J Med Microbiol Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polzehl, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rimek, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Polzehl, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rimek, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Polzehl, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rimek, D.
J Med Microbiol 54 (2005), 31-37; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.45881-0
© 2005 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Fungus culture and PCR in nasal lavage samples of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

Doreen Polzehl1, Michael Weschta1, Andreas Podbielski2, Herbert Riechelmann1 and Dagmar Rimek3{dagger}

1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, 89075 Ulm, Germany 2Department of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, University Hospital, Rostock, Germany 3Department of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, University of Rostock, Germany

Correspondence Herbert Riechelmann herbert.riechelmann{at}medizin.uni-ulm.de

Received August 27, 2004
Accepted September 13, 2004

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) affects approximately 15 % of the adult population in industrialized countries. Fungi have been recognized as important pathogens in CRS in the immunocompromised host. Recently, fungi have been detected in more than 90 % of nasal lavages (NLs) in immunocompetent patients with CRS. Employing NLs of immunocompetent patients with CRS in the present study, the detection rates for fungi by culture techniques were compared with the results of different fungus-specific PCR assays. Standard fungal cultures were performed on NLs from 77 patients with CRS. NLs were also tested for the presence of fungal DNA by a panfungal assay with and without specific probes for Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp./Penicillium spp., and an Aspergillus-specific nested PCR assay. Nineteen of the 77 samples (25 %) grew fungi. Fungus-specific DNA was detected in 34 of 77 NLs (44 %). Twelve samples were positive for both culture and panfungal PCR, whereas seven specimens grew fungi in culture, but were negative in panfungal PCR, and an additional seven samples were positive in panfungal PCR, but negative in culture. The combination of culture and all employed PCR assays detected fungi in 39 patients (50 %). This study demonstrated that PCR and conventional culture techniques could be complementary diagnostic techniques to detect fungi in nasal specimens from CRS patients.


{dagger}Present address: TLLV, Department of Medical Microbiology, Erfurt, Germany.

Abbreviations: CRS, chronic rhinosinusitis; DTT, dithiothreitol; NL, nasal lavage.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in adults is an inflammatory disease of the nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa defined by persistence of symptoms for longer than 8 weeks, or by more than four episodes of rhinosinusitis occurring within a year (Bachert et al., 2003). CRS affects approximately 15 % of the adult population in Western industrialized countries (Benson & Marano, 1998). It is unclear whether nasal polyps are a distinct form of chronic sinusitis of unknown aetiology or whether they reflect an advanced stage of chronic sinusitis in general (Pawankar, 2003). Frequently, nasal polyps are associated with asthma or aspirin sensitivity (Bateman et al., 2003). Eosinophils are abundantly found in the tissue of most nasal polyps (Pawankar, 2003) and also within the mucus blanket covering the nasal and paranasal mucosa (Ponikau et al., 1999). This eosinophilic infiltration is independent from atopy in most patients (Bachert et al., 2003).

Fungi have been increasingly recognized as important pathogens in sinusitis. Fungal infection, mainly by moulds, can impose a severe acute and chronic sinusitis in the immunocompromised host (Malani & Kauffman, 2002). In contrast, fungi are regarded as frequent innocent bystanders when cultured from the respiratory tract of immunocompetent hosts (Uffredi et al., 2003). Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction to fungal colonization of the paranasal sinus mucosa. Besides positive skin tests for fungal allergens, AFRS is defined by distinct clinical features including nasal polyps, frequently unilateral opacification of the paranasal sinus system with hyperdense spots on CT scans, peanut-butter-like ‘allergic mucin’ within the sinus lumen, and demonstration of fungi by culture or histology (Bent & Kuhn, 1994). The reported prevalence of AFRS is subject to considerable geographical variations and ranges between 1 and 20 % of patients with CRS (Ferguson, 2000). The characteristic clinical appearance of AFRS may also occur without detectable fungi. This condition was addressed as eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis (Ferguson, 2000; Lara & Gomez, 2001).

Recently, fungi have been specified as the main aetiological agent of CRS in immunocompetent patients (Ponikau et al., 1999; Braun et al., 2003). The authors employed nasal lavages (NLs) instead of standard swab techniques to obtain specimens for fungal detection. Subsequently, NL fluids were treated with dithiothreitol (DTT). This mucolytic agent was supposed to release fungal elements entrapped within the nasal secretions and make them accessible to detection by standard culture techniques. This modification of sample acquisition and treatment was reported to yield positive culture results in 87–96 % of patients with CRS (Ponikau et al., 1999; Braun et al., 2003). This high detection rate was not confirmed by others employing similar techniques (Lebowitz et al., 2002), raising the question of whether insufficient sensitivity of the standard culture techniques may obscure the suspected pivotal role of fungal organisms in CRS. PCR assays have been reported to increase sensitivity and reliability of fungal detection (Hendolin et al., 2000; Catten et al., 2001). However, results obtained by panfungal DNA amplification techniques with or without genus-specific probes (Einsele et al., 1997; Kappe et al., 1998) differ from those obtained with genus-specific primers (Skladny et al., 1999). The exact value of PCR for fungus detection in patients suffering from CRS has not yet been evaluated, particularly in NLs pretreated with a mucolytic agent.

In this study, we compared the detection of fungi in culture in NLs of patients with CRS with the results of two different PCR assays: one panfungal assay with and without specific probes for Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp./Penicillium spp., and an Aspergillus-specific nested PCR assay.


    METHODS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients.

Patients referred for paranasal sinus surgery to the tertiary rhinologic referral centre between April 2001 and April 2003 were recruited. Patients with severe CRS with a minimum CT score of 20 (Lund & Kennedy, 1997), a minimum symptom score of 15 (Lund & Kennedy, 1997) and a minimum endoscopy score of 3 (Malm, 1997) were included. Only immunocompetent adults without a history of malignancies or chronic infectious diseases except CRS were eligible for this study. Patients suspected of having cystic fibrosis or immotile cilia syndrome or with previous systemic antimycotic treatment were excluded. Nine healthy volunteers served as control group. All patients and volunteers gave their written consent to participate in the study. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Ulm (Nr. 82/2001).

NL.

After mucosal decongestion, patients were asked to recline their head some 45° and to breathe in and hold. Then, both nostrils were flushed with 5 ml of sterile isotonic saline solution using a sterile disposable syringe. After 10 s, the patients vigorously blew the solution into a sterile glass container.

Fungal cultures.

All samples were further processed under laminar flow to prevent contamination with airborne fungal spores. For microbiological examinations, 2–5 ml of the lavage fluids were treated with equal volumes of sterile DTT (0.3 mg ml–1) for 15 min at room temperature in order to dissolve viscous mucus (Ponikau et al., 1999). Then, 0.5 ml of the samples were inoculated on two Sabouraud/glucose (4 %) agar plates (Becton-Dickinson) each containing chloramphenicol (0.4 g l–1) and gentamicin (0.04 g l–1). The plates were incubated for 30 days at 37 and 30 °C, respectively.

The remainder of the lavage sample was centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min; the supernatants were discarded, leaving approximately 1.6 ml for resuspension of the sediment by vortexing. An aliquot (0.5 ml) was cultured on Sabouraud agar and in Sabouraud bouillon for 30 days at 30 °C. The remaining 0.5 ml was utilized for PCR.

All fungal isolates were identified morphologically and biochemically by standard methods (de Hoog et al., 2000).

In addition, a direct microscopic examination of these fluids for the presence of hyphal elements, using the optical brightener Blankophor, was performed (Ruchel & Schaffrinski, 1999).

Fungal PCR assays.

General recommendations to prevent PCR assay contamination were followed (Kwok & Higuchi, 1989). Sample preparation, PCR set-up and PCR analysis were performed in separate rooms under laminar flow. A negative control containing 500 µl sterile saline paralleled all processing steps. Controls for each PCR run included 10 pg and 1 pg Aspergillus fumigatus DNA as positive controls and two negative controls: one fully processed DNA-free sample preparation and one DNA-free mixture of PCR reagents.

Of the stored samples, 500 µl were centrifuged at 14 000 g for 10 min. The supernatants were discarded, and 50 µl of 1 M NaOH and 50 µl of 2 % SDS were added to the pellets. The mixtures were thoroughly vortexed and alkaline lysis was performed by boiling for 5 min in a water bath. After neutralization with 50 µl of 1 M HCl and 50 µl of 1 M Tris, pH 8.0, the samples were processed by a purification and concentration procedure for DNA using the GeneClean II kit (Bio 101), according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. The DNA preparations were finally dissolved in 25 µl sterile water.

For panfungal PCR the broad-range primers S1 and CUF1 were used, amplifying a 194 bp segment of the 18S rRNA gene of a wide variety of fungal species (Kappe et al., 1998; Rimek et al., 1998). PCR amplifications were carried out in 100 µl volumes with 10 µl of prepared sample added. The mixtures contained 0.5 µM of each primer, 200 µM each of dATP, dCTP, dTTP and dGTP, 2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris/HCl (pH 9) and 1 unit of Thermoprime Plus DNA polymerase (ABGene). PCR runs were performed in a thermocycler (Tpersonal; Biometra) as follows: 2 min at 94 °C; 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 1 min at 53 °C, 1 min at 72 °C; and a final extension segment for 3 min at 72 °C; the mixtures were then kept at 4 °C.

PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in 2 % agarose gels utilizing 1x Tris/borate/EDTA as running buffer, visualized by ethidium-bromide staining and detected under UV light. A band of 194 bp indicated a positive result in the panfungal PCR. The amplified fungal DNA was hybridized with the biotinylated oligonucleotide probes V2AS (10 ng ml–1, specific for Aspergillus spp. and Penicillium spp.) and V2CA (50 ng ml–1, specific for Candida spp.) at 48 °C. Hybridization products were detected with the GEN-ETI-K DNA enzyme immunoassay (DEIA; BykDiaSorin), according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The DEIA cut-off value was defined as 0.15 OD units above the mean value of the negative controls (Fig. 1).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel of PCR products obtained from NL samples from different patients with CRS, using a universal fungal PCR assay. Lanes: L, 100 bp ladder; 1–7, samples from seven different patients; 8, 10 pg A. fumigatus DNA as positive control; 9, negative control. The amplification products of patients 1 and 6 hybridized with the Aspergillus spp./Penicillium spp. probe, the product of patient 3 hybridized with the Candida spp. probe.

 

For the Aspergillus-specific nested PCR two-step amplification, primers AFU7S and AFU7AS (first step) and primers AFU5S and AFU5AS (second step) were used, amplifying a 405 bp and a 236 bp segment of the 18S rRNA gene of Aspergillus spp. in the first and second step, respectively (Skladny et al., 1999). PCR amplifications were carried out in 100 µl volumes with 10 µl of prepared sample added. The mixtures contained 0.5 µM of each primer, 200 µM each of dATP, dCTP, dTTP and dGTP, 2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris/HCl (pH 9) and 1 unit of Thermoprime Plus DNA polymerase. PCR runs were performed in a Tpersonal thermocycler as follows: for the first PCR, 2 min at 94 °C, 23 cycles of 40 s at 94 °C, 1 min at 65 °C, 1 min at 72 °C, and a final extension segment for 5 min at 72 °C, then the mixtures were kept at 4 °C; for the second PCR, 2 min at 94 °C, 35 cycles of 40 s at 94 °C, 1 min at 65 °C, 1 min at 72 °C, and a final extension segment for 5 min at 72 °C, then the mixtures were kept at 4 °C. For the second PCR, 5 µl of the first-round PCR product was used as template. The PCR products were separated by using 2 % agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light.

Sensitivity level of the PCR assays.

To determine the lower limits of detection, the panfungal PCR assay was performed with 100 pg, 10 pg, 1 pg, 100 fg, 10 fg and 1 fg of genomic DNA of A. fumigatus and Candida albicans, respectively. Furthermore, serial dilutions of conidiospores of A. fumigatus and of blastospores of C. albicans in sterile saline ranging from 106 to 10–1 c.f.u. ml–1 were pretreated and tested in the same way as the patient specimens. The Aspergillus-specific PCR assay was performed with serial dilutions of 100 pg to 1 fg A. fumigatus DNA and pretreated A. fumigatus conidiospore suspensions of 106 to 10–1 c.f.u. ml–1, respectively.

Statistics.

The level of agreement between the results of fungal cultures and the corresponding PCR assay was estimated by using the Cohen kappa coefficient (Agresti, 1990). In detail, the following agreement levels were determined: panfungal PCR and growth of all fungi, hybridization with the Aspergillus spp./Penicillium spp. probe and growth of Aspergillus spp. or Penicillium spp., hybridization with the Candida probe and growth of Candida spp., and Aspergillus-specific nested PCR and growth of Aspergillus spp. The Cohen's kappa coefficient with a 95 % confidence interval and the exact two-sided P value were calculated employing StatXact 4.01 (Cytel Software).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In total, 77 patients, 27 female and 50 male, were included in this study. The mean age was 48 years (range 25–77 years).

Fungal cultures

Nineteen of the 77 NL samples (25 %) grew fungi. In eight samples two different fungal species were isolated resulting in a total of 27 isolates (Table 1). Predominant species were Penicillium spp. and Aspergillus spp., with 11 and 7 isolates, respectively. Quantitative cultural analysis showed that the number of viable fungal elements per millilitre of NL was less than 10 c.f.u. ml–1 in most cases. In detail, culture plates showed 1–10 c.f.u. ml–1 in 15 cases, 11–100 c.f.u. ml–1 in three cases and more than 100 c.f.u. ml–1 in one case.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Fungus characterization and PCR results in NLs from 19 patients with positive fungal cultures among a total number of 77 patients with CRS
 

Direct microscopic examination detected hyphal elements in one of 77 patients.

PCR techniques

The panfungal PCR assay detected 1 pg A. fumigatus and 1 pg C. albicans DNA or 40 A. fumigatus conidiospores and 40 C. albicans blastospores per reaction after hybridization with the corresponding probes. The sensitivity level of the Aspergillus-specific nested PCR assay was 100 fg A. fumigatus DNA or 10 A. fumigatus conidiospores per reaction. With all PCR techniques employed, fungus-specific DNA was detected in 34 of 77 lavage specimens. Nineteen samples were positive in the panfungal PCR assay, and 12 and four samples were positive after hybridization with the Aspergillus and Candida probe, respectively. The Aspergillus-specific nested PCR detected Aspergillus DNA in 16 samples. Positive and negative results of the different PCR techniques are cross-tabulated in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. PCR results in correlation with positive and negative results of fungal culture
 

Correlation of culture and PCR findings

NL samples were considered fungus-positive if either culture and/or any of the PCR assays yielded a positive fungal result. NLs of 38/77 patients with CRS were fungus-negative by culture and by every one of the four types of PCR assays employed, leaving 39 patients in which at least one of the investigational techniques yielded a positive result. Five of the latter were exclusively positive by culture, 20 by PCR and 14 by both culture and PCR.

In NLs from healthy controls (n = 9), no fungal elements were detected either by PCR or by culture (P < 0.005).

Comparing the culture results for all fungi and panfungal PCR, in 12 samples both the culture and the PCR were positive. In seven cases a positive PCR was found with a negative culture result, which could be due to the exclusive presence of non-viable fungal elements. The Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated as 0.52 (P < 0.001). For Aspergillus spp. and Penicillium spp. PCR and cultures yielded concordant results in 58/77 samples, Cohen's kappa coefficient equalled 0.1 (P = 0.4). Concordant results for Aspergillus spp. in culture and Aspergillus-specific nested PCR were found in 61/77 lavage samples. In 13 cases the PCR detected fungal elements without a simultaneous demonstration of fungi by culture. For this situation, the Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated as 0.24 (P < 0.05).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Fungal sinusitis is a serious disease in the immunocompromised host. Recently, it has been suggested that in immunocompetent individuals, fungi are also the main aetiological agents of CRS, a widespread pathologic condition (Ponikau et al., 1999; Braun et al., 2003). The incidence of fungal elements in nasal specimens of affected persons differed between various studies. It thus appeared necessary to further evaluate current techniques to contribute to the epidemiological analysis and to elucidate which technique might be superior for the detection of fungal elements in the upper airways.

Employing NLs pretreated with the mucolytic agent DTT to release entrapped fungal elements from the mucus film, fungi were identified in approximately 90 % of immunocompetent patients with CRS (Ponikau et al., 1999; Braun et al., 2003). NL is a widely used technique to atraumatically obtain specimens of nasal secretions (Riechelmann et al., 2003). The lavage fluid reaches most areas of nasal mucosa exposed to the respiratory airway, as well as the main nasal mucus transport pathways originating in the paranasal sinus system. It is thus assumed that NL fluid has contact with the relevant mucosal areas possibly contaminated with fungal elements. The probable dilution effect inherent to NL techniques will be compensated by sedimentation of fungal elements using subsequent centrifugation steps. Thus, the higher fungus yield reported in recent studies involving the use of NLs treated subsequently with a mucolytic agent could explain the different sensitivity when compared with results of previous studies employing nasal swabs, which only reach limited areas of the nasal mucosa.

Major objectives of the present study were to determine (a) the incidence of fungal elements in DTT-treated NLs from immunocompetent patients with CRS, (b) the influence of current fungus detection techniques on positive test results, and (c) the concordance rates between current detection techniques. In 77 patients with CRS confirmed by clinical history, nasal endoscopy and CT scans, a standard NL was performed and subsequently treated with DTT. Standard culture techniques (de Hoog et al., 2000) and PCR techniques for fungal DNA identification were then employed. PCR techniques included two different PCR assays: one panfungal assay with and without specific probes for Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp./Penicillium spp., and an Aspergillus-specific nested PCR assay (Kappe et al., 1998; Rimek et al., 1998; Skladny et al., 1999).

Positive fungal cultures were obtained from 25 % of patients with CRS. However, in most cases less than 10 c.f.u. ml–1 indicated low quantities of viable fungal elements within the lavage samples. This detection rate lies within the range of several other investigations (Lebowitz et al., 2002; Willinger et al., 2003; Vennewald et al., 1999). However, cultural fungus detection rates in patients with CRS in this study were far less than those described in two recent investigations employing similar sampling and culture techniques on patients from the USA and Austria (Ponikau et al., 1999; Braun et al., 2003). This difference may be explained with the established geographical variability of fungal sinusitis (Ferguson, 2000).

As fungal cultures could last for considerable incubation periods until a positive result is obtained, a molecular diagnostic method (PCR) is supposed to accelerate the detection of fungi in NLs. Moreover, superior sensitivity of PCR for fungus detection in NLs has been reported (Willinger et al., 2003; Pham et al., 2003; Rimek et al., 1998). In this study, culture techniques alone demonstrated fungal elements in 25 %, PCR techniques alone indicated the presence of fungal DNA in 44 % and the combination of culture and PCR assays detected fungi in 50 % of NLs. Thus, PCR increased the rate of fungus detection in NLs considerably, but was not able to replace culture techniques.

PCR assays detect small quantities of DNA. A crucial step in sample processing for PCR is the digestion of the fungal cell wall, which is subject to variations due to diverse sample preparation protocols. This and dilution procedures may cause DNA loss (Haugland et al., 1999). As a consequence, it is critical to assess the sensitivity of each PCR technique used for fungus detection. The panfungal PCR assay employed in this study detected 1 pg A. fumigatus and 1 pg C. albicans DNA or 40 A. fumigatus conidiospores and 40 C. albicans blastospores per reaction after hybridization with the corresponding probes. The sensitivity level of the Aspergillus-specific nested PCR assay was found to be 100 fg A. fumigatus DNA or 10 A. fumigatus conidiospores per reaction.

In fungal culture, the presence of at least one viable spore per specimen is theoretically sufficient for a positive result. This extreme sensitivity was not achieved with the PCR techniques employed. However, reaching this sensitivity level still also has to be demonstrated by quantitative studies for commonly used culture techniques, though this is very likely not achievable. However, non-viable fungus material is generally not detected by culture techniques, but could serve as an appropriate template for PCR provided the material contains fungal DNA. In this respect, PCR adds relevant information to current fungal culture techniques. Standard culture techniques and a panfungal PCR employing common primers yielded concordant positive results from material of 12/77 patients. However, each technique identified seven additional positive specimens, resulting in a combined detection rate of 26/77 patients. Panfungal PCR thus appeared not sufficiently reliable to serve as the only diagnostic tool for fungus detection in NLs. As a consequence, standard culture techniques and PCR are considered complementary methods for the detection of fungal elements in NLs.

NLs of a small group of nine normal controls were initially included as a laboratory reference group. Since fungal elements could not be detected in any material from this group, the clinical implication of this specific result deserves further consideration. The subjects in the control group were younger than the patients of the study group. It is not surprising to fail to detect fungal spores in NLs of normal subjects. In south Germany, approximately 200 spores per cubic metre of indoor or outdoor air have been found (Jovanovic & Piechotowski, 2000). An adult human respires something like 10 m–3 of air per day, equating to roughly 2000 spores. Due to their low aerodynamic diameter, somewhere in the order of 10 % of spores are deposited on the nasal mucosa and cleared by the mucociliary transport system within a few minutes. Thus, less than one spore can be expected in the nose, when a NL is performed. In patients with CRS, the mucociliary transport system is severely impaired and thus the chance to detect inhaled spores is increased (Bertrand et al., 2000; Hafner et al., 1997). As a consequence, inhaled spores may stay longer within the nasal airways in patients with CRS than in the airways of healthy controls, increasing the chance of them being detected by sensitive assays. This may explain the striking difference between the high fungus detection rates in patients with CRS and the complete absence of fungi in the specimens of the study controls.

The ubiquitous nature of fungal spores makes it difficult to determine their aetiological role for fungal infection in patients with CRS. The mere presence of fungi in the nose and sinuses, determined by culture or PCR assay techniques, cannot be considered as sufficient to prove their role in the pathogenesis of CRS.

In conclusion, this study detected fungal elements in DTT-pretreated NLs in 50 % of patients with CRS. The rate of fungus detection is influenced by the detection techniques used. It is suggested that fungal cultures and PCR from NLs of immunocompetent patients with CRS are complementary techniques when establishing an association between the disease and the presence of a potential aetiological agent.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  • Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley.

  • Bachert, C., Hormann, K., Mosges, R., Rasp, G., Riechelmann, H., Muller, R., Luckhaupt, H., Stuck, B. A. & Rudack, C. (2003). An update on the diagnosis and treatment of sinusitis and nasal polyposis. Allergy 58, 176–191.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Bateman, N. D., Fahy, C. & Woolford, T. J. (2003). Nasal polyps: still more questions than answers. J Laryngol Otol 117, 1–9.[Medline]

  • Benson, V. & Marano, M. A. (1998). Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1995. Vital Health Stat 10, 1–428.

  • Bent, J. P., III & Kuhn, F. A. (1994). Diagnosis of allergic fungal sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 111, 580–588.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Bertrand, B., Collet, S., Eloy, P. & Rombaux, P. (2000). Secondary ciliary dyskinesia in upper respiratory tract. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 54, 309–316.[Medline]

  • Braun, H., Buzina, W., Freudenschuss, K., Beham, A. & Stammberger, H. (2003). 'Eosinophilic fungal rhinosinusitis': a common disorder in Europe? Laryngoscope 113, 264–269.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Catten, M. D., Murr, A. H., Goldstein, J. A., Mhatre, A. N. & Lalwani, A. K. (2001). Detection of fungi in the nasal mucosa using polymerase chain reaction. Laryngoscope 111, 399–403.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • de Hoog, G., Guarro, J., Gené, J. & Figueras, M. (2000). Atlas of Clinical Fungi, 2nd edn. Utrecht: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures.

  • Einsele, H., Hebart, H., Roller, G. & 8 other authors (1997). Detection and identification of fungal pathogens in blood by using molecular probes. J Clin Microbiol 35, 1353–1360.[Abstract]

  • Ferguson, B. J. (2000). Eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis: a distinct clinicopathological entity. Laryngoscope 110, 799–813.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Hafner, B., Davris, S., Riechelmann, H., Mann, W. J. & Amedee, R. G. (1997). Endonasal sinus surgery improves mucociliary transport in severe chronic sinusitis. Am J Rhinol 11, 271–274.[Medline]

  • Haugland, R. A., Heckman, J. L. & Wymer, L. J. (1999). Evaluation of different methods for the extraction of DNA from fungal conidia by quantitative competitive PCR analysis. J Microbiol Methods 37, 165–176.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Hendolin, P. H., Paulin, L., Koukila-Kahkola, P., Anttila, V. J., Malmberg, H., Richardson, M. & Ylikoski, J. (2000). Panfungal PCR and multiplex liquid hybridization for detection of fungi in tissue specimens. J Clin Microbiol 38, 4186–4192.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Jovanovic, S. & Piechotowski, I. (2000). Zusammenhang zwischen biologischen Innenraumbelastungen und Allergien bzw. Atemwegserkrankungen: Studie 1997–1998. Stuttgart: Landesgesundheitsamt Baden-Württemberg.

  • Kappe, R., Okeke, C. N., Fauser, C., Maiwald, M. & Sonntag, H. G. (1998). Molecular probes for the detection of pathogenic fungi in the presence of human tissue. J Med Microbiol 47, 811–820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Kwok, S. & Higuchi, R. (1989). Avoiding false positives with PCR. Nature 339, 237–238.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Lara, J. F. & Gomez, J. D. (2001). Allergic mucin with and without fungus: a comparative clinicopathologic analysis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 125, 1442–1447.[Medline]

  • Lebowitz, R. A., Waltzman, M. N., Jacobs, J. B., Pearlman, A. & Tierno, P. M. (2002). Isolation of fungi by standard laboratory methods in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 112, 2189–2191.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Lund, V. J. & Kennedy, D. W. (1997). Staging for rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117, S35–S40.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Malani, P. N. & Kauffman, C. A. (2002). Invasive and allergic fungal sinusitis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 4, 225–232.[Medline]

  • Malm, L. (1997). Assessment and staging of nasal polyposis. Acta Otolaryngol 117, 465–467.[Medline]

  • Pawankar, R. (2003). Nasal polyposis: an update: editorial review. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 3, 1–6.[Medline]

  • Pham, A. S., Tarrand, J. J., May, G. S., Lee, M. S., Kontoyiannis, D. P. & Han, X. Y. (2003). Diagnosis of invasive mold infection by real-time quantitative PCR. Am J Clin Pathol 119, 38–44.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Ponikau, J. U., Sherris, D. A., Kern, E. B., Homburger, H. A., Frigas, E., Gaffey, T. A. & Roberts, G. D. (1999). The diagnosis and incidence of allergic fungal sinusitis. Mayo Clin Proc 74, 877–884.[Abstract]

  • Riechelmann, H., Deutschle, T., Friemel, E., Gross, H. J. & Bachem, M. (2003). Biological markers in nasal secretions. Eur Respir J 21, 600–605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Rimek, D., Garg, A. P., Kappe, R. & Sonntag, H. G. (1998). Fungal nucleic acid detection for invasive aspergillosis. Mycoses 41 Suppl 2, 65–68 (in German).[Medline]

  • Ruchel, R. & Schaffrinski, M. (1999). Versatile fluorescent staining of fungi in clinical specimens by using the optical brightener Blankophor. J Clin Microbiol 37, 2694–2696.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Skladny, H., Buchheidt, D., Baust, C., Krieg-Schneider, F., Seifarth, W., Leib-Mosch, C. & Hehlmann, R. (1999). Specific detection of Aspergillus species in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage samples of immunocompromised patients by two-step PCR. J Clin Microbiol 37, 3865–3871.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Uffredi, M. L., Mangiapan, G., Cadranel, J. & Kac, G. (2003). Significance of Aspergillus fumigatus isolation from respiratory specimens of nongranulocytopenic patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 22, 457–462.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Vennewald, I., Henker, M., Klemm, E. & Seebacher, C. (1999). Fungal colonization of the paranasal sinuses. Mycoses 42 Suppl 2, 33–36.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Willinger, B., Obradovic, A., Selitsch, B. & 7 other authors (2003). Detection and identification of fungi from fungus balls of the maxillary sinus by molecular techniques. J Clin Microbiol 41, 581–585.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




    This article has been cited by other articles:


    Home page
    Am J Clin PatholHome page
    J. B. Taxy, S. El-Zayaty, and A. Langerman
    Acute Fungal Sinusitis: Natural History and the Role of Frozen Section
    Am J Clin Pathol, July 1, 2009; 132(1): 86 - 93.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
    A. Niederfuhr, H. Kirsche, H. Riechelmann, and N. Wellinghausen
    The Bacteriology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With and Without Nasal Polyps
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, February 1, 2009; 135(2): 131 - 136.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J Med MicrobiolHome page
    K. Kostamo, M. Richardson, E. Eerola, K. Rantakokko-Jalava, T. Meri, H. Malmberg, and E. Toskala
    Negative impact of Aspergillus galactomannan and DNA detection in the diagnosis of fungal rhinosinusitis
    J. Med. Microbiol., October 1, 2007; 56(10): 1322 - 1327.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
    M. Weschta, D. Rimek, M. Formanek, A. Podbielski, and H. Riechelmann
    Effect of nasal antifungal therapy on nasal cell activation markers in chronic rhinosinusitis.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, July 1, 2006; 132(7): 743 - 747.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    This Article
    Right arrow Abstract Freely available
    Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
    Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
    Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
    Right arrow Citation Map
    Services
    Right arrow Email this article to a friend
    Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
    Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
    Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
    Right arrow Download to citation manager
    Right arrow reprints & permissions
    Citing Articles
    Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
    Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
    Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
    Google Scholar
    Right arrow Articles by Polzehl, D.
    Right arrow Articles by Rimek, D.
    Right arrow Search for Related Content
    PubMed
    Right arrow PubMed Citation
    Right arrow Articles by Polzehl, D.
    Right arrow Articles by Rimek, D.
    Agricola
    Right arrow Articles by Polzehl, D.
    Right arrow Articles by Rimek, D.


    HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
    INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS