J Med Microbiol Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kulkarni, S P
Right arrow Articles by Kadival, G V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kulkarni, S P
Right arrow Articles by Kadival, G V
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kulkarni, S P
Right arrow Articles by Kadival, G V
J Med Microbiol 54 (2005), 369-373; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.45801-0
© 2005 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Evaluation of an in-house-developed PCR for the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis in Indian children

S P Kulkarni1, M A Jaleel2 and G V Kadival1

1Laboratory Nuclear Medicine Section, Isotope Group, BARC, C/o Tata Memorial Centre, Annexe, Mumbai – 400012, India 2Department of Pediatrics, KEM Hospital, Mumbai – 400012, India

Correspondence G. V. Kadival gkadival{at}hotmail.com

Received June 29, 2004
Accepted December 23, 2004

Early and rapid detection of the causative organism is necessary in tuberculosis, particularly tuberculous meningitis, as the disease affects mainly children and if untreated or improperly treated can cause severe central nervous system disorders and can often be fatal. An in-house-developed PCR technique was developed for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA, in which the target for amplification was a 340 bp nucleotide sequence located within the 38 kDa protein gene. The test can detect as small an amount of DNA as 10 fg, which is equivalent to two to three organisms, and is highly specific. Amplified product was detected by ethidium bromide staining after electrophoresis and Southern hybridization. Evaluation of test sensitivity and specificity was carried out using acid-fast bacilli-positive sputum samples from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and an equal number of non-tuberculosis patient samples as negative controls. In a double-masked study 30 cerebrospinal fluid samples from tuberculous meningitis patients and 30 samples from non-tuberculous meningitis patients were investigated. Out of the 30 samples 22 were positive by ethidium bromide-stained gel electrophoresis and 27 gave positive results by Southern hybridization. All of the 30 control samples showed negative results. The sensitivity of this PCR was 90 % and specificity, 100 %.


Abbreviations: AFB, acid-fast bacilli; CNS, central nervous system; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence; TBM, tuberculous meningitis.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Tuberculous meningitis (TBM), which occurs in 7–12 % of tuberculosis patients in developing countries, involves the central nervous system (CNS) and is one of the most severe forms of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (Tandon, 1978). It is common among children and is often a post-primary manifestation that develops 2–12 months after primary infection. Rapid detection of the causative organism is of paramount importance in TBM as the disease can be fatal and clinical outcome depends heavily on the stage at which treatment is initiated (Leonard & Des Prez, 1990).

Diagnosis of TBM is presumptive and is based on clinical symptoms, neurological signs, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings, CT scans and the response to anti-tuberculosis drugs (Kennedy & Fallon, 1979). Conventional methods like microscopy and culture, although considered as gold standards, are quite inadequate. Acid-fast staining requires a large number of organisms (>104 cells ml–1) and it has been reported that the positivity of acid-fast smears in children with tuberculosis is low (Delacourt et al., 1995), and in TBM, in particular, it is only 8–10 % (Davis et al., 1993). Culture requires 6–8 weeks due to the slow growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and is often negative.

Various techniques have been reported for the diagnosis of TBM, including adenosine deaminase assay (Lopez-Cortes et al., 1995), radioimmunoassay (Ashtekar et al., 1987; Kadival et al., 1987a) and ELISA (Kadival et al., 1986) for the detection of mycobacterial antigens and antibodies to the mycobacterium (Mathai et al., 1991; Kadival et al., 1994). These techniques show promise but the sensitivity and often the specificity reported is insufficient and needs improvement.

Rapid techniques based on nucleic acid amplification such as PCR are more sensitive and specific as they attempt to detect specific DNA sequences of the organism. We have already described a PCR assay using a 340 bp sequence of the 38 kDa protein gene as the target sequence for amplification (Kadival et al., 1995, 1996). The 38 kDa protein is an important secretory protein of M. tuberculosis (Kadival et al., 1987b; Young et al., 1996); it is involved in phosphate transport and is highly specific for M. tuberculosis (Anderson et al., 1990). The objective of the current study was to evaluate the role of this PCR technique in the diagnosis of TBM.


    METHODS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients and clinical specimen.

CSF samples from 60 patients (28 males, 32 females; age range 5 months to 12 years) were received from the paediatric department of the KEM Hospital, Mumbai. All the samples were received in ice and were stored at –20 °C until further analysis. Samples were collected on the basis of signs and symptoms that indicated involvement of the CNS. The study was double-masked, i.e. the laboratory was not aware of the clinical data and the clinician was not aware of the laboratory data until all analysis was complete. All the samples, and clinical and other data were kept by one of the authors (M.A.J.) and after coding, the samples were transferred to the laboratory for PCR. The personnel performing the PCR were not aware of the identities of the samples until the test had been performed on all the samples. Acid-fast microscopy was performed by the Ziehl–Neelsen method and culture was performed on Lowenstein–Jensen slants for all samples. Two hundred microlitres of CSF was centrifuged and the precipitate was used for culture.

Diagnosis.

For all of the patients a detailed medical history was obtained that included: (i) presentation of clinical signs and symptoms, such as fever, headache, neck stiffness, vomiting and alterations of sensorium; (ii) BCG vaccination status, past history of tuberculosis or presence of a contact; (iii) general and systemic examination including a detailed CNS examination; (iv) routine laboratory tests that included complete blood count, CSF cytology, proteins and sugar, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Mantoux test and chest X-ray; (v) CT scans of the brain, both plain and contrast. Criteria generally used to classify patients as TBM are given in Table 1(Doerr et al., 1995; Lang et al., 1998). The patient population classified as TBM fulfilled major criteria A and B and any two of the minor criteria (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Criteria used for classification of the likelihood of TBM
 

TBM.

CT scans of the brain revealed basal exudates and hydrocephalus, typical of TBM, in six and 25 of the 30 TBM patients, respectively. Chest X-ray revealed the presence of progressive primary complex in two patients while one had extra pulmonary tuberculosis (tuberculous cervical lymphadenopathy). Four patients had tuberculosis contacts in the family and two were positive by the Mantoux test (>10 mm). CSF cytology showed pleocytosis with lymphocyte predominance and increased proteins (>40 mg dl–1). Most importantly all patients showed clinical improvement with anti-tuberculosis treatment, leading to improved signs and symptoms. All samples from TBM cases were, however, negative for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) and culture.

Controls.

Thirty patients were classified as non-TBM controls. None of the patients were positive for AFB, while three grew other bacterial cultures (Staphylococcus aureus in one and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in two others). The Mantoux test was negative in all of them and chest X-rays did not show any abnormality. There was no evidence of tuberculosis in any of the patients. CSF cytology revealed pleocytosis with polymorphonuclear cells predominating. Twenty-four of the controls were classified as cases of pyogenic meningitis, four were viral encephalitis, one was aseptic meningitis and one was neurosarcoidosis.

Preparation of CSF for PCR.

Two hundred microlitres of neat CSF sample was treated with proteinase K (10 mg ml–1, in 200 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.3) at 65 °C overnight and boiled for 10 min. Ten microlitres of the sample was directly used for PCR.

Oligonucleotide primers and probes.

Primers for amplification of the 340 bp region of the 38 kDa protein gene of M. tuberculosis were procured from Isogen. The primers were synthesized by an automated DNA synthesizer on the basis of phosphoramidite chemistry. The two primers were designated KD1 (5' CCA AGC AAG ATC CCG AGG GCT 3') and KD2 (TTG ATG ATC GGG TAG CCG TCC 3') and in addition a biotinylated internal probe KD3 (5' TGC GCC GAG GAG ACA CCG GGC TGC GTG GCC TAT 3') was also synthesized.

DNA amplification by PCR.

Fifty microlitres of PCR mixture, containing 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM NaCl, 0.01 % gelatin, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.5 µM of each primer KD1 and KD2, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (AmpliTaq, Perkin Elmer, Cetus) and 50 µl of mineral oil, was added to each tube. Ten microlitres of the treated CSF sample was added last. The test was carried out in duplicate where the second sample was spiked with 100 fg of M. tuberculosis H37 Rv DNA. The mixtures were then subjected to 40 cycles of PCR in a programmable thermal cycler (MJ Research). Each cycle comprised denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 64 °C for 1 min and primer extension at 72 °C for 1 min. After the 40 cycles were completed, additional extension for 10 min at 72 °C was carried out.

Detection of amplified product.

An aliquot (15 µl) from the PCR was analysed by gel electrophoresis in 2 % agarose gel in Tris/borate EDTA (TBE) buffer for 2 h at 70 V then stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under a transilluminator. For Southern hybridization the gel was soaked in 0.25 M HCl for 10 min and rinsed with distilled water. The gel was denatured in 0.4 M NaOH for 30 min and the DNA transferred overnight to a nylon membrane using 10x SSC by a capillary method. The membranes were exposed to UV light for 3 min for immobilization of DNA. Pre-hybridization was carried out at 60 °C for 4 h in a solution containing 6x SSC, 0.5 % SDS, 5x Denhardt's reagent and 100 µg ml–1 of salmon sperm DNA as a blocking reagent.

Hybridization was carried out at 60 °C overnight in a solution containing biotinylated internal probe KD3. Subsequently the membranes were washed twice with 0.1x SSC and 0.1 % SDS at room temperature for 5 min and twice at 60 °C for 10 min. The membranes were then incubated in 1 : 4000 diluted Streptavidin-POD conjugate at 42 °C for 1 h and washed with 2x SSC and 0.5 % SDS twice at 42 °C and once at room temperature for 5 min. Hybrids were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) after the membranes were exposed to X-ray film for autoradiography results.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PCR was performed in duplicate for each sample and one tube was spiked with standard M. tuberculosis DNA to identify inhibition of Taq polymerase. A test was considered as inhibited if both sample and spike gave negative PCR, as positive if both gave positive PCR, and as negative if the test gave negative and the spike gave positive PCR. Twenty-seven of the 30 TBM samples were positive (sensitivity 90 %) while all the controls were negative (specificity 100 %). Out of the 27 positive results, 22 samples showed a strong band of amplification product at 340 bp in ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel and five samples showed uncertain weak bands which were confirmed as positive by Southern hybridization with the internal oligonucleotide probe by the ECL technique. Thus our test gave 73.3 % sensitivity when amplicon detection was done by ethidium bromide staining alone (22/30) and increased to 90 % sensitivity (27/30) when Southern hybridization was also used. Fig. 1 presents the Southern hybridization results of 14 samples from the TBM group. The samples in lanes 2, 5, 8, 12 and 13 showed poor or no band on ethidium bromide staining (Fig. 1a) but showed a clear band on Southern hybridization (Fig. 1b). None of the samples showed inhibition. The positive predictive value thus was 100 % and the negative predictive value was 90 %.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Southern blot hybridization of amplicon detected by ECL. Samples in lanes 1–14 are PCR products of TBM patient samples and lane 15 is positive control 100 fg M. tuberculosis H37Rv DNA. (a) Ethidium bromide staining of the samples observed on a transilluminator (reverse picture). (b) Autoradiography results after Southern blot hybridization with internal biotinylated probe KD3 and ECL detection. Bands in lanes 2, 5, 8, 12 and 13 were not clear in ethidium bromide staining but are seen clearly on hybridization.

 

TBM is one of the common clinical manifestations of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. The incidence of TBM in developing countries like India has shown an upward trend during the past two decades. Though TBM can occur at any age, it is common in infants and children. The population in this study was a paediatric population between 6 months and 12 years. In an earlier study 20 % of paediatric patients who died from active tuberculosis were found at autopsy to have CNS involvement (Udani & Dastur, 1970). Classical TBM evolves through three stages: (1) prodromal stage with non-specific symptoms, (2) stage of meningeal irritation with headache and vomiting, (3) stage with diffuse or focal cerebral involvement with unconsciousness, stupor or coma, and raised intracranial pressure. All the patients in the TBM group were either in stage 2 or stage 3, i.e. in advanced stages of TBM.

Definitive diagnosis of TBM is possible by AFB and culture. However, in TBM in children many reports indicate positive results in only 8–10 % and 29–48 % for AFB and culture, respectively (Stamos & Rowley, 1995). In the Indian subcontinent, smear and culture positivity was observed in only 15–20 % of patients with TBM (Tandon, 1978).

The use of molecular biology techniques in the diagnosis of tuberculosis started with the use of DNA probes (Grange, 1989), which were less sensitive than even the existing conventional tests. They have been increasingly used for this purpose since the introduction of the PCR technique. The majority of the investigators performing PCR-based diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis have used insertion sequence IS6110 as a target (Miorner et al., 1995; Caws et al., 2000; Narayanan et al., 2001). The principal reason for using IS6110 is the presence of multiple copies in the M. tuberculosis genome (Van Soolingen et al., 1991), which was thought to confer higher sensitivity. It has, however, been shown that there are M. tuberculosis strains originating from India which do not contain IS6110 (Van Soolingen et al., 1993). Our laboratory has reported previously the development of a PCR using the 38 kDa gene as the target sequence. This has been shown to give a sensitivity of 10 fg of DNA, the equivalent of two to three organisms, and is highly specific (Kadival et al., 1995, 1996).

The present study was performed as a double-masked study and demonstrates that PCR is a rapid and powerful technique for the accurate diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Of the 30 patients diagnosed with TBM 27 showed positive PCR results, i.e. a sensitivity of 90 % was achieved. One of the reasons for the high sensitivity of our study could be that the patients were classified as advanced cases of TBM.

This sensitivity is comparable to previous studies by Liu et al. (1994) (90 %) and Seth et al. (1996) (85 %) while it is much superior to various other studies: Ahuja et al. (1994) (75 %), Lin et al. (1995) (70 %), Donald et al. (1993) (63 %), Bonington et al. (1998) (60 %), Kox et al. (1994) (48 %), Miorner et al. (1995) (54 %) and Nguyen et al. (1996) (32 %). These earlier studies used IS6110 or the MPB 64 or 65 kDa protein genes as their target for amplification. The study conducted by Lee et al. (1994) showed high false-positives with IS6110 (62 %) and the 65 kDa protein gene (33 %). The lower sensitivities and specificities found by earlier investigators could be due to the methods used for extraction of DNA and amplicon detection.

Most of the earlier investigators isolated DNA from a 12 000 g pellet of CSF using either phenol/chloroform or Boom's procedure. But M. tuberculosis is present in CSF as free DNA in very small amounts, if at all, and therefore such extraction procedures will result in false-negative results, which reduce the sensitivity. In this study we used whole CSF samples as suggested by Kox et al. (1995) for DNA PCR. Kox et al. (1995) stated that the volume of the CSF sample is very important for good results and at least 2 ml should be processed. However, in the paediatric group that we were dealing with (5 months–12 years), it was difficult to get a large amount of CSF after lumbar puncture and our test has proved that smaller volumes (200 µl) when used directly can give good results.

The sensitivity of PCR was improved by using confirmation by Southern hybridization, which indicates the need for such hybridization rather than detection by ethidium bromide staining alone. All 30 patients, who were classified as non-TBM, were negative by our test, which demonstrates 100 % specificity. All the samples showing negative results were true negatives as the spiked samples containing the clinical sample and standard DNA were positive for PCR, thus confirming that there was no inhibition of Taq polymerase. These results showing no false-positives indicate no cross- or carryover-contamination in the PCR test. This was achieved by performing various procedures of the PCR in different rooms (physical separation), dedicated pipettes and other equipment for each laboratory, and enforcing good laboratory practice.

Commercially available kits such as MTD Gene-Probe and Roche AMPLICOR, which are PCR-based tests, when used for diagnosis of TBM have been shown to give low sensitivities of 33 % and 60 %, respectively (Lang et al., 1998; Bonington et al., 1998).

In conclusion our PCR test is very specific and sensitive, and can be used for rapid and accurate diagnosis of TBM especially in India.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  • Ahuja, G. K., Mohan, K. K., Prasad, K. & Behari, M. (1994). Diagnostic criteria for tuberculous meningitis and their validation. Tuber Lung Dis 75, 149–152.[Medline]

  • Anderson, A. B., Ljunqvist, L. & Olsen, M. (1990). Evidence that protein antigen b of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is involved in phosphate metabolism. J Gen Microbiol 136, 477–480.[Medline]

  • Ashtekar, M. D., Dhalla, A. S., Mazarelo, T. B. M. S. & Samuel, A. M. (1987). A study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen and antibody in cerebrospinal fluid and blood in tuberculous meningitis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 45, 29–34.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Bonington, A., Strang, J. I., Klapper, P. E., Hood, S. V., Rubombora, W., Willers, R. & Wilkins, E. G. L. (1998). Use of Roche Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis PCR in early diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. J Clin Microbiol 36, 1251–1254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Caws, M., Wilson, S. M., Clough, C. & Drobniewski, F. (2000). Role of IS6110-targeted PCR, culture, biochemical, clinical and immunological criteria for diagnosis of tuberculosis meningitis. J Clin Microbiol 38, 3150–3155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Davis, L. E., Rastogi, K. R., Lambert, L. C. & Skipper, B. J. (1993). Tuberculous meningitis in the southwest United States: a community-based study. Neurology 43, 1775–1778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Delacourt, C., Poveda, J. D., Chureau, C., Beydon, N., Mahut, B., de Blic, J., Scheinman, P. & Garrigue, G. l. (1995). Use of polymerase chain reaction for improved diagnosis of tuberculosis in children. J Pediatr 126, 703–709.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Doerr, C. A., Starke, J. R. & Ong, L. T. (1995). Clinical and public health aspects of tuberculous meningitis in children. J Pediatr 127, 27–33.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Donald, P. R., Victor, T. C., Jordaan, A. M., Schoeman, J. F. & Van Heldon, P. D. (1993). Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Scand J Infect Dis 25, 613–617.[Medline]

  • Grange, J. M. (1989). The rapid diagnosis of paucibacillary tuberculosis. Tubercle 70, 1–4.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Kadival, G. V., Mazarelo, T. B. M. S. & Chaparas, S. D. (1986). Sensitivity and specificity of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the detection of antigen in tuberculous meningitis cerebrospinal fluids. J Clin Microbiol 23, 901–904.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Kadival, G. V., Samuel, A. M., Mazarelo, T. B. M. S. & Chaparas, S. D. (1987a). Radioimmunoassay for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen in cerebrospinal fluids of patients with tuberculous meningitis. J Infect Dis 155, 608–611.[Medline]

  • Kadival, G. V., Chaparas, S. D. & Hussong, D. (1987b). Characterization of serologic and cell-mediated reactivity of 38-kDa antigen isolated from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol 139, 2447–2451.[Abstract]

  • Kadival, G. V., Kameswaran, M., Doshi, R., Todiwala, S. S. & Samuel, A. M. (1994). Detection of antibodies to defined M.tuberculosis antigen (38 kDa) in cerebrospinal fluids of patients with tuberculous meningitis. Zentbl Bakteriol 281, 95–101.

  • Kadival, G. V., D'Souza, C. D., Kolk, H. J. & Samuel, A. M. (1995). Polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.Comparison of two target sequences for amplification. Zbl Bakt 282, 353–361.

  • Kadival, G. V., D'Souza, C. D., Kulkarni, S. P. & Samuel, A. M. (1996). A highly specific polymerase chain reaction test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Indian J Tuberc 43, 151–154.

  • Kennedy, D. H. & Fallon, R. J. (1979). Tuberculous meningitis. JAMA 241, 264–268.[Abstract]

  • Kox, L. F. F., Rheinthong, D., Miranda, A. M., Udomsantisuk, N., Ellis, K., van Leeuwen, J., van Heusden, S., Kuijper, S. & Kolk, A. H. J. l. (1994). A more reliable PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 32, 672–678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Kox, L. F. F., Kuijen, S. & Kolk, H. J. (1995). Early diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis by polymerase chain reaction. Neurology 45, 2228–2232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Lang, A. M., Feris-Iglesias, J., Pena, C. & 7 other authors (1998). Clinical evaluation of the Gen-Probe amplified direct test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms in cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol 36, 2191–2194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Lee, B. W., Tan, J. A., Wong, S. C., Tan, C. B., Yap, H. K., Low, P. S., Chia, J. N. & Tay, J. S. l. (1994). DNA amplification by the polymerase chain reaction for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis.Comparison of protocols involving three mycobacterial DNA sequences, IS6110, 65 kDa antigen and MPB64. J Neurol Sci 123, 173–179.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Leonard, J. M. & Des Prez, R. M. (1990). Tuberculous meningitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 4, 769–787.[Medline]

  • Lin, J. J., Ham, H. J., Hsu, Y. D., Tsao, W. L., Lee, H. S. & Lee, W. H. (1995). Rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis by polymerase chain reaction assay of cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurol 242, 147–152.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Liu, P. Y., Shi, Z. Y., Lau, Y. J. & Hu, B. S. (1994). Rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis by simplified nested amplification protocol. Neurology 44, 1161–1164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Lopez-Cortes, L. F., Cruz-Ruiz, M., Gomez-Mateos, J., Jimenez-Hernandez, D., Jimenez-Mejias, E., Pachon, J. & Castillo, J. (1995). Adenosine deaminase activity in the CSF of patients with aseptic meningitis: utility in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis or neurobrucellosis. Clin Infect Dis 20, 525–530.[Medline]

  • Mathai, A., Radhakrishnan, V. V. & Thomas, M. (1991). Rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis with a dot enzyme immunoassay to detect antibody in cerebrospinal fluid. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 10, 440–443.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Miorner, H., Sjobring, U., Nayak, P. & Chandramuki, A. (1995). Diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: a comparitive analysis of 3 immunoassays, an immune complex assay and the polymerase chain reaction. Tuber Lung Dis 76, 381–386.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Narayanan, S., Parandaman, V., Narayanan, P. R., Venkatesan, P., Girish, C., Mahadevan, S. & Rajajee, S. l. (2001). Evaluation of PCR using TRC4 and IS6110 primers in detection of tuberculous meningitis. J Clin Microbiol 39, 2006–2008.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Nguyen, L. N., Kox, L. F., Pham, L. D., Kuijper, S. & Kolk, A. H. (1996). The potential contribution of the polymerase chain reaction to the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Arch Neurol 53, 771–776.[Abstract]

  • Seth, P., Ahuja, G. K., Bhanu, N. V., Behari, M., Bhowmik, S., Broor, S., Dar, L. & Chakraborty, M. (1996). Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction for rapid diagnosis of clinically suspected tuberculous meningitis. Tuber Lung Dis 77, 353–357.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Shankar, P., Manjunath, N., Mohan, K. K., Prasad, K., Behari, M. & Shriniwas Ahuja, G. K. l. (1991). Rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis by polymerase chain reaction. Lancet 337, 5–7.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Stamos, J. K. & Rowley, A. H. (1995). Pediatric tuberculosis: an update. Curr Probl Pediatr 25, 131–136.[Medline]

  • Tandon, P. N. (1978). Tuberculous meningitis. In Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 33, pp. 195–262. Edited by P. J. Vinken & G. W. Bruyn. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.

  • Udani, P. M. & Dastur, D. K. (1970). Tuberculous encephalopathy with and without meningitis. J Neurol Sci 10, 541–561.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Van Soolingen, D., Herman, P. W. M., De Haas, P. E. W., Soll, D. R. & Van Embden, J. D. A. (1991). Occurrence and stability of insertion sequence in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains: evaluation of an insertion sequence-dependent DNA polymorphism as a tool in the epidemiology of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 29, 2578–2586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Van Soolingen, D., De Haas, P. E. W., Hermans, P. W. M., Groenen, P. M. A. & Van Embden, J. D. A. (1993). Comparison of various repetitive DNA elements as genetic markers of strain differentiation of epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 31, 1987–1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Young, D. L., Kent, L., Rees, K. A., Lamb, J. & Ivanyi, J. (1986). Immunological activity of a 38-kilodalton protein purified from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 54, 177–183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




    This article has been cited by other articles:


    Home page
    Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
    R. B. Rock, M. Olin, C. A. Baker, T. W. Molitor, and P. K. Peterson
    Central Nervous System Tuberculosis: Pathogenesis and Clinical Aspects
    Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2008; 21(2): 243 - 261.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
    N. P. Shah, A. Singhal, A. Jain, P. Kumar, S. S. Uppal, M. V. P. Srivatsava, and H. K. Prasad
    Occurrence of Overlooked Zoonotic Tuberculosis: Detection of Mycobacterium bovis in Human Cerebrospinal Fluid
    J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2006; 44(4): 1352 - 1358.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    This Article
    Right arrow Abstract Freely available
    Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
    Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
    Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
    Right arrow Citation Map
    Services
    Right arrow Email this article to a friend
    Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
    Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
    Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
    Right arrow Download to citation manager
    Right arrow reprints & permissions
    Citing Articles
    Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
    Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
    Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
    Google Scholar
    Right arrow Articles by Kulkarni, S P
    Right arrow Articles by Kadival, G V
    Right arrow Search for Related Content
    PubMed
    Right arrow PubMed Citation
    Right arrow Articles by Kulkarni, S P
    Right arrow Articles by Kadival, G V
    Agricola
    Right arrow Articles by Kulkarni, S P
    Right arrow Articles by Kadival, G V


    HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
    INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS