J Med Microbiol NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carneiro, L. A.M.
Right arrow Articles by Merquior, V. L.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carneiro, L. A.M.
Right arrow Articles by Merquior, V. L.C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Carneiro, L. A.M.
Right arrow Articles by Merquior, V. L.C.
J Med Microbiol 53 (2004), 761-768; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.05453-0
© 2004 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Antimicrobial-resistance and enterotoxin-encoding genes among staphylococci isolated from expressed human breast milk

Letícia A.M. Carneiro, Mara L.P. Queiroz and Vânia L.C. Merquior

Disciplina de Microbiologia e Imunologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Avenida 28 de Setembro, 87, Fundos – 3o andar, 20551-030, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Correspondence Vânia L. C. Merquior merquior{at}uerj.br

Received September 3, 2003
Accepted March 4, 2004

Resistance traits and the presence of enterotoxin-encoding genes were investigated in staphylococcus isolates obtained from expressed human breast milk. A total of 54 staphylococcal isolates identified as Staphylococcus epidermidis (53.6 %), Staphylococcus warneri (20.4 %), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (13 %) and Staphylococcus aureus (13 %) were investigated. By using a disc-diffusion method, higher rates of resistance, including intermediate resistance, were observed for penicillin (87 %) and erythromycin (59.3 %). All strains were susceptible to clindamycin and vancomycin. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by a macrodilution method for four clinically relevant antimicrobial drugs. High rates of resistance or intermediate resistance were observed for erythromycin, gentamicin and oxacillin. Additionally, three isolates showed reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (MIC, 8 µg ml–1). Genetic determinants of resistance were detected by using PCR and the results showed good correlation with the macrodilution tests. Moreover, in four staphylococcus isolates, the presence of enterotoxin-encoding genes (seg, seh and sea) was identified. The results demonstrated that expressed human breast milk can be a reservoir of multiresistant staphylococci that may also harbour important virulent determinants.


Abbreviations: CNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; EHM, expressed human breast milk; SE, staphylococcal enterotoxins.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
High rates of nosocomial infections among neonates, especially those premature, are a great concern among health professionals (Sohn et al., 2001; Edwards, 2002). Several critical factors have been shown to be associated with this problem including food as a potential vehicle for the dissemination of pathogens and microbial metabolites in the nosocomial setting. The ingestion of these organisms should not lead to subsequent infection since gastric acid and the microflora normally prevent colonization within the gastrointestinal tract. However, in immunocompromised patients taking antacids (gastroesophageal reflux therapy) or antibiotics, for example hospitalized infants, these physical barriers may be altered, allowing the gastrointestinal tract to be colonized by these organisms. Colonization and subsequent infection, particularly septicaemia in neonates, have been associated with the ingestion of contaminated infant formulas or expressed human breast milk (EHM) (Weir, 2002; Youssef et al., 2002). Contamination of EHM is likely to occur because of maternal infection and/or colonization by opportunistic pathogens or by improper expression, manipulation and storage procedures (Boo et al., 2001; Qutaishat et al., 2003). According to Novak et al. (2000b), the isolation of multiresistant bacteria in EHM could be associated with long-term hospitalization and abusive antimicrobial usage that commonly occur in Brazil, particularly because of the high number of caesarean sections, which increases the rate of the mother's colonization by opportunistic pathogens.

Staphylococci have been recognized as potential pathogens with increasing rates of resistance to various antimicrobial drugs currently used in the nosocomial setting (NNIS, 2002). In addition to Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) have been isolated from EHM and intestinal microflora of neonates (Goldmann, 1988; Novak et al., 2000b).The presence of staphylococci in EHM samples can be accounted for by secondary contamination from the skin and the nasal cavity of milk donors and health care professionals, or alternatively, by unsatisfactory conditions of the utensils (Gutierrez & Almeida, 1998). Furthermore, there is evidence of a significant association between gastrointestinal colonization by CNS and septicaemia and necrotizing enterocolitis in premature neonates (Ng et al., 1995).

In staphylococci, resistance to macrolides, aminoglycosides, ß-lactams and glycopeptides usually compromises antimicrobial therapeutic choices. In addition to antimicrobial-resistance traits, these micro-organisms, particularly S. aureus, produce a variety of exoproducts, including enterotoxins, toxic shock syndrome toxin 1, exfoliatine, haemolysin and coagulase. Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SE) are a major cause of food poisoning. To date, nine biochemically, genetically and serologically different SEs have been described (SEA, SEB, SEC, SED, SEE, SEG, SEI, SEJ, SEH and SEI) (Novick et al., 2001). SEA is the most frequently implicated in food-borne outbreaks. The presence of enterotoxin-producing staphylococci in EHM has been reported elsewhere (Adekeye & Adesiyun, 1984; Novak et al., 2000a).

Considering the potential role of EHM in the dissemination of pathogens, known to be an important cause of nosocomial infections in neonatology units, the present study aimed to detect the presence of staphylococci in EHM samples as well as to examine phenotypic and genotypic markers of antimicrobial resistance and to detect genes encoding enterotoxin production.


    METHODS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial strains.

A total of 54 bacterial strains obtained from EHM were analysed. EHM samples were collected during a survey of 15 weeks (one sample per week) at the Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, a tertiary-teaching hospital located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Samples were collected from different mothers 24 h after expression. The EHM was manually expressed by mothers into sterile glass containers and stored frozen and non-pasteurized until the volume was enough to pour into a single-dose feeding bottle. One millilitre aliquots of the stored EHM were collected into sterile vials, transported under refrigeration and immediately processed at the laboratory. A volume of 0.1 ml of 10-fold dilutions (10–1, 10–2, 10–3) for each EHM sample was plated onto Baird–Parker agar. After overnight incubation, about six blackened colonies from each milk sample were characterized at the genus and species level using the following physiological tests: Gram-staining, production of catalase, coagulase, cytochrome oxidase, urease and DNase, nitrate reduction, novobiocin susceptibility, aerobic growth in thioglycolate and fermentation of lactose, maltose, mannitol, mannose, sucrose, trehalose and xylose (Kloos & Bannerman, 1994; Koneman et al., 1997).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disc-diffusion.

Resistance to amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin, clindamycin, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, gentamicin, ofloxacin, penicillin, rifampicin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, tetracycline and vancomycin was determined by a disc-diffusion method as recommended by the NCCLS (2000a). S. aureus ATCC 25923 and Escherichia coli ATCC 35218 were used as reference strains.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by macrodilution (MIC).

MICs were determined by a macrodilution method using cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth (Difco Laboratories) according to the recommendations of the NCCLS (2000b). The antimicrobial drugs tested were gentamicin, erythromycin, oxacillin and vancomycin. S. aureus ATCC 29213 was used as a quality control of the procedures.

DNA extraction.

DNA was extracted by the phenol/chloroform method and further precipitated using ethanol as described elsewhere (Sambrook et al., 1989). After centrifugation, the dried pellet was suspended in 200 µl pyrogen-free water and diluted to a final concentration of 10 ng µl–1.

Detection of resistance genes.

The presence of genes involved in erythromycin, gentamicin and methicillin resistance in staphylococci was determined by using PCR. The amplification parameters used to detect erm, aac(6')/aph(2'') and mecA followed the recommendations of Sutcliffe et al. (1996), Martineau et al. (2000) and York et al. (1996), respectively. The nucleotide primer sequences are described in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Nucleotide sequences of the primers used for amplification of resistance and enterotoxin staphylococci genes
 

SE gene detection.

The following SE genes were analysed: sea, seb, sec, sed, see, seg, seh, sei and sej. The multiplex PCR was performed in a 50 µl reaction mixture containing: 1x Taq polymerase buffer, 4 mM MgCl2, 300 nM of each primer, 400 µM of each dNTP and 5 µl DNA template. The PCR tubes were incubated for 10 min (95 °C); after the initial 3 min, 5 U Taq polymerase was added to each reaction. DNA was amplified by 15 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 68 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 1 min and then 16 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 64 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 1 min and a final cycle of 72 °C for 10 min. The nucleotide sequences are described in Table 1. Positive control strains FRI472 and FRI100 were generously provided by D. Doro and T. C. Oliveira from Universidade Federal de Londrina, Brazil.

Electrophoresis.

PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis in 1.5 % agarose gels (0.5x TBE) at 100 V, stained with ethidium bromide and photographed under UV light.


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The role of food is now recognized in the dissemination and maintenance of opportunistic pathogens in the nosocomial environment and the potential threat that it might represent to the treatment of patients at high risk such as preterm babies is also known.

In this study, a total of 54 staphylococcus isolates were recovered from 13 EHM samples. Conventional physiological tests identified 53.6, 20.4, 13 and 13 % of the isolates as S. epidermidis, Staphylococcus warneri, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively. From a single EHM sample, it was possible to recover up to three different species. The different staphylococcus colonies recovered from the same EHM sample were counted as distinct isolates.

Disc-diffusion tests indicated that higher rates of resistance, including intermediate resistance, were observed for penicillin (87 %) and erythromycin (59.3 %). Strain-to-strain variation, among isolates of the same species as well as among isolates of different species was observed, even between isolates recovered from the same milk sample. Forty-seven isolates (87 %) were resistant to at least two of the drugs tested and one single isolate was resistant to seven of the antimicrobial agents tested (erythromycin, gentamicin, oxacillin, penicillin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, ofloxacin and tetracycline). All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and clindamycin (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility rates obtained by disc-diffusion method of staphylococcus isolates from EHM Values are percentages of isolates. CLO, Chloramphenicol; ERI, erythromycin; GEN, gentamicin; OFX, ofloxacin; PEN, penicillin; RIF, rifampicin; TET, tetracycline; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible. All the isolates were susceptible to amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin, clindamycin and vancomycin.
 

Both disc-diffusion and broth macrodilution methods showed that 24.1 % of the isolates were resistant to gentamicin and 3.7 % were included in the intermediate-resistance category. However, there were discrepancies between the two methods: three isolates were considered to be susceptible by disc-diffusion and included in the intermediate-resistance category by macrodilution, while another four strains were included in the intermediate-resistance category by disc-diffusion and considered to be susceptible by the macrodilution testing. MIC determination showed that three isolates identified as S. epidermidis and one isolate of S. warneri exhibited an MIC > 128 µg ml–1 to gentamicin. MIC values are listed in Table 3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. MIC values, resistance and enterotoxin genetic determinants of staphylococcus isolates ERI, Erythromycin; GEN, gentamicin; VAN, vancomycin; OXA, oxacillin; SE gene, staphylococcus enterotoxin gene.
 

Genotypic characterization of the resistance genes by PCR allowed the detection of the aac(6')/aph(2'') gene in 18.5 % of isolates. This gene was detected in all isolates showing MIC values >128 µg ml–1 (Table 3). The aac(6')/aph(2'') gene encodes the bifunctional aminoglycoside-modifying-enzyme AAC(6')/APH(2''), which confers concomitant resistance to gentamicin and the majority of aminoglycosides commonly used in medical practice. This gene is the most common aminoglycoside-resistance gene found in staphylococci. In this study, a good correlation between gentamicin resistance based on disc-diffusion and MIC tests was observed, which has also been reported by others (Shaw et al., 1993; Vanhoof et al., 1994; Martineau et al., 2000). Similar rates of gentamicin resistance have been reported in clinical isolates from the USA and Canada (Pfaller et al., 2001; Martineau et al., 2000), suggesting that the distribution of the aac(6')/aph(2'') gene among EHM isolates does not differ significantly from the distribution among isolates recovered from infections.

Disc-diffusion and MIC determination for erythromycin showed good correlation. The prevalence of erythromycin resistance recorded among all staphylococcus isolates was 25.9 %. Another 33.3 % isolates were included in the intermediate-resistance category. However, there were minor discrepancies between the two methods: 5.6 % of the strains included in the intermediate-resistance category by the macrodilution method were considered to be susceptible by the disc-diffusion test. Among the CNS isolates (n = 47), the prevalence of resistance to erythromycin, including the intermediary category, was 72.3 %, while only one of the S. aureus isolates (n = 7) showed intermediate resistance to erythromycin. MICs for erythromycin varied from <=0.25 µg ml–1 to >64 µg ml–1 (Table 3).

Among the 35 (64.8 %) isolates showing resistance or intermediate resistance to erythromycin, 4 (11.4 %), 12 (34.3 %) and 16 (45.7 %) showed amplification products related to ermA, ermB and ermC, respectively. Three isolates (one S. epidermidis and two S. warneri) showed intermediate-resistance to erythromycin but were negative for amplification products of the erm genes, shown by PCR. Westh et al. (1995) have reported the isolation of resistant strains that harboured neither the erm genes nor the mrsA gene, another erythromycin-resistance determinant that encodes efflux pumps, suggesting the occurrence of additional resistance mechanisms.

Considering the distribution of the erm gene variants among the staphylococci species studied, ermA was detected in all S. warneri isolates with MIC >= 64 µg ml–1 and in one of the S. haemolyticus isolates with MIC = 1 µg ml–1; ermB was detected in all S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus with MIC >= 32 µg ml–1 and in one S. warneri isolate with MIC = 16 µg ml–1; and ermC was present in S. epidermidis, S. warneri and S. aureus isolates with MICs ranging from 0.5 to >=2 µg ml–1.

Erythromycin resistance in staphylococci is predominantly mediated by erythromycin-resistant methylases encoded by the erm genes. The ermA gene has been reported as having the most prevalent erythromycin resistance in staphylococci and is usually associated with inducible resistance. In human infections, ermA and ermC are the most commonly found methylase genes (Nicola et al., 1998). In the present study, we observed a low frequency of the ermA gene among CNS isolates; also, none of the S. aureus isolates harboured this gene. This contrasts with the study of Martineau et al. (2000), in which ermA was the most prevalent erythromycin-resistance determinant in S. aureus. Among the CNS isolates, except for S. warneri, ermB was the most prevalent, presenting high-level resistance (MIC >= 32 µg ml–1). The gene ermB, which is very similar to the Streptococcus gene ermAM and is also usually found in Enterococus, has been associated with constitutive high-level erythromycin resistance (Westh et al., 1995; Sutcliffe et al., 1996). On the other hand, the ermC gene was the most prevalent among staphylococcus isolates presenting MIC values ranging from 0.5 to 8 µg ml–1. Eady et al. (1993) described the distribution of erythromycin- resistance genes in a broad array of human and animal CNS. In that study, the ermC gene was found to be widely distributed while the ermA and ermB genes were only detected in a minority of strains. Others have also reported a high incidence of erythromycin-resistant CNS isolates carrying ermC (Martineau et al., 2000).

By using a macrodilution method, 53 (98.1 %) of the isolates were found to be resistant to oxacillin (MIC >= 0.5 µg ml–1 for CNS and MIC >= 2 µg ml–1 for S. aureus). Only one S. epidermidis isolate (MIC = 0.06 µg ml–1) was susceptible to this drug (Table 3). The detection of the mecA gene by PCR is considered to be the gold standard method to test methicillin resistance, since phenotypical methods using oxacillin may be difficult to interpret. Additionally, some isolates do not express resistance unless selective pressure is applied. This has been frequently observed in heterogeneously resistant isolates (Killgore et al., 2000; Louie et al., 2000). Among the CNS showing resistance to oxacillin according to the macrodilution method (46 strains; MIC >= 0.5 µg ml–1), 37 (80.4 %) were also mecA-positive. Another nine isolates (7 S. epidermidis, 1 S. haemolyticus and 1 S. warneri) that were negative for the presence of the mecA gene showed MICs ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 µg ml–1, and should be classified as borderline oxacillin-resistant staphylococci. In general, CNS isolates with MICs from 0.5 to 2 µg ml–1 are mecA-negative (Hussain et al., 2000). According to other authors the resistance to methicillin in these isolates may be associated with alternative resistance mechanisms, such as ß-lactamase hyperproduction (Kolbert et al., 1998; Louie et al., 2000).

In this study, two isolates identified as S. haemolyticus that were recovered from the same EHM sample were considered to be intermediately resistant to vancomycin by MIC determination (MIC = 8 µg ml–1). The occurrence of staphylococcus isolates, especially S. aureus, S. haemolyticus and S. epidermidis, with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin has been reported in Japan, North America, Europe and Brazil (Sieradzki et al., 1998; Del'Alamo et al., 1999; Biavasco et al., 2000). To our knowledge, this is the first report of isolation of staphylococcus strains expressing reduced susceptibility to vancomycin from EHM.

In addition to resistance markers, all isolates were tested for the presence of genes encoding SE by using multiplex PCR. Although S. aureus is considered to be the species with greater pathogenic potential, CNS strains have also been reported as enterotoxin producers (Novak et al., 2000a). In the present study, one S. aureus isolate was sea-positive, while three S. epidermidis isolates were seg- (two strains) and seh- (one strain) positive (Fig. 1). SEA is also the SE most frequently implicated in food-borne outbreaks (Balaban & Rasooly, 2000). Additionally, because of their role as superantigens, SEA, SEG and SEH have been linked to other staphylococcal syndromes such as toxic shock syndrome, staphylococcal scarlet fever and recalcitrant erythematous desquamating disorder (Sharma et al., 2000). The presence of enterotoxin-producing staphylococci in EHM has been reported elsewhere (Novak et al., 2000a).



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. SE genes detection by PCR. Lanes: 1, 50 bp ladder; 2, DNA pool of positive control strains; 3, positive control FRI472 strain (sed+, seg+, sei+, sej+); 4, positive control FRI100 strain (sea+); 5, S. epidermidis, seh+ (isolate 03); 6, S. epidermidis, seh+ (isolate 04); 7, S. epidermidis, seg+ (isolate 20); 8, S. aureus, sea+ (isolate 54); 9–10, negative reactions (S. epidermidis isolates 10 and 24).

 

The dosage of enterotoxin necessary to cause symptoms in humans is yet to be established. However, there is evidence to show that the presence of SE in food with concentrations as low as 1 ng g–1 is enough to initiate an outbreak (Jay, 1992). Although one cannot ensure that the isolates harbouring genes encoding enterotoxins are actually able to express them, they have the potential to do so. If such strains find favourable conditions in the hospital environment, they might produce SEs resulting in critical situations, particularly considering the immune status of the population for which this food is destined.

At the hospital analysed in the present study, CNS infections are the major cause of bacteraemia in the neonatology unit (E. Castro, personal communication). The use of broad-spectrum antibiotic regimens may contribute to increasing isolation rates of multiresistant strains of CNS. Rigorous bacteriological investigation incorporated into Gram-positive, CNS identification schemes and the monitoring of their resistant features should properly detect and characterize these pathogens. The presence of staphylococci in EHM and their wide antimicrobial-resistance profiles as well as the presence of enterotoxin determinants are reasons for concern considering the immunological immaturity of the population that will receive the EHM. Additional studies are necessary to determine the source of contamination and the potential contribution of contaminated EHM in propagating multiresistant staphylococcus colonization and infection.

Our results bring attention to the necessity of quality-control programs, personnel training and continuous surveillance in order to reduce the risk that EHM might represent as a vehicle of dissemination of these pathogens. This in turn will improve information in developing countries related to the epidemiological aspects of isolates obtained from different sources.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  • Adekeye, J. D. & Adesiyun, A. A. (1984). Frequency of isolation of enterotoxigenic staphylococci from milk of nursing mothers in Kaduna, Nigeria. J Hyg (Lond) 93, 531–538.[Medline]

  • Balaban, N. & Rasooly, A. (2000). Staphylococcal enterotoxins. Int J Food Microbiol 61, 1–10.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Biavasco F., Vignaroli C. & Varaldo P.E. (2000). Glycopeptide resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 19, 403–417.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Boo, N. Y., Nordiah, A. J., Alfizah, H., Nor-Rohaini, A. H. & Lim, V. K. (2001). Contamination of breast milk obtained by manual expression and breast pumps in mothers of very low birthweight infants. J Hosp Infect 49, 274–281.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Del'Alamo L., Cereda R.F., Tosin I., Miranda E.A. & Sader H.S. (1999). Antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci and characterization of isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 34, 185–191.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Eady, E. A., Ross, J. I., Tipper, J. L., Walters, C. E., Cove, J. H. & Noble, W. C. (1993). Distribution of genes encoding erythromycin ribosomal methylases and an erythromycin efflux pump in epidemiologically distinct groups of staphylococci. J Antimicrob Chemother 31, 211–217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Edwards, W. H. (2002). Preventing nosocomial bloodstream infection in very low birth weight infants. Semin Neonatol 7, 325–333.[Medline]

  • Goldmann, D. A. (1988). The bacterial flora of neonates in intensive care-monitoring and manipulation. J Hosp Infect 11, A340–A351.[CrossRef]

  • Gutierrez, D. & Almeida, J. A. (1998). Human milk banks in Brazil. J Hum Lact 14, 333–335.[Free Full Text]

  • Hussain, Z., Stoakes, L., Massey, V., Diagre, D., Fitzgerald, V., Elsayed, S. & Lannigan, R. (2000). Correlation of oxacillin MIC with mecA gene carriage in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 38, 752–754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Jay, J. M. (1992). Modern Food Microbiology, 4th edn. New York: Chapman & Hall.

  • Killgore, G. E., Holloway, B. & Tenover, F. C. (2000). A 5' nuclease PCR (TaqMan) high-throughput assay for detection of the mecA gene in staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 38, 2516–2519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Kloos, W. E. & Bannerman, T. L. (1994). Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 7, 117–140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Kolbert, C., Arruda, J., Varga-Delmore, P., Zheng, X., Lewis, M., Kolberg, J. & Persing D. H. (1998). Branched-DNA assay for detection of the mecA gene in oxacillin-resistant and oxacillin-sensitive staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 36, 2640–2644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Koneman, E. W., Allen, S. D., Janda, W. M. & Schreckenberger, P. C. (1997). Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Willians & Wilkins.

  • Louie, L., Matsumura, S. O., Choi, E., Louie, M. & Simor, A. E. (2000). Evaluation of three rapid methods for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 38, 2170–2173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Martineau, F., Picard, F. J., Lansac, N., Ménard, C., Roy, P. H., Ouellette, M. & Bergeron, M. G. (2000). Correlation between the resistance genotype determined by multiplex PCR assays and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44, 231–238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Monday, S. R. & Bohach, G. A. (1999). Use of multiplex PCR to detect classical and newly described pyrogenic toxin genes in staphylococcal isolates. J Clin Microbiol 37, 3411–3414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • NCCLS (2000a). Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved Standards, 7th edn. Villanova, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.

  • NCCLS (2000b). Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests. Approved Standards, 7th edn (M7-A5). Villanova, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.

  • Ng, P. C., Lewindon, P. J., Siu, Y. K., Wong, W., Cheung, K. L. & Liu, K. (1995). Bacterial contaminated breast milk and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm twins. J Hosp Infect 31, 105–110.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Nicola, F. G., McDougal, L. K., Biddle, J. W. & Tenover, F. C. (1998). Characterization of erythromycin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus recovered in the United States from 1958 through 1969. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42, 3024–3027.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • NNIS (2002). National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 to June 2002, issued August 2002. Am J Infect Control 30, 458–475.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Novak, F. R., Almeida, J. A., Warnken, M. B., Ferreira-Carvalho, B. T. & Hagler, A. N. (2000a). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in human milk. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 95, 29–33.[Medline]

  • Novak, F. R., Da Silva, A. V., Hagler, A. N. & Figueiredo, A. M. S. (2000b). Contamination of expressed human breast milk with an epidemic multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus clone. J Med Microbiol 49, 1109–1117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Novick, R. P., Schlievert, P. & Ruzin, A. (2001). Pathogenicity and resistance islands of staphylococci. Microbes Infect 3, 585–594.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Pfaller, M. A., Acar, J., Jones, R. N., Verhoef, J. J., Turnidge, J. & Sader, H. S. (2001). Integration of molecular characterization of microorganisms in a global antimicrobial resistance surveillance program. Clin Infect Dis 32, S156–S167.

  • Qutaishat, S. S., Stemper, M. E., Spencer, S. K., Borchardt, M. A., Opitz, M. A., Monson, T. A., Anderson, J. L. & Ellingson, J. L. (2003). Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium DT104 to infants through mother's breast milk. Pediatrics 111, 1442–1446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Sambrook, J., Fristch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

  • Sharma, N. K., Rees, C. E. D. & Dodd, C. E. R. (2000). Development of a single-reaction multiplex PCR toxin typing assay for Staphylococcus aureus strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 1347–1353.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Shaw, K. J., Rather, P. N., Hare, R. S. & Miller, G. H. (1993). Molecular genetics of aminoglycoside resistance genes and familial relationships of the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Microbiol Rev 57, 138–163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Sieradzki K., Villari P. & Tomasz A. (1998). Decreased susceptibilities to teicoplanin and vancomycin among coagulase-negative methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42, 100–107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Sohn, A. H., Garrett, D. O., Sinkowitz-Cochran, R. L., Grohskopf, L. A., Levine, G. L., Stover, B. H., Siegel, J. D., Jarvis, W. R. & Pediatric Prevention Network (2001). Prevalence of nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care unit patients: results from the first national point-prevalence survey. J Pediatr 139, 821–827.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Sutcliffe, J., Grebe, T., Tait-Kamradt, A. & Wondrack, L. (1996). Detection of erythromicin-resistant determinants by PCR. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40, 2562–2566.[Abstract]

  • Vanhoof, R., Godard, C., Content, J., Nyssen, H. J. & Hannecart-Pokorni, E. (1994). Detection by polymerase chain reaction of genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates of epidemic phage types. J Med Microbiol 41, 282–290.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Weir, E. (2002). Powdered infant formula and fatal infection with Enterobacter sakazakii. Can Med Assoc J 166, 1570. 1570.[Free Full Text]

  • Westh, H., Hougaard, D. M., Vuust, J. & Rosdahl, V. T. (1995). Prevalence of erm gene classes in erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated between 1959 and 1988. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39, 369–373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • York, M. K., Gibbs, L., Chehab, F. & Brooks, G. F. (1996). Comparison of PCR detection of mecA with standard susceptibility testing methods to determine methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 34, 249–253.[Abstract]

  • Youssef, R. F., Darcy, E., Barone, A., Borja, M. T. & Leggiadro, R. J. (2002). Expressed breast milk as a source of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 21, 888–889.[CrossRef][Medline]




    This article has been cited by other articles:


    Home page
    Vet Rec.Home page
    M. Nemati, K. Hermans, D. Vancraeynest, S. De Vliegher, O. C. Sampimon, M. Baele, E. M. De Graef, F. Pasmans, and F. Haesebrouck
    Screening of bovine coagulase-negative staphylococci from milk for superantigen-encoding genes
    Vet Rec., December 20, 2008; 163(25): 740 - 743.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    This Article
    Right arrow Abstract Freely available
    Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
    Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
    Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
    Right arrow Citation Map
    Services
    Right arrow Email this article to a friend
    Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
    Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
    Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
    Right arrow Download to citation manager
    Right arrow reprints & permissions
    Citing Articles
    Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
    Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
    Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
    Google Scholar
    Right arrow Articles by Carneiro, L. A.M.
    Right arrow Articles by Merquior, V. L.C.
    Right arrow Search for Related Content
    PubMed
    Right arrow PubMed Citation
    Right arrow Articles by Carneiro, L. A.M.
    Right arrow Articles by Merquior, V. L.C.
    Agricola
    Right arrow Articles by Carneiro, L. A.M.
    Right arrow Articles by Merquior, V. L.C.


    HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
    INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS