|
|
||||||||
1 Instituto de Medicina Tropical Pedro Kouri, Autopista Novia del Mediodía Km 61/2, Apartado Postal 601, La Lisa, La Habana, Cuba
2 Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Correspondence
Ernesto Montoro
emontoro{at}ipk.sld.cu
Received 24 January 2006
Accepted 26 February 2006
Abbreviations: EMB, ethambutol; INH, isoniazid; MDR, multidrug-resistant; NRA, nitrate reductase assay; PM, proportion method; RMP, rifampicin; STR, streptomycin.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are different methods for detection of TB drug resistance. The proportion method (PM) and other conventional tests, based on the measurement of growth in culture media containing antibiotics, require several weeks to give results. The BACTEC radiometric system has the advantage of being more rapid (510 days), but requires the use of radioisotopes and can be costly to be performed routinely. Commercial tests (MGIT, ETest) and molecular tools (INNO-LiPA) have been proposed, but are expensive and also impractical for routine use (Lemus et al., 2004; Palomino, 2005).
For developing countries, it would be useful to have a simple and inexpensive test that could rapidly detect drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strains. Several methods have been reported, including colorimetric methods that use redox indicators (MTT and resazurin) and phage amplification technology (Abate et al., 1998; Martin et al., 2003; Simboli et al., 2005).
An alternative method is the nitrate reductase assay (NRA), previously reported as a useful tool for rapid and accurate detection of resistance to first-line antituberculous drugs (Ängeby et al., 2002; Panaiotov & Kantardjiev, 2002; Coban et al., 2004; Montoro et al., 2005).
The objective of this research was to evaluate the performance of the NRA as a simple and rapid alternative method for routine detection of resistance to first-line antituberculous drugs. The NRA uses colorimetric detection of nitrite as an indication of growth for drug-susceptibility testing.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antituberculous drugs. INH, STR, EMB and RMP (Sigma-Aldrich) were each prepared at a concentration of 1 mg ml1 in distilled water with the exception of RMP, which was diluted in methanol. Stock solutions were filter-sterilized and stored at 70 °C. The evaluated concentrations were 0.2, 4, 2 and 40 µg ml1 for INH, STR, EMB and RMP, respectively.
Proportion method. The PM was performed on LJ medium according to the standard procedure with the recommended critical concentration (Canetti et al., 1969).
Nitrate reductase assay. The NRA was performed according to the protocol described previously by Ängeby et al. (2002). The inoculum turbidity was adjusted to a McFarland tube no. 1 and diluted 1 : 10 in PBS. Undiluted suspension (200 µl) was inoculated into tubes of LJ medium with KNO3 (1 mg ml1) containing each of the drugs at the concentrations described above and 200 µl of the 1 : 10 dilution was inoculated into three control tubes without antibiotics. The assay was developed with reagent mix (50 % conc. HCl, 0.2 % sulfanilamide and 0.1 % N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride at ratio of 1 : 2 : 2) after 7 days of incubation at 37 °C by adding 500 µl reagent mix to one control tube. If the clear reagent mix turned pink, the drug-containing tubes were subsequently developed. If there was no colour change, the tubes were reincubated and the procedure repeated on days 10 and 14. An isolate was considered resistant if the drug-containing tube produced a colour change that was more intense than the drug-free tube.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here, the NRA was used as alternative method for rapid detection of resistance to first-line antituberculous drugs in 320 M. tuberculosis strains. The mean time required to obtain results was 10 days.
The results are presented in Table 1
. For INH, both methods detected 55 resistant strains and 260 susceptible strains; five false-negative results were obtained with the NRA. For STR, 83 strains were correctly identified as resistant and 232 as susceptible by both methods; five strains gave discordant results, three of which were false negative, being susceptible by the NRA but resistant by the PM. For EMB, 22 true positive (resistant) results were obtained and 295 strains were defined as susceptible by both methods; three strains were misidentified as susceptible by the NRA. For RMP, all of the susceptible strains were correctly identified by the NRA and 46/49 resistant strains were correctly detected by this method.
|
In this study, the accuracy with the gold standard PM was very good according to the criteria established by the WHO/IUATLD Supranational Laboratory Network, which has proposed accuracy levels of 99.0 % and 97.0 % for RMP and INH, respectively, and 92.0 % for EMB and STR as reasonable goals for reference laboratories. Although it is well known that STR and EMB are difficult drugs to test, even by conventional standard methods (Laszlo et al., 2002), the results obtained in this study were promising, as few discordant results were obtained.
In a previous study carried out in our laboratory (Montoro et al., 2005), the NRA was compared with colorimetric methods (using MTT and resazurin). Although no statistical difference was found between them, the highest accuracy was for the NRA (98.2 %). Other studies have reported high sensitivity and specificity values for INH and RMP (Ängeby et al., 2002; Coban et al., 2004).
In a multicentre study, the NRA was evaluated in different settings to determine the susceptibility of M. tuberculosis to first-line antituberculosis drugs. The accuracy was higher than 96.6 % for INH, EMB and RMP, while that for STR was lower (85.3 %) (Martin et al., 2005a).
The NRA has the potential to be used for the evaluation of second-line drugs. In 2005, Martin et al. (2005b) reported the evaluation of this method for ofloxacin resistance detection and found complete concordance with the agar PM.
Recently, with the aim of reducing the turnaround time for susceptibility results, the NRA was applied directly to sputum smear-positive samples. Musa et al. (2005) reported full concordance for RMP resistance detection, although some discordant results were obtained for other drugs. Similar results have been reported by Solis et al. (2005). The advantage of the direct method is that results are available sooner and better represent the patient's original bacterial population (Ramachandran & Paramasivan, 2003). Current studies are in progress to evaluate this method in our laboratory.
In conclusion, the NRA constitutes a useful tool for detection of TB drug resistance in low-resource countries with limited laboratory facilities due to its low cost, ease of performance and lack of requirement for sophisticated equipment.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Martin, S. Panaiotov, F. Portaels, S. Hoffner, J. C. Palomino, and K. Angeby The nitrate reductase assay for the rapid detection of isoniazid and rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2008; 62(1): 56 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Affolabi, M. Odoun, A. Martin, J. C. Palomino, S. Anagonou, and F. Portaels Evaluation of Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rifampin Resistance by a Nitrate Reductase Assay Applied to Sputum Samples in Cotonou, Benin J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2007; 45(7): 2123 - 2125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | J MED MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL | ALL SGM JOURNALS |