J Med Microbiol NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, H.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, H.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J.-H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lee, H.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J.-H.
J Med Microbiol 54 (2005), 1049-1054; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.45918-0
© 2005 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Potential antimicrobial effects of human lactoferrin against oral infection with Listeria monocytogenes in mice

Hui-Young Lee1, Jong-Hwan Park1, Seung-Hyeok Seok1, Min-Won Baek1, Dong-Jae Kim1, Byoung-Hee Lee1, Pil-Don Kang2, Yong-Soon Kim2 and Jae-Hak Park1

1Department of Laboratory Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine and School of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, San 56-1, Shillim-Dong, Kwanak-Gu, Seoul, 151-742, Korea 2Department of Agricultural Biology, National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suwon, 441-744, Korea

Correspondence Jae-Hak Park pjhak{at}snu.ac.kr

Received October 4, 2004
Accepted July 8, 2005

Listeria monocytogenes is a food-borne pathogen that causes serious listeriosis in humans. Antimicrobial effects of human lactoferrin (hLF) against L. monocytogenes have been clearly demonstrated in in vitro studies. However, in vivo studies have not been reported yet. This study investigated whether the oral administration of hLF could inhibit oral infection of listeria in BALB/c mice. The MICs for several strains of L. monocytogenes were determined, and the most sensitive strain was used for the animal work. hLF was administered to BALB/c mice for 7 days, commencing 4 days before oral infection. The effect of hLF was determined by bacterial enumeration and histopathological analysis of the liver and spleen, which are well-known as the major targets of oral listeria infection in mice. In bacterial enumeration, hLF decreased the number of L. monocytogenes cells in the liver. Histopathologically, the size and frequency of necrotic foci in the liver samples decreased with hLF administration. However, these changes were not observed in the spleen samples. The mRNA levels of inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1ß, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-{alpha} and interferon (IFN)-{gamma}, decreased in the liver of mice receiving hLF. This study has shown that hLF decreases the hepatic colonization of L. monocytogenes, hepatic necrosis and expression of inflammatory cytokines. It revealed that perorally given hLF could mediate antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities remote from the gut (i.e. in the liver) of mice challenged with L. monocytogenes.

Abbreviation: hLF, human lactoferrin.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 INTRODUCTION
METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Listeria monocytogenes is a food-borne pathogen that causes an estimated 2500 cases of human disease and as many as 500 deaths per year in the USA (Mead et al., 1999; Notermans et al., 1998). Interestingly, L. monocytogenes is responsible for less than 0.1 % of all food-borne illnesses but causes 27.6 % of deaths attributed to food-borne diseases (Mead et al., 1999). Other studies have shown that serious listeriosis occurs worldwide, for example as cases of invasive listeriosis in non-pregnant adults (Siegman-Igra et al., 2002) and in neonates (Fleming et al., 1985; McLauchlin, 1990; Schwarze et al., 1989; Teberg et al., 1987). Although most of the outbreaks of human listeriosis have clearly been shown to be associated with the ingestion of contaminated food, many studies for oral listeriosis in experimental animals were conducted using a parenteral route of infection (Blanot et al., 1997; Mannering et al., 2002; Menudier et al., 1991). As such, understanding of the pathogenesis of listeria infection via the gastrointestinal tract remains very limited.

Human lactoferrin (hLF) is an iron-binding glycoprotein that is present in milk, saliva and other exocrine secretions as well as neutrophils. This protein has a number of biological functions, including antimicrobial and immunomodulatory abilities in vitro and in vivo (Brock, 1995; Notermans et al., 1998; Vorland, 1999; Haversen et al., 2003). The antimicrobial effects can be direct, through bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity, or host-mediated, through the activation of a complex series of reactions leading to a protective immune response after infection (Levay & Viljoen, 1995). In addition, lactoferrin has been reported to inhibit the entry process of pathogens, such as L. monocytogenes into intestinal cells (Valenti et al., 1999) or hepatitis B virus into human hepatocytes (Hara et al., 2002).

A number of in vitro studies have been published on the antimicrobial effects of lactoferrin against L. monocytogenes (Branen & Davidson, 2000; Murdock & Matthews, 2002; Nibbering et al., 2001; Longhi et al., 2004). However, in vivo studies have not to our knowledge been reported. Therefore, we investigated whether hLF could inhibit oral infection of listeria in BALB/c mice.


   METHODS
TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial strains and human lactoferrin.

L. monocytogenes strains ATCC 19111, 19113, 19115 and 51774 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. The bacteria were incubated in BHI broth (Difco) at 37 °C for 12 h with shaking (200 r.p.m.). For determination of MICs and for oral challenge, cultures were diluted in fresh BHI broth to 2 x 107 c.f.u. ml–1 and 2 x 108 c.f.u. ml–1, respectively. Lactoferrin from human milk was purchased from Sigma and stored at –20 °C until use.

Determination of MICs.

The hLF MICs of L. monocytogenes strains were determined using a modification of the method described by Shin et al. (1998). Briefly, bacteria were diluted to approximately 2 x 107 c.f.u. ml–1 in BHI broth, and equal volumes (100 µl) of the bacterial suspension and BHI broth containing various concentrations of hLF were mixed in 96-well plates. The final concentrations of hLF were 2000, 1000, 500 and 250 µg ml–1. Bacterial cultures without hLF were used as positive controls, and uninoculated BHI broth was used as a negative control. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and optical density was measured by 96-well plate reader at 620 nm after shaking at 200 r.p.m. for 5 s (Techan's Sunrise Absorbance Microplate Reader, Phenix Research Products). The MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of hLF that showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in OD620 compared to the positive control after 24 h incubation. The assay was performed in triplicate for each strain. The most sensitive of the four L. monocytogenes strains was selected and used in the animal study.

Animals.

Four-week-old specific pathogen-free female BALB/c mice were purchased from Seoul National University Laboratory Animal Center (Seoul, Korea). Animals were allowed food and water ad libitum, and were housed in cages at a controlled temperature (22 ± 2 °C), humidity (55 ± 10 %) and with a 12 h light/dark cycle. They were fed commercial mouse pellets and had free access to water at all times throughout the study. The mice were acclimatised for 7 days prior to the start of the experiments. All procedures were performed according to the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals approved by Seoul National University.

Experimental designs.

Twenty-four mice were divided into four groups: non-treated, control, and 100 mg hLF kg–1 day–1 and 10 mg hLF kg–1 day–1 treatment groups. The hLF was administered for 7 days, commencing 4 days before oral challenge with 1x108 c.f.u. of the most sensitive strain. Thirty minutes prior to bacterial administration, all mice were orally administered 100 µl 10 % sodium bicarbonate (w/v) to neutralize gastric acid (Czuprynski & Faith, 2002). The non-treated group and control group were administered sterilized PBS instead of hLF for 7 days, and the control group was orally challenged with L. monocytogenes similarly to the two treatment groups. During all experimental periods, food was removed from the cages 4 h prior to drug administration.

Bacterial enumeration in organs.

After 7 days, all mice were humanely euthanized by anaesthesia with ethyl ether (Sigma) followed by cervical dislocation. The abdominal cavities of the mice were aseptically opened, and the liver and spleen were removed in small fractions and homogenized in sterilized PBS for bacterial counts. Several dilutions of the homogenates were plated on PALCAM (Merck) agar. After incubation for 36 h at 37 °C, the numbers of bacteria per gram of tissue were calculated.

Histopathology.

The livers and spleens were fixed with 10 % formalin buffer for 48 h. Formalin-fixed tissues were dehydrated in an alcohol-xylene series and embedded in paraffin wax. From each block, 2 µm-thick sections were prepared and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The area of necrotic foci was measured by image analyser (Image-Pro Plus version 4.5, Media Cybernetics) in the three hepatic lobes of each mouse and calculated as the size of foci in mm2 per 100 mm2 hepatic area.

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR.

Cytokine mRNA expression was analysed by a semi-quantitative RT-PCR. RNA samples from liver were prepared using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) and the RNA concentration was determined by the absorbance at 260 nm and stored at –80 °C until use. cDNA was reverse transcribed from 1 µg of total RNA using a GeneAmp RNA PCR core kit (Applied Biosystems). PCR was performed using i-Taq DNA polymerase (iNtRON) and cytokine-specific primer sets (Table 1). The PCR conditions were as follows: 3 min of denaturation at 95 °C; 32 cycles of denaturation (30 s, 94 °C), annealing (30 s, appropriate temperature), and chain extension (1 min, 72 °C); and 7 min of final extension at 72 °C after amplification. The PCR product was detected by electrophoresis of 9 µl of the reaction solution in a 1.5 % (w/v) agarose gel, followed by staining with ethidium bromide. The bands of the PCR product were visualized on a UV transilluminator. The band densities were measured by an analysing program (Kodak Digital Science 1D, NEN Life Science Products) and statistically evaluated.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Primer sequences, annealing temperatures and sizes of PCR products Primer pairs of IL-1ß were designed by the primer selection program of BCM Search Launcher (Baylor College of Medicine, Human Genome Sequencing Center, Houston, TX, USA). Primer pairs of IFN-{gamma} (Nomura et al., 2002), tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-{alpha} and ß-actin (Johnson et al., 2000) were used as previously reported.
 

Statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis was performed using Duncan's Multiple Range Test (SAS v. 8.2, SAS Institute). P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


   RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Determination of MICs

To select the most sensitive strain for the animal work, we determined the hLF MICs for four L. monocytogenes strains. As shown in Fig. 1, the growth of L. monocytogenes was effectively inhibited by hLF. Concentrations of 1000 and 2000 µg hLF ml–1 resulted in significantly lower OD620 values for all four L. monocytogenes strains (from 5 h onwards) compared to the positive controls (with no hLF). The MIC of hLF was determined to be 1000 µg ml–1 for all four L. monocytogenes in culture medium at pH 7.2, similar to that previously reported for other strains of L. monocytogenes (Branen & Davidson, 2000). L. monocytogenes ATCC 51774 was determined to be the most sensitive strain in the current study, because the time at which the OD620 values were significantly lower in the presence of 1000 or 2000 µg ml–1 of hLF than those of the control was earlier than for the other three strains.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Growth curves of L. monocytogenes strains in BHI broth supplemented with various concentrations of hLF. L. monocytogenes strains ATCC 19111 (a), 19113 (b), 19115 (c) and 51774 (d) were tested with 2000 ({blacksquare}), 1000 ({square}) and 500 (•) µg hLF ml–1. BHI broth without and with bacteria was cultured for the same periods for the negative control ({blacktriangleup}) and positive control ({bigcirc}), respectively. *,** indicate the times at which the 2000 and 1000 µg hLF ml–1 treatment groups showed significantly lower OD620 values compared to the positive control group. Values are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicate runs at OD620.

 

Criteria for animal work

Previous studies have demonstrated that L. monocytogenes extensively colonizes the liver and spleen of orally challenged mice at 2–4 days post-inoculation, and multi-focal necrosis occurs in the liver and spleen (Czuprynski et al., 2003; Marco et al., 1992). For this reason, the liver and spleen were selected as major target organs and the effects of hLF were assessed 3 days after oral challenge with L. monocytogenes ATCC 51774. In addition, hLF was administered prior to the challenge with L. monocytogenes in this study, because previous work reported that lactoferrin was more effective against systemic staphylococcal infections in mice when it was given prior to bacterial administration (Bhimani et al., 1999).

We daily administered 2500 µg hLF or 250 µg hLF to the high and low dose groups of mice, respectively (high dose, 100 mg kg–1; low dose, 10 mg kg–1; mean body weight of mice, approximately 25 g). The total amounts of hLF administered over the 7 days were 17.5 and 1.75 mg per mouse in the high dose and low dose groups, respectively. Other studies have reported that an effective dose for dextran sulphate-induced colitis in mice is twice daily oral administration of hLF (2 mg per dose) for 7 days (Haversen et al., 2003). They have also reported that a single oral administration of hLF (500 µl per mouse) decreases the number of Escherichia coli O6K5 in the kidney (Haversen et al., 2000). The MIC of hLF for E. coli O6K5 is 1 mg hLF ml–1, similar to that seen for L. monocytogenes in our study.

Effects of hLF on bacterial enumeration

hLF-treated mice had significantly fewer L. monocytogenes cells in liver samples than control animals (P < 0.05). The mean ± SD of the bacterial numbers for the control group was 5.383 ± 0.172 log10 c.f.u. g–1; however, those for the 100 mg hLF kg–1 day–1 and 10 mg hLF kg–1 day–1 treatment groups were 4.704 ± 0.198 log10 c.f.u. g–1 and 4.755 ± 0.337 log10 c.f.u. g–1, respectively. The numbers of bacteria in the spleen were also slightly lower in hLF-treated mice, but not statistically significant. In the spleen, the mean bacterial numbers for the control group was 5.385 ± 0.157 log10 c.f.u. g–1; however, those for the 100 mg hLF kg–1 day–1 and 10 mg hLF kg–1 day–1 treatment groups were 5.223 ± 0.209 log10 c.f.u. g–1 and 5.288 ± 0.395 log10 c.f.u. g–1, respectively. No bacteria were detected in the liver and spleen samples of the non-treated animals.

Histopathological analysis of the effects of hLF on listerial infection

Oral administration of hLF alleviated listeria infection in the liver (Fig. 2b). Multi-focal necrosis was observed in the livers of mice infected with L. monocytogenes ATCC 51774 (Fig. 2a). Neutrophils migrated markedly, as well as lymphocytes and macrophages, and infiltrated necrotic foci. The number and size of the necrotic foci decreased in mice administered with 100 mg hLF kg–1 day–1 .



View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Histopathological signs of inflammation in liver samples 3 days after oral challenge with 1x108 c.f.u. of L. monocytogenes. Liver tissue from positive control group (sterilized PBS for 7 days) (a) and hLF-treated group (100 mg kg–1 day–1 for 7 days) (b). Inset: overview of liver, where necrotic foci were observed. Arrows indicate the necrotic foci. H&E staining; bars, 100 µm.

 

The area of necrotic foci in the three hepatic lobes of each mouse was calculated as the size of foci in mm2 per 100 mm2 hepatic area. The mean ± SD of the necrotic areas of the control group was 0.112 ± 0.062; however, those of the 100 mg hLF kg–1 day–1 and 10 mg hLF kg–1 day–1 treatment groups were 0.008 ± 0.004 and 0.052 ± 0.030, respectively. The necrotic area was approximately 10-fold lower in the livers of hLF-treated mice compared to the control animals (P < 0.05). Although splenitis, characterized by the central necrosis of white pulp with neutrophil infiltration, was observed, there was no difference in histopathological lesions between hLF-treated mice and control mice (data not shown). Hepatic necrosis and splenitis were not observed in the non-treated group.

Other studies in vitro have shown that macrophages may acquire LF through surface receptors and thereby enhance the killing of intracellular Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium microti and Trypanosoma cruzi (Lima & Kierszenbaum, 1985). With regard to the effects of LF on human neutrophils, it has been shown by in vitro studies that bovine lactoferrin (bLF) and its fragment bovine lactoferricin enhance the phagocytic activity of these cells; this effect seems to be due to direct binding of bLF to neutrophils and an opsonin-like activity (Miyauchi et al., 1998).

In this study, hLF decreased the hepatic colonization and hepatitis in mice challenged with listeria; however, this decrease was not seen in the spleen. Other researchers have shown that the bio-distribution of hLF peptides varies between different organs in bacterially infected mice (Welling et al., 2000). They reported that deposits of certain 99mTc-labelled hLF peptides were 10- to 15-fold higher in the liver than in the spleen. However, whether this bio-distributional difference has any effect on organ-specific protection in vivo needs further study.

Effects of hLF on the expression level of inflammatory cytokines

The expression of inflammatory cytokines was assessed by analysis of mRNA levels in mouse liver samples. As shown in Fig. 3, the interferon (IFN)-{gamma}, interleukin (IL)-1ß and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-{alpha} mRNA levels increased in liver samples of control mice compared to the non-treated group. The mRNA levels of these cytokines significantly decreased in the liver samples of the 100 mg hLF kg–1 day–1 treatment group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Although a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the two hLF-treated groups was not observed, hLF dose-dependently decreased the expression of each cytokine (Fig. 3).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Expression of inflammatory cytokines in liver samples. After semi-quantitative PCR, band densities were measured by an analysing program and evaluated statistically. Values were expressed as mean ± SD normalized density of target mRNA. ß-Actin, a housekeeping gene, was used for normalization. Significantly different values (P < 0.05) between treatment groups are indicated by ‘a’ and ‘b'. Graph shows mean and SD. Bars: white, non-treated; black, control; horizontal stripes, 100 mg hLF kg–1 day–1 treatment; vertical stripes, 10 mg hLF kg–1 day–1.

 

The reasons why hLF acts as an anti-infective agent for L. monocytogenes may be multifactorial. Since antimicrobial (Bellamy et al., 1992) and anti-inflammatory (Mattsby-Baltzer et al., 1996) activities have been described for hLF and human lactoferricin in vitro, it is possible that hLF exerts both of these properties in our infection model. In vivo studies have shown that hLF downregulates dextran sulphate-induced IL-1ß production in blood (Haversen et al., 2003). Thus, the anti-inflammatory capacity of hLF in our model could be a consequence of either its antibacterial activity or downregulation of inflammatory cytokines or both.

Conclusions

This study has shown that perorally given hLF could mediate antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities in the liver (i.e. remote from the gut) of mice challenged with L. monocytogenes.


   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by the Brain Korea 21 Project and grant 202050-03-2-CG000 from the National Agricultural R&D Promotion Center.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  • Bellamy, W. M., Takase, M., Yamauchi, K., Wakabayashi, H., Kawase, K. & Tomita, M. (1992). Identification of the bactericidal domain of lactoferrin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1121, 130–136.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Bhimani, R. S., Vendrov, Y. & Furmanski, P. (1999). Influence of lactoferrin feeding and injection against systemic staphylococcal infections in mice. J Appl Microbiol 86, 135–144.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Blanot, S., Joly, M. M., Vilde, F., Jaubert, F., Clement, O., Frija, G. & Berche, P. (1997). A gerbil model for rhombencephalitis due to Listeria monocytogenes. Microb Pathog 23, 39–48.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Branen, J. & Davidson, P. M. (2000). Activity of hydrolysed lactoferrin against foodborne pathogenic bacteria in growth media: the effect of EDTA. Lett Appl Microbiol 30, 233–237.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Brock, J. (1995). Lactoferrin: a multifunctional immunoregulatory protein? Immunol Today 16, 417–419.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Czuprynski, C. J. & Faith, N. G. (2002). Sodium bicarbonate enhances the severity of infection in neutropenic mice orally inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes EGD. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9, 477–481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Czuprynski, C. J., Faith, N. G. & Steinberg, H. (2003). A/J mice are susceptible and C57BL/6 mice are resistant to Listeria monocytogenes infection by intragastric inoculation. Infect Immun 71, 682–689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Fleming, D. W., Cochi, S. L., MacDonald, K. L. & 7 other authors (1985). Pasteurized milk as a vehicle of infection in an outbreak of listeriosis. N Engl J Med 312, 404–407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Hara, K., Ikeda, M., Saito, S., Matsumoto, S., Numata, K., Kato, N., Tanaka, K. & Sekihara, H. (2002). Lactoferrin inhibits hepatitis B virus infection in cultured human hepatocytes. Hepatol Res 24, 228–235.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Haversen, L. A., Engberg, I., Baltzer, L., Dolphin, G., Hanson, L. A. & Mattsby-Baltzer, I. (2000). Human lactoferrin and peptides derived from a surface-exposed helical region reduce experimental Escherichia coli urinary tract infection in mice. Infect Immun 68, 5816–5823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Haversen, L. A., Baltzer, L., Dolphin, G., Hanson, L. A. & Mattsby-Baltzer, I. (2003). Anti-inflammatory activities of human lactoferrin in acute dextran sulphate-induced colitis in mice. Scand J Immunol 57, 2–10.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Johnson, V. J., Tsunoda, M. & Sharma, R. P. (2000). Increased production of proinflammatory cytokines by murine macrophages following oral exposure to sodium selenite but not to seleno-L-methionine. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39, 243–250.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Levay, P. F. & Viljoen, M. (1995). Lactoferrin: a general review. Haematologica 80, 252–267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Lima, M. F. & Kierszenbaum, F. (1985). Lactoferrin effects on phagocytic cell function.I. Increased uptake and killing of an intracellular parasite by murine macrophages and human monocytes. J Immunol 134, 4176–4183.[Abstract]

  • Longhi, C., Conte, M. P., Penta, M., Cossu, A., Antonini, G., Superti, F. & Seganti, L. (2004). Lactoferricin influences early events of Listeria monocytogenes infection in THP-1 human macrophages. J Med Microbiol 53, 87–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Mannering, S. L., Zhong, J. & Cheers, C. (2002). T-cell activation, proliferation and apoptosis in primary Listeria monocytogenes infection. Immunology 106, 87–95.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Marco, A. J., Prats, N., Ramos, J. A., Briones, V., Blanco, M., Dominguez, L. & Domingo, M. (1992). A microbiological, histopathological and immunohistological study of the intragastric inoculation of Listeria monocytogenes in mice. J Comp Pathol 107, 1–9.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Mattsby-Baltzer, I., Roseanu, A., Motas, C., Elverfors, J., Engberg, I. & Hanson, L. A. (1996). Lactoferrin or a fragment thereof inhibits the endotoxin-induced interleukin-6 response in human monocytic cells. Pediatr Res 40, 257–262.[Medline]

  • McLauchlin, J. (1990). Human listeriosis in Britain, 1967–85, a summary of 722 cases.1. Listeriosis during pregnancy and in the newborn. Epidemiol Infect 104, 181–189.[Medline]

  • Mead, P. S., Slutsker, L., Dietz, V., McCaig, L. F., Bresee, J. S., Shapiro, C., Griffin, P. M. & Tauxe, R. V. (1999). Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 5, 607–625.[Medline]

  • Menudier, A., Bosiraud, C. & Nicolas, J. A. (1991). Virulence of Listeria monocytogenes serovars and Listeria spp.in experimental infection of mice. J Food Protect 54, 917–921.

  • Miyauchi, H., Hashimoto, S., Nakajima, M., Shinoda, I., Fukuwatari, Y. & Hayasawa, H. (1998). Bovine lactoferrin stimulates the phagocytic activity of human neutrophils: identification of its active domain. Cell Immunol 187, 34–37.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Murdock, C. A. & Matthews, K. R. (2002). Antibacterial activity of pepsin-digested lactoferrin on foodborne pathogens in buffered broth systems and ultra-high temperature milk with EDTA. J Appl Microbiol 93, 850–856.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Nibbering, P. H., Ravensbergen, E., Welling, M. M., van Berkel, L. A., van Berkel, P. H., Pauwels, E. K. & Nuijens, J. H. (2001). Human lactoferrin and peptides derived from its N terminus are highly effective against infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Infect Immun 69, 1469–1476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Nomura, T., Kawamura, I., Tsuchiya, K., Kohda, C., Baba, H., Ito, Y., Kimoto, T., Watanabe, I. & Mitsuyama, M. (2002). Essential role of interleukin-12 (IL-12) and IL-18 for gamma interferon production induced by listeriolysin O in mouse spleen cells. Infect Immun 70, 1049–1055.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Notermans, S., Dufrenne, J., Teunis, P. & Chackraborty, T. (1998). Studies on the risk assessment of Listeria monocytogenes. J Food Protect 61, 244–248.[Medline]

  • Schwarze, R., Bauermeister, C. D., Ortel, S. & Wichmann, G. (1989). Perinatal listeriosis in Dresden 1981–1986: clinical and microbiological findings in 18 cases. Infection 17, 131–138.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Shin, K., Yamauchi, K., Teraguchi, S., Hayasawa, H., Tomita, M., Otsuka, Y. & Yamazaki, S. (1998). Antibacterial activity of bovine lactoferrin and its peptides against enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 : H7. Lett Appl Microbiol 26, 407–411.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Siegman-Igra, Y., Levin, R., Weinberger, M. & 20 other authors (2002). Listeria monocytogenes infection in Israel and review of cases worldwide. Emerg Infect Dis 8, 305–310.[Medline]

  • Teberg, A. J., Yonekura, M. L., Salminen, C. & Pavlova, Z. (1987). Clinical manifestations of epidemic neonatal listeriosis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 6, 817–820.[Medline]

  • Valenti, P., Greco, R., Pitari, G., Rossi, P., Aiello, M., Melino, G. & Antonini, G. (1999). Apoptosis of Caco-2 intestinal cells invaded by Listeria monocytogenes: protective effect of lactoferrin. Exp Cell Res 250, 197–202.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Vorland, L. H. (1999). Lactoferrin: a multifunctional glycoprotein. APMIS 107, 971–981.[Medline]

  • Welling, M. M., Paulusma-Annema, A., Balter, H. S., Pauwels, E. K. & Nibbering, P. H. (2000). Technetium-99m labelled antimicrobial peptides discriminate between bacterial infections and sterile inflammations. Eur J Nucl Med 27, 292–301.[CrossRef][Medline]





    This Article
    Right arrow Abstract Freely available
    Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
    Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
    Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
    Right arrow Citation Map
    Services
    Right arrow Email this article to a friend
    Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
    Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
    Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
    Right arrow Download to citation manager
    Right arrow reprints & permissions
    Citing Articles
    Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
    Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
    Google Scholar
    Right arrow Articles by Lee, H.-Y.
    Right arrow Articles by Park, J.-H.
    Right arrow Search for Related Content
    PubMed
    Right arrow PubMed Citation
    Right arrow Articles by Lee, H.-Y.
    Right arrow Articles by Park, J.-H.
    Agricola
    Right arrow Articles by Lee, H.-Y.
    Right arrow Articles by Park, J.-H.

    HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
    INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS