J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geric, B.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geric, B.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Geric, B.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, S.
J Med Microbiol 53 (2004), 887-894; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.45610-0
© 2004 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Distribution of Clostridium difficile variant toxinotypes and strains with binary toxin genes among clinical isolates in an American hospital

Barbara Geric1, Maja Rupnik1, Dale N. Gerding2,3, Miklavz Grabnar1 and Stuart Johnson2,3

1Department of Biology, University of Ljubljana, Vecna pot 111, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 2Hines VA Hospital, Hospital/151 Fifth Avenue & Roosevelt Road, Hines, IL 60141, USA 3Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA

Correspondence Stuart Johnson sjohnson{at}lumc.edu

Received January 21, 2004
Accepted May 21, 2004

Genetic variants of Clostridium difficile have been reported with increasing frequency, but their true incidence is unknown. C. difficile strains have been classified into variant toxinotypes according to variations in the pathogenicity locus encoding the major virulence factors, toxins A and B. Some strains produce an additional toxin, binary toxin CDT. This survey of clinical isolates (153) from patients in a single hospital set out to ascertain the distribution of variant toxinotypes and strains possessing binary toxin genes. A PCR-RFLP-based method of toxinotyping identified 123 (80.4 %) isolates as toxinotype 0, 13 (8.5 %) strains as non-toxigenic and 17 (11.1 %) as belonging to variant toxinotypes. Binary toxin genes were amplified by PCR in nine strains (5.8 %), all of which were variant toxinotypes. Toxin variants of C. difficile are pathogenic and commonly isolated and need to be considered when evaluating new diagnostic testing strategies for C. difficile disease.


Abbreviations: CDAD, C. difficile-associated diarrhoea; PaLoc, pathogenicity locus; PMC, pseudomembranous colitis; TcdA, toxin A; TcdB, toxin B.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile commonly produce two large clostridial toxins, toxins A (TcdA) and B (TcdB), to which disease symptoms are attributed. They are encoded by genes tcdA and tcdB. Together with three additional genes (tcdC, D and E), they form a 19.6-kb chromosomal pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) (Fig. 1) (Braun et al., 1996; Hammond & Johnson, 1995). However, a number of different genetic variants of C. difficile have been described.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A schematic representation of the PaLoc region encoding the large clostridial toxins TcdA and TcdB in reference toxinotype 0, toxinotype XIV and the newly described toxinotypes XXI and XXII. The positions of PCR fragments PL1–4, PLC, B1, B2s, B3s and A1–3 are shown above the schematics. Restriction sites are indicated by vertical lines below each schematic: A, AccI; E, EcoRI; Ec, EcoRV; H, HindIII; Ha, HaeIII; Hc, HincII; N, NsiI; Nc, NcoI; P, PstI; R, RsaI; S, SpeI. Toxinotypes with identical PCR fragment restriction patterns are included within boxes above each schematic. White areas within the schematic indicate regions with restriction sites identical to toxinotype 0, grey for previously described restriction types and dark grey for new restriction types. Insertion of a novel mobile genetic element in toxinotypes XIV and XXII is indicated by hatched symbols above the schematics (Braun et al., 2000). The restriction patterns for the B1 and A3 PCR fragments from the newly described toxinotypes have been designated as follows. Toxinotype XXI: B1 PCR fragment type (HincII/AccI) 4; A3 PCR fragment type (EcoRI) 1. Toxinotype XXII: B1 PCR fragment type 5; A3 PCR fragment type 1.

 

Strains with variations in PaLoc sequence have been classified into toxinotypes; 20 variant toxinotypes (I–XX) have been described (Rupnik, 2001; Rupnik et al., 2003a). Strains in which the PaLoc is identical to the reference strain VPI 10463 are referred to as toxinotype 0. Not all variations of toxin genes affect toxin production. Strains of toxinotypes I–VII, IX, XII–XV and XVIII–XX produce both toxins (A+B+ strains) despite changes in their toxin genes (Rupnik, 2001; Rupnik et al., 2003a). Strains of toxinotype XI have only the 3' portion of tcdA present and do not produce either TcdA or TcdB (AB) (Rupnik, 2001), whereas strains of toxinotypes VIII, X, XVI and XVII produce a functional TcdB but no TcdA (AB+ strains).

AB+ strains are clinically important and cause typical C. difficile-associated disease syndromes ranging from uncomplicated diarrhoea to fatal pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) (Kato et al., 1998; Sambol et al., 2000; Johnson et al., 2001). Commercial toxin A immunoassays used by many clinical laboratories do not detect AB+ variants (Johnson et al., 2001), although these variants can be detected if immunoassays for both toxins or a combination of cell culture cytotoxin and toxin A immunoassay tests are used (Rupnik, 2001). The prevalence of such AB+ variants in different studies from the USA, Europe and Asia has ranged from 0.2 % up to 48 % (Kato et al., 1998; Lyerly et al., 1998; Kader et al., 1998; Brazier et al., 1999; Pituch et al., 2001; Barbut et al., 2002). Differences in the prevalence of AB+ strains could be explained by selection biases in the different studies as well as by clonal spread of certain strains, such as those responsible for the AB+ outbreaks in Canadian and Dutch hospitals (al-Barrak et al., 1999; Kuijper et al., 2001).

Some C. difficile strains produce an additional toxin, called binary toxin CDT (Rupnik et al., 2003b). Genes cdtA and cdtB, located on the CDT locus of the chromosome outside of the PaLoc, encode the enzymic (CDTa) and binding (CDTb) components of the binary toxin (Popoff et al., 1988; Perelle et al., 1997). Binary toxin is an actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase and is cytotoxic for eukaryotic cells in culture (Popoff et al., 1988). The role of binary toxin in human disease is not yet defined but it is suggested that CDT could contribute to the pathogenesis of C. difficile disease (Carman et al., 2003; Geric et al., 2003a).

The role of different toxinotypes and the production of binary toxin in the outcome of human disease are not well defined. Studies have described the frequency of binary toxin-positive strains in isolate collections from various sources, but information on such strains within a single hospital is missing. In this study the distribution of different toxinotypes and strains possessing binary toxin genes in clinical C. difficile isolates from a Veterans Affairs hospital in the USA was examined.


    METHODS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Clinical isolates.

From May 1996 to April 2001, 162 clinical C. difficile isolates from 125 patients at the Lakeside division of the Veterans Affairs Chicago Healthcare System in Chicago, IL, USA were saved for subsequent analysis. All isolates were included in the study except for the period of time from February to December 1998 when the laboratory relied primarily on toxin testing, and isolates were not available.

In 1995 the Lakeside VA was a 250-bed tertiary University-affiliated hospital (Mekonen et al., 2002). As a consequence of hospital consolidation within the VA system, the inpatient service at this hospital declined during the study period. There were no major C. difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD) outbreaks during the study period. In 1996, at the start of this study, there were 556 patient admissions/month with a mean length of stay of 10.7 days. By the end of the study in 2001, there were 341 patient admissions/month with a mean length of stay of 7.8 days. The rate of nosocomial CDAD also decreased during this time period from 8.1/1000 admissions (0.75/1000 patient days) in 1996 to 5.9/1000 admissions (0.67/1000 patient days) in 2001.

Faecal samples collected from patients suspected to be infected with C. difficile were cultured anaerobically on selective cycloserine, cefoxitin, fructose and egg yolk agar (CCFA) as described previously (Mekonen et al., 2002). In addition, a cell culture-based stool cytotoxin assay (Bartels cytotoxicity assay for Clostridium difficile toxins; Bartels) was performed on all submitted stool specimens. Bacterial isolates were identified as C. difficile in the clinical laboratory according to colony morphology on CCFA, Gram's stain and biochemical assay with the RapID ANA II System (Innovative Diagnostic Systems). Colonies of C. difficile were then subcultured in chopped meat media (CMM; BBL Microbiology Systems) and stored at room temperature. Nine isolates could not be recovered from CMM, leaving 153 isolates from 118 patients for analysis.

DNA preparation.

Strains were recovered from CMM by subculture onto anaerobic sheep blood agar plates (BD) and a crude DNA extract was obtained from growth on the agar plate after 24 h with 5 % Chelex 100 Resin (Bio-Rad) as described by O'Neill et al. (1996).

Detection of toxin genes cdtB, tcdA and tcdB and toxinotyping.

The presence of binary toxin gene cdtB was detected by PCR as described previously (Stubbs et al., 2000).

Genes for the large clostridial toxins A and B (tcdA and tcdB) were detected by PCR and characterized by RFLP and the toxinotypes of all tested isolates were determined as described previously (Rupnik et al., 1997, 1998, 2001). Briefly, toxinotype characterization was performed by PCR amplification of two PaLoc fragments from the 5' end of tcdB (fragment B1) and the 3' end of tcdA (fragment A3) with subsequent restriction enzyme digestion. A detailed description of the toxinotyping method can be found on the website: http://rcul.uni-lj.si/~bfbcdiff.

Strains that showed toxin gene variations not described previously in the toxinotyping scheme were characterized with additional PCR reactions for 11 fragments covering the whole PaLoc region. Fragments PL1–4, A1–3 and B1 were amplified and restricted as described by Rupnik et al. (1998) and fragment PLC was amplified with primers Tim2 and Struppi2 (Braun et al., 1996) (Fig. 1). Modified primers were used for amplification of B2 and B3 PCR fragments. The putative translocation region (fragment B2s) was amplified with primers LJP4 (5'-GCGCTGCAGTTCTTCACTAGTTGACATAAGAAT-3') and LJP7 (5'-CGCGTCGACCAAGATGATTTAGTGATATCAGAA-3') and the binding region (fragment B3s) was amplified with primers LJP9 (5'-CGCGTCGACTATATAGGATTCAATAGCGAATTA-3') and LJP16 (5'-GCGCTGCAGCTATTCACTAATCACTAATTGAGC-3'). The reaction mixture and cycling conditions were the same as described previously for fragments B1 and A3 (Rupnik et al., 1998). Fragment PL1 was restricted with restriction enzyme HindIII, PL2 with NsiI, PL3 with EcoRV, PL4 with HincII and SpeI, PLC with NcoI, A1 with PstI and NsiI, A2 with EcoRV and HaeIII, A3 with EcoRI, B1 with HincII and AccI, B2s with HindIII and RsaI and B3s with HindIII and RsaI and restriction patterns were compared to other known toxinotypes.

Strains in which no PaLoc-specific fragments could be amplified, were confirmed as non-toxigenic with Lok1Lok3-PCR (Braun et al., 1996), which gives an approximately 700 bp product only in strains lacking the PaLoc (Fig. 1). In toxigenic strains the expected PCR product by this reaction would be 20 kb and is therefore not amplified under the conditions selected for this amplification protocol.

Detection of toxin production.

In vitro production of TcdA and TcdB was determined on all variant isolates. Production of cytotoxin TcdB was determined on 5-day cultures in brain heart infusion broth (Difco Becton Dickinson) by the same cell-culture-based cytotoxin assay used for the stool cytotoxin determination or on in-house-grown McCoy cells. TcdA testing was performed on the same culture supernatant with a toxin A immunoassay (Tox-A Test; TechLab or C. difficile Triage micro; Biosite).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Molecular characterization of the pathogenicity locus (PaLoc) in clinical C. difficile isolates

The 153 isolates were characterized by toxinotyping; 123 (80.4 %) were toxinotype 0 with a PaLoc identical to reference strain VPI 10463 (Table 1). Thirteen strains (8.5 %) were non-toxigenic and lacked the entire PaLoc as confirmed with Lok1Lok3 PCR. Seventeen strains (11.1 %) were variant toxinotypes with changes in composition of the PaLoc compared to the reference strain VPI 10463 (Table 1). Fifteen of these strains belonged to eight previously characterized variant toxinotypes (I, III, IV, V, VIII, IX, XII and XIV), and two strains showed new RFLPs and were, therefore, designated new toxinotypes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Distribution of toxinotypes and strains with binary toxin genes among clinical isolates of C. difficile
 

One of the new toxinotypes, isolate 6223, designated toxinotype XXI, was from a patient seen in the clinic whose stool cytotoxin test was positive and whose clinical syndrome was consistent with CDAD. This isolate produced TcdA and TcdB with a cytopathic effect in the cell culture cytotoxin assay that was typical for standard TcdB from reference strain VPI 10463.

The other new toxinotype, isolate 6143, designated toxinotype XXII, was also from a patient with a positive stool cytotoxin test and CDAD. This patient developed CDAD after prolonged hospitalization for rhabdomyolosis and renal failure. His isolate produced TcdA and TcdB with a typical cytopathic effect in vitro as well.

Both new toxinotypes were initially characterized by new combinations of previously described B1 and A3 PCR fragment restriction patterns (Fig. 1 legend). Further molecular characterization revealed additional PaLoc changes in each of the new toxinotypes (Fig. 1): (i) a ~2 kb large insertion within the A1 fragment of toxinotype XXII. This insertion was identical to that found in toxinotype XIV and was shown to be a new type of mobile genetic element (Rupnik et al., 2001; Braun et al., 2000) (Fig. 2a); (ii) a new type of A2 restriction pattern in toxinotype XXI (Fig. 2b) and (iii) a new type of B2s restriction pattern in toxinotype XXII (Fig. 3, restriction pattern 6).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (a) Comparison of PstI restriction site polymorphisms of PCR A1 fragments found in toxinotype 0, VIII, XIV and XXII strains. The A1 fragment restriction patterns for toxinotypes 0, VIII and XIV have been described previously. Toxinotypes XIV and XXI have a ~2 kb insertion but the PstI restriction site is conserved when compared to reference toxinotype 0. Lanes 1 and 6, 1 kb DNA ladder (Fermentas); lane 2, reference strain VPI 10463 (toxinotype 0); lane 3, strain 1470 (toxinotype VIII); lane 4, strain R 10870 (toxinotype XIV); lane 5, isolate 6143 (new toxinotype XXII). (b) EcoRV (E) and HaeIII (H) restriction site polymorphisms of PCR A2 fragments. The A2 fragment restriction patterns shown for toxinotypes III, 0 and VII have been described previously, whereas the restriction pattern for toxinotype XXI represents a new pattern. Lanes 1 and 10, 1 kb DNA ladder (Invitrogen); lanes 2 and 3, strain SE844 (toxinotype III); lanes 4 and 5, reference strain, VPI 10463 (toxinotype 0); lanes 6 and 7, strain 57267 (toxinotype VII); lanes 8 and 9, isolate 6223 (new toxinotype XXI).

 


View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Restriction patterns of PCR fragments B2s and B3s of all known toxinotypes. Currently, nine B2s PCR fragment restriction pattern types and seven B3s PCR fragment restriction pattern types have been described. Toxinotype III strains may have one of three different restriction patterns for each of these PCR fragments and this toxinotype is now subdivided into subtypes IIIa, IIIb and IIIc. The toxinotypes associated with each particular restriction pattern are shown above each restriction type. H, HindIII; R, RsaI; M, 100 bp DNA ladder (Invitrogen).

 

All A+B+ variant strains from this study (except for the toxinotype IX strain) produced characteristic arborizing effects on cultured cells, where long protrusions were retained, similar to the cytopathic effect of reference strain VPI 10463. Isolates 6124 and 6134 of toxinotype VIII (AB+), produced an atypical cell rounding effect described previously, in which protrusions disappeared and cells completely round up (Chaves-Olarte et al., 2003).

Frequency of variant toxinotypes

Of all the clinical isolates obtained over a 5-year period at one tertiary care hospital, 11 % were variant by analysis of the pathogenicity region on the C. difficile chromosome encoding TcdA and TcdB (PaLoc). The frequency of toxinotypes observed in this systematic survey was similar to that observed in surveys on isolate collections from Europe and elsewhere (Rupnik et al., 1998, 2001, 2003a; Kato et al., 1998; Spigaglia & Mastrantonio, 2002). The proportion and the types of variant strains found in these previous studies may have been influenced by the manner in which these strain collections were obtained. Strains of toxinotypes III, IV and VIII were the most frequent variant toxinotypes in two European collections (Rupnik et al., 1998, 2001). Variant strains from Asia showed a slightly different distribution among toxinotypes (Rupnik et al., 2003a). Only six of 15 variant toxinotypes found in European collections were detected among Asian strains, and five new variants were found as well (XVI–XX).

As expected, strains of toxinotype 0 were the most prevalent among our clinical isolates. Among variant toxinotypes, more than one isolate of toxinotypes III, IV, VIII and XII (Table 1) were found, which were shown to be most numerous in previous studies of strains from collections in Europe and Asia (Rupnik et al., 1998, 2001, 2003a; M. Rupnik, unpublished data). Toxinotypes VI and VII were also frequently noted in European collections (Rupnik et al., 2001; Spigaglia & Mastrantonio, 2002) but they were not seen in this survey and they were also absent from a large collection of strains from Asia.

Fifteen variant strains were of toxinotypes that commonly produce both toxins (A+B+) and two (1.3 %) were toxinotype VIII, which produces only toxin TcdB (AB+). The low prevalence of AB+ strains found in this study is similar to that reported in a previous smaller survey from the same hospital (Mekonen et al., 2002) and other surveys (Lyerly et al., 1998; Brazier et al., 1999; Barbut et al., 2002), whereas some other reports have noted higher rates (Kato et al., 1998; Kader et al., 1998; Pituch et al., 2001). One of the toxinotype VIII isolates was from a patient with a clinical syndrome typical for CDAD evidenced by a positive stool cytotoxin assay, a clinical response to metronidazole, and followed by a symptomatic relapse. The second toxinotype VIII isolate was recovered from a patient with transient diarrhoea that resolved without specific treatment. Although toxinotype VIII isolates were originally isolated from asymptomatic patients (Depitre et al., 1993; Stubbs et al., 2000) and were not thought to be pathogenic, several recent reports have documented isolation of AB+ strains from patients with the full range of clinical manifestations seen with CDAD (Kato et al., 1998; Sambol et al., 2000; al-Barrak et al., 1999). Moreover, infections caused by toxinotype VIII strains are not detected by immunoassays for toxin A, which are the only tests for C. difficile disease used by many clinical laboratories (Johnson et al., 2001).

Clinical characteristics of patients infected with variant toxinotypes

The presence of variant strains was compared with the clinical patient histories. The 17 variant toxinotypes were from 16 male patients aged 43–84 (mean age, 67.5 yrs), reflecting the patient demographics at this VA hospital (Table 2). The stool cytotoxin assay was positive in ten patients (62.5 %). Overall, the clinical syndromes associated with these variant strains were similar to what has been reported for CDAD in general. Symptoms ranged from uncomplicated to severe diarrhoea and PMC. CDAD was documented in twelve patients (75 %) and PMC in one patient (6.3 %). The strain isolated from the patient with PMC was of toxinotype III, which also possesses binary toxin genes. This toxinotype has been isolated from patients with PMC in a previous report (Rupnik et al., 1998). Three of the four unique patient-cases with toxinotype XII infections occurred within a 3-month period, but only one was nosocomial. A half of the episodes were nosocomial and involved infection by six different toxinotype strains.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Clinical summary of the 16 patients from whom toxin-gene-variant C. difficile strains were isolated BT, Binary toxin genes; CDAD, C. difficile-associated diarrhoea; PMC, pseudomembranous colitis; I, indeterminant cytotoxin result; Unknown, the clinical record was not available; Diarrhoea is listed when other clinical data were not present to support the diagnosis of CDAD, such as a positive stool cytotoxin assay and response to specific therapy for CDAD; M, metronidazole; V, vancomycin.
 

Two or more consecutive isolates were obtained from 27 patients. The toxinotype of subsequent C. difficile isolates from the same patient was identical in 85 % of the cases (21 cases with toxinotype 0, one case with toxinotype IV and one case with a non-toxigenic isolate). In four instances a different strain was isolated. From one patient two samples were taken approximately 1 year apart; the first isolate was non-toxigenic and the second was toxinotype 0. Similarly, from a second patient, two strains were isolated more than 1 year apart and were characterized as toxinotype III and 0. From the third patient, isolates of toxinotypes 0 and III were isolated approximately 2 months apart. Isolates of toxinotype 0 and a non-toxigenic strain were isolated just 3 days apart from a fourth patient. A third strain (toxinotype XII) was isolated from this same patient 2 months later.

Therefore, in three cases where different strains were isolated, the interval between isolation of the strains was greater than 1 month. Recurrent episodes of CDAD within 1 month of the original episode are more likely to represent relapses of the original strain (potentially due to persistence of spores in the gut or reacquisition of spores from the contaminated environment) whereas late recurrences are usually due to infections with new strains (Johnson et al., 1989). In general, many cases of CDAD ‘relapses’ actually represent new infections with different strains (O'Neill et al., 1991; Wilcox et al., 1998; Barbut et al., 2000). In one case, two different strains were isolated 3 days apart from the same patient. Although simultaneous carriage of two different strains (Delmée et al., 1988; Camorlinga-Ponce et al., 1987) may explain this finding, sequential recovery of different strains from the same patient is not unexpected in the setting of a susceptible host (patient receiving antibiotics) living in an environment contaminated with multiple different strains (Johnson & Gerding, 1998; Clabots et al., 1992; Cohen et al., 1998; Johnson et al., 1989).

Frequency of strains with binary toxin genes

Binary toxin genes were not detected in any of the toxinotype 0 isolates or in the non-toxigenic isolates. Nine isolates (5.8 %) of the variant toxinotypes III, IV, V, IX, XIV and XXII amplified binary toxin gene cdtB (Tables 1 and 2). This percentage is lower than shown previously for selected strains isolated from multiple hospitals (13.7 %; Spigaglia & Mastrantonio, 2002), but similar to an estimated frequency of 5.5 % of all C. difficile isolates in the Anaerobe Reference Unit collection as determined by the percentage of binary toxin-positive ribotypes (Stubbs et al., 2000). As previously observed, strains with genes for binary toxin also have altered genes for TcdA and/or TcdB (toxinotypes III–VII, IX–XI and XIV–XVII). The reason for this correlation is unknown, but it is possible that binary toxin confers an evolutionary advantage to strains that produce variant large clostridial toxins (TcdA and TcdB) by the combined action of these toxins.

Thirteen strains (8.5 %) lacked the entire PaLoc and had no binary toxin gene present. There is no evidence that these non-toxigenic strains cause disease and it is likely that these patients had symptoms due to enteric diseases or conditions unrelated to C. difficile infection. We have found, in a separate study, C. difficile strains lacking the entire PaLoc that do produce binary toxin and studies are being conducted to determine the pathogenetic potential of these strains (Geric et al., 2003a, b).

In summary, this study of clinical C. difficile patient isolates from a single hospital suggests that variant strains of C. difficile are frequently encountered in the clinical setting. Although many of these variants express both of the large clostridial toxins and are associated with typical CDAD syndromes, characterization of these variants is important in considering potential diagnostic strategies such as PCR or immunoassays that target genes or gene products of the PaLoc. It was recently reported that some prevalent toxinotypes might not be detected with real-time PCR if only tcdB is amplified (Bélanger et al., 2003). The epidemiology of variant toxinotypes in this survey from the USA shows similarities and differences between variants isolated in Europe and Asia. One particular variant, toxinotype VIII, is widely disseminated on at least three different continents and is capable of causing severe disease as well as hospital outbreaks, despite lack of toxin A production. Further surveillance for these clinically significant AB+ strains is particularly important as they are not detected by current tests used in many clinical laboratories.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We thank S. Sambol, M. Merrigan, J. Warren, L. Sims and the staff of the VACHS-Lakeside Clinical Microbiology Laboratory for their help in this investigation. This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of Republic of Slovenia grant numbers Sl-487-002/20069/99 and P0-0523-0481, the Department of Veterans Affairs, Pharmacia & Upjohn, USA and GelTex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., USA.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  • al-Barrak, A., Embil, J., Dyck, B., Olekson, K., Nicoll, D., Alfa, M. & Kabani, A. (1999). An outbreak of toxin A negative, toxin B positive Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a Canadian tertiary-care hospital. Can Commun Dis Rep 25, 65–69.[Medline]

  • Barbut, F., Richard, A., Hamadi, K., Chomette, V., Burghoffer, B. & Petit, J.-C. (2000). Epidemiology of recurrences or reinfections of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol 38, 2386–2388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Barbut, F., Lalande, V., Burghoffer, B., Thien, H. V., Grimprel, E. & Petit, J. C. (2002). Prevalence and genetic characterization of toxin A variant strains of Clostridium difficile among adults and children with diarrhea in France. J Clin Microbiol 40, 2079–2083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Bélanger, S. D., Boissinot, M., Clairoux, N., Picard, F. J. & Bergeron, M. G. (2003). Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile in feces by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 41, 730–734.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Braun, V., Hundsberger, T., Leukel, P., Sauerborn, M. & von Eichel-Streiber, C. (1996). Definition of the single integration site of the pathogenicity locus in Clostridium difficile. Gene 181, 29–38.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Braun, V., Mehlig, M., Moos, M., Rupnik, M., Kalt, B., Mahony, D. E. & von Eichel-Streiber, C. (2000). A chimeric ribozyme in Clostridium difficile combines features of group I introns and insertion elements. Mol Microbiol 36, 1447–1459.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Brazier, J. S., Stubbs, S. L. & Duerden, B. I. (1999). Prevalence of toxin A negative/B positive Clostridium difficile strains. J Hosp Infect 42, 248–249.[Medline]

  • Camorlinga-Ponce, M., Gamboa, M., Barragan, J. J., Munoz, O., Fekety, F. R. & Torres, J. F. (1987). Epidemiological aspects of Clostridium difficile in a pediatric hospital and its role in diarrheal disease. Eur J Clin Microbiol 6, 542–546.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Carman, R., McEllistrem, M. C., Genheimer, C. W. & Zheng, L. (2003). Iota-like binary toxin producing strains of Clostridium difficile (Cd) associated with an outbreak of severe nosocomial antibiotic-associated diarrhea (ADD). In ASM 103rd general meeting abstract book, Washington, DC, abstract C-381, p. 188. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

  • Chaves-Olarte, E., Freer, E., Parra, A., Guzman-Verri, C., Moreno, E. & Thelestam, M. (2003). R-ras glucosylation and transient RhoA activation determine the cytopathic effect produced by toxin B variants from toxin A-negative strains of Clostridium difficile. J Biol Chem 278, 7956–7963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Clabots, C. R., Johnson, S., Olson, M. M., Peterson, L. R. & Gerding, D. N. (1992). Acquisition of Clostridium difficile by hospitalized patients: evidence for colonized new admissions as a source of infection. J Infect Dis 166, 561–567.[Medline]

  • Cohen, S. H., Tang, Y. J., Hansen, B. & Silva, J., Jr (1998). Isolation of a toxin B-deficient mutant strain of Clostridium difficile in a case of recurrent C.difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 26, 410–412.[Medline]

  • Delmée, M., Verellen, G., Avesani, V. & Francois, G. (1988). Clostridium difficile in neonates: serogrouping and epidemiology. Eur J Pediatr 147, 36–40.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Depitre, C., Delmée, M., Avesani, V., L'Haridon, R., Roels, A., Popoff, M. & Corthier, G. (1993). Serogroup F strains of Clostridium difficile produce toxin B but not toxin A. J Med Microbiol 38, 434–441.[Abstract]

  • Geric, B., Rupnik, M., Sambol, S. P., Carman, R. J., Grabnar, M., Gerding, D. N. & Johnson, S. (2003a). The effect of Clostridium difficile binary toxin (CDT) in animals depends upon the animal model. In Program and abstracts of Clostridia Pathogenesis 03, Woods Hole, MA, abstract 12.

  • Geric, B., Johnson, S., Gerding, D. N., Grabnar, M. & Rupnik, M. (2003b). Frequency of binary toxin genes among Clostridium difficile strains that do not produce large clostridial toxins. J Clin Microbiol 41, 5227–5232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Hammond, G. A. & Johnson, J. L. (1995). The toxigenic element of Clostridium difficile strain VPI 10463. Microb Pathog 19, 203–213.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Johnson, S. & Gerding, D. N. (1998). Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 26, 1027–1036.[Medline]

  • Johnson, S., Adelmann, A., Clabots, C. R., Peterson, L. R. & Gerding, D. N. (1989). Recurrences of Clostridium difficile diarrhea not caused by the original infecting organism. J Infect Dis 159, 340–343.[Medline]

  • Johnson, S., Kent, S. A., O'Leary, K. J., Merrigan, M. M., Sambol, S. P., Peterson, L. R. & Gerding, D. N. (2001). Fatal pseudomembranous colitis associated with a variant Clostridium difficile strain not detected by toxin A immunoassay. Ann Intern Med 135, 434–438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Kader, H. A., Piccoli, D. A., Jawad, A. F., McGowan, K. L. & Maller, E. S. (1998). Single toxin detection is inadequate to diagnose Clostridium difficile diarrhea in pediatric patients. Gastroenterology 115, 1329–1334.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Kato, H., Kato, N., Watanabe, K. & 7 other authors (1998). Identification of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 36, 2178–2182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Kuijper, E. J., de Weerdt, J., Kato, H., Kato, N., van Dam, A. P., van der Vorm, E. R., Weel, J., van Rheenen, C. & Dankert, J. (2001). Nosocomial outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea due to a clindamycin-resistant enterotoxin A-negative strain. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 20, 528–534.[Medline]

  • Lyerly, D. M., Neville, L. M., Evans, D. T. & 7 other authors (1998). Multicenter evaluation of the Clostridium difficile TOX A/B TEST. J Clin Microbiol 36, 184–190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Mekonen, E. T., Gerding, D. N., Sambol, S. P., Pottinger, J. M., Pulvirenti, J. J., Marsh, D., Kocka, F. E. & Johnson, S. (2002). Predominance of a single restriction endonuclease analysis group with intrahospital subgroup diversity among Clostridium difficile isolates at two Chicago hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 23, 648–652.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • O'Neill, G. L., Beaman, M. H. & Riley, T. V. (1991). Relapse versus reinfection with Clostridium difficile. Epidemiol Infect 107, 627–635.[Medline]

  • O'Neill, G. L., Ogunsola, F. T., Brazier, J. S. & Duerden, B. I. (1996). Modification of a PCR ribotyping method for application as a routine typing scheme for Clostridium difficile. Anaerobe 2, 205–209.

  • Perelle, S., Gibert, M., Bourlioux, P., Corthier, G. & Popoff, M. R. (1997). Production of a complete binary toxin (actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase) by Clostridium difficile CD196. Infect Immun 65, 1402–1407.[Abstract]

  • Pituch, H., van den Braak, N., van Leeuwen, W., van Belkum, A., Martirosian, G., Obuch-Woszczatynski, P., Luczak, M. & Meisel-Mikolajczyk, F. (2001). Clonal dissemination of a toxin-A-negative/toxin-B-positive Clostridium difficile strain from patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea in Poland. Clin Microbiol Infect 7, 442–446.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Popoff, M. R., Rubin, E. J., Gill, D. M. & Boquet, P. (1988). Actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase produced by a Clostridium difficile strain. Infect Immun 56, 2299–2306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Rupnik, M. (2001). How to detect Clostridium difficile variant strains in a routine laboratory. Clin Microbiol Infect 7, 417–420.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Rupnik, M., Braun, V., Soehn, F., Janc, M., Hofstetter, M., Laufenberg-Feldmann, R. & von Eichel-Streiber, C. (1997). Characterization of polymorphisms in the toxin A and B genes of Clostridium difficile. FEMS Microbiol Lett 148, 197–202.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Rupnik, M., Avesani, V., Janc, M., von Eichel-Streiber, C. & Delmée, M. (1998). A novel toxinotyping scheme and correlation of toxinotypes with serogroups of Clostridium difficile isolates. J Clin Microbiol 36, 2240–2247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Rupnik, M., Brazier, J. S., Duerden, B. I., Grabnar, M. & Stubbs, S. L. (2001). Comparison of toxinotyping and PCR ribotyping of Clostridium difficile strains and description of novel toxinotypes. Microbiology 147, 439–447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Rupnik, M., Kato, N., Grabnar, M. & Kato, H. (2003a). New types of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive strains among Clostridium difficile isolates from Asia. J Clin Microbiol 41, 1118–1125.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Rupnik, M., Grabnar, M. & Geric, B. (2003b). Binary toxin producing Clostridium difficile strains. Anaerobe 9, 289–294.

  • Sambol, S. P., Merrigan, M. M., Lyerly, D., Gerding, D. N. & Johnson, S. (2000). Toxin gene analysis of a variant strain of Clostridium difficile that causes human clinical disease. Infect Immun 68, 5480–5487.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Spigaglia, P. & Mastrantonio, P. (2002). Molecular analysis of the pathogenicity locus and polymorphism in the putative negative regulator of toxin production (TcdC) among Clostridium difficile clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol 40, 3470–3475.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Stubbs, S., Rupnik, M., Gibert, M., Brazier, J., Duerden, B. & Popoff, M. (2000). Production of actin-specific ADP-ribosyltransferase (binary toxin) by strains of Clostridium difficile. FEMS Microbiol Lett 186, 307–312.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Wilcox, M. H., Fawley, W. N., Settle, C. D. & Davidson, A. (1998). Recurrence of symptoms in Clostridium difficile infection–relapse or reinfection? J Hosp Infect 38, 93–100.[CrossRef][Medline]




    This article has been cited by other articles:


    Home page
    J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
    H. Martin, B. Willey, D. E. Low, H. R. Staempfli, A. McGeer, P. Boerlin, M. Mulvey, and J. S. Weese
    Characterization of Clostridium difficile Strains Isolated from Patients in Ontario, Canada, from 2004 to 2006
    J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2008; 46(9): 2999 - 3004.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
    P. L. Hinkson, C. Dinardo, D. DeCiero, J. D. Klinger, and R. H. Barker Jr.
    Tolevamer, an Anionic Polymer, Neutralizes Toxins Produced by the BI/027 Strains of Clostridium difficile
    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2008; 52(6): 2190 - 2195.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J Med MicrobiolHome page
    B.-M. Shin, E. Y. Kuak, H. M. Yoo, E. C. Kim, K. Lee, J.-O. Kang, D. H. Whang, and J.-H. Shin
    Multicentre study of the prevalence of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Korea: results of a retrospective study 2000-2005
    J. Med. Microbiol., June 1, 2008; 57(6): 697 - 701.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
    J. Halsey
    Current and future treatment modalities for Clostridium difficile-associated disease
    Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., April 15, 2008; 65(8): 705 - 715.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
    H. Kim, T. V. Riley, M. Kim, C. K. Kim, D. Yong, K. Lee, Y. Chong, and J.-W. Park
    Increasing Prevalence of Toxin A-Negative, Toxin B-Positive Isolates of Clostridium difficile in Korea: Impact on Laboratory Diagnosis
    J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2008; 46(3): 1116 - 1117.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J Med MicrobiolHome page
    E. Mutlu, A. J. Wroe, K. Sanchez-Hurtado, J. S. Brazier, and I. R. Poxton
    Molecular characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from hospitals in south-east Scotland
    J. Med. Microbiol., July 1, 2007; 56(7): 921 - 929.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J Med MicrobiolHome page
    B. G. Stare, M. Delmee, and M. Rupnik
    Variant forms of the binary toxin CDT locus and tcdC gene in Clostridium difficile strains
    J. Med. Microbiol., March 1, 2007; 56(3): 329 - 335.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J Med MicrobiolHome page
    I. Poilane, C. Humeniuk-Ainouz, I. Durand, C. Janoir, P. Cruaud, M. Delmee, M. R. Popoff, and A. Collignon
    Molecular characterization of Clostridium difficile clinical isolates in a geriatric hospital
    J. Med. Microbiol., March 1, 2007; 56(3): 386 - 390.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    Arch Intern MedHome page
    S. V. Kazakova, K. Ware, B. Baughman, O. Bilukha, A. Paradis, S. Sears, A. Thompson, B. Jensen, L. Wiggs, J. Bessette, et al.
    A Hospital Outbreak of Diarrhea Due to an Emerging Epidemic Strain of Clostridium difficile
    Arch Intern Med, December 11, 2006; 166(22): 2518 - 2524.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
    N. Sadeghifard, V. Gurtler, M. Beer, and R. J. Seviour
    The Mosaic Nature of Intergenic 16S-23S rRNA Spacer Regions Suggests rRNA Operon Copy Number Variation in Clostridium difficile Strains
    Appl. Envir. Microbiol., November 1, 2006; 72(11): 7311 - 7323.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J Med MicrobiolHome page
    L. G. Arroyo, H. R. Stampfli, and J. S. Weese
    Potential role of Clostridium difficile as a cause of duodenitis-proximal jejunitis in horses.
    J. Med. Microbiol., May 1, 2006; 55(Pt 5): 605 - 608.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    JAMAHome page
    S. Dial, J. A. C. Delaney, A. N. Barkun, and S. Suissa
    Use of Gastric Acid-Suppressive Agents and the Risk of Community-Acquired Clostridium difficile-Associated Disease
    JAMA, December 21, 2005; 294(23): 2989 - 2995.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    NEJMHome page
    L. C. McDonald, G. E. Killgore, A. Thompson, R. C. Owens Jr., S. V. Kazakova, S. P. Sambol, S. Johnson, and D. N. Gerding
    An Epidemic, Toxin Gene-Variant Strain of Clostridium difficile
    N. Engl. J. Med., December 8, 2005; 353(23): 2433 - 2441.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
    D. E. Voth and J. D. Ballard
    Clostridium difficile Toxins: Mechanism of Action and Role in Disease
    Clin. Microbiol. Rev., April 1, 2005; 18(2): 247 - 263.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    This Article
    Right arrow Abstract Freely available
    Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
    Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
    Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
    Right arrow Citation Map
    Services
    Right arrow Email this article to a friend
    Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
    Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
    Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
    Right arrow Download to citation manager
    Right arrow reprints & permissions
    Citing Articles
    Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
    Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
    Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
    Google Scholar
    Right arrow Articles by Geric, B.
    Right arrow Articles by Johnson, S.
    Right arrow Search for Related Content
    PubMed
    Right arrow PubMed Citation
    Right arrow Articles by Geric, B.
    Right arrow Articles by Johnson, S.
    Agricola
    Right arrow Articles by Geric, B.
    Right arrow Articles by Johnson, S.


    HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
    INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS