J Med Microbiol Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al Amri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Botta, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al Amri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Botta, G. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Al Amri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Botta, G. A.
J Med Microbiol 56 (2007), 1350-1355; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47220-0
© 2007 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 1473-5644

Multiplex PCR for direct identification of Campylobacter spp. in human and chicken stools

Aisha Al Amri1,{dagger}, Abiola C. Senok2,{dagger}, Abdulrahman Yusuf Ismaeel1, Ali E. Al-Mahmeed1 and Giuseppe A. Botta1,3

1 Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, PO Box 22979, Manama, Kingdom of Bahrain

2 Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

3 Department of Medical and Morphological Sciences, Institute of Microbiology, Udine Medical School, Udine, Italy

Abiola C. Senok
asenok{at}sharjah.ac.ae

Received 8 February 2007
Accepted 15 June 2007


Differentiation between Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli is problematic in clinical specimens due to fastidious growth requirements and limited biochemical tests. This study describes a rapid, multiplex PCR protocol for the direct detection and differentiation of C. jejuni and C. coli in stools. An evaluation was carried out of this multiplex protocol based on the detection of cadF (genus specific), and hipO (C. jejuni) and asp (C. coli) genes, using stool from patients with Campylobacter enteritis and chicken. Protocol sensitivity was assessed and specificity determined using a panel of enteric bacteria, and evaluation of 30 diarrhoeic stool specimens culture negative for Campylobacter. Of the 114 specimens (54 human and 60 chicken) evaluated by the protocol, 70 (61.4 %) were identified as C. jejuni, 35 (30.7 %) as C. coli and 9 (7.9 %) as a mixed infection/colonization with both species. All mixed infections were identified as C. jejuni by culture. Among the stool specimens that were culture negative for Campylobacter, two (6.7 %) were C. jejuni positive by multiplex PCR. The protocol sensitivity limit was 0.015–0.016 ng C. jejuni and C. coli DNA µl–1 in the specimen. There was no cross-reaction with the reference strains assessed. Comparison of hippurate test and multiplex PCR demonstrated 17 isolates with false-positive hippurate enzymic activity and 7 with false-negative activity. This rapid protocol (turnaround time 6 h) is highly sensitive and specific for direct evaluation of stool for these pathogens. It has significant application for routine clinical diagnostic and epidemiological purposes.


{dagger}These authors contributed equally to this work. Back


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Campylobacter spp. are a major cause of bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide (Moore et al., 2005; Ismaeel et al., 2002). The relatively low infective dose, the potentially serious sequelae (Moore et al., 2005), as well as the association between certain Campylobacter virulence genes and the pattern of clinical infection (Al-Mahmeed et al., 2006; Rozynek et al., 2005), confirm the importance of this zoonotic infection as a significant health hazard. Conventional diagnostic methods utilizing a combination of culture and biochemical testing require that suspected stool specimens are cultured on selective agar at 42 °C under microaerophilic conditions for up to 72 h before a negative report is issued. Only culture plates with colonies showing characteristic Campylobacter morphology and oxidase positivity are reported as Campylobacter spp. Further identification to the species level requires other tests, including growth temperature preferences, antibiotic sensitivity to cephalothin and nalidixic acid, and biochemical tests. The sodium hippurate hydrolysis reaction is the only biochemical test used to differentiate Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. The extended and tedious nature of these procedures has stimulated research into molecular diagnostic approaches. Several workers have investigated the application of multiplex PCR for Campylobacter detection and speciation (Aquino et al., 2002; Chuma et al., 2000; Klena et al., 2004; LaGier et al., 2004) with these protocols being applied to isolates from pure cultures. However, the application of multiplex PCR on bacterial colonies meant that conventional cultures were still needed for the initial identification. To evaluate the multiplex approach directly on stool specimens, Persson & Olsen (2005) artificially spiked stool specimens with bacteria. However, only two reports have described the direct application of a multiplex protocol on stools obtained from patients with enteritis (Houng et al., 2001; LaGier et al., 2004) and both used primers targeting the ceuE gene.

Various combinations of genus-specific and species-specific genes, as well as combinations of species-specific sequences of ceuE or lpxA genes, have been applied in multiplex protocols (Jensen et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2005; Best et al., 2003; Gebreyes et al., 2005). In this study, we have developed a multiplex PCR protocol using a novel combination of species-specific and virulence genes, and applied it directly to stool specimens of both human and poultry origin.


    METHODS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Collection of human and poultry stool specimens. Human stool specimens (n=91) were obtained from the diagnostic microbiology laboratories of three tertiary hospitals in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia and two hospitals in the Kingdom of Bahrain. These specimens were from patients with gastroenteritis and included those subsequently determined to be due to Campylobacter infection (n=61) according to the routine diagnostic method applied in the hospitals. Campylobacter detection in these hospitals was carried out using selective media (blood based), and incubation at 42 °C under microaerophilic conditions for a minimum of 48 h. Only one tertiary hospital routinely carried out speciation of Campylobacter isolates using the hippurate hydrolysis test. All stool specimens were stored at 4 °C until collection by the research team. The participating centres were provided with cryopreservation tubes containing preservative medium (10 % fetal bovine serum, 60 % nutrient broth, 30 % glycerol) used for storing isolated Campylobacter colonies at –20 °C until collection by the research team. Chicken stool specimens (n=60) were obtained directly from three slaughter houses, two in Saudi Arabia and one in Bahrain.

DNA extraction from stool. DNA from 180–220 mg stool specimens (manufacturer's recommended minimum 180 mg stool) was extracted using a QIAamp DNA stool mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's recommended procedures. As some researchers had reported incubation at 95 °C with the lysing buffer for DNA release (Inglis & Kalischuk, 2003; Persson & Olsen, 2005), in preliminary experiments some specimens were subjected to incubation at both 70 °C and at 95 °C to see if there was any effect on the sensitivity of the extraction method. As no differences were observed between the two temperatures, incubation at 70 °C in lysing buffer, as recommended by the manufacturer, was used for all the specimens. The DNA obtained was stored at –20 °C.

Multiplex PCR protocol. Three genes were targeted in the multiplex PCR protocol, namely cadF (genus-specific virulence gene) (Nayak et al., 2005), hipO (hippuricase gene for C. jejuni) (Linton et al., 1997) and asp (aspartokinase gene for C. coli) (Linton et al., 1997). The primer sets used, as described by Nayak et al. (2005) and Linton et al. (1997), were: cadF (F 5'-TTG AAG GTA ATT TAG ATA TG-3'and R 5'-CTA ATA CCT AAA GTT GAA AC-3') giving a 400 bp product, hipO (F 5'-GAA GAG GGT TTG GGT GGT G-3' and R 5'-AGC TAG CTT CGC ATA ATA ACT TG-3') giving a 735 bp product and asp (F 5'-GGT ATG ATT TCT ACA AAG CGA G-3' and R 5'-ATA AAA GAC TAT CGT CGC GTG-3') giving a 500 bp product (Thermo Electron).

The multiplex protocol used a reaction mixture at a final volume of 50 µl, consisting of 25 µl multiplex master mix (Qiagen), 0.5 µl cadF primer (50 pmol µl–1), 0.3 µl asp primer (30 pmol µl–1), 1.0 µl hipO primer (100 pmol µl–1), 0.5 µl 10 mg BSA ml–1 (Promega), 4.5 µl eluted DNA (0.1 µg) and sterile water. The PCR amplification cycle included initial denaturation at 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 49 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 1 min. The final stage was an extension cycle at 72 °C for 7 min. PCR cycles were carried out in a GeneAmp (Perkin-Elmer 9700; Applied BioSystems). C. jejuni ATCC 33291 and a well-characterized in-house C. coli strain, AGU 12305 (isolated from a clinical specimen), were used as positive controls, and the negative control did not include any template DNA. These controls were included in every PCR run. Following gel electrophoresis, the amplified PCR product was stained with ethidium bromide (Sigma) and visualized with a UV transilluminator (Bio-Rad). The sizes of PCR products were estimated by comparison with 100 bp DNA molecular mass markers (Bio-Rad; EZ Load) and the amplified control strains. This protocol was used for the identification and speciation of Campylobacter in the human and stool specimens obtained. Where specimens showed mixed infection with C. jejuni and C. coli, single PCR assays were carried out to confirm the finding.

Bacterial suspensions of the control strains were prepared in a Tris-EDTA buffer equivalent to 0.5 McFarland, and DNA was extracted by the boiling method as previously described (Al-Mahmeed et al., 2006). The DNA concentration was measured; serial dilutions (1 : 10, 1 : 100, 1 : 1000 and 1 : 10000) were used together with the concentrated DNA to determine the minimal amount of DNA detectable by the multiplex PCR protocol. A panel of enteric bacteria that are found in stool specimens normally or under pathological conditions was used for the assessment of protocol specificity. Table 1Go shows the list of bacterial reference strains tested. To assess the ability of the multiplex PCR protocol to correctly identify Campylobacter-negative specimens, 30 stool specimens obtained from patients with gastroenteritis due to non-Campylobacter infection (as determined by culture methods) were tested.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Reference strains of enteric bacteria tested using the multiplex protocol

 
Comparison of the multiplex protocol with the conventional method. A comparative assessment of the multiplex protocol and the conventional diagnostic method was carried out. As hippurate test remains the main biochemical test for differentiating between C. jejuni and C. coli, an evaluation of this test versus the multiplex approach was undertaken. The hippurate enzyme activity of 74 isolates (29 human and 45 chicken) was carried out to differentiate C. jejuni from C. coli, and the findings compared with the result obtained by multiplex PCR. In addition, an evaluation of the turnaround time and the cost of both tests was conducted.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
For the assessment of the multiplex protocol, DNA extraction was carried out for a total of 91 human stool specimens and 60 chicken stool specimens. The human stool specimens provided by participating centres were from patients with gastroenteritis, and included both bloody and mucoid specimens. A total of 61 specimens were identified as Campylobacter culture positive at the participating diagnostic laboratories and the remaining 30 were Campylobacter negative. Seven Campylobacter-positive specimens were also reported as being positive for Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Stool represents a heterogeneous specimen consisting of micro-organisms, dietary by-products, bile salts, complex polysaccharides and fat (McOrist et al., 2002), while under pathological conditions, blood, pus and mucous may also be present. This heterogeneity makes DNA extraction technically challenging and this has hindered the direct application of molecular techniques on faecal material. In a report of a comparative assessment of DNA extraction kits, the QIAamp DNA stool mini kit was found to be the most sensitive kit, particularly for Gram-negative bacteria (McOrist et al., 2002). Furthermore, it has been utilized for Campylobacter spp. with satisfactory results (Inglis & Kalischuk, 2003; LaGier et al., 2004), hence its selection for use in this study.

We developed a multiplex PCR protocol using a novel combination of genus-specific virulence genes and species-specific genes that has been validated on stool specimens from humans and poultry. Culture-positive stool specimens (61 human and 60 chicken) were evaluated. Fig. 1Go shows a representative electrophoresis gel of samples from a direct application of the multiplex PCR protocol using human and chicken stool specimens. Multiplex PCR is particularly attractive as it enables the simultaneous detection and speciation of the micro-organism. Unlike other molecular techniques, such as PCR-RFLP and PCR-nested PCR, no manipulation of the post-amplification product is required before gel electrophoresis, thus reducing the risk of false-positive results likely associated with amplicon contamination.


Figure 1
View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Representative electrophoresis gels of multiplex PCR samples for identification and speciation of C. jejuni and C. coli. (a) C. jejuni and C. coli in chicken stool specimens: lane 1, C. coli; lanes 2–6, C. jejuni; lanes 7 and 8, positive controls of C. jejuni and C. coli, respectively; M, 100 bp marker. (b) C. jejuni and C. coli in human stool specimens: lane 1, 3 and 6, C. jejuni; lane 2, mixed infection with both C. jejuni and C. coli; lanes 4 and 5, positive controls of C. jejuni and C. coli, respectively; M, 100 bp marker.

 
The results of seven human specimens were excluded from the study because of the insufficient quantity of faecal material provided by the participating centres (less than the minimum 180 mg required). The assays of the seven excluded specimens were negative. Of the remaining 114 specimens, 70 (61.4 %) were C. jejuni, 35 (30.7 %) were C. coli and 9 (7.9 %) were a mixed infection/colonization with both species (Table 2Go). The majority of the mixed infections were in chicken specimens (77.8 %' n=7/9). Single PCRs of all the specimens showing mixed infection/colonization confirmed the presence of both C. jejuni and C. coli. The ability to detect such mixed infections has important therapeutic implications in view of the high level of resistance of C. coli to erythromycin, which is usually the drug of choice for C. jejuni.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Assessment of human and chicken stool specimens using the multiplex PCR protocol

 
In our protocol, three genes, namely cadF (genus-specific virulence gene), and hipO and asp (species specific for C. jejuni and C. coli, respectively), were targeted. These genes and the primers used for their identification have been studied independently and reported on by other workers (Nayak et al., 2005; Linton et al., 1997). However, this is the first study using such a combination of virulence and species-specific genes in a multiplex protocol for Campylobacter. The cadF gene, a putative virulence gene associated with adhesion, is 100 % conserved among isolates of diverse sources (Datta et al., 2003; Rozynek et al., 2005). The hipO gene is highly conserved in C. jejuni strains and represents the most widely validated gene for the identification of C. jejuni (Linton et al., 1997; Sinha et al., 2004). The asp gene encodes aspartokinase and is highly specific for C. coli (Linton et al., 1997). Although several studies have targeted the rRNA genes for genus and species identification, they may lack specificity due to the high level of conservation among closely related species (On & Jordan, 2003; Linton et al., 1996). Thus the choice of target genes used in this study clearly overcomes this drawback. However, a possible limitation of our multiplex protocol is the absence of an internal PCR control, which could be important when analysing stools that may be Campylobacter negative. In this study, all culture-positive specimens were correctly identified by our protocol. In addition, 30 human specimens identified as Campylobacter negative at the diagnostic laboratories were examined and 2 (6.7 %) were found to be C. jejuni positive by the multiplex protocol. These findings are indicative of the usefulness of this protocol to correctly detect the presence of these Campylobacter spp. in stools.

The presence of more than one primer pair in the multiplex PCR tends to increase the chances of non-specific PCR products being amplified resulting in inaccurate results. In this study, use of the multiplex master mix significantly increased protocol performance and eliminated non-specific bands. The multiplex PCR master mix contains pre-optimized concentrations of HotStar Taq DNA polymerase with balanced combination of salts and additives, which enables comparable efficiencies for annealing and extension with maximal yield of targeted PCR products. However, the multiplex master mix is about three times more expensive than the regular master mix and contributed to the higher cost of the multiplex assay.

Sensitivity and specificity

Using serial dilutions of DNA extracted from cultures of C. jejuni and C. coli, the level of bacterial DNA detectable using this protocol was as low as 0.015–0.016 ng µl–1 (15–16 ng ml–1), which is equivalent to 10 bacterial cells per PCR tube (Fig. 2Go). Thus the sensitivity of the protocol for detection of Campylobacter DNA directly from stool is very high and quite similar to published data from studies using artificially spiked stool specimens (Persson & Olsen, 2005). This ability to detect very low numbers of Campylobacter is of diagnostic importance, particularly in patients with convalescent-phase excretion or in those with post-infectious manifestations such as Guillain-Barré syndrome. To assess the specificity of the protocol, 16 reference strains representing a cross-section of enteric pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria were tested. None of these enteric reference strains showed a positive cross-reaction with the multiplex PCR protocol, suggesting that the protocol is highly specific. This is in keeping with other reports, which have demonstrated the specificity of hipO gene for C. jejuni and asp gene for C. coli when tested using a wide range of enteric and non-enteric micro-organisms (Linton et al., 1997). For cadF, although there is a single report of false positivity for this gene in Enterococcus casseliflavus and Pasteurella aerogenes (Nayak et al., 2005), and Escherichia coli (ATCC 43889), the authors reported the specificity of their multiplex protocol as 97 %. In our study, cadF was not detected in any of the reference bacterial strains tested including E. coli (O157:H7) NCTC 12900. Although Enterococcus casseliflavus and P. aerogenes were not tested in our study, these bacterial strains have little clinical relevance. It should be stated that we have not tested any other species of Campylobacter and there has been no testing on arcobacters, which are closely related to campylobacters. However, their limited clinical relevance and the high specificity of the genes targeted, as shown in the literature, suggest that this is a minor limitation.


Figure 2
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Sensitivity of the multiplex PCR protocol. Lanes 1–4 and 5–8, serially diluted DNA from C. jejuni and C. coli, respectively. Lanes 3 and 7 show the lowest concentrations of DNA that the multiplex protocol was able to detect from C. jejuni and C. coli, respectively.

 
Comparison of the multiplex protocol and the hippurate hydrolysis test

Although questions remain about the effectiveness of the hippurate test in correctly differentiating the two Campylobacter spp. C. jejuni and C. coli, it is the only biochemical test used in most diagnostic laboratories Therefore, 74 Campylobacter isolates were tested for hippurate biochemical activity and the results compared with findings of multiplex PCR assays applied on the same specimens. A total of 17 isolates (4 from humans and 13 from chicken) showed false-positive hippurate enzymic activity despite the absence of hippuricase gene in the multiplex PCR products. On the other hand, seven isolates (five from human and two from chicken) showed false-negative hippurate enzymic activity despite the presence of hippuricase gene in the multiplex PCR products. Specimens showing mixed infection by multiplex PCR were identified as C. jejuni according to the biochemical test. In light of these findings, the detection of the hippuricase gene by PCR was used as the gold standard in the evaluation of the performance of the multiplex PCR versus the hippurate test (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Evaluation of the species identification by hippurate hydrolysis biochemical test versus multiplex PCR

Using the PCR as the gold standard, there were 34 and 9 true positives for C. jejuni and C. coli, respectively (correctly identified by both test methods). Seventeen strains identified as C. coli by PCR were wrongly identified as C. jejuni by the hippurate test. Seven C. jejuni isolates with hippuricase gene were wrongly identified as C. coli by the hippurate test. All specimens with mixed C. jejuni and C. coli isolates were identified as C. jejuni by the hippurate test. The positive predictive value for the hippurate test was 83 % and the negative predictive value was 35 %.

 
Although we were able to assess only 74 isolates due to loss of viability of some of the isolates during cryopreservation, the findings are still in agreement with other reports describing a discrepancy between hippurate biochemical and PCR-based speciation, with a majority of false positivity (Rautelin et al., 1999; Nayak et al., 2005). Some C. jejuni strains harbour the hippuricase (hipO) gene but fail to express the enzymic activity (Rautelin et al., 1999), and as shown in this study, such isolates can only be correctly identified using molecular methods. Interestingly, similar to other reports, C. coli isolates without a detectable hipO gene by PCR but with a positive hippurate enzyme activity were identified in this study (Nayak et al., 2005). We speculate that the presence of another gene (not hipO) encoding hippuricase might explain this phenomenon. Alternatively, another enzyme with similar substrate activity resulting in hippurate hydrolysis might exist in C. coli, thus interfering with the results of the hippurate test.

The multiplex PCR protocol we have described has the potential to improve the clinical management and epidemiological tracking of Campylobacter enteritis. The procedure had a turnaround time of ~6 h (from DNA extraction to gel electrophoresis) with an estimated cost of US$3.7 per test. The conventional diagnostic method (inclusive of culture and biochemical tests) requires 2–5 days to obtain a result with an estimated cost of US$0.92 per test. The availability of the laboratory results (showing speciation) to the clinician on the same day would, therefore, have an impact on clinical management. Additionally, the application of the protocol for chicken stool specimens makes it a useful tool for investigating the epidemiology of Campylobacter colonization in poultry. It also is potentially applicable for Campylobacter testing in food, and further studies are needed to investigate this. In outbreaks of campylobacteriosis, the application of the multiplex PCR approach can help to rapidly establish the causative Campylobacter species, and because the protocol can be applied to frozen stools, stored specimens can be retrospectively analysed, even after an outbreak, to correctly understand patterns of transmission.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
Some of the bacterial reference strains used in this study were kindly provided by centres in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, namely: King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (Riyadh), Saudi Aramco Hospital (Dhahran) and King Faisal University (Dammam). This work has been partially supported by a grant from the Arabian Gulf University to G. A. B. as principal investigator. G. A. B. is supported by an endowment by the late H. H. Shaikh Al-Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Al-Mahmeed, A., Senok, A. C., Ismaeel, A. Y., Bindayna, K. M., Tabbara, K. S. & Botta, G. A. (2006). Clinical relevance of virulence genes in Campylobacter jejuni isolates in Bahrain. J Med Microbiol 55, 839–843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Aquino, M. H., Regua Mangia, A. H., Filgueiras, A. L., Teixeira, L. M., Ferreira, M. C. & Tibana, A. (2002). Use of a multiplex PCR-based assay to differentiate Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli strains isolated from human and animal sources. Vet J 163, 102–104.[CrossRef][Medline]

Best, E. L., Powell, E. J., Swift, C., Grant, K. A. & Frost, J. A. (2003). Applicability of a rapid duplex real-time PCR assay for speciation of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli directly from culture plates. FEMS Microbiol Lett 229, 237–241.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chuma, T., Hashimoto, S. & Okamoto, K. (2000). Detection of thermophilic Campylobacter from sparrows by multiplex PCR: the role of sparrows as a source of contamination of broilers with Campylobacter. J Vet Med Sci 62, 1291–1295.[CrossRef][Medline]

Datta, S., Niwa, H. & Itoh, K. (2003). Prevalence of 11 pathogenic genes of Campylobacter jejuni by PCR in strains isolated from humans, poultry meat and broiler and bovine faeces. J Med Microbiol 52, 345–348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gebreyes, W. A., Thakur, S. & Morrow, W. E. (2005). Campylobacter coli: prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems. J Antimicrob Chemother 56, 765–768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Houng, H. S., Sethabutr, O., Nirdnoy, W., Katz, D. E. & Pang, L. W. (2001). Development of a ceuE-based multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for direct detection and differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in Thailand. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 40, 11–19.[CrossRef][Medline]

Inglis, G. D. & Kalischuk, L. D. (2003). Use of PCR for direct detection of Campylobacter species in bovine feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 69, 3435–3447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ismaeel, A. Y., Jamsheer, A. E., Yousif, A. Q., Al Otaibi, M. A. & Botta, G. A. (2002). Causative pathogens of severe diarrhea in children. Saudi Med J 23, 1064[Medline]

Jensen, A. N., Andersen, M. T., Dalsgaard, A., Baggesen, D. L. & Nielsen, E. M. (2005). Development of real-time PCR and hybridization methods for detection and identification of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in pig faecal samples. J Appl Microbiol 99, 292–300.[CrossRef][Medline]

Klena, J. D., Parker, C. T., Knibb, K., Ibbitt, J. C., Devane, P. M., Horn, S. T., Miller, W. G. & Konkel, M. E. (2004). Differentiation of Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter lari, and Campylobacter upsaliensis by a multiplex PCR developed from the nucleotide sequence of the lipid A gene lpxA. J Clin Microbiol 42, 5549–5557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

LaGier, M. J., Joseph, L. A., Passaretti, T. V., Musser, K. A. & Cirino, N. M. (2004). A real-time multiplexed PCR assay for rapid detection and differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Mol Cell Probes 18, 275–282.[CrossRef][Medline]

Linton, D., Owen, R. J. & Stanley, J. (1996). Rapid identification by PCR of the genus Campylobacter and of five Campylobacter species enteropathogenic for man and animals. Res Microbiol 147, 707–718.[Medline]

Linton, D., Lawson, A. J., Owen, R. J. & Stanley, J. (1997). PCR detection, identification to species level, and fingerprinting of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli direct from diarrheic samples. J Clin Microbiol 35, 2568–2572.[Abstract]

Liu, G. M., Su, W. J., Cai, H. N., Xie, M. X., Liu, T. & Peng, X. L. (2005). Establishment of immunomagnetic capture-fluorescent PCR detection method for Campylobacter jejuni. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 21, 336–340.[Medline]

McOrist, A. L., Jackson, M. & Bird, A. R. (2002). A comparison of five methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from human faecal samples. J Microbiol Methods 50, 131–139.[CrossRef][Medline]

Moore, J. E., Corcoran, D., Dooley, J. S., Fanning, S., Lucey, B., Matsuda, M., McDowell, D. A., Mégraud, F., Miller, B. C. & other authors (2005). Campylobacter. Vet Res 36, 351–382.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nayak, R., Stewart, T. M. & Nawaz, M. S. (2005). PCR identification of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni by partial sequencing of virulence genes. Mol Cell Probes 19, 187–193.[CrossRef][Medline]

On, S. L. & Jordan, P. J. (2003). Evaluation of 11 PCR assays for species-level identification of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Clin Microbiol 41, 330–336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Persson, S. & Olsen, K. E. (2005). Multiplex PCR for identification of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni from pure cultures and directly on stool samples. J Med Microbiol 54, 1043–1047.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rautelin, H., Jusufovic, J. & Hanninen, M. L. (1999). Identification of hippurate-negative thermophilic campylobacters. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 35, 9–12.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rozynek, E., Dzierzanowska-Fangrat, K., Jozwiak, P., Popowski, J., Korsak, D. & Dzierzanowska, D. (2005). Prevalence of potential virulence markers in Polish Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates obtained from hospitalized children and from chicken carcasses. J Med Microbiol 54, 615–619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sinha, S., Prasad, K. N., Pradhan, S., Jain, D. & Jha, S. (2004). Detection of preceding Campylobacter jejuni infection by polymerase chain reaction in patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 98, 342–346.[CrossRef][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
N. B. Parahitiyawa, L. J. Jin, W. K. Leung, W. C. Yam, and L. P. Samaranayake
Microbiology of Odontogenic Bacteremia: beyond Endocarditis
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2009; 22(1): 46 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al Amri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Botta, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al Amri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Botta, G. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Al Amri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Botta, G. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS