J Med Microbiol Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mokaddas, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, Z. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mokaddas, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, Z. U.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mokaddas, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, Z. U.
J Med Microbiol 56 (2007), 255-259; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.46817-0
© 2007 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 1473-5644

Species distribution and antifungal susceptibility of Candida bloodstream isolates in Kuwait: a 10-year study

Eiman M. Mokaddas, Noura A. Al-Sweih and Zia U. Khan

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, PO Box 24923, Safat, Kuwait 13110

Correspondence
Zia U. Khan
Ziauddin{at}hsc.edu.kw

Received 4 July 2006
Accepted 13 October 2006


Bloodstream infections due to Candida species are important complications in severely ill hospitalized patients. This study presents data on species distribution and antifungal susceptibility profiles of Candida bloodstream isolates obtained from Kuwait during a 10-year period. All the bloodstream isolates were identified to species level by the germ tube test and carbohydrate assimilation profile using the VITEK 2 yeast identification system. Using E-test strips for amphotericin B, fluconazole, 5-flucytosine and voriconazole, MICs were determined on RPMI agar supplemented with 2 % glucose. The MIC breakpoints for resistance were based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria or those published by reference laboratories, and were as follows: amphotericin B, >1 µg ml–1; fluconazole, >=64 µg ml–1; 5-flucytosine, >=32 µg ml–1; and voriconazole, 4 µg ml–1. In all, 607 bloodstream yeast isolates were obtained over the past 10 years in Kuwait. Candida albicans was the predominant species (39.5 %), followed by Candida parapsilosis (30.6 %), Candida tropicalis (12.4 %), Candida glabrata (5.6 %) and Candida krusei (1.6 %). All C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. glabrata isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B. Of 186 isolates of C. parapsilosis tested, only four (2 %) exhibited an MIC for amphotericin B of >1 µg ml–1. Resistance to fluconazole was observed in nine (3.8 %) C. albicans isolates, two (5.8 %) C. glabrata isolates and four (40 %) C. krusei isolates. Resistance to 5-flucytosine was observed in two (0.8 %) C. albicans isolates, seven (9.3 %) C. tropicalis isolates, three (1.6 %) C. parapsilosis isolates and all ten (100 %) C. krusei isolates. All the isolates of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata and C. krusei were susceptible to voriconazole, including those resistant to fluconazole. Although amphotericin B and fluconazole are widely used in clinical practice in Kuwait, resistance to these drugs remained low.


Abbreviations: CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Candida species are one of the major causes of nosocomial bloodstream infections worldwide (Jarvis, 1995; Pfaller et al., 2001). Despite the availability of an expanded antifungal armamentarium, the mortality associated with invasive Candida infections remains high, ranging between 19 and 49 % (Blot et al., 2002; Alonso-Valle et al., 2003; Gudlaugsson et al., 2003; Morgan, 2005). The incidence and associated mortality due to candidaemia can be influenced by several factors including characteristics of the population at risk, standard of the healthcare facilities available, distribution of Candida species and prevalence of resistance (Hobson, 2003; Eggimann et al., 2003). Hence, epidemiological information available for one centre or geographical region may not be applicable to others (Hobson, 2003). The increased isolation rates of non-albicans Candida species and a gradual shift in the antifungal susceptibility profile, especially against azole antifungal agents, have underlined the need to monitor laboratory data for possible emergence of resistance and to select the most appropriate antifungal agent for therapy (Sanglard & Odds, 2002; Eggimann et al., 2003). Candida species have been reported as important nosocomial pathogens in several studies reported from the Middle East (Nampoory et al., 1996; Khan & Chugh, 2000; Al-Essa et al., 2000; Mokaddas et al., 2000; Rennert et al., 2000; Bukharie, 2002; Ahmad et al., 2002, 2003; Ellis et al., 2003; Al-Jasser & Elkhizzi, 2004). However, comprehensive studies on antifungal susceptibility of Candida species from this region are lacking. In this communication, we present data on five major Candida species isolated from candidaemic patients during 1996–2005 and their antifungal susceptibility profiles.


    METHODS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bloodstream yeast isolates. The bloodstream yeast isolates referred to the Mycology Reference Laboratory for identification and antifungal susceptibility testing from January 1996 to December 2005 were included in the study. These isolates originated from different categories of patients admitted to tertiary care hospitals in Kuwait. The isolates were initially tested with the germ tube test. All the germ tube positive isolates were provisionally identified as Candida albicans or Candida dubliniensis. The germ tube negative isolates were identified by carbohydrate assimilation tests using the VITEK 2 yeast identification system (bioMérieux). None of the isolates was identified as C. dubliniensis by the VITEK 2 system or morphological characteristics on sunflower seed agar (Khan et al., 2004).

Antifungal susceptibility by the E-test. The in vitro activity of the antifungal agents was determined by the E-test (AB Biodisk), in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The E-test was performed by inoculating a 150 mm Petri dish containing 60 ml RPMI agar supplemented with 2 % glucose and buffered to pH 7.0 with MOPS. The inoculum was applied with cotton swabs using growth suspension prepared in 0.85 % NaCl with turbidity adjusted to 0.5 McFarland standard. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 35 °C and read after 24 h. For Candida glabrata, the incubation time was 48 h. Reference strains C. albicans ATCC 90028 and Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were used for quality control. Interpretive susceptibility criteria for fluconazole and 5-flucytosine were those recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), formerly the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 2002). For fluconazole, isolates showing MICs <=8.0 µg ml–1 were regarded as susceptible, 16–32 µg ml–1 as dose-dependent susceptible and >=64 µg ml–1 as resistant. For 5-flucytosine, isolates showing MICs <=4 µg ml–1 were considered as susceptible, 8–16 µg ml–1 as intermediate and >=32 µg ml–1 as resistant. For voriconazole, recently approved CLSI breakpoints were followed: <=1.0 µg ml–1 regarded as susceptible, 2.0 µg ml–1 as dose-dependent and >=4 µg ml–1 as resistant (Pfaller et al., 2003, 2005). Due to the lack of defined breakpoints for amphotericin B, isolates showing an MIC of <=1.0 µg ml–1 were taken as susceptible and those with MIC >1 µg ml–1 were considered as resistant (Rex et al., 1997; Ostrosky-Zeichner et al., 2003a).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
During the 10-year study period, a total of 607 bloodstream yeast isolates were received in the Mycology Reference Laboratory for identification. The species distribution of Candida species was as follows: C. albicans, 39.5 % (n=240); C. parapsilosis, 30.6 % (n=186); Candida tropicalis, 12.4 % (n=75); C. glabrata, 5.6 % (n=34); Candida krusei, 1.6 % (n=10); and other yeast species, 10.2 % (n=62) (Table 1Go). Of these, 198 (32.6 %) isolates were received for identification during 1996–2000 as compared to 409 (67.4 %) during 2001–2005, representing a more than twofold increase in the latter period. The most prominent increase was observed in the isolation rate of C. tropicalis (3.4-fold), followed by C. albicans (3.1-fold), C. glabrata (1.8-fold) and C. parapsilosis (1.4-fold). The ratio of C. albicans to non-albicans isolates in the two study periods was 59 : 139 and 181 : 228, respectively. The greater than twofold increase in candidaemia cases detected between the two study periods may be a reflection of its rising incidence. Recent epidemiological studies from the USA and Europe have suggested that the annual incidence of candidaemia in some centres might have stabilized or decreased (Trick et al., 2002; Hobson, 2003; Eggimann et al., 2003; Morgan, 2005). However, this does not appear to be the case in Kuwait. Here it may be mentioned that our data are based on the number of bloodstream isolates received in the Reference Laboratory for identification and susceptibility testing from different tertiary care hospitals and not on isolation rates/1000 admissions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Species distribution of bloodstream yeast isolates received in 1996–2000 and 2001–2005

 
Consistent with the published reports from different parts of the world (Eggimann et al., 2003; Hobson, 2003), C. albicans was the predominant species, followed by C. parapsilosis. A relatively greater proportion of C. parapsilosis isolates in our study may be related to the large number of isolates received from paediatric patients where small outbreaks of candidaemia due to this species had occurred. Of 138 candidaemia cases recorded during 1998–2003 in a neonatal intensive care unit of the maternity hospital, Kuwait, 48.2 % were caused by C. parapsilosis (N. A. Al-Sweih, unpublished results). Considerable differences in the distribution of Candida species were also reported in different published studies from the region (Table 2Go). These differences may be attributed to several factors including the type of patient population studied, sample size, duration of study and presence of intravascular catheters. In a solitary report from Saudi Arabia based on 32 candidaemic patients, C. parapsilosis was the predominant species; notably 66 % of these patients had a central venous catheter in place (Bukharie, 2002).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Distribution of Candida species isolated from candidaemic patients in different studies reported from the Middle East

 
The data on E-test susceptibility for amphotericin B, fluconazole, 5-flucytosine and voriconazole against five Candida species are presented in Table 3Go. Except for four (2.2 %) isolates of C. parapsilosis which showed an MIC of >=1 µg ml–1, all Candida isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B. Resistance against 5-flucytosine was observed in 0.8 % of C. albicans isolates, 9.3 % of C. tropicalis isolates, 1.6 % of C. parapsilosis isolates and all the isolates of C. krusei. Nine (3.8 %) C. albicans isolates and two (5.8 %) C. glabrata isolates exhibited resistance to fluconazole. None of the isolates was found to be resistant to voriconazole, including those that showed resistance to fluconazole (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. In vitro susceptibility of Candida bloodstream isolates to amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine, fluconazole and voriconazole

 
A comparison of the MIC90 values for amphotericin B for different Candida species suggested that C. albicans tended to have higher susceptibility (0.25 µg ml–1) than C. tropicalis (0.38 µg ml–1), C. krusei (0.38 µg ml–1), C. parapsilosis (0.5 µg ml–1) and C. glabrata (0.38 µg ml–1). These observations were consistent with several studies comparing MICs for bloodstream isolates of C. albicans with those for non-albicans Candida species (Simor et al., 1997; Ostrosky-Zeichner et al., 2003a; Lu et al., 2004). While resistance to 5-flucytosine for C. albicans, C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata was generally low (<2 %), 9.3 % of C. tropicalis isolates and all the C. krusei isolates were found to be resistant to this drug. In early studies, up to 6.5 % of C. albicans isolates in Europe and 33 % in the USA were found to be intrinsically resistant (Scholer, 1980), which apparently precluded use of this drug as a single therapeutic agent. However, more recent surveys based on CLSI methodology demonstrated much lower levels of 5-flucytosine resistance (Pfaller et al., 1998, 2002; Barchiesi et al., 2000). Pfaller et al. (2002) determined the in vitro activity of 5-flucytosine against 8803 clinical isolates, representing 18 Candida species, which were obtained from 200 medical centres worldwide. Regardless of the Candida species tested, 90 % of isolates showed MICs of <=1 µg ml–1. While 97 % of C. albicans isolates and 92 % of C. tropicalis isolates were susceptible to 5-flucytosine, 28 % of 184 C. krusei isolates were resistant and 67 % showed intermediate susceptibility. In another study of 2000 Candida bloodstream isolates from the USA, Ostrosky-Zeichner et al. (2003a) found that 6 % of C. tropicalis and 12 % of C. krusei isolates were resistant to this drug, whereas resistance among other Candida species was less than 5 %. It is apparent that Candida species have variable susceptibilities to 5-flucytosine, and C. krusei is relatively less susceptible with resistance rates ranging between 7 and 44 % in different studies (Medoff & Kobayashi, 1980; Pfaller et al., 2002; Quindos et al., 2004). In this context, demonstration of 100 % resistance to 5-flucytosine in our C. krusei isolates is noteworthy.

Susceptibility to fluconazole was similar to that seen in other major surveillance studies reported from Europe and the USA (Sanglard & Odds, 2002; Ostrosky-Zeichner et al., 2003a). In our isolates, with the exception of C. krusei where resistance to fluconazole was 40 % (4/10), the other Candida species were found to be quite susceptible (Table 3Go). Although C. krusei had a low prevalence (1.6 %) among bloodstream isolates, its resistance to fluconazole may have therapeutic implications. Since some of the isolates of C. krusei could be intrinsically resistant to fluconazole, it is not clear whether these isolates developed resistance during chemoprophylaxis. Ostrosky-Zeichner et al. (2003a) found that 34 % of 50 C. krusei bloodstream isolates were resistant to fluconazole, which is similar to what we observed in Kuwait. Interestingly, Candida species isolates exhibiting resistance to fluconazole were not resistant to voriconazole. Hence voriconazole, due to its wider species coverage, could be used in the treatment of candidaemia cases caused by fluconazole-resistant strains of C. krusei (Ostrosky-Zeichner et al., 2003b).

In summary, we have presented data on species distribution and antifungal susceptibility profiles of Candida bloodstream isolates received in the Mycology Reference Laboratory over a 10-year period. The percentage prevalence of different Candida species was largely similar to what has been reported in most published studies (Eggimann et al., 2003). Non-C. albicans yeast species constituted 60.5 % of the isolates. Although amphotericin B and fluconazole are widely used in clinical practice in Kuwait, there was no evidence of enhanced resistance.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
The authors are thankful to all the microbiologists for referring bloodstream yeast isolates to the Mycology Reference Laboratory. Excellent technical support received from R. Chandy and Daad Farhat is acknowledged.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ahmad, S., Khan, Z., Mustafa, A. S. & Khan, Z. U. (2002). Seminested PCR for diagnosis of candidemia: comparison with culture, antigen detection, and biochemical methods for species identification. J Clin Microbiol 40, 2483–2489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ahmad, S., Khan, Z., Mustafa, A. S. & Khan, Z. U. (2003). Epidemiology of Candida colonization in an intensive care unit of a teaching hospital in Kuwait. Med Mycol 41, 487–493.[CrossRef][Medline]

Al-Essa, M., Khan, Z. U., Rashwan, N. & Kazi, A. (2000). Pattern of candidemia in the newborn: a study from Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 9, 174–180.[CrossRef]

Al-Jasser, A. M. & Elkhizzi, N. A. (2004). Distribution of Candida species among bloodstream isolates. Saudi Med J 25, 566–569.[Medline]

Alonso-Valle, H., Acha, O., Garcia-Palomo, J. D., Farinas-Alvarez, C., Fernandez-Mazarrasa, C. & Farinas, M. C. (2003). Candidemia in a tertiary care hospital: epidemiology and factors influencing mortality. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 22, 254–257.[Medline]

Barchiesi, F., Arzeni, D., Caselli, F. & Scalise, G. (2000). Primary resistance to flucytosine among clinical isolates of Candida spp. J Antimicrob Chemother 45, 408–409.[Free Full Text]

Blot, S. I., Vandewoude, K. H., Hoste, E. A. & Colardyn, F. A. (2002). Effects of nosocomial candidemia on outcomes of critically ill patients. Am J Med 113, 480–485.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bukharie, H. A. (2002). Nosocomial candidemia in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Mycopathologia 153, 195–198.[CrossRef][Medline]

Eggimann, P., Garbino, J. & Pittet, D. (2003). Epidemiology of Candida species infections in critically ill non-immunosuppressed patients. Lancet Infect Dis 3, 685–702.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ellis, M., Hedstrom, U., Jumaa, P. & Bener, A. (2003). Epidemiology, presentation, management and outcome of candidemia in a tertiary care teaching hospital in the United Arab Emirates, 1995-2001. Med Mycol 41, 521–528.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gudlaugsson, O., Gillespie, S., Lee, K., Vande Berg, J., Hu, J., Messer, S., Herwaldt, L., Pfaller, M. A. & Diekema, D. (2003). Attributable mortality of nosocomial candidemia, revisited. Clin Infect Dis 37, 1172–1177.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hobson, R. P. (2003). The global epidemiology of invasive Candida infections – is the tide turning? J Hosp Infect 55, 159–168.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jarvis, W. R. (1995). Epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections, with emphasis on Candida species. Clin Infect Dis 20, 1526–1530.[Medline]

Khan, Z. U. & Chugh, T. D. (2000). Invasive fungal infections in Kuwait: a retrospective study. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 42, 279–287.[Medline]

Khan, Z. U., Ahmad, S., Mokaddas, E. & Chandy, R. (2004). Simplified sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seed agar for differentiation of Candida dubliniensis from Candida albicans. Clin Microbiol Infect 10, 590–592.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lu, J. J., Lee, S. Y. & Chiueh, T. S. (2004). In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida blood isolates and evaluation of the E-test method. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 37, 335–342.[Medline]

Medoff, G. & Kobayashi, G. S. (1980). Strategies in the treatment of systemic fungal infections. N Engl J Med 302, 145–155.[Medline]

Mokaddas, E. M., Ramadan, S. A., Abo el-Maaty, S. H. & Sanyal, S. C. (2000). Candidemia in pediatric surgery patients. J Chemother 12, 332–338.[Medline]

Morgan, J. (2005). Global trends in candidemia: review of reports from 1995–2005. Curr Infect Dis Rep 7, 429–439.[Medline]

Nampoory, M. R., Khan, Z. U., Johny, K. V., Constandi, J. N., Gupta, R. K., Al-Muzairi, I., Samhan, M., Mozavi, M. & Chugh, T. D. (1996). Invasive fungal infections in renal transplant recipients. J Infect 33, 95–101.[CrossRef][Medline]

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2002). Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts. Approved standard (M27-A2). Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.

Osoba, A. O., Al-Mowallad, A. W., McAlear, D. E. & Hussein, B. A. (2003). Candidemia and the susceptibility pattern of Candida isolates in blood. Saudi Med J 24, 1060–1063.[Medline]

Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Rex, J. H., Pappas, P. G., Hamill, R. J., Larsen, R. A., Horowitz, H. W., Powderly, W. G., Hyslop, N., Kauffman, C. A. & other authors (2003a). Antifungal susceptibility survey of 2,000 bloodstream Candida isolates in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47, 3149–3154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Oude Lashof, A. M., Kullberg, B. J. & Rex, J. H. (2003b). Voriconazole salvage treatment of invasive candidiasis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 22, 651–655.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pfaller, M. A., Jones, R. N., Messer, S. A., Edmond, M. B. & Wenzel, R. P. (1998). National surveillance of nosocomial bloodstream infection due to Candida albicans: frequency of occurrence and antifungal susceptibility in the SCOPE Program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 31, 327–332.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Jones, R. N., Sader, H. S., Fluit, A. C., Hollis, R. J., Messer, S. A. & The Sentry Participant Group (2001). International surveillance of bloodstream infections due to Candida species: frequency of occurrence and in vitro susceptibilities to fluconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole of isolates collected from 1997 through 1999 in the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. J Clin Microbiol 39, 3254–3259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pfaller, M. A., Messer, S. A., Boyken, L., Huynh, H., Hollis, R. J. & Diekema, D. J. (2002). In vitro activities of 5-fluorocytosine against 8,803 clinical isolates of Candida spp.: global assessment of primary resistance using National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards susceptibility testing methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46, 3518–3521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Messer, S. A., Boyken, L. & Hollis, R. J. (2003). Activities of fluconazole and voriconazole against 1,586 recent clinical isolates of Candida species determined by Broth microdilution, disk diffusion, and E-test methods: report from the ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Susceptibility Program, 2001. J Clin Microbiol 41, 1440–1446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pfaller, M. A., Boyken, L., Messer, S. A., Tendolkar, S., Hollis, R. J. & Diekema, D. J. (2005). Comparison of results of voriconazole disk diffusion testing for Candida species with results from a central reference laboratory in the ARTEMIS global antifungal surveillance program. J Clin Microbiol 43, 5208–5213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Quindos, G., Ruesga, M. T., Martin-Mazuelos, E., Salesa, R., Alonso-Vargas, R., Carrillo-Munoz, A. J., Brena, S., San Millan, R. & Ponton, J. (2004). In-vitro activity of 5-fluorocytosine against 1,021 Spanish clinical isolates of Candida and other medically important yeasts. Rev Iberoam Micol 21, 63–69.[Medline]

Rennert, G., Rennert, H. S., Pitlik, S., Finkelstein, R. & Kitzes-Cohen, R. (2000). Epidemiology of candidemia – a nationwide survey in Israel. Infection 28, 26–29.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rex, J. H., Pfaller, M. A., Galgiani, J. N., Bartlett, M. S., Espinel-Ingroff, A., Ghannoum, M. A., Lancaster, M., Odds, F. C., Rinaldi, M. G. & other authors (1997). Development of interpretive breakpoints for antifungal susceptibility testing: conceptual framework and analysis of in vitro–in vivo correlation data for fluconazole, itraconazole, and candida infections. Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Clin Infect Dis 24, 235–247.[Medline]

Sanglard, D. & Odds, F. C. (2002). Resistance of Candida species to antifungal agents: molecular mechanisms and clinical consequences. Lancet Infect Dis 2, 73–85.[CrossRef][Medline]

Scholer, H. J. (1980). Flucytosine. In Antifungal Chemotherapy, pp. 35–106. Edited by D. C. E. Speller. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Simor, A. E., Goswell, G., Louie, L., Lee, M. & Louie, M. (1997). Antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates from blood cultures by microbroth dilution and the E test. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 16, 693–697.[CrossRef][Medline]

Trick, W. E., Fridkin, S. K., Edwards, J. R., Hajjeh, R. A. & Gaynes, R. P. (2002). Secular trend of hospital-acquired candidemia among intensive care unit patients in the United States during 1989–1999. Clin Infect Dis 35, 627–630.[CrossRef][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
M. Asadzadeh, S. Ahmad, N. Al-Sweih, and Z. U. Khan
Rapid molecular differentiation and genotypic heterogeneity among Candida parapsilosis and Candida orthopsilosis strains isolated from clinical specimens in Kuwait
J. Med. Microbiol., June 1, 2009; 58(6): 745 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mokaddas, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, Z. U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mokaddas, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, Z. U.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mokaddas, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Khan, Z. U.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS