J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tabart, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mignon, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tabart, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mignon, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tabart, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mignon, B.
J Med Microbiol 56 (2007), 971-975; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47115-0
© 2007 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 1473-5644

Reconstructed interfollicular feline epidermis as a model for Microsporum canis dermatophytosis

Jeremy Tabart1, Aline Baldo1, Sandy Vermout1, Betty Nusgens2, Charles Lapiere2, Bertrand Losson1 and Bernard Mignon1

1 Department of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, B43 Sart Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium

2 Laboratory of Connective Tissues Biology, University of Liège, Tour de Pathologie B23/3, 4000 Liège, Belgium

Correspondence
Bernard Mignon
bmignon{at}ulg.ac.be

Received 8 December 2006
Accepted 7 March 2007


Microsporum canis is a pathogenic fungus that causes a superficial cutaneous infection called dermatophytosis. The complexity of mechanisms involved in dermatophytic infections makes relevant in vivo studies particularly difficult to perform. The aim of this study was to develop a new in vitro model of M. canis dermatophytosis using feline fetal keratinocytes in reconstructed interfollicular epidermis, and to investigate its relevance in studying the host–pathogen relationship. Histological analysis of reconstructed interfollicular feline epidermis (RFE) revealed a fully differentiated epidermis. A proliferation assay showed replicating cells only in the basal layer, indicating that RFE is a well-stratified living tissue, leading to the formation of a horny layer. Histopathological analysis of RFE infected by M. canis arthroconidia revealed that the fungus invades the stratum corneum and produces SUB3, a keratinase implicated in the infectious process. In view of these results, an M. canis dermatophytosis model on RFE seems to be a useful tool to investigate mechanisms involved in natural M. canis feline infections.


Abbreviations: BrdU, bromodeoxyuridine; RFE, reconstructed feline epidermis; RHE, reconstructed human epidermis; SUB3, subtilisin-like protease 3.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Microsporum canis causes a superficial cutaneous infection, mainly in cats, its natural and reservoir host, but also in dogs, other pets and humans. As for other dermatophytoses, the pathogenesis of M. canis infection remains poorly understood, mainly because relevant in vivo studies are particularly difficult to perform. Additionally, to date, there is no in vitro model of feline dermatophytosis to investigate the role of putative M. canis virulence factors and to study the keratinocyte response to infection. Nevertheless, in vitro models were shown to be useful to study the pathogenesis of some non-M. canis dermatophytoses. In this context, Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton interdigitale and Trichophyton quinckeanum were shown to adhere to stripped stratum corneum within 4 h (Zurita & Hay, 1987). Interleukin-8 and tumour necrosis factor alpha were also shown to be produced in keratinocyte monolayers inoculated with Trichophyton mentagrophytes (Nakamura et al., 2002). In a more elaborate model of T. mentagrophytes infection using reconstructed human epidermis (RHE), the infection process was shown to be similar to that observed in vivo (Rashid et al., 1995). Consequently, in the present study, we developed for the first time both the culture of normal feline keratinocytes and a model of interfollicular reconstructed feline epidermis (RFE). Additionally, we demonstrate the relevance of RFE to the in vivo M. canis infection process.


    METHODS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Fungal growth and arthroconidia production. The M. canis strain IHEM 21239 isolated from a naturally infected cat was used for all experiments. After isolation, the fungus was grown on Sabouraud's dextrose agar (Gibco, Life Technologies). Then, arthroconidia were produced essentially as previously described by Gupta et al. (2003). Briefly, arthroconidia were obtained from 15-day-old cultures on 2 % yeast extract/1 % peptone agar (VWR Scientific Products) in an atmosphere containing 12 % CO2, at 30 °C. Surface mycelium and conidia were scraped with a scalpel blade and transferred to PBS (pH 7.2). After gentle agitation for 1 h, the fungal suspension was filtered through three Miracloth layers (22–25 µm pore size; Calbiochem) to remove hyphae and centrifuged at 3000 g for 5 min. The pellet containing arthroconidia was washed three times in PBS, resuspended in PBS and stored at 4 °C until use. Arthroconidia concentration was determined by serial dilutions on Sabouraud's dextrose agar and adjusted to 1x107 cells ml–1. Preliminary studies showed that the mortality rate was non-significant until more than 3 months after arthroconidia isolation. In all cases, arthroconidia were used within 1 month.

Isolation of feline keratinocytes and fibroblasts. The cells were obtained from feline fetuses over 30 days of age, in cooperation with a veterinarian surgeon and with the agreement of the cat's owner. Except when mentioned, solutions and vessels were kept on ice during the entire procedure. The fetal skin was cut into small pieces. After removal of subcutaneous fat, the samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C floating on William's Medium E supplemented with 100 U penicillin ml–1, 100 µg streptomycin ml–1, 2.5 µg fungizone ml–1 and 5 mg dispase ml–1 (all from Gibco). The epidermis was then separated from the dermis with a scalpel blade, rapidly chopped and trypsinized for 30 min at 37 °C in 0.12 % trypsin/0.02 % EDTA (Gibco) in PBS. The cell suspension was filtered through a cell strainer, 70 µm pore size (VWR), and centrifuged for 5 min at 900 g at 4 °C. The cellular pellet was resuspended in keratinocyte growth medium (KGM) composed of keratinocyte basal medium supplemented with Singlequots (Biowhittaker). The cells were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h in a humidified atmosphere containing 5 % CO2. De-epidermized dermis was cut into small pieces and incubated for 7 days in fibroblast growth medium (FGM) containing Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium, 10 % fetal bovine serum, 100 U penicillin ml–1, 100 µg streptomycin ml–1 and 2.5 µg fungizone ml–1 (all from Gibco). Medium was changed every other day.

Cell type characterization. Cultured keratinocytes and fibroblasts were immunolabelled using a rabbit polyclonal anti-human pan-cytokeratin and a mouse polyclonal anti-human vimentin antibody, respectively (Sigma Aldrich), essentially as described by Chen et al. (2002). Briefly, cells grown for 48 h on coverslips were washed with PBS and fixed for 10 min in methanol. Endogenous peroxidases were inhibited by incubating the cells for 20 min in 3 % H2O2 in PBS. Coverslips were rinsed with PBS and sequentially incubated for 1 h with non-immune goat serum (Dako) and anti-pan-cytokeratin or anti-vimentin antibody. After washing with PBS, a horseradish peroxidase-coupled mouse anti-rabbit or rabbit anti-mouse antibody (Dako) was applied for 30 min. After washing with PBS, amino ethyl carbazole (Dako) was used as a chromogen and slides were counterstained for 5 min with Mayer's haematoxylin.

Dermal equivalent. Fibroblasts were used at passage 3–5 for all experiments. Cells were harvested by trypsinization for 5 min at 37 °C [0.025 % trypsin/0.01 % EDTA (Gibco) in PBS] and adjusted to 1x103 cells ml–1 in FGM supplemented with 200 µg NaOH ml–1, 2.1 mg NaHCO3 ml–1, 50 µg ascorbic acid ml–1 and 2 mg rat tail collagen ml–1 (Roche Applied Science). The cellular suspension was poured on a cell insert (Anopore 0.63 cm diameter, 0.2 µm diameter pore size; VWR) supplied with a stainless steel ring and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C, in a humidified atmosphere containing 5 % CO2. After collagen polymerization the cell inserts were immersed in FGM and incubated under the same conditions for an additional 24 h. The medium was then replaced with KGM.

Reconstructed interfollicular feline epidermis. RFE was developed essentially as described for RHE (Poumay et al., 2004). Proliferating keratinocytes from primary cultures in KGM were trypsinized and seeded on dermal equivalent in cell inserts at 5x105 cells cm–2. After immersion for 24 h in KGM, cell inserts were lifted using a stainless steel grid support to form an air–liquid interface. The medium was replaced by RFE culture medium [a 1 : 1 mix of KGM and Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium : Ham's F-12 (3 : 1)] supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 100 µM non-essential amino acids, 1 mM pyruvate, 60 U penicillin ml–1, 60 µg streptomycin ml–1, 2.5 µg fungizone ml–1 (all from Gibco), 10 mM HEPES (Biowhittaker), 1x10–10 M cholera toxin, 5 µg insulin ml–1, 0.4 µg hydrocortisone ml–1, 20 µg adenine ml–1, 5 µg transferrin ml–1, 1.5 ng tri-iodo-L-thyronine ml–1, 2 ng epidermal growth factor ml–1, 2.85 mM calcium and 100 µg ascorbic acid ml–1 (all from Sigma). Medium was changed every other day for 14 days.

Histological evaluation. After 14 days of growth at the air–liquid interface, RFE was histologically evaluated and compared to normal feline epidermis. Briefly, RFE was fixed for 24 h in 4 % buffered formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections (7 µm thick) perpendicular to the RFE were stained with haematoxylin and eosin.

Proliferation assay. The culture medium of RFE placed at the air–liquid interface for 11 and 13 days was supplemented with 10 mM bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) for either 72 or 24 h, respectively. At day 14, RFE was fixed in 4 % formaldehyde and processed as described above. BrdU incorporation was immunohistochemically evaluated using the BrdU In-situ Detection kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (BD Biosciences).

Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses. RFE was seeded with 1x105 M. canis arthroconidia, incubated for 5 days at 37 °C with 5 % CO2 in a humidified atmosphere, and processed for histopathology as described above, except that haematoxylin and eosin were replaced by periodic acid–Schiff. Immunodetection of the M. canis keratinolytic protease SUB3 (Mignon et al., 1998; Descamps et al., 2002) was performed in infected RFE sections essentially as previously described (Mignon et al., 1998). Briefly, slides were sequentially incubated with a non-immune goat serum (Dako) containing 3 % BSA (Sigma), a rabbit anti-SUB3 polyclonal antibody, and then with a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated swine anti-rabbit immunoglobulin antibody (Dako). Control consisted of anti-SUB3 primary antibody omission.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
KGM and FGM select feline keratinocytes and fibroblasts

The nature of cultured cells was determined by immunochemistry using an anti-pan-cytokeratin or an anti-vimentin antibody. As shown in Fig. 1(a)Go, cells cultured in KGM were polygonal, with a cytoskeleton labelled with anti-pan-cytokeratin but not with anti-vimentin (Fig. 1bGo) antibody. In contrast, cells cultured in FGM were fibroblastic with a cytoskeleton labelled with anti-vimentin (Fig. 1dGo) but not with anti-pan-cytokeratin (Fig. 1cGo) antibody. This demonstrates that FGM and KGM are suitable for selecting feline fibroblasts and keratinocytes, which are subsequently used to develop dermal equivalent and RFE, respectively.


Figure 1
View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Feline cells cultured in KGM and FGM are keratinocytes and fibroblasts, respectively. Non-confluent feline skin cells cultured in KGM or FGM were labelled with an anti-pan-cytokeratin or an anti-vimentin antibody followed by a secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody. Over 95 % of the cells cultured in KGM were polygonal and exhibited a brown staining with pan-cytokeratin (a) whereas they were not stained for vimentin (b). Cells cultured in FGM were fibroblastic; none were stained for pan-cytokeratin (c) whereas over 95 % were stained for vimentin (d).

 
RFE is fully differentiated

Staining of RFE with haematoxylin and eosin (Fig. 2a, bGo) revealed a structure composed of four typical successive layers (basal, spinous, granular and cornified) as commonly observed in vivo. It is noticeable that the cornified layer is very thick. Additionally, the high reproducibility of RFE was independent of the origin of feline fetuses. Thus this is the first description of a fully differentiated RFE. The use of both gel collagen and feline fibroblasts was critical for epidermal differentiation. The relative disorganization of the basal cells could be related to the absence of basement membrane, and the high number of keratinocytes seeded on the collagen gel, a prerequisite to obtain a rapid confluence of cells. The proliferation of basal keratinocytes during the differentiation process of RFE was evaluated using their capacity to integrate BrdU. In RFE incubated for 72 h from day 11, both the basal and spinous layers were stained (Fig. 2cGo). Basal keratinocytes were also stained in RFE incubated for 24 h from day 13 (Fig. 2dGo). These results, which were obtained in duplicate, show that division of keratinocytes is only observed in the basal layer. They also show that, in spite of a complete stratification, the keratinocyte division and maturation is continuous until the end of the differentiation process (day 14).


Figure 2
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. RFE as a model for feline dermatophytosis caused by M. canis. (a, b) RFE stained with haematoxylin and eosin showed a limited number of fibroblasts in the collagen gel (1, black arrow), a basal layer consisting of cuboidal nucleated keratinocytes (2), a spinous layer, composed of differentiated large nucleated cells (3), a granular layer characterized by closely intricate flattened cells (4) and a superficial layer composed of anucleated cornified cells (5). RFE incubated for 72 h with BrdU from day 11 (c) or for 24 h from day 13 (d) exhibited a brown staining in the basal and spinous layers or only in the basal layer, respectively. (e, f) RFE cultured for 14 days at the air–liquid interface was inoculated with M. canis arthroconidia and cultured for an additional 5 days. Staining with periodic acid–Schiff showed M. canis hyphae (black arrows) in the stratum corneum. (g, h) RFE incubated 5 days after inoculation with M. canis was stained with a rabbit polyclonal anti-SUB3 antibody followed by a secondary fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated swine anti-rabbit immunoglobulin antibody. The white arrow shows positively stained M. canis hyphae. Control consisting of anti-SUB3 antibody omission resulted in an absence of staining.

 
RFE can be infected by M. canis

Histologically, fungal hyphae were detected in the stratum corneum 5 days after RFE inoculation in more than five independent experiments, demonstrating the high reproducibility of this model (Fig. 2e, fGo). The fungus recovered from the infected stratum corneum was identified as M. canis after culture on Sabouraud's dextrose agar. Additionally, expression of SUB3, a keratinase implicated in the infectious process (Mignon et al., 1998; Descamps et al., 2002), was immunohistochemically detected in fungal hyphae (Fig. 2g, hGo) using an anti-SUB3 polyclonal antibody. These results demonstrate that M. canis not only grows on RFE but invades it, even in the absence of hair follicules, and produces SUB3 as previously demonstrated in naturally infected cats (Mignon et al., 1998) and in experimentally infected guinea pigs (Mignon et al., 1999).

In summary, for the first time a fully differentiated RFE was developed in vitro. This new serum-free model was demonstrated to be reproducible and relevant for studying M. canis–epidermis interactions. However, this model does not contain any hair follicles, sebaceous and sweat glands or leukocytes, which could limit its value for some applications. Similarly, the absence of cutaneous microflora could be a disadvantage in comparison with an in vivo model. In spite of these limitations, the RFE model displays many advantages. Firstly, in contrast with stripped stratum corneum and isolated hairs, RFE is a living tissue allowing the investigation of cellular responses against cutaneous pathogens. Secondly, the cornified layer resulting from the differentiation process in RFE mimics dermatophytic infection more realistically than keratinocyte monolayers. The potential involvement of M. canis proteases in both invasion of corneocytes and induction of epidermal cytokine production is currently under investigation. In the near future, we plan to create an immortalized feline keratinocyte cell line, to abrogate the need for fresh fetal keratinocytes and allow large-scale studies centring on different feline skin pathogens.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
The authors thank Drs M. Blaise, M. Simon and O. Delpire for their cooperation in this study. We gratefully acknowledge Drs Y. Poumay and P. Hubert for their help with reconstructed epidermis. We thank Dr Arjen Nikkels for excellent assistance. We also sincerely thank veterinarians of the Prince Laurent foundation of Seraing, Dr B. Adam, and the Department of Obstetrics and Reproduction (Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Belgium). This work was supported by grant 3.4595.04 from Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique Médicale (FRSM). J. T., A. B. and S. V. are the recipients of a studentship from FRIA (Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture, rue d'Egmont 5, 1000 Bruxelles).


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chen, T. A., Halliwell, R. E. & Hill, P. B. (2002). Failure of extracts from Malassezia pachydermatis to stimulate canine keratinocyte proliferation in vitro.. Vet Dermatol 13, 323–329.[CrossRef][Medline]

Descamps, F., Brouta, F., Monod, M., Zaugg, C., Baar, D., Losson, B. & Mignon, B. (2002). Isolation of a Microsporum canis gene family encoding three subtilisin-like proteases expressed in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 119, 830–835.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gupta, A. K., Ahmad, I., Porretta, M. & Summerbell, R. C. (2003). Arthroconidial formation in Trichophyton raubitschekii. Mycoses 46, 322–328.[Medline]

Mignon, B., Swinnen, M., Bouchara, J. P., Hofinger, M., Nikkels, A., Pierard, G., Gerday, C. & Losson, B. (1998). Purification and characterization of a 31.5 kDa keratinolytic subtilisin-like serine protease from Microsporum canis and evidence of its secretion in naturally infected cats. Med Mycol 36, 395–404.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mignon, B. R., Leclipteux, T., Focant, C., Nikkels, A. J., Pierard, G. E. & Losson, B. J. (1999). Humoral and cellular immune response to a crude exo-antigen and purified keratinase of Microsporum canis in experimentally infected guinea pigs. Med Mycol 37, 123–129.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nakamura, Y., Kano, R., Hasegawa, A. & Watanabe, S. (2002). Interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor alpha production in human epidermal keratinocytes induced by Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9, 935–937.[CrossRef][Medline]

Poumay, Y., Dupont, F., Marcoux, S., Leclercq-Smekens, M., Herin, M. & Coquette, A. (2004). A simple reconstructed human epidermis: preparation of the culture model and utilization in in vitro studies. Arch Dermatol Res 296, 203–211.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rashid, A., Edward, M. & Richardson, M. D. (1995). Activity of terbinafine on Trichophyton mentagrophytes in a human living skin equivalent model. J Med Vet Mycol 33, 229–233.[Medline]

Zurita, J. & Hay, R. J. (1987). Adherence of dermatophyte microconidia and arthroconidia to human keratinocytes in vitro. J Invest Dermatol 89, 529–534.[CrossRef][Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tabart, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mignon, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tabart, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mignon, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tabart, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mignon, B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS