to identify serotypes for which we currently have no serological reagents. This adaptability is useful when the prevalent serotypes are changing as a result of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine usage. We believe that this hybrid system, which shares one common bacterial lysate, has the capability to be highly precise, efficient and useful for laboratories with high-throughput serotyping needs.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Thurmer, J. H. Helbig, E. Jacobs, and P. C. Luck PCR-based 'serotyping' of Legionella pneumophila J. Med. Microbiol., May 1, 2009; 58(5): 588 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Zartler, R. J. Porambo, C. L. Anderson, L. H. Chen, J. Yu, and M. H. Nahm Structure of the Capsular Polysaccharide of Pneumococcal Serotype 11A Reveals a Novel Acetylglycerol That Is the Structural Basis for 11A Subtypes J. Biol. Chem., March 13, 2009; 284(11): 7318 - 7329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Sabharwal, S. Ram, M. Figueira, I. H. Park, and S. I. Pelton Role of Complement in Host Defense against Pneumococcal Otitis Media Infect. Immun., March 1, 2009; 77(3): 1121 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | J MED MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL | ALL SGM JOURNALS |