J Med Microbiol International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nováková, D.
Right arrow Articles by Petrás, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nováková, D.
Right arrow Articles by Petrás, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nováková, D.
Right arrow Articles by Petrás, P.
J Med Microbiol 55 (2006), 523-528; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.46246-0
© 2006 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 1473-5644

Staphylococcus equorum and Staphylococcus succinus isolated from human clinical specimens

Dana Nováková1, Ivo Sedlácek1, Roman Pantucek2, Vlastimil Stetina1, Pavel Svec1 and Petr Petrás3

1 Czech Collection of Microorganisms, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Tvrdého 14, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic

2 Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlárská 2, 611 37, Brno, Czech Republic

3 Reference Laboratory for Staphylococci, National Institute of Public Health, Srobárova 48, 100 42, Praha 10, Czech Republic

Correspondence
Dana Nováková
danan{at}sci.muni.cz

Received 15 July 2005
Accepted 12 January 2006


A polyphasic identification approach was applied to a group of 11 novobiocin-resistant staphylococci isolated from human clinical materials. Phenotypic characteristics obtained by both commercial and conventional tests assigned eight strains as Staphylococcus xylosus and three strains as ambiguous S. xylosus/Staphylococcus equorum. In contrast to biotyping, ribotyping with EcoRI and HindIII restriction endonucleases and whole-cell protein fingerprinting assigned six analysed strains as S. equorum, and five strains as Staphylococcus succinus. Confirmation of the identification was done by partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing and S. equorum isolates were verified by a PCR assay targeting the sodA gene. From the data it has been implied that ribotyping and whole-cell protein analysis can be used to differentiate between the biochemically almost indistinguishable species S. xylosus, S. equorum and S. succinus. The present study confirms what is believed to be the first occurrence of S. equorum in a relevant human clinical material in the Czech Republic and describes what is believed to be the first-ever isolation of S. succinus from human clinical material.


Abbreviations: CCM, Czech Collection of Microorganisms; CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci.

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the partial 16S rDNA sequences of Staphylococcus succinus strains NRL 99/698, CCM 7312, CCM 7313, CCM 7314 and NRL 02/262 are DQ006829–DQ006833, respectively, and those for Staphylococcus equorum strains CCM 7301, NRL 00/738, CCM 7302, NRL 02/216, NRL 99/524 and NRL 99/760 are DQ006834–DQ006839, respectively.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are common inhabitants of the skin, skin glands and mucous membranes of various mammals and birds (Nagase et al., 2001; Hauschild, 2001). Although these organisms are part of the normal flora of animals and are generally considered to be of low virulence, they appeared to be implicated in the aetiology of a variety of human and animal infections, and they have established themselves as important pathogens showing increasing trends towards antibiotic resistance in the last decade (von Eiff et al., 2001). CoNS are also frequently isolated from bovine, caprine and ovine milk and dairy products (Bockelmann & Hoppe-Seyler, 2001; Meugnier et al., 1996; Vernozy-Rozand et al., 2000). Staphylococcus xylosus, Staphylococcus equorum, Staphylococcus succinus, Staphylococcus nepalensis and Staphylococcus gallinarum are phylogenetically and/or biochemically closely related novobiocin-resistant CoNS (Lambert et al., 1998; Spergser et al., 2003). S. xylosus is a common commensal inhabitant of animals. Nagase et al. (2001) studied the distribution of staphylococcal species on the skin of several animals and found S. xylosus to be predominant in chickens, laboratory mice and pigeons, and isolated this species very frequently from dogs, pigs, horses and cows. However, isolation of S. xylosus from human skin was rare in their study. In humans, S. xylosus may play a role in infections of the urinary tract and more rarely, it can be involved in endocarditis, pyelonephritis or pneumonia (Marsou et al., 2001; Siqueira & Lima, 2002). S. equorum subsp. equorum was originally isolated from healthy horses (Schleifer et al., 1984), and later isolates were obtained from the milk of a cow with mastitis and from healthy goats (Meugnier et al., 1996). Only a few S. equorum subsp. equorum strains were found in relevant human clinical materials (Alcaráz et al., 2003; Marsou et al., 2001; Pinna et al., 1999). The other subspecies, S. equorum subsp. linens, was isolated from the surface of ripening cheese (Place et al., 2003). S. succinus subsp. succinus was isolated from amber (Lambert et al., 1998), while S. succinus subsp. casei was obtained from the surface of ripened cheese (Place et al., 2002). S. succinus strains were also isolated as a part of the microflora in both fermented and fresh sausages (Blaiotta et al., 2004; Rantsiou et al., 2005). S. nepalensis was found as a pathogen of goats (Spergser et al., 2003) and S. gallinarum was isolated from the skin of poultry (Devriese et al., 1983).

The aim of this study was to characterize in detail 11 novobiocin-resistant CoNS strains isolated from human clinical materials and presumptively assigned as S. xylosus or ambiguous S. xylosus/S. equorum. Different phenotypical and molecular methods were applied to the analysed group to provide a reliable approach for the differentiation between these phylogenetically and phenotypically closely related staphylococcal species.


    METHODS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial strains. Eleven epidemiologically unrelated strains of presumptive S. xylosus and S. xylosus/S. equorum were isolated from human clinical materials in different clinical laboratories in the Czech Republic. The possibility that they were skin contaminants was excluded. All strains were collected by the National Reference Laboratory (NRL) for Staphylococci (Prague, Czech Republic) between 1999 and 2002 as clinically significant agents isolated from different clinical materials (Table 1Go). Strains CCM 7301, CCM 7302, CCM 7312, CCM 7313 and CCM 7314 were deposited in the Czech Collection of Microorganisms (CCM), Masaryk University, Brno (http://www.sci.muni.cz/ccm).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Origin of strains phenotypically assigned to S. xylosus or ambiguous S. xylosus/S. equorum

 
The reference strains of S. xylosus (CCM 2738T and CCM 2725), S. equorum subsp. equorum (CCM 3832T and CCM 3833), S. equorum subsp. linens (CCM 7278T), S. gallinarum (CCM 3572T and CCM 4506), S. nepalensis (CCM 7045T and CCM 7046), S. succinus subsp. succinus (CCM 7157T) and S. succinus subsp. casei (CCM 7194T) were obtained from the CCM.

Cultivation and phenotypic identification. Bacterial strains were routinely grown for 24 h at 37 and 30 °C on sheep blood agar (HiMedia). Colony size and morphology on P agar were determined after 48 h of incubation at 37 °C, and additionally after 72 h of incubation at laboratory temperature (Meugnier et al., 1996).

Biochemical properties were tested by API Staph, ID 32 Staph and API ZYM commercial kits (bioMérieux), and the STAPHYtest 16 system (PLIVA-Lachema), according to the manufacturers' instructions. When either a weak or a delayed reaction was observed the test was repeated by a conventional method (acid production from D-xylose and D-mannose, production of ß-galactosidase and hydrolysis of aesculin). Other tests, such as production of oxidase, pyrrolidonyl arylamidase (PLIVA-Lachema), catalase and acetoin, detection of clumping factor (Slidex Staphy Plus; bioMérieux) and coagulase (ITEST plus), acid production from D-cellobiose, L-arabinose, N-acetylglucosamine, D-raffinose, D-ribose, D-melezitose and D-melibiose, hydrolysis of Tween 80, gelatin and casein, were performed as described by Mannerová et al. (2003). Susceptibility to novobiocin (5 µg), bacitracin (0·04 IU), furazolidone (100 µg) and polymyxin B (300 IU) was tested by the disc diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar (Oxoid) according to Woods & Washington (1995). Evaluation of biochemical test results was carried out using TNW 6.0 software (PLIVA-Lachema) and published phenotype characteristics described by Lambert et al. (1998), Place et al. (2002) and Schleifer et al. (1984).

Ribotyping. Isolation of genomic DNAs and ribotyping with either EcoRI or HindIII restriction endonuclease, as well as hybridization with digoxigenin-labelled probes complementary to 16S and 23S rRNA, were done as described by Svec et al. (2001). The obtained ribotype profiles were digitised and analysed using GelCompar II software (Applied Maths). Dendrogram construction was carried out using the Dice similarity coefficient and the UPGMA clustering method. A position tolerance of 1 % was allowed for the bands.

Whole-cell protein analysis by SDS-PAGE. Isolation of whole-cell protein extracts from bacterial cells, grown under standard conditions (24 h at 37 °C) on nutrient agar (CM3; Oxoid), and SDS-PAGE were performed as described by Pot et al. (1994). Wide range markers (Sigma) ranging from 6·5 to 205 kDa were used as the molecular mass markers. Densitometric analysis of the visualized protein bands was performed by GelCompar II software (Applied Maths). Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient converted for convenience to a percentage value and the UPGMA clustering method were used for the construction of the dendrogram.

PCR identification of S. equorum. A set of specific primers (SdAEqF and SdAEqR) targeting the manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase gene (sodA) was used for S. equorum identification (Blaiotta et al., 2004).

16S rDNA sequencing. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using primers 16Sfw (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3') and 16Srev (5'-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3'). The 5' portion of the amplicon, which corresponds to the 22–541 nt region of the Escherichia coli rrnB-16S rRNA gene (Brosius et al., 1978), was sequenced by dideoxynucleotide chain termination sequencing using internal sequencing primer 16S553L (5'-CGCTTTACGCCCAATAATTCCG-3'). The primer synthesis, amplification conditions, DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis were performed as described previously (Mannerová et al., 2003). The following nucleotide sequences of close evolutionary relatives of the analysed isolates were retrieved from the GenBank database: S. xylosus, accession no. D83374; S. equorum subsp. equorum, accession no. AB009939; S. equorum subsp. linens, accession no. AF527483; S. succinus subsp. succinus, accession no. AF004220; S. succinus subsp. casei, accession no. AJ320272; S. gallinarum, accession no. D83366; S. nepalensis, accession no. AJ517414. Multiple alignments were performed by using the program ClustalW available at the EMBL-EBI server (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Novobiocin-resistant CoNS species are phylogenetically and phenotypically very close, and their biochemical identification is often unclear and unreliable (Marsou et al., 2001; Meugnier et al., 1996; Pennington et al., 1991). Evaluation of the obtained phenotypical results assigned strains CCM 7301, NRL 99/524 and NRL 99/760 as ambiguous S. xylosus/S. equorum strains, strain CCM 7302 as atypical S. xylosus and the remaining strains as S. xylosus. The tested biochemical properties corresponded with the S. xylosus species description. Some atypical and differential reactions occurred (Table 2Go). All tested strains assigned by molecular approaches as S. equorum (and the S. equorum subsp. equorum type strain) showed strong production of ß-glucosidase, while strains assigned as S. succinus did not produce this enzyme. Differentiation between S. xylosus, S. equorum and S. succinus is generally very difficult and ambiguous, because no clear key biochemical tests are available. S. xylosus can be distinguished from S. equorum by colony size and morphology on P agar. Growth at 37 and 30 °C can also be a useful indicator. S. equorum forms small colonies (<6 mm) without pigmentation and grows preferably at 30 °C. In contrast, S. xylosus strains form larger colonies (>6 mm) often with yellowish pigment and have more abundant growth at 37 °C (Meugnier et al., 1996). In this study, strains NRL 00/738, NRL 02/216, CCM 7302 and CCM 7301 grew better at 30 °C than at 37 °C, and formed small, grey, circular colonies on P agar. Strains CCM 7313, CCM 7314 and NRL 02/262 formed small, dry, flat colonies. Because the identification based on biotyping was unclear, the ribotyping and whole-cell protein analysis by SDS-PAGE were chosen for more detailed characterization and identification.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Variable biochemical reactions and results of polyphasic identification

PHS, phosphatase production; NIT, nitrate reduction; TW 80, hydrolysis of Tween 80; XYL, acid production from xylose; ESC, hydrolyse of aesculin; CEL, acid production of cellobiose; ß-GLU, production of ß-glucosidase; HEM, {alpha}-haemolysis.

 
In the present study, ribotyping done separately with EcoRI and HindIII restriction enzymes grouped, in contrast to biotyping, all analysed strains into two clearly distinguished clusters. The same results were obtained by whole-cell protein fingerprinting. Fig. 1Go shows combined cluster analysis containing ribotypes obtained by both restriction enzymes, as well as whole-cell protein patterns. The cluster analysis grouped six of the tested strains with S. equorum reference strains, and five remaining clinical strains with those of S. succinus. The remaining reference strains of S. xylosus, S. nepalensis and S. gallinarum formed clearly separated clusters by ribotyping, as well as by whole-cell protein analysis. Any relationship to other species of the genus Staphylococcus included in the in-house CCM bacteria collection database based on ribotype similarity was not observed (data not shown). Because of a relatively high similarity of ribotype profiles and protein patterns between the studied and the reference S. equorum and S. succinus strains, these methods did not allow classification of the tested strains to the subspecies level. The percentage of similarity between the tested and reference strains was more than 75 % for S. equorum and 69 % at least for the S. succinus cluster (Fig. 1Go). Analogous results were reported by other authors who applied ribotyping and whole-cell protein analysis for characterization of novobiocin-resistant CoNS. The S. xylosus and S. equorum isolates from cheese and goat's milk were correctly identified by ribotyping, while the ID 32 Staph system classified them into the S. xylosus/S. equorum group (Meugnier et al., 1996). Marsou et al. (2001) identified several S. equorum clinical isolates by ribotyping and amplification of 16S–23S rDNA intergenic spacers. Similarly, ribotyping appeared to be a suitable tool for species classification and identification of certain CoNS in other studies (Izard et al., 1992; Svec et al., 2004; Villard et al., 2000). The results of whole-cell protein analysis by separated cluster analysis were in full agreement with those obtained by ribotyping, and confirmed this method as a useful means for identification of CoNS, as also shown by other studies (Pennington et al., 1991; Pot et al., 1994; Svec et al., 2004).


Figure 1
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Dendrogram based on combined cluster analysis of EcoRI and HindIII ribotype patterns, and whole-cell protein profiles of tested strains and related novobiocin-resistant CoNS.

 
The sequencing of a 5' 527 bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene, which was described as a useful tool able to distinguish most staphylococcal species (Becker et al., 2004), proved to be useful in unambiguous classification of the tested isolates into S. equorum and S. succinus species, and confirmed the results obtained by other methods. The best 16S rRNA sequence matches and similarities obtained using the RDP-II Seqmatch tool (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/) are shown in Table 2Go. Analysis of the sequences determined for strains NRL 99/698, CCM 7312 and CCM 7313 showed their identity with the type strain S. succinus subsp. casei DSM 15096T (Place et al., 2002); however, these identification results were not clearly confirmed by further identification methods used in this study. Partial 16S rRNA sequencing did not allow identification of the S. equorum strains to the subspecies level (Table 2Go). The isolates CCM 7314 and NRL 02/262 exhibited high similarity to the 16S rRNA gene sequence for S. succinus subsp. succinus strain AMG-D1T (Lambert et al., 1998), with the only exception at nucleotide position 264 (E. coli coordinate), the A residue being found in the two clinical isolates instead of the T residue in the amber isolate.

In this study, a polyphasic identification approach based on ribotyping, whole-cell protein analysis by SDS-PAGE and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene assigned six strains to S. equorum and five strains to S. succinus. In addition, a 193 bp sodA gene amplicon specific for S. equorum species was obtained from six of the tested strains, as well as from the S. equorum reference strains (Table 2Go). Our results imply that these methods are suitable for the identification of biochemically similar novobiocin-resistant CoNS species and exhibit higher reliability than biotyping. However, identification of analysed taxa to the subspecies level using these methods was revealed to be uncertain.

The strains under study were isolated from relevant clinical specimens such as blood culture, pus, cerebrospinal fluid, exudate, eye swabs and wound swab. The results obtained indicate that S. equorum and S. succinus clinical isolates may be misidentified as S. xylosus strains in routine clinical laboratory analysis. The incidence of the two species in clinical specimens may not be as sporadic as believed until recently and this fact must be taken into account in microbiological laboratories. This is believed to be the first report of an occurrence of S. equorum in relevant human clinical specimens in the Czech Republic and the first isolation of S. succinus from human clinical material.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
This work was supported in part by projects numbers 301/02/1505 and 204/02/D099 of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, and by long-term research programme number MSM0021622415 of the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic. We thank Eva Kodytková for revising the manuscript.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Alcaráz, L. E., Satorres, S. E., Lucero, R. M. & Puig de Centorbi, O. N. (2003). Species identification, slime production and oxacillin susceptibility in coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from nosocomial specimens. Braz J Microbiol 34, 45–51.

Becker, K., Harmsen, D., Mellmann, A., Meier, C., Schumann, P., Peters, G. & von Eiff, C. (2004). Development and evaluation of a quality-controlled ribosomal sequence database for 16S ribosomal DNA-based identification of Staphylococcus species. J Clin Microbiol 42, 4988–4995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Blaiotta, G., Ercolini, D., Mauriello, G., Salzano, G. & Villani, F. (2004). Rapid and reliable identification of Staphylococcus equorum by a species-specific PCR assay targeting the sodA gene. Syst Appl Microbiol 27, 696–702.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bockelmann, W. & Hoppe-Seyler, T. S. (2001). The surface flora of bacterial smear-ripened cheese from cow's and goat's milk. Int Dairy J 11, 307–314.[CrossRef]

Brosius, J., Palmer, M. L., Kennedy, P. J. & Noller, H. F. (1978). Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 75, 4801–4805.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Devriese, L. A., Poutrel, B., Kilpper-Bälz, R. & Schleifer, K. H. (1983). Staphylococcus gallinarum and Staphylococcus caprae, two new species from animals. Int J Syst Bacteriol 33, 480–486.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hauschild, T. (2001). Phenotypic and genotypic identification of staphylococci isolated from wild small mammals. Syst Appl Microbiol 24, 411–416.[CrossRef][Medline]

Izard, N. C., Hächler, H., Grehn, M. & Kayser, F. H. (1992). Ribotyping of coagulase-negative staphylococci with special emphasis on intraspecific typing of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Clin Microbiol 30, 817–823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lambert, L. H., Cox, T., Mitchell, K., Rosselló-Mora, R. A., Del Cueto, C., Dodge, D. E., Orkand, P. & Cano, R. J. (1998). Staphylococcus succinus sp. nov., isolated from Dominican amber. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48, 511–518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mannerová, S., Pantucek, R., Doskar, J., Svec, P., Snauwaert, C., Vancanneyt, M., Swings, J. & Sedlácek, I. (2003). Macrococcus brunensis sp. nov., Macrococcus hajekii sp. nov. and Macrococcus lamae sp. nov., from the skin of llamas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53, 1647–1654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Marsou, R., Bes, M., Brun, Y., Boudouma, M., Idrissi, L., Meugnier, H., Freney, J. & Etienne, J. (2001). Molecular techniques open up new vistas for typing of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Pathol Biol 49, 205–215.[Medline]

Meugnier, H., Bes, M., Vernozy-Rozand, C., Mazuy, C., Brun, Y., Freney, J. & Fleurette, J. (1996). Identification and ribotyping of Staphylococcus xylosus and Staphylococcus equorum strains isolated from goat milk and cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 31, 325–331.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nagase, N., Sasaki, A., Yamashita, K., Shimizu, A., Wakita, Y., Kitai, S. & Kawano, J. (2001). Isolation and species distribution of staphylococci from animal and human skin. J Vet Med Sci 64, 245–250.

Pennington, T. H., Harker, C. & Thomson-Carter, F. (1991). Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci by using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and rRNA restriction patterns. J Clin Microbiol 29, 390–392.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pinna, A., Zanetti, S., Sotgiu, M., Sechi, L. A., Fadda, G. & Carta, F. (1999). Identification and antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase negative staphylococci isolated in corneal/external infections. Br J Ophthalmol 83, 771–773.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Place, R. B., Hiestand, D., Burri, S. & Teuber, M. (2002). Staphylococcus succinus subsp. casei subsp. nov., a dominant isolate from a surface ripened cheese. Syst Appl Microbiol 25, 353–359.[CrossRef][Medline]

Place, R. B., Hiestand, D., Gallmann, H. R. & Teuber, M. (2003). Staphylococcus equorum subsp. linens, subsp. nov., a starter culture component for surface ripened semi-hard cheeses. Syst Appl Microbiol 26, 30–37.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pot, B., Vandamme, P. & Kersters, K. (1994). Analysis of electrophoretic whole-organism protein fingerprints. In Chemical Methods in Prokaryotic Systematics, pp. 493–521. Edited by M. Goodfellow & A. G. O'Donnell. Chichester: Wiley.

Rantsiou, K., Iacumin, L., Cantoni, C., Comi, G. & Cocolin, L. (2005). Ecology and characterization by molecular methods of Staphylococcus species isolated from fresh sausages. Int J Food Microbiol 97, 277–284.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schleifer, K. H., Kilpper-Bälz, R. & Devriese, L. A. (1984). Staphylococcus arlettae sp. nov., S. equorum sp. nov. and S. kloosii sp. nov. Three new coagulase-negative, novobiocin-resistant species from animal. Syst Appl Microbiol 5, 501–509.

Siqueira, J. F., Jr & Lima, K. C. (2002). Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus xylosus in a secondary root canal infection with persistent symptoms: a case report. Aust Endod J 28, 61–63.[Medline]

Spergser, J., Wieser, M., Taubel, M., Rossello-Mora, R. A., Rosengarten, R. & Busse, H. J. (2003). Staphylococcus nepalensis sp. nov., isolated from goats of the Himalayan region. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53, 2007–2011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Svec, P., Sedlácek, I., Pantucek, R., Devriese, L. A. & Doskar, J. (2001). Evaluation of ribotyping for characterization and identification of Enterococcus haemoperoxidus and Enterococcus moraviensis strains. FEMS Microbiol Lett 203, 23–27.[CrossRef][Medline]

Svec, P., Vancanneyt, M., Sedlácek, I., Engelbeen, K., Stetina, V., Swings, J. & Petrás, P. (2004). Reclassification of Staphylococcus pulvereri Zakrzewska-Czerwinska et al., 1995 as a later synonym of Staphylococcus vitulinus Webster et al., 1994. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54, 2213–2215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takahashi, T., Satoh, I. & Kikuchi, N. (1999). Phylogenetic relationships of 38 taxa of the genus Staphylococcus based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49, 725–728.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vernozy-Rozand, C., Mazuy, C., Meugnier, H., Bes, M., Lasne, Y., Fiedler, F., Etienne, J. & Freney, J. (2000). Staphylococcus fleurettii sp. nov., isolated from goat's milk cheeses. Int J Syst Bacteriol 50, 1521–1527.[Abstract]

Villard, L., Kodjo, A., Borges, E., Maurin, F. & Richard, Y. (2000). Ribotyping and rapid identification of Staphylococcus xylosus by 16–23S spacer amplification. FEMS Microbiol Lett 185, 83–87.[Medline]

von Eiff, C., Proctor, R. A. & Peters, G. (2001). Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Pathogens have major role in nosocomial infections. Postgrad Med 110, 63–76.

Woods, G. L. & Washington, J. A. (1995). Antibacterial susceptibility tests: dilution and disk-diffusion methods. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 6th edn, pp. 1327–1341. Edited by P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover & R. H. Yolken. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nováková, D.
Right arrow Articles by Petrás, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nováková, D.
Right arrow Articles by Petrás, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nováková, D.
Right arrow Articles by Petrás, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS