J Med Microbiol International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Litwin, C. M
Right arrow Articles by Martins, T. B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Litwin, C. M
Right arrow Articles by Martins, T. B
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Litwin, C. M
Right arrow Articles by Martins, T. B
J Med Microbiol 53 (2004), 1221-1227; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.45616-0
© 2004 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

The Bartonella henselae sucB gene encodes a dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase protein reactive with sera from patients with cat-scratch disease

Christine M Litwin1,2, Joel M Johnson1,2 and Thomas B Martins2

1Section of Clinical Immunology, Microbiology and Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Utah, 50 N. Medical Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA 2Associated Regional and University Pathologists (ARUP), Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA

Correspondence Christine M. Litwin Christine.Litwin{at}path.utah.edu

Received January 26, 2004
Accepted September 14, 2004

Bartonella henselae is a recently recognized pathogenic bacterium associated with cat-scratch disease, bacillary angiomatosis and bacillary peliosis. A recombinant clone expressing an immunoreactive antigen of B. henselae was isolated by screening a genomic DNA cosmid library by Western blotting with sera pooled from patients positive for B. henselae IgG antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence (IFA). The deduced amino acid sequence of the 43.7 kDa encoded protein was found to be 76.3 % identical to the dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase enzyme (SucB) of Brucella melitensis. SucB has been shown to be an immunogenic protein during infections by Brucella melitensis, Coxiella burnetii and Bartonella vinsonii. The agreement between reactivity with a recombinant SucB fusion protein on immunoblot analysis and the results obtained by IFA was 55 % for IFA-positive sera and 88 % for IFA-negative sera. Cross-reactivity was observed with sera from patients with antibodies against Brucella melitensis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Francisella tularensis, Coxiella burnetii and Rickettsia typhi.


Abbreviations: CSD, cat-scratch disease; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; IFA, indirect immunofluorescence assay.

The GenBank accession number for the DNA sequence of the Bartonella henselae sucA, sucB and lpdA genes presented in this article is AY375300.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 Subcloning of the B....
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Bartonella henselae is a recently recognized pathogenic bacterium that has been found to be associated with cat-scratch disease (CSD), bacillary angiomatosis and bacillary peliosis (Cockerell & Friedman-Kien, 1988; Dolan et al., 1993; Koehler et al., 1994; Reed et al., 1992; Zangwill et al., 1993). Of these syndromes, CSD is the most common and affects an estimated 25 000 people in the United States annually, the majority of whom are children (Jackson et al., 1993). Severe and protracted cases of CSD often require extensive clinical and laboratory investigation, including lymph node biopsy. The use of serological tests specific for B. henselae may help in avoiding invasive procedures in these patients.

Current diagnostic methods for determining the presence of Bartonella antibodies in CSD include indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Sensitivity of the IFA has been reported to vary from 32 (Bergmans et al., 1997) to 100 % (Sander et al., 1998) in different studies. A high degree of cross-reactivity of Bartonella serology with other intracellular pathogens has been described and has made the serologically based diagnosis of CSD problematic (La Scola & Raoult, 1996; Maurin et al., 1997; McGill et al., 1998; Sander et al., 1998). Highly purified and cloned antigens have been shown to be very sensitive and specific in serologic assays. Anderson et al. (1995) found 92 % agreement with IFA-positive sera using the cloned 17 kDa antigen of B. henselae in an EIA. Therefore, the characterization and cloning of the individual antigens involved in eliciting an immune response to B. henselae in humans should aid in the development of more sensitive and specific diagnostic serologic tests.

Relatively little is known regarding the immunoreactive proteins associated with B. henselae infections. Only two immunoreactive B. henselae antigens have been cloned and characterized to date: the 17 kDa antigen (Anderson et al., 1995) and HtrA stress response protein (Anderson et al., 1996). Recently, the 45 kDa dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase protein (SucB) was found to be immunogenic in a mouse experimentally infected with Bartonella (Gilmore et al., 2003). The present study was initiated to identify and characterize immunogenic proteins of B. henselae that are expressed during human infection. In this paper we describe the cloning and characterization of the gene encoding the immunoreactive dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase enzyme (sucB) of B. henselae. Studies were also performed to evaluate the possible role for this protein as a diagnostic reagent for the serological evaluation of patients with suspected CSD.


    METHODS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 Subcloning of the B....
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Bacterial strains and media.

B. henselae strain ATCC 49793 was obtained from the American Type Culture Collections (ATCC). The Escherichia coli strain used was XL-1 Blue MR (Stratagene). E. coli strains were routinely grown in Luria–Bertani broth (LB). Kanamycin (50 µg ml–1) and ampicillin (100 µg ml–1) were added as appropriate. B. henselae was grown on freshly prepared Columbia 5 % sheep blood agar plates for 7 days at 35 °C under 5 % carbon dioxide. All strains were maintained at –70 °C in LB media containing 15 % glycerol.

Clinical samples.

The serum used for initially screening the B. henselae cosmid library was pooled from 68 cases of suspected CSD that were submitted to ARUP laboratories for confirmative diagnosis. These sera had IgG titres ranging from 1 : 512 to 1 : 4096 for B. henselae, as determined by IFA. The IFA titre of the pooled specimen was 1 : 1024.

One hundred serum samples positive for IgG antibodies by IFA (titres of 1 : 128–1 : 4096), and 50 samples negative for both IgM and IgG (titres < 1 : 16 for IgM and < 1 : 64 for IgG) and 100 random healthy donors in the Salt Lake City, Utah area were used in determining the agreement, sensitivity and specificity compared to IFA. The procedures followed were in accord with the ethical standards established by the University of Utah and are in accord with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. Specimens were collected under approval by the University of Utah Institutional Review Board (IRB#11343). Specimens were stored at –20 °C until testing commenced and were then stored at 2–8 °C while the evaluations were performed.

Sera used for cross-reactivity analysis.

A panel of sera from patients with IgG antibodies against Brucella melitensis [>=1.1 index value (IV) is positive], Chlamydia pneumoniae (titre >=1 : 64), Coxiella burnetii (titre >=1 : 16), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (>=0.95 U l–1), Treponema pallidum (titre >=1 : 5), Ehrlichia chaffeensis (titre >=1 : 16), Francisella tularensis (titre >=1 : 80), Rickettsia typhi (titre >=1 : 256), Rickettsia rickettsii (>=1.1 IV), Leptospira spp. (titre >=1 : 100) and Legionella pneumophila (titre >=1 : 128) was used in cross-reactivity studies. Serum testing for antibodies against M. pneumoniae was performed using an ELISA (GenBio); for Brucella melitensis using an ELISA (PANBIO); for Chlamydia pneumoniae using a microimmunofluorescent assay (Focus Technologies); for Coxiella burnetii using an IFA (Focus Technologies); for T. pallidum using an IFA (SCIMEDX Corporation); for Ehrlichia chaffeensis using an IFA (PANBIO); for F. tularensis using agglutination (Germaine Laboratories); for Rickettsia typhi using an IFA (Focus Technologies); for Rickettsia rickettsii using an ELISA (PANBIO); for Leptospira spp. using indirect haemagglutination (Focus Technologies) and for Legionella pneumophila using an IFA (MARDX). A single positive representative sample was used for each organism. All serum samples tested by the SucB immunoblot were also tested for M. pneumoniae antibodies (except for three samples in which there was insufficient volume) to assess cross-reactivity with the SucB antigen. All tests were performed according to manufacturers’ recommendation.

Construction of B. henselae cosmid library.

A cosmid library of B. henselae ATCC 49793 was constructed using SuperCos1 cosmid vector kit (Stratagene).

B. henselae genomic DNA was partially digested with BamHI. The digested DNA was sized to yield 30–40 kb fragments, dephosphorylated and then ligated into the BamHI site of SuperCos1, previously linearized with XbaI. Packaging of the cosmids into phage and their subsequent infection in the E. coli strain XL-1 Blue MR were performed as described by the manufacturer.

Preparation and analysis of whole-cell proteins.

Whole-cell proteins were prepared from E. coli cells grown to late exponential phase in LB medium. Whole-cell proteins were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 0.2 M Tris/HCl (pH 8.0). The cells were centrifuged again and resuspended in 2x Laemmli's sample buffer, boiled for 10 min and centrifuged again. Protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford method (1976) with Coomassie protein assay reagent (Pierce). Whole-cell proteins were prepared from B. henselae as described above except that cells were harvested directly from Columbia sheep blood agar plates after 3 days growth. The proteins were separated on SDS 4–15 % PAGE and were stained with Coomassie blue.

IFA.

B. henselae-coated slides were obtained from Focus Technologies. Serum dilutions of 1 : 64 were applied to each well of the IFA slide for initial testing and titrated to end-point for initial positives. The slides were incubated at 37 °C in a moist chamber for 30 min. The slides were then rinsed with PBS and soaked for an additional 5 min in PBS. The slides were allowed to air dry before fluorescein-labelled goat anti-human IgG conjugate (Sigma) was added to the slides. The slides were then incubated for 30 min and washed and dried as before. The reacted slides were read at a magnification of 400x. Samples giving 2+ or greater fluorescence were considered positive at the screening dilution. Twofold serial dilutions of the sample were performed to a 2+ fluorescence end-point. Patient samples were considered equivocal at a dilution of 1 : 64–1 : 128; 1 : 256 and above was considered positive.

Western blot.

Five microlitres whole-cell protein (6.5 mg ml–1) were loaded in each well of an SDS 4–15 % PAGE gel. Twenty-five microlitres protein were used in loading two-well Ready Gel preparative gels (Bio-Rad). Electrophoresis was carried out at 200 V for 30–60 min. The separated proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 100 V for 1 h using the Mini-Trans-Blot electrophoretic transfer cell (Bio-Rad). The membranes were then blocked overnight at 4 °C with 3 % dry milk in TBS solution. Serum samples were diluted 1 : 200 in a diluent/wash solution (3 % dry milk in TBS).

The sera used in this study for screening the cosmid library were preadsorbed with E. coli antigens. Fresh overnight cultures of E. coli XL-1 Blue MR containing SuperCos1 vector were pelleted by centrifugation. The supernatant was discarded, the pellet was washed with 0.02 M Tris/HCl, and resuspended in 500 µl protoplasting buffer (150 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0; 100 M sucrose; 8 mM EDTA). Next, 10 µl 2 mg lysozyme ml–1 was added, and the cells were incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The diluted primary antibody solution was incubated with a 1 : 10 (v/v) dilution of the lysate for 30 min with shaking at 37 °C.

After preadsorption, the sera were reacted with the membrane containing the protein samples for 3 h on a rocking platform. The membrane was then washed three times, changing the diluent/wash every 5 min. A 1 : 5000 dilution of alkaline phosphatase goat anti-human IgG ({gamma}-chain specific) conjugate (Sigma), was added to the membranes. The membrane was then incubated for 1 h and washed as before, before the addition of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium (BCIP/NBT) substrate (Sigma). This reaction was carried out for 5–10 min and then stopped by the addition of distilled water.


    Subcloning of the B. henselae sucB gene and its expression in E. coli.
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 Subcloning of the B....
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
A gene fusion of sucB with lacZ was used to confirm the identity of the 45 kDa antigen as SucB and allow increased expression in E. coli. PCR primers from the sucB gene sequence were designed to contain a BamHI site on the 5' end (5'-AAGGATCCTATGACTACTGAAAT CCGTGTTCCTA-3') and an EcoRI site on the 3' end (5'-GGAATTC TGTACTTTTACAAGTCAAGAACCAG-3'). The restriction sites allowed in-frame and directional cloning of a 1.2 kb insert containing the sucB gene into the pBluescript SK– vector (Stratagene). DNA from B. henselae was amplified through 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 92 °C for 40 s and 60 °C for 40 s using GeneAmp reagents, Taq polymerase and a thermal cycler (MJ Research). The resulting PCR product was digested with BamHI and EcoRI, purified and ligated to pBluescript to produce a fusion of the immunogenic protein with LacZ. The ligation was transformed into E. coli XL-1 Blue MR. Potential clones were examined by restriction endonuclease analysis and DNA sequencing to confirm the correct insert. The clone, designated pCML74, was grown to early exponential phase in LB broth, induced with 1 mM IPTG and allowed to continue to grow for an additional 2 h. Proteins were isolated as described above and resolved on a single preparative well of an SDS 4–15 % gradient PAGE minigel. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose, and the resulting membrane was cut into individual 3 mm strips and reacted with individual serum samples.

Serum activity.

Individual sera positive and negative for B. henselae antibodies by IFA, sera positive for antibodies to the various other organisms listed above and sera from healthy blood donors were analysed for reactivity against the recombinant SucB protein. All sera were preadsorbed with a 1 : 10 dilution of a lysate of E. coli XL-1Blue MR carrying SuperCos1, as described before, to remove non-specific antibodies reacting with proteins from E. coli.

DNA manipulations and cloning.

Standard methods were followed for molecular biological techniques (Sambrook et al., 1989). Oligonucleotides were synthesized at the Huntsman Cancer Center peptide and DNA facility, University of Utah.

DNA sequencing.

The DNA sequence was determined by the AB 3700 96 capillary DNA Analyser from Applied Biosystems. Synthetic oligonucleotides used as primers for DNA sequencing were synthesized by the Huntsman Cancer Center peptide and DNA facility.

Statistical analyses.

Agreement, sensitivity and specificity of the SucB immunoblot correlation with the B. henselae IFA were calculated with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) using a two-way contingency table analysis with Yates-corrected Chi-squared test (Fleiss, 1981). A Student's t-test was used for continuous variables.

DNA and protein database searches.

The National Center for Biotechnology Information Services were used to consult the SwissPROT, GenBank and EMBL databases with the BLAST algorithm (Altschul et al., 1990; Gish & States, 1993).


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 Subcloning of the B....
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Identification of immunoreactive clones

Our approach for cloning the immunogenic proteins of B. henselae was similar to the method used by Anderson et al. (1995) to clone the 17 kDa antigen of B. henselae. We also used a pool of IFA-positive sera to screen a B. henselae library for immunoreactive proteins. The major difference was that we screened immunoblots of proteins separated by SDS-PAGE that were isolated from individual clones from a B. henselae cosmid library.

We chose to pool sera with titres of 1 : 512 or above to screen the B. henselae cosmid library so that the pooled sera would be as specific as the IFA assay can allow. This cut-off titre was based on previous studies examining the sensitivity and specificity of the IFA. Regnery et al. (1992) and Zangwill et al. (1993) increased the specificity of the B. henselae IgG IFA assay to 99 % when a titre of 1 : 512 was considered the cut-off. Bergmans et al. (1997) found that a cut-off titre of 1 : 512 was needed to obtain a specificity of >=95 % in blood donors. Maurin et al. (2002) recommended that a titre of >=1 : 128 should be the cut-off for the Focus Technologies IgG IFA to ensure a specificity of 95 %.

Two hundred cosmids from the B. henselae SuperCos1 library were analysed for proteins immunoreactive with the pooled sera positive by IFA for B. henselae antibodies. Numerous cosmids were identified that contained immunoreactive bands on Western blots reacting with the pooled sera. The characterization of a cosmid designated pBH96 containing a 30 kb insert and expressing a 45 kDa antigen reactive with the pooled sera is presented in this study (Fig. 1b, lane 3, white arrow). A distinct 45 kDa protein band was not seen on a Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gel of the E. coli strain containing cosmid pBH96 when compared to the control E. coli strain (Fig. 1a, lanes 2–3, white arrow). The antigenic 45 kDa band expressed by pBH96 on Western blot is similar in size to an approximately 45 kDa antigenic band identified in the B. henselae protein lane (Fig. 1b, lane 1).



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (a) SDS-PAGE of whole-cell proteins stained with Coomassie. Lanes: 1, B. henselae ATCC 49793; 2, E. coli XL-1 Blue containing SuperCos1 control; 3, E. coli (pBH96); 4, un-induced E. coli (pCML74); 5, induced E. coli (pCML74) expressing the 55.6 kDa SucB fusion protein. (b) Duplicate gel transferred to nitrocellulose and reacted with a 1 : 200 dilution of a human sera pool positive for B. henselae antibodies by IFA. White arrows indicate the position of the 45 kDa SucB protein. Black arrows indicate the position of the 55.6 kDa SucB fusion protein. Molecular size standards (in kDa) are shown on the left.

 

DNA sequence analysis of sucB gene and organization of the suc genes

DNA sequencing of 6.5 kb of the 30 kb insert in cosmid pBH96 revealed three ORFs. Comparison of the ORFs to those in GenBank by using the BLAST algorithm showed that the ORFs encoded proteins homologous to SucA, SucB and LpdA, which are 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase (E1o), dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase (E2o) and dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase enzymes, respectively (Fig. 2). These enzymes are components of the 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase operon complex previously identified in E. coli and Brucella melitensis (Spencer & Guest, 1982; Zygmunt et al., 2001). The order of the sucA, sucB and lpdA genes in the operon are identical to what has been described for Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii and similar to Brucella melitensis except that an extra ORF is located between the sucB and lpdA genes for Brucella melitensis. B. henselae sucB was determined to have 82.9 % amino acid identity to SucB of B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii, 85.3 % identity to SucB of Bartonella quintana and 69.8 % identity to SucB of Brucella melitensis. The sucB coding sequence consists of 1218 bp with a deduced amino acid sequence of 406 amino acids that have a calculated molecular mass of 43.6 kDa. The B. henselae sucA coding sequence consists of 2997 bp and was determined to have 76.3 % amino acid sequence identity to SucB of Brucella melitensis. The B. henselae lpdA coding sequence consists of 1404 bp and was determined to have 74.1 % amino acid sequence identity to LpdA of B. henselae.



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Organization of the B. henselae ATCC 49793 suc genes. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription.

 

Expression of sucB and gene fusion construction

The SucB protein has been previously recognized as an immunogenic protein of 45 kDa in Brucella-infected sheep (Zygmunt et al., 2001) and identified as an immunogenic protein of B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii and B. quintana by mouse polyclonal antibodies raised against heat-killed Bartonella (Gilmore et al., 2003). To confirm that SucB of B. henselae was the immunogenic protein expressed by cosmid pBH96, the coding sequence of the B. henselae sucB was amplified by PCR with primers designed to facilitate directional cloning into pBluescript and to produce an in-frame fusion of the antigen with the 12 kDa ß-galactosidase sequence of the vector, which is inducible by IPTG. The calculated molecular mass of the fusion protein was 55.6 kDa. The induced protein was identified on Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1a, lane 5, black arrow). Both the un-induced and induced recombinant SucB immunoblotted positively with the pooled sera containing Bartonella antibodies by IFA (Fig. 1b, lanes 4 and 5).

Immunoreactivity of the fusion protein

Immunoblot analyses were performed to examine the reactivities of the 55.6 kDa SucB fusion protein with individual serum samples from patients with suspected CSD that were positive for B. henselae antibodies by IFA, as well as sera negative for B. henselae antibodies by IFA and sera from healthy normal control donors (Fig. 3). When individual serum samples previously tested for B. henselae antibodies by IFA were reacted with the recombinant SucB protein, agreement between the IFA and reactivity with SucB was 55 % for IFA-positive sera and 88 % for IFA-negative sera. The calculated sensitivity was 55 % (49.2–59.2 % CI) (Table 1).



View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Immunoblot of the 55.6 kDa SucB fusion protein reacted with individual serum samples. Whole-cell protein preparations from E. coli containing the induced SucB 55.6 kDa fusion protein were electrophoresed through a SDS 4–15 % gradient PAGE gel and transferred to nitrocellulose. The filter was cut into strips and reacted with the individual serum samples diluted 1 : 200. (a) Individual serum samples positive and negative for B. henselae antibodies by IFA and normal healthy controls. Lanes: 1, IFA-positive, titre 1 : 1024; 2, IFA-positive, titre 1 : 1024; 3, IFA-positive, titre 1 : 256; 4, IFA-positive, titre 1 : 512, negative for reactivity against SucB; 5, IFA-positive, titre 1 : 512, negative for reactivity against SucB; 6, IFA-negative, titre < 1 : 64; 7, IFA-negative, titre < 1 : 64; 8, IFA-negative, reactive with SucB; 9 and 10, normal healthy control; 11, normal healthy control reactive with SucB fusion. (b) Study of cross-reactivity of B. henselae SucB with individual serum samples positive for antibodies against various infectious agents. Lanes: 1, B. henselae, IFA titre 1 : 1024; 2, IFA titre < 1 : 64; 3, Brucella melitensis, titre 1 : 1280; 4, Chlamydia pneumoniae, titre >1 : 1024; 5, M. pneumoniae, index value 3.67; 6, T. pallidum, FTA-positive; 7, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, titre 1 : 4096; 8, F. tularensis, titre 1 : 1280; 9, Q fever (Coxiella burnetii), titre phase I, 1 : 16, phase II, 1 : 32; 10, R. typhi, titre 1 : 256; 11, R. rickettsii, index value 10.5; 12, Leptospira interrogans, titre 1 : 3200; lane 13, Legionella pneumophila, titre 1 : 128. Arrows indicate the position of the 55.6 kDa SucB fusion protein. Molecular size standards (in kDa) are shown on the left.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Calculation of sensitivity and specificity of SucB immunoblot with CSD, IFA-positive and -negative sera and normal control sera, with and without inclusion of M. pneumoniae-positive sera
 

Nine of 50 sera negative for B. henselae antibodies by IFA (titre < 1 : 64) were also reactive with the SucB fusion protein for a background reactivity of 18 %. Twenty-three of 100 healthy normal control sera were also reactive with the SucB fusion protein (23 %). The calculated specificity of the SucB fusion immunoblot using IFA-negative sera is 82 % (70.4–90.5 % CI) and using healthy normal controls is 77 % (70–83.3 % CI) (Table 1).

We found that only 55 out of 100 IFA-positive serum samples reacted with the recombinant SucB protein by immunoblotting. Therefore, the sensitivity of the recombinant SucB antigen is much lower than the 92 % sensitivity reported for the recombinant 17 kDa antigen of B. henselae when compared to the B. henselae IFA. The 55 % sensitivity found with SucB, however, correlates with our previous study examining individual IgG Western blot patterns on IFA-positive patients (Litwin et al., 1997). We found that only 11 of 25 (44 %) samples positive for B. henselae IgG antibodies by IFA showed reactivity against a 45 kDa band on Western blots of B. henselae proteins. Others have also shown that anti-Bartonella serum samples are reactive on immunoblots with proteins having molecular masses ranging from 45 to 50 kDa (Freeland et al., 1999; Liang & Raoult, 2000). In the study by Maurin et al. (1994), immunoblots showed a reactive 48.5 kDa band in B. vinsonii, B. henselae and B. quintana Western blots, when serum from a patient with HIV infection and B. quintana infection (bacillary angiomatosis) was used. This 48.5 kDa protein was also identified when mouse antisera to B. quintana or B. henselae was used to react with the Western blots.

The median IFA titre for SucB-reactive and nonreactive sera was 1 : 256 for both, with a range of 1 : 256–1 : 4096 for the reactive sera and 1 : 128–1 : 4096 for the non-reactive sera. The IFA titre also did not correlate with the intensity of reactivity with the recombinant SucB band on immunoblot. For example, in Fig. 3, lanes 1 and 2 represent individual patient sera positive by IFA for B. henselae antibodies. Both samples had titres of 1 : 1024 by IFA, yet the reactivity with recombinant SucB is more intense in lane 1. There was variability of the reactivity of the individual sera with several E. coli proteins on the immunoblots as noted by the other bands of varying molecular mass (Fig. 3a).

Cross-reactivity studies

SucB reactivity was tested against sera from patients with antibodies against other bacterial species (Fig. 3b). Cross-reactivity of SucB was observed with sera positive for antibodies against Brucella melitensis, M. pneumoniae, F. tularensis, Coxiella burnetii and R. typhi. No cross-reactivity was observed with sera from patients with antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae, T. pallidum, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, R. rickettsii, Leptospira spp. and Legionella pneumophila.

Our study confirms and adds to the observations by Gilmore et al. (2003) that SucB is an important immunogenic protein for B. henselae infections in addition to infections with B. vinsonii and B. quintana. Gilmore et al. (2003) screened a B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii library with a pool of mouse polyclonal antibodies raised against heat-killed Bartonella sp. cotton rat isolates. One immunoreactive clone was found to contain the 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase operon, sucA, sucB and lpdA. Antiserum from a mouse experimentally infected with live Bartonella was reactive against the recombinant B. vinsonii SucB protein.

A large number of IFA-negative sera (18 %) and healthy normal control sera (23 %) reacted with the recombinant SucB protein. This calculates to a specificity of 82 and 77 % for IFA-negative and healthy control sera, respectively. This specificity, however, is actually only slightly decreased when compared to the 88 % specificity observed for the 17 kDa antigen, using IFA as the gold standard. Some of this high degree of reactivity may be explained by the cross-reactivity of the SucB protein with human sera containing antibodies against M. pneumoniae. When a similarity search is performed on the SucB protein of B. henselae it was found to be 53 % similar to dihydrolipoamide acetyltransferase component (E2) of M. pneumoniae, an immunogenic protein in Mycoplasma spp. (Jan et al., 2001). Cross-reactions with M. pneumoniae have been described for B. henselae serological tests (McGill et al., 1998). Healthy people often have relatively high backgrounds of specific M. pneumoniae IgG antibodies in their sera, probably because of past M. pneumoniae infections. These antibodies remain for up to 7 years following M. pneumoniae infection. In a seroprevalence study by Tuuminen et al. (2000) 16 % of 2- to 4-year-old children were positive for IgG antibodies to M. pneumoniae. Antibodies to M. pneumoniae continue to increase in adolescence and level off to a prevalence of about 40–50 % in adulthood (Tuuminen et al., 2000).

Cross-reactivity studies with M. pneumoniae

To address whether cross-reactivity with M. pneumoniae may cause false-positive SucB immunoblots, we tested all SucB immunoblot samples for IgG M. pneumoniae antibodies. We found that 40 % of CSD IFA-positives, 43 % of CSD IFA-negatives and 53 % of healthy normal controls were positive for M. pneumoniae IgG antibodies. The positivity rates of the CSD IFA-positives, CSD IFA-negatives and healthy normal controls are consistent with the 40–50 % prevalence observed for adult populations (Tuuminen et al., 2000).

When the M. pneumoniae IgG-positive samples were excluded, the number of CSD IFA-negative sera/SucB-immunoblot-positive samples decreased from ten to five and the healthy normal control/SucB-immunoblot-positive decreased from 23 to ten. Exclusion of the M. pneumoniae IgG-positive samples from the calculations modestly increased the specificity to 83.3 and 80.0 % for IFA-negative samples and healthy normal controls, respectively. This modest increase in specificity suggests that additional cross-reactive organisms may be important in the specificity of the SucB immunoblot.

Cross-reactions of Bartonella serological tests have also been observed between the various Bartonella spp. (Dalton et al., 1995; Sander et al., 1998), and with Coxiella burnetii (La Scola & Raoult, 1996), Chlamydia trachomatis (Maurin et al., 1997), and other species, including T. pallidum, R. rickettsii, Ehrlichia chaffeensis and F. tularensis (McGill et al., 1998). Gilmore et al. (2003) found that antibodies against Coxiella burnetii, F. tularensis and R. typhi cross-reacted with the recombinant B. vinsonii SucB protein. Our study confirmed the cross-reactivity with these intracellular bacteria. Not unexpectedly, we also observed antigenic cross-reactivity of SucB with sera from patients with antibodies against Brucella melitensis. No cross-reactivity of B. henselae SucB was observed with sera from patients with antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae, T. pallidum, R. rickettsii, Leptospira spp. and Legionella pneumophila.

The antigenic cross-reactivity of B. henselae SucB with the common respiratory pathogen M. pneumoniae may explain some of the problems associated with the variable specificity of the IFA and EIAs for the diagnosis of Bartonella infections. The SucB antigen is not as sensitive or specific as the 17 kDa protein for the serologic diagnosis of CSD. This cross-reactivity precludes the use of reactivity of this antigen alone to correlate with Bartonella infections. But as suggested by Gilmore et al. (2003), using SucB as a broadly cross-reactive antigen for the diagnosis of infections with the phylogenetically related intracellular pathogens such as Brucella spp., Coxiella burnetii and F. tularensis is potentially feasible. The cross-reactivity of SucB with M. pneumoniae may require additional testing to rule out infections with this organism.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 Subcloning of the B....
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We gratefully acknowledge Bob Schackmann of the Huntsman Cancer Institute for providing synthetic oligonucleotides and N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis (NCI CA42014). This work was supported by Public Health Service grant AI40067 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to C. M. L. and the ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 Subcloning of the B....
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  • Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. L. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215, 403–410.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Anderson, B., Lu, E., Jones, D. & Regnery, R. (1995). Characterization of a 17-kilodalton antigen of Bartonella henselae reactive with sera from patients with cat scratch disease. J Clin Microbiol 33, 2358–2365.[Abstract]

  • Anderson, B., Jones, D. & Burgess, A. (1996). Cloning, expression and sequence analysis of the Bartonella henselae gene encoding the HtrA stress-response protein. Gene 178, 35–38.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Bergmans, A. M., Peeters, M. F., Schellekens, J. F., Vos, M. C., Sabbe, L. J., Ossewaarde, J. M., Verbakel, H., Hooft, H. J. & Schouls, L. M. (1997). Pitfalls and fallacies of cat scratch disease serology: evaluation of Bartonella henselae-based indirect fluorescence assay and enzyme-linked immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol 35, 1931–1937.[Abstract]

  • Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Anal Biochem 72, 248–254.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Cockerell, C. J. & Friedman-Kien, A. E. (1988). Epithelioid angiomatosis and cat scratch disease bacillus. Lancet i, 1334–1335.

  • Dalton, M. J., Robinson, L. E., Cooper, J., Regnery, R. L., Olson, J. G. & Childs, J. E. (1995). Use of Bartonella antigens for serologic diagnosis of cat-scratch disease at a national referral center. Arch Intern Med 155, 1670–1676.[Abstract]

  • Dolan, M. J., Wong, M. T., Regnery, R. L., Jorgensen, J. H., Garcia, M., Peters, J. & Drehner, D. (1993). Syndrome of Rochalimaea henselae adenitis suggesting cat scratch disease. Ann Intern Med 118, 331–336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd edn. New York: Wiley and Sons.

  • Freeland, R. L., Scholl, D. T., Rohde, K. R., Shelton, L. J. & O'Reilly, K. L. (1999). Identification of Bartonella-specific immunodominant antigens recognized by the feline humoral immune system. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 6, 558–566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Gilmore, R. D., Jr, Carpio, A. M., Kosoy, M. Y. & Gage, K. L. (2003). Molecular characterization of the sucB gene encoding the immunogenic dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase protein of Bartonella vinsonii subsp.berkhoffii and Bartonella quintana. Infect Immun 71, 4818–4822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Gish, W. & States, D. J. (1993). Identification of protein coding regions by database similarity search. Nat Genet 3, 266–272.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Jackson, L. A., Perkins, B. A & Wenger, J. D. (1993). Cat scratch disease in the United States. Am J Public Health 83, 1707–1711.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Jan, G., Le Henaff, M., Fontenelle, C. & Wroblewski, H. (2001). Biochemical and antigenic characterisation of Mycoplasma gallisepticum membrane proteins P52 and P67 (pMGA). Arch Microbiol 177, 81–90.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Koehler, J. E., Glaser, C. A. & Tappero, J. W. (1994). Rochalimaea henselae infection.A new zoonosis with the domestic cat as reservoir. JAMA 271, 531–535.[Abstract]

  • La Scola, B. & Raoult, D. (1996). Serological cross-reactions between Bartonella quintana, Bartonella henselae, and Coxiella burnetii. J Clin Microbiol 34, 2270–2274.[Abstract]

  • Liang, Z. & Raoult, D. (2000). Differentiation of Bartonella species by a microimmunofluorescence assay, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and Western immunoblotting. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 7, 617–624.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Litwin, C. M., Martins, T. B. & Hill, H. R. (1997). Immunologic response to Bartonella henselae as determined by enzyme immunoassay and Western blot analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 108, 202–209.[Medline]

  • Maurin, M., Roux, V., Stein, A., Ferrier, F., Viraben, R. & Raoult, D. (1994). Isolation and characterization by immunofluorescence, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, western blot, restriction fragment length polymorphism-PCR, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of Rochalimaea quintana from a patient with bacillary angiomatosis. J Clin Microbiol 32, 1166–1171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Maurin, M., Eb, F., Etienne, J. & Raoult, D. (1997). Serological cross-reactions between Bartonella and Chlamydia species: implications for diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol 35, 2283–2287.[Abstract]

  • Maurin, M., Rolain, J. M. & Raoult, D. (2002). Comparison of in-house and commercial slides for detection by immunofluorescence of immunoglobulins G and M against Bartonella henselae and Bartonella quintana. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9, 1004–1009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • McGill, S. L., Regnery, R. L. & Karem, K. L. (1998). Characterization of human immunoglobulin (Ig) isotype and IgG subclass response to Bartonella henselae infection. Infect Immun 66, 5915–5920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Reed, J. A., Brigati, D. J., Flynn, S. D., McNutt, N. S., Min, K. W., Welch, D. F. & Slater, L. N. (1992). Immunocytochemical identification of Rochalimaea henselae in bacillary (epithelioid) angiomatosis, parenchymal bacillary peliosis, and persistent fever with bacteremia. Am J Surg Pathol 16, 650–657.[Medline]

  • Regnery, R. L., Olson, J. G., Perkins, B. A. & Bibb, W. (1992). Serological response to ‘‘Rochalimaea henselae’’ antigen in suspected cat-scratch disease. Lancet 339, 1443–1445.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

  • Sander, A., Posselt, M., Oberle, K. & Bredt, W. (1998). Seroprevalence of antibodies to Bartonella henselae in patients with cat scratch disease and in healthy controls: evaluation and comparison of two commercial serological tests. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 5, 486–490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Spencer, M. E. & Guest, J. R. (1982). Molecular cloning of four tricarboxylic acid cycle genes of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 151, 542–552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Tuuminen, T., Varjo, S., Ingman, H., Weber, T., Oksi, J. & Viljanen, M. (2000). Prevalence of Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae immunoglobulin G and A antibodies in a healthy Finnish population as analyzed by quantitative enzyme immunoassays. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 7, 734–738.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Zangwill, K. M., Hamilton, D. H., Perkins, B. A., Regnery, R. L., Plikaytis, B. D., Hadler, J. L., Cartter, M. L. & Wenger, J. D. (1993). Cat scratch disease in Connecticut.Epidemiology, risk factors, and evaluation of a new diagnostic test. N Engl J Med 329, 8–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Zygmunt, M. S., Diaz, M. A., Teixeira-Gomes, A. P. & Cloeckaert, A. (2001). Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of the Brucella melitensis sucB gene coding for an immunogenic dihydrolipoamide succinyltransferase homologous protein. Infect Immun 69, 6537–6540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




    This article has been cited by other articles:


    Home page
    Infect. Immun.Home page
    C. M. Litwin, M. L. Rawlins, and E. M. Swenson
    Characterization of an Immunogenic Outer Membrane Autotransporter Protein, Arp, of Bartonella henselae
    Infect. Immun., November 1, 2007; 75(11): 5255 - 5263.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    Infect. Immun.Home page
    J. K. Boonjakuakul, H. L. Gerns, Y.-T. Chen, L. D. Hicks, M. F. Minnick, S. E. Dixon, S. C. Hall, and J. E. Koehler
    Proteomic and Immunoblot Analyses of Bartonella quintana Total Membrane Proteins Identify Antigens Recognized by Sera from Infected Patients
    Infect. Immun., May 1, 2007; 75(5): 2548 - 2561.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    This Article
    Right arrow Abstract Freely available
    Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
    Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
    Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
    Right arrow Citation Map
    Services
    Right arrow Email this article to a friend
    Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
    Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
    Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
    Right arrow Download to citation manager
    Right arrow reprints & permissions
    Citing Articles
    Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
    Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
    Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
    Google Scholar
    Right arrow Articles by Litwin, C. M
    Right arrow Articles by Martins, T. B
    Right arrow Search for Related Content
    PubMed
    Right arrow PubMed Citation
    Right arrow Articles by Litwin, C. M
    Right arrow Articles by Martins, T. B
    Agricola
    Right arrow Articles by Litwin, C. M
    Right arrow Articles by Martins, T. B


    HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
    INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS