J Med Microbiol NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saito, R.
Right arrow Articles by Okamura, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saito, R.
Right arrow Articles by Okamura, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Saito, R.
Right arrow Articles by Okamura, N.
J Med Microbiol 54 (2005), 1037-1041; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.46071-0
© 2005 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Development and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae

Ryoichi Saito1,2, Yoshiki Misawa1, Kyoji Moriya1, Kazuhiko Koike1, Kimiko Ubukata3 and Noboru Okamura2

1Department of Infection Control and Prevention, University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan 2Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Graduate School of Allied Health Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan 3Kitasato Institute for Life Sciences and Graduate School of Infection Control Sciences, Kitasato University, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8641, Japan

Correspondence Ryoichi Saito saito-lab{at}h.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Received March 3, 2005
Accepted July 29, 2005

A loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the rapid detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae was developed and evaluated. The assay specifically amplified only M. pneumoniae sequences, and no cross-reactivity was observed for other Mycoplasma species or respiratory bacterial species. The detection limit for this assay was found to be 2 x 102 copies, corresponding to 2–20 colour changing units of M. pneumoniae in 1 h, as observed in a real-time turbidimeter and electrophoretic analysis. The accuracy of the LAMP reaction was confirmed by restriction endonuclease analysis as well as direct sequencing of the amplified product. The assay was applied to 95 nasopharyngeal swab samples collected from patients or from healthy individuals, and compared to a real-time PCR assay in-house. A concordance of 100 % was observed between the two assays. The LAMP assay is easy to perform, shows a rapid reaction and is inexpensive. It may therefore be applied in the routine diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection in the clinical laboratory.


Abbreviation: LAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Mycoplasma pneumoniae is the causative agent of atypical pneumonia and is also responsible for other respiratory tract infections such as tracheobronchitis, bronchiolitis, croup and less-severe respiratory-tract infections in older children and young adults (Clyde, 1993). Epidemics break out at intervals of 4–7 years (Foy, 1993). Since this organism is not sensitive to ß-lactam antibiotics, which are often used for the empirical treatment of lower respiratory tract infections, a rapid diagnosis method is necessary to avoid the use of such ineffective antibiotics (Dorigo-Zetsma et al., 1999).

Currently, three methods are available for the routine diagnosis of infections caused by M. pneumoniae: culture, serology and nucleic acid amplification techniques. Culture is time-consuming, taking several weeks to produce results and is relatively insensitive (Dorigo-Zetsma et al., 1999; Harris et al., 1988; Kok et al., 1988). Serological methods are insufficiently sensitive and require paired serum samples from the acute and convalescent phases of the disease, thus only allowing a retrospective diagnosis (Dorigo-Zetsma et al., 1999; Chia et al., 1988; Sillis, 1990; Fedorko et al., 1995). More rapid, higher sensitivity methods were therefore developed, one of them being the PCR for fragments of the P1 gene or the 16S rRNA gene (Dorigo-Zetsma et al., 1999; Tjhie et al., 1994; Ieven et al., 1996). In the last few years, real-time PCR methods for the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae have been described (Hardegger et al., 2000; Ursi et al., 2003; Templeton et al., 2003). The advantages of this application, compared to conventional PCR methods, are higher speed and less handling of PCR products such as electrophoretic analysis. However, owing to the expensive systems required, this application is still not very common in hospital laboratories.

Recently, Notomi et al. (2000) reported a novel nucleic acid amplification method called loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), which is capable of amplifying DNA under isothermal conditions with high specificity, efficiency and speed. This method depends on autocycling strand-displacement DNA synthesis performed by the Bst DNA polymerase, and the amplification products are stem–loop DNA structures with several inverted repeats of the target and cauliflower-like structures with multiple loops (Notomi et al., 2000). The most significant advantage of LAMP is the ability to amplify specific sequences of DNA under isothermal conditions between 63 °C and 65 °C, thereby obviating the need for a thermal cycler (Notomi et al., 2000). Moreover, this method can be carried out with simple systems and the LAMP reaction can be monitored in real-time through measurement of turbidity, which is correlated with the production of magnesium pyrophosphate, by means of an inexpensive photometer (Mori et al., 2001).

In the present study, we investigated a real-time quantitative LAMP assay for rapid detection of M. pneumoniae in clinical specimens. This is the first research report on the application of this method to the detection of M. pneumoniae.


    METHODS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial stains and clinical specimens.

For the evaluation of primer specificity, bacterial stains were prepared from 24 reference stains and three clinical isolates representing eight mycoplasmal species and 19 bacterial species (Table 1). Between January and February 2004, nasopharyngeal swab samples were collected from 70 outpatients (age range, 1–74 years; 43 males and 27 females) with acute respiratory symptoms admitted to the University of Tokyo Hospital in Japan, and analysed using the LAMP assay and real-time PCR assay. The diagnosis was based on clinical signs and symptoms (cough, fever, chill, productive sputum, chest pain or abnormal breathing sounds), and radiographic pulmonary abnormalities that were at least segmental and were due to pre-existing or other known causes. As controls, nasopharyngeal swab samples were obtained from 25 healthy volunteers.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Bacterial species and strains
 

Design of primers.

Oligonucleotide primers used for the LAMP assay of M. pneumoniae were designed using the P1 gene sequences (GenBank accession no. M21519). A set of five primers, consisting of two outer (F3 and B3) and two inner (FIP and BIP) primers, and one loop (loop F) primer, capable of recognizing six distinct regions on the target sequence was designed using a LAMP primer design support software program (Net Laboratory). The primer sequences are shown in Fig. 1. FIP consists of a complementary sequence of F1 and a sense sequence of F2. BIP consists of a complementary sequence of B1 and a sense sequence of B2.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Oligonucleotide primers used for LAMP assay of M. pneumoniae (GenBank accession no. M21519) within P1 gene. F1c, B2c and B3c indicate complementary sequences to F1, B2 and B3, respectively. Arrows and box indicate the position of the target sequences and the site of the restriction enzyme AluI, respectively. F1c, B2c and B3c indicate complementary sequences to F1, B2 and B3, respectively.

 

DNA preparation.

DNA was extracted from bacteria and nasopharyngeal swab samples with a QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen), in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The extracted DNA was eluted in a total volume of 30 µl of elution buffer and stored at –80 °C until use.

LAMP.

The LAMP assay was conducted on 28 µl of a reaction mixture consisting of a 20 µM concentration of each inner primer (FIP and BIP), a 5 µM concentration of each outer primer (F3 and B3), a 20 µM concentration of the loop primer (loop F), 2x reaction mix (12.5 µl), Bst DNA polymerase (1 µl) and 2 µl isolated DNA templates, using the Loopamp DNA amplification kit (Eiken Chemical). For the real-time monitoring of the LAMP assay, the reaction mixture was incubated at 65 °C for 90 min in a Loopamp real-time turbidimeter (LA-200; Teramecs). Positive and negative controls were included in each run, and all precautions to prevent cross-contamination were taken. After making turbidity measurements, LAMP products and those digested with 5 units of the restriction enzyme AluI were electrophoresed in 3 % agarose gels, and then stained with ethidium bromide and visualized on a UV transilluminator at 365 nm. Furthermore, in order to confirm that the LAMP products had the target sequence, direct sequencing was performed using loop F. In addition, direct sequencing of the LAMP products was performed to confirm the accuracy of the LAMP assay. The LAMP products were purified with a PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and sequenced with a Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. In order to identify inhibition, 5 µl of the purified DNA preparation from all the LAMP-assay-negative specimens was spiked with 2 µl extract DNA from M. pneumoniae M129 at a concentration corresponding to approximately 2 x 102 copies per reaction. All experiments were repeated at least two times.

Real-time PCR.

Real-time PCR was performed in a Lightcycler using a Faststart DNA master hybridization probes kit (Roche Diagnostics), by a method described elsewhere (Ursi et al., 2003), except that plasmid DNA (pCRP1) containing the P1 gene of M. pneumoniae was used for the standard curve. The primers for amplification were 5'-CACC CTCGGGGGCAGTCAG-3' (forward) and 5'-CGGGATTCCCCG- CGGAGG-3' (reverse). The two hybridization probes were 5'-GCCTTATCATTCCTTCACCCCGCCCC-3'FITC and 5'LCRed640-TTCAGAGCTGGAGGTTGGCTTGGTCGAG-3'Ph. The thermal conditions were as follows: initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 min and 50 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, hybridization at 65 °C for 10 s, with a touchdown to 60 °C in steps of 1 °C from cycle 20 on and extension at 72 °C for 10 s. The slope was set at 20 °C per second for all steps. The pCRP1 solution was quantified by measuring the optical density at 260 nm, and the copy number was calculated. Serial dilutions of pCRP1 ranging from 2 to 2 x 107 copies per reaction were made in order to prepare standard curves, which were also used for the determination of LAMP detection limits.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The LAMP reaction produced ladder-like patterns on the gel and LAMP products were detected only with the target DNA of M. pneumoniae (Fig. 2b).



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Comparative sensitivity of LAMP and real-time PCR for detection of M. pneumoniae using serial dilutions of pCRP1. (a) Sensitivity of LAMP for M. pneumoniae as monitored in a real-time turbidity assay with a Loopamp real-time turbidimeter. (b) Electrophoretic analysis of LAMP products for 60 min reaction. Lane M, 100 bp DNA ladder marker; lanes 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, 2 x 104, 2 x 103, 2 x 102 and 2 x 101 copies per reaction, respectively; lane 6, no template DNA (H2O); lanes 7, 8 and 9, LAMP products of lanes 3, 4 and 5, respectively, digested with AluI (bands at 66 and 107 bp). (c) Sensitivity of real-time PCR for the detection of M. pneumoniae as observed in electrophoretic analysis.

 

The LAMP assay specifically amplified DNA from M. pneumoniae but not from any of the other Mycoplasma species or other respiratory bacterial species listed in Table 1. To establish the detection limit of M. pneumoniae by the LAMP assay, serial dilutions of pCRP1 that had been quantified by measuring the optical density at 260 nm were tested and compared with the results for a real-time PCR assay done in-house. The detection limit for the LAMP reaction was found to be 2 x 102 copies for a 60 min reaction in a Loopamp real-time turbidimeter as well as in electrophoretic analysis (Fig. 2a, b). At this point, the turbidity of the reaction tube was discernable by the naked eye. The same result was achieved for the detection limit through serial dilution of a DNA solution of M. pneumoniae M129 (data not shown). For the real-time PCR assay, the detection limit was 2 x 101 copies in 60 min (Fig. 2c).

The accuracy of the LAMP reaction was confirmed by digestion with restriction enzyme AluI to ensure that the LAMP products had the corresponding sequence of the P1 gene of M. pneumoniae. The sizes of fragments produced by digestion were in good agreement with the sizes predicted theoretically from the expected DNA structures: 66 and 107 bp (Fig. 2b). In addition, the structures of the amplified products were confirmed through direct sequencing, in which the sequences obtained were perfectly matched with the expected DNA sequences (data not shown).

Nasopharyngeal swab samples collected from patients (n = 70) or from healthy individuals (n = 25) were analysed using the LAMP and real-time PCR assays simultaneously. For both LAMP and real-time PCR assays, six of the 70 patient specimens tested positive and all of the healthy controls tested negative. Thus, the concordance between the two assays was 100 %. No inhibition of the LAMP assay was identified among the LAMP-assay-negative specimens in this study. All of the LAMP-assay-positive specimens were positive with culture using PPLO broth and agar plates (data not shown).

In the present study, we evaluated the LAMP assay, a novel nucleic acid amplification method, for the detection of M. pneumoniae in either culture isolates or throat and nasal specimens. This assay is a simple diagnostic tool in which the reaction takes place in a single tube. For this purpose, the buffer, primers and DNA polymerase are mixed together and the mixture is incubated at 65 °C in a regular laboratory water bath or heat block that provides a constant temperature. The specificity of the assay is extremely high because it uses four primers for the recognition of six distinct regions on the target DNA (Notomi et al., 2000; Iwamoto et al., 2003). The LAMP assay was initially evaluated for detection of hepatitis B virus DNA (Notomi et al., 2000), and has recently been applied to the direct detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare (Iwamoto et al., 2003), and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (Hong et al., 2004).

In the present study, the assay specifically amplified only M. pneumoniae and no cross-reactivity was observed for other Mycoplasma species or other respiratory bacterial species. These results demonstrate that it has high specificity for the amplification of M. pneumoniae and detected it with high efficiency. We found that the detection limits using pCRP1 for the LAMP and real-time PCR assays in 60 min were 2 x 102 and 2 x 101 copies, respectively, and the detection limit was the same when using serial dilution of a DNA solution of M. pneumoniae M129. This indicates that the LAMP assay has almost the same sensitivity as the real-time PCR assay.

We indicated our titres as copies per microlitre. In the literature, the detection limits for M. pneumoniae nucleic acid amplification assays are expressed in different units [number of colony-forming units (c.f.u.), number of colour-changing units (c.c.u.), number of cells or quantity of DNA], which makes a straightforward comparison of the sensitivities of assays very difficult. One colour-changing unit corresponds to 10–100 organisms (Loens et al., 2002). For example, Abele-Horn et al. (1998) reported that the detection limit of their assay was 3000 genome copies, 30 pg of DNA, 19 c.f.u. or 1900 organisms, and Ursi et al. (2003), who used similar a method similar to ours for the real-time PCR assay, noted a detection limit of 2 c.c.u. M. pneumoniae per reaction. Taking these findings together, expressed in c.c.u., the detection limit for M. pneumoniae by the LAMP assay is estimated to be equivalent to 2–20 c.c.u. of M. pneumoniae per reaction.

Another feature of this assay is that if it is used as the standard curve of pCR1, M. pneumoniae concentrations in clinical samples may be measured, enabling M. pneumoniae infection to be discovered at an early stage and potential source transmitters to be identified. Also, since the concordance between the LAMP and the real-time PCR assay for 95 nasopharyngeal swab samples collected from patients or from healthy individuals was 100 %, it is capable of being applied to the routine diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection in the clinical laboratory, and clinicians will be able to evaluate its clinical utility in comparison with the real-time PCR assay.

Summing up, this assay was highly specific and showed a sensitivity of 2 x 102 copies M. pneumoniae for a 60 min reaction in a Loopamp real-time turbidimeter LA-200 as well as in electrophoretic analysis. In turbidity monitoring, the M. pneumoniae LAMP assay had almost the same sensitivity as the real-time PCR assay. Considering this together with its ease of operation, rapid reaction and inexpensive system, the LAMP assay is more appropriate than the real-time PCR assay at the genetic point of care in the hospital laboratory.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant 16922134). We thank Etsuko Suzuki, Miyuki Morozumi and Atsuko Horino for providing stock of Mycoplasma species.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  • Abele-Horn, M., Busch, U., Nitschko, H., Jacobs, E., Bax, R., Pfaff, F., Schaffer, B. & Heesemann, J. (1998). Molecular approaches to diagnosis of pulmonary diseases due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol 36, 548–551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Chia, W. K., Spence, L., Dunkley, L. & Bradbury, W. (1988). Development of urease conjugated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies against Mycoplasma pneumoniae in human sera. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 11, 101–107.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Clyde, W. A., Jr. (1993). Clinical overview of typical Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. Clin Infect Dis 17 (Suppl. 1), S32–S37.

  • Dorigo-Zetsma, J. W., Zaat, S. A., Wertheim-van Dillen, P. M., Spanjaard, L., Rijntjes, J., Van Waveren, G., Jensen, J. S., Angulo, A. F. & Dankert, J. (1999). Comparison of PCR, culture, and serological tests for diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory tract infection in children. J Clin Microbiol 37, 14–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Fedorko, D. P., Emery, D. D., Franklin, S. M. & Congdon, D. D. (1995). Evaluation of a rapid enzyme immunoassay system for serologic diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 23, 85–88.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Foy, H. M. (1993). Infections caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae and possible carrier state in different populations of patients. Clin Infect Dis 17 (Suppl. 1), S37–S47.

  • Hardegger, D., Nadal, D., Bossart, W., Altwegg, M. & Dutly, F. (2000). Rapid detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in clinical samples by real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods 41, 45–51.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Harris, R., Marmion, B. P., Varkanis, G., Kok, T., Lunn, B. & Martin, J. (1988). Laboratory diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection.2. Comparison of methods for the direct detection of specific antigen or nucleic acid sequences in respiratory exudates. Epidemiol Infect 101, 685–694.[Medline]

  • Hong, T. C., Mai, Q. L., Cuong, D. V., Parida, M., Minekawa, H., Notomi, T., Hasebe, F. & Morita, K. (2004). Development and evaluation of a novel loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for rapid detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Clin Microbiol 42, 1956–1961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Ieven, M., Ursi, D., Van Bever, H., Quint, W., Niesters, H. G. & Goossens, H. (1996). Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by two polymerase chain reactions and role of M.pneumoniae in acute respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients. J Infect Dis 173, 1445–1452.[Medline]

  • Iwamoto, T., Sonobe, T. & Hayashi, K. (2003). Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, M.avium, and M. intracellulare in sputum samples. J Clin Microbiol 41, 2616–2622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Kok, T. W., Varkanis, G., Marmion, B. P., Martin, J. & Esterman, A. (1988). Laboratory diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection.1. Direct detection of antigen in respiratory exudates by enzyme immunoassay. Epidemiol Infect 101, 669–684.[Medline]

  • Loens, K., Ursi, D., Ieven, M., Van Aarle, P., Sillekens, P., Oudshoorn, P. & Goossens, H. (2002). Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in spiked clinical samples by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification. J Clin Microbiol 40, 1339–1345.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Mori, Y., Nagamine, K., Tomita, N. & Notomi, T. (2001). Detection of loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction by turbidity derived from magnesium pyrophosphate formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 289, 150–154.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Notomi, T., Okayama, H., Masubuchi, H., Yonekawa, T., Watanabe, K., Amino, N. & Hase, T. (2000). Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 28, E63. E63.

  • Sillis, M. (1990). The limitations of IgM assays in the serological diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. J Med Microbiol 33, 253–258.[Abstract]

  • Templeton, K. E., Scheltinga, S. A., Graffelman, A. W. & 7 other authors (2003). Comparison and evaluation of real-time PCR, real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, conventional PCR, and serology for diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol 41, 4366–4371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Tjhie, J. H., Van Kuppeveld, F. J., Roosendaal, R., Melchers, W. J., Gordijn, R., MacLaren, D. M., Walboomers, J. M., Meijer, C. J. & van den Brule, A. J. (1994). Direct PCR enables detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in patients with respiratory tract infections. J Clin Microbiol 32, 11–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Ursi, D., Dirven, K., Loens, K., Ieven, M. & Goossens, H. (2003). Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in respiratory samples by real-time PCR using an inhibition control. J Microbiol Methods 55, 149–153.[CrossRef][Medline]




    This article has been cited by other articles:


    Home page
    J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
    J. M. Winchell, K. A. Thurman, S. L. Mitchell, W. L. Thacker, and B. S. Fields
    Evaluation of Three Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in an Outbreak Investigation
    J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2008; 46(9): 3116 - 3118.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
    J. Inacio, O. Flores, and I. Spencer-Martins
    Efficient Identification of Clinically Relevant Candida Yeast Species by Use of an Assay Combining Panfungal Loop-Mediated Isothermal DNA Amplification with Hybridization to Species-Specific Oligonucleotide Probes
    J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2008; 46(2): 713 - 720.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
    J.-I. Sekiguchi, T. Asagi, T. Miyoshi-Akiyama, A. Kasai, Y. Mizuguchi, M. Araake, T. Fujino, H. Kikuchi, S. Sasaki, H. Watari, et al.
    Outbreaks of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Community Hospitals in Japan
    J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2007; 45(3): 979 - 989.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    This Article
    Right arrow Abstract Freely available
    Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
    Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
    Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
    Right arrow Citation Map
    Services
    Right arrow Email this article to a friend
    Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
    Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
    Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
    Right arrow Download to citation manager
    Right arrow reprints & permissions
    Citing Articles
    Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
    Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
    Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
    Google Scholar
    Right arrow Articles by Saito, R.
    Right arrow Articles by Okamura, N.
    Right arrow Search for Related Content
    PubMed
    Right arrow PubMed Citation
    Right arrow Articles by Saito, R.
    Right arrow Articles by Okamura, N.
    Agricola
    Right arrow Articles by Saito, R.
    Right arrow Articles by Okamura, N.


    HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
    INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS