|
|
||||||||
Department of Microbiology, Level 4 Camelia Botnar Laboratories, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK
Correspondence Kathryn A. Harris harrik2{at}gosh.nhs.uk
Received February 7, 2003
Accepted April 19, 2003
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To be useful in a routine clinical microbiological service the assay should be able to amplify rDNA from all common pathogens, correctly identify species in original sample from the PCR product and be sufficiently sensitive to detect organisms when routine methods fail. Moreover, the clinician needs to be confident that the assay does not detect DNA from potentially pathogenic micro-organisms when not significant, for example, due to the presence of DNA in the reagents, due to unavoidable introduction of contamination during sample collection and handling or because bacterial DNA is insignificantly present at normally sterile sites. Finally, the assay procedure must be robust enough to work in the routine setting and swift enough to produce a clinically useful result.
We describe the development of a broad-range PCR, based on bacterial 16S rDNA, for use in the routine diagnostic clinical microbiology service. We include a preliminary report on its use in the clinical diagnosis of bacterial infection in children over a 2-year period at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH), London, and compare our results to those obtained by standard culture methods. We discuss where the technique may offer an improvement in the diagnosis of bacterial infection in a paediatric setting when employed alongside standard culture techniques.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Quantification.
Suspensions of Escherichia coli (NCTC 10418) and Staphylococcus aureus (NCTC 6571) isolates were prepared as described above and the number of colony forming units present estimated by plate counts (Miles & Misra, 1938). DNA was extracted from the original suspension, as described above, and serial tenfold dilutions were amplified in the PCR.
Amplification.
The PCR reaction mixture was as follows: 1x PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM dNTPs, 1 U Taq polymerase (all Invitrogen), 0.4 µM of each of the following primers: 16SFa: 5'-GCTCAGATTGAACGCTGG-3', 16SFb: 5'-GCTCAGGAYGAACG CTGG-3', 16SR: 5'-TACTGCTGCCTCCCGTA-3' (Harris et al., 2002) and sterile UV-irradiated water to give a final volume of 45 µl. Five microlitres of extracted DNA and 5 µl extracted DNA diluted 1-in-10 were added to two separate aliquots of this mixture and the reactions were heated to 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 2535 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 63 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min. A final extension was carried out at 72 °C for 5 min.
PCR controls.
To control for PCR inhibition a spiked control was performed for each extracted sample by adding 1 µl Escherichia coli positive control (
100 c.f.u. µl-1) along with 5 µl of the extracted sample to a third PCR reaction. Sterile UV-irradiated water was used as amplification target in a fourth reaction as a negative control. Each PCR run included two positive controls (1 µl each of Escherichia coli
100 c.f.u. µl-1 and Staphylococcus aureus
100 c.f.u. µl-1).
Amplicon detection.
PCR reactions were electrophoresed through a 2 % agarose gel containing 2 µl 500 nM ethidium bromide and bands were visualized by UV transillumination.
UV irradiation of PCR reagents.
PCR reaction mixtures were prepared as described above but with the primers and DNA template omitted. Reaction mixtures were UV-irradiated at a distance of 20 cm from a 254 nm, 15 W UV light source for 0, 5, 10, 20 and 30 min. Primers and template (either Escherichia coli positive control DNA or sterile, UV-irradiated negative control water) were then added. Reaction mixtures were then subjected to the cycling conditions described above.
Sequencing.
Positive PCR reactions were sequenced with the ABI PRISM Big-dye sequencing kit and analysed on the ABI 377 Genetic Analyzer (PE Applied Biosystems).
Cloning of PCR products.
Where the direct sequence of a PCR product indicated a mixture of 16S rDNA sequences from different bacterial species, PCR cloning was performed using the TOPO-TA cloning kit (Invitrogen). Individual colonies were amplified directly by PCR using the M13 forward (-20) and reverse priming sites and three resulting amplicons of the correct size were sequenced, as described above, using primers T3 and T7.
Clinical specimens.
Between 31 October 1999 and 1 November 2001, 382 selected clinical specimens from children at GOSH, and referred paediatric specimens, were tested for the presence of bacterial DNA by our broad-range 16S rDNA PCR, in addition to routine microbiological culture. Adequate material was submitted for routine culture first, residual material was processed for 16S rDNA PCR, frequently resulting in less specimen being processed for PCR than for culture. The assay was not performed in a comparative study of sequential specimens but specimens were selected when clinical and other laboratory variables suggested a higher likelihood of infection. 16S rDNA PCR was initially run in parallel with culture, but subsequently 16S PCR was delayed until primary culture was completed. Results were generated real time, within the constraints of the service, and discussed by the Clinical Microbiology service with clinicians responsible for each case on an individual basis.
DNA extraction from clinical specimens.
Genomic DNA was extracted from a range of clinical samples including tissue, pus, blood, cerebrospinal fluid and other body fluids using the QIAmp DNA mini kit (Qiagen), following either the body fluid or tissue extraction protocol as appropriate. An additional incubation at 95 °C for 15 min was performed following the Proteinase K digestion to ensure compete lysis of bacterial cells. However, for all samples processed after 1 October 2000 this step was performed mechanically using a Ribolyser cell disrupter (Hybaid) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, following Proteinase K digestion, Ribolyser resin for bacterial cells was added to the sample (approx. one quarter of an individual aliquot) and the sample was placed in the Ribolyser and run at maximum speed for 40 s. One negative control (200 µl sterile, UV-irradiated water) was included in each extraction run.
Conventional microbiological methods.
GOSH has a Clinical Pathology Accreditation (UK) accredited laboratory providing a comprehensive microbiological and virological service. Samples were processed by a range of routine microbiological methods. Tissues and all fluids (except urines) were cultured directly and after enrichment in overnight broth culture; tissue broths were further subcultured after 5 days. (Broths were inoculated using sterile techniques on the open bench.) Where appropriate bacterial antigens were sought in cerebrospinal fluid and serum by latex agglutination (Murex Biotech). Isolates were identified by routine tests, API (bioMérieux) or referred to a reference laboratory if conventional identification was unsuccessful.
Bacterial identification.
The identities of bacteria detected by the 16S rDNA PCR were revealed by sequencing of the PCR products and comparison of these sequences to the GenBank database using the BLAST program available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). While molecular phylogeny based on the ribosomal genes is the reference standard for bacterial classification, there are no universally accepted criteria for the level of homology expected between 16S rDNA from different isolates of bacteria from the same species or genera. A recent report suggested 99100 % similarity over the 16S rDNA for members of the same species and 9799 % for members of the same genus (Drancourt et al., 2000). When comparing the 320 bp sequence generated in this assay with publicly available sequences we have used these figures as guidelines in assigning a species or genus name to a 16S rDNA sequence. In addition to BLAST analysis sequences were also compared to an in-house database of bacterial 16S rDNA sequences using the CLUSTAL algorithm in the MEGALIGN computer program (DNAStar, Madison, WI, USA). When used together these methods can identify most bacteria to species level and all bacteria to genus level, with the exception of novel bacterial sequences. Unusual sequences can be investigated further by sequencing of the entire 16S rDNA (Harris et al., 2002).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PCR reagents, sterile UV-irradiated water, buffer, MgCl2, dNTPs and Taq polymerase were subjected to UV irradiation prior to amplification of either Escherichia coli DNA or a negative control (sterile UV-irradiated water). Table 1 shows the PCR result obtained for a range of different UV irradiation times and PCR cycle numbers.
|
UV irradiation of the PCR reagents for 10 min or more resulted in the negative control consistently giving a negative PCR result. However, it also resulted in failure to detect the positive control at 25 cycles when UV irradiation was carried out for 10 min, at 25 and 30 cycles when UV irradiation was carried out for 20 min and at 25, 30 and 35 cycles when irradiation was carried out for 30 min.
The experiment was repeated with UV irradiation of only the sterile water, PCR buffer and MgCl2 (Table 1). This resulted in the negative control giving a positive result at 30 and 35 cycles, but a negative result at 25 cycles when UV irradiation was carried out for 5 min or longer. The positive control was detected with all UV irradiation times and cycle numbers. Further experiments showed that following UV irradiation of sterile water, PCR buffer and MgCl2 for 5 min, a maximum of 26 PCR cycles could be performed at which negative controls gave a consistently negative result (data not shown).
Following optimization, the resulting PCR conditions were UV irradiation of the sterile water, PCR buffer and MgCl2 at a distance of 20 cm from a 254 nm UV light source for 10 min. Primers (16Sfa, 16SFb and 16SR), Taq polymerase, dNTPs and template DNA were then added. Reaction mixtures were then subjected to the cycling conditions described above, with 26 cycles.
Using the optimized PCR conditions and isolates enumerated as colony-forming units, the sensitivity of the PCR was estimated to be 10100 c.f.u. per reaction for Escherichia coli suspensions and 1001000 c.f.u. per reaction for Staphylococcus aureus suspensions when bacterial cells were lysed by incubating at 95 °C. When mechanical disruption was used as the method of cell lysis, the sensitivity of the PCR was estimated to be 10100 c.f.u. per reaction for both Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.
The sensitivity of the optimized PCR was compared to other single-target bacterial PCRs that are run in-house. The 16S rDNA PCR was 10-fold more sensitive than a 30 cycle PCR for the penicillin-binding protein (PBP) 2b gene in Streptococcus pneumoniae (1400 bp product). However, its sensitivity was similar to that of a 35-cycle PCR for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (350 bp product) and 50-fold less sensitive than a nested 70-cycle PCR for ß-haemolytic streptococci (250 bp product).
Comparison of broad-range 16S rDNA PCR and standard culture techniques a preliminary analysis
A total of 382 clinical specimens from children referred to GOSH and referred paediatric specimens were tested for the presence of bacterial DNA by our broad-range 16S rDNA PCR in addition to routine microbiological culture. These specimens comprised 30 blood samples, 123 cerebrospinal fluid samples, 79 tissues, 69 pus samples, 23 pleural fluids, seven peritoneal dialysis fluids, six bronchoalveolar lavages, three blood culture fluids and 42 other fluids.
An overall comparison of culture and PCR results is shown in Fig. 1, with further analysis of subgroups (AF) below. A total of 205 specimens were both culture- and PCR-negative (A); no further analysis of these results is provided here. Nineteen specimens were culture-positive and negative by PCR (B) (Table 2). A further 25 specimens were positive on enrichment culture but PCR-negative (C); the majority of these (18/25) were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), common laboratory contaminants (Table 2).
|
|
Sixty-three samples were both culture-positive (primary or enrichment) and PCR-positive. In 34 cases the identities of the bacteria were concordant (D) and in 29 samples discordant (E). Of the 29 discordant samples, culture and PCR results were entirely different in 23 samples; of these, 13 (two primary culture-positive and 11 enrichment culture-positive) grew only CNS but were PCR-positive for a potential human pathogen, determined to be clinically significant by clinical review (Table 3). In 10 of the 23 samples, PCR detected an organism other than a clinically significant organism detected by culture. In the remaining six discordant samples additional organisms were detected by either PCR (four samples) or culture (two samples).
|
Seventy samples were primary and enrichment culture-negative and PCR-positive (F), some with more than one bacterial species. A potential human pathogen, determined clinically significant by clinical review, was detected 58 times from 70 samples (Table 4).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bacterial classification is an evolving science that, for the clinical microbiologist, should enable the establishment of usable and reproducible identification schemes for commonly encountered species. While traditionally based on phenotypic characteristics, classification is now increasingly reliant on genotype and old and new species can be defined by their rDNA sequences. While there is agreement on the importance of rDNA sequence analysis, there is not universal agreement on the degree of sequence divergence permissible within a species or genus. Suggested cut-off values based on whole 16S rDNA sequences (Drancourt et al., 2000; Janda & Abbott, 2002) are 99100 % similarity for members of the same species and 9799 % for members of the same genus. This may be used as a guideline in assigning a species or genus name to a 16S rDNA sequence. In reality these figures will vary between genera. Some phenotypically distinct species share up to 100 % identity in their 16S rDNA sequences (e.g. Escherichia coli and Shigella sonnei, Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus cereus). Conversely, some strains considered to be members of the same species vary in their 16S rDNA sequence by >1 %. Assigning a species based on 16S rDNA sequence is also difficult, as not all bacterial species have representative 16S rDNA sequences in the GenBank database. Sequences that diverge by greater than 1 % from the closest match in the database may represent novel bacterial species or simply reflect the incomplete status of the database. An in-house database can address this problem by including 16S rDNA sequences from the missing species within a genus, following in-house sequencing of well-characterized strains. Rigorous analysis would be necessary in order to conclude that a 16S rDNA sequence is derived from a novel species.
In this study the 320 bp hypervariable region at the 5' end of the 1400 bp 16S rDNA was used. The criteria used to assign a species name were 98100 % similarity to more than one GenBank sequence of the same species and/or tight clustering with members of one species in the in-house database using the CLUSTAL algorithm in the MEGALIGN program. Sequences not meeting these criteria but with >95 % similarity to more than one GenBank sequence of the same genus and/or tight clustering within one genus in the in-house database were assigned an identity to the genus level only. Using these criteria most potentially pathogenic bacteria from identified cultures were successfully identified to species level. In this study the vast majority of bacterial sequences from clinical specimens were identified to at least the genus level and most of these to the species level. Unidentified sequences are occasionally encountered; the significance of these is unknown at this stage. A further consideration is that GenBank is a public database containing a vast number of 16S rDNA sequences; consequently, there is no control over who submits data and whether it is accurate. A 16S rDNA sequence submitted to the database could be incorrectly named and care must be taken when identifying bacteria on this basis. In order to be confident that a sequence was correctly identified, we required matches with several 16S rDNA sequences submitted by independent laboratories. Our in-house database contains selected 16S rDNA sequences and is more accurate; however, it does not contain the range of data required to classify more unusual bacteria, so both methods were used to obtain the most accurate results. Despite such measures identification of some species by their 16S rDNA sequences is still problematic. There was particular difficulty in identifying members of the Streptococcus mitis group. CLUSTAL analysis of GenBank and in-house sequences from this group of organisms showed that Streptococcus pneumoniae could reliably be identified but that Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus oralis cannot be distinguished (K. Harris, unpublished data). However, a few Streptococcus pneumoniae sequences from GenBank were not identified as such by CLUSTAL analysis, indicating that they may have been incorrectly assigned to this species. We have concluded that it is not possible to accurately identify the three species within this group from partial 16S rDNA using BLAST searching of the GenBank database alone. CLUSTAL analysis reliably identifies Streptococcus pneumoniae but the other species from this group are identified as Streptococcus sp. (mitis group).
The potential clinical application of broad-range 16S rDNA PCR is demonstrated in the preliminary review of results from clinical specimens. 16S rDNA PCR provided the sole evidence of the presence of specific bacterial DNA in 70 out of 275 culture-negative specimens; 58 of these were considered to be clinically significant pathogens. A further 13 samples grew CNS but were PCR-positive for clinically significant pathogens. In total therefore, in this selected group of specimens, PCR provided the sole evidence of potentially pathogenic infection in 71 cases. A range of different organisms was detected by PCR that were not detected by culture. Some were unusual and difficult to culture such as Helicobacter sp. (Harris et al., 2002) and Mycoplasma orale, while others were more common organisms that probably failed to grow because of prior empirical treatment with antibiotics. The most common organism detected only by PCR was Streptococcus pneumoniae, an organism that may be difficult to grow because of its tendency to undergo autolysis but also usually covered in empirical antibiotic therapy. Where bacterial infection is diagnosed solely by molecular methods, no information on antibiotic sensitivity is available. In the case of Streptococcus pneumoniae, penicillin resistance is becoming increasingly common. A number of reports have been published that describe the typing of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates as penicillin-sensitive or -resistant by PCR or RFLP analysis (Beall et al., 1998; O'Neill et al., 1999). The genetic determinants of other antibiotic-resistance mechanisms are also known and many more are being investigated. This information will greatly enhance the clinical utility of molecular techniques for diagnostic microbiology.
While detecting many potentially pathogenic organisms not yielded on culturing, 16S rDNA PCR did not detect all significant infections. There were 44 PCR-negative specimens that were positive by either primary or enrichment culture. Eighteen of these had grown CNS on enrichment culture which were considered to be contaminants. A further two specimens had yielded fungi which could not have been detected by this PCR. However, the remaining 24 specimens represent false-negative PCR results, probably due to failure to detect bacteria present in a sample at a level below the sensitivity of the method. In some cases, culture-positive results were considered to be clinically insignificant, especially if only enrichment culture was positive. The significant species most frequently missed were staphylococci, whose Gram-positive walls are difficult to break down during extraction. However, since 1 October 2000 we have performed mechanical disruption with the Ribolyser during the extraction procedure. This is as effective as lysozyme/lysostaphin treatment for the lysis of bacterial cell walls but is more rapid (data not shown). Any staphylococci missed by PCR after this modification of the extraction procedure was probably due to low numbers of organisms. The only genus that was detected by culture but never by PCR was Mycobacterium sp. We have shown that mechanical disruption was effective in lysing mycobacterial cells and that the 16S rDNA could be amplified (data not shown). Failure to detect Mycobacterium sp. by 16S rDNA PCR in clinical specimens was probably due to a small number of organisms present in the specimen. Nucleic acid amplification for the specific detection of mycobacteria has also been hampered by sensitivity issues (Drobniewski et al., 2003). For 10 specimens, PCR and culture result were discordant and PCR failed to detect a clinically significant organism that was detected by culture. This was probably due to a greater amount DNA from a non-viable organism in these specimens than DNA from the viable organism that was detected by culture.
This work has shown that the broad-range 16S rDNA PCR can detect and identify DNA from a wide range of organisms from culture or in clinical specimens. Use of broad-range 16S rDNA PCR in the routine clinical microbiology service increases the diagnosis of bacterial infection from clinical specimens when used alongside routine culture techniques. PCR does not replace culture. The PCR technique, when performed by a single skilled operator, is rapid (results can be produced within 48 h) and reproducible (data not shown). The clinical significance of the result is supported by the analysis of species detected; the majority of DNA detected comes from potentially pathogenic micro-organisms in clinically appropriate settings. However, DNA from potentially pathogenic bacteria was not detected at the sensitivity of this assay in the majority of specimens processed, demonstrating that bacterial DNA is not usually found in normally sterile sites. While DNA could be analysed from any specimen, material from usually sterile sites is preferred. Further analysis of the data is under way to determine the clinical impact of the 16S rDNA PCR on patient management in specific patient groups.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Kommedal, K. Kvello, R. Skjastad, N. Langeland, and H. G. Wiker Direct 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing from Clinical Specimens, with Special Focus on Polybacterial Samples and Interpretation of Mixed DNA Chromatograms J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2009; 47(11): 3562 - 3568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. B. Rogers, M. P. Carroll, and K. D. Bruce Studying bacterial infections through culture-independent approaches J. Med. Microbiol., November 1, 2009; 58(11): 1401 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M G Jones, S De Mel, N J Cortes, R J Kurukulaaratchy, and K M A O'Reilly Cough, confusion and flaccid paralysis in a 46-year old man with left apical consolidation and ring-enhancing lesions on cerebral imaging Thorax, October 1, 2009; 64(10): 862 - 862. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Gahleitner, A. M Hussain, J. Gaskin, A. A Moir, N. Perera, and J. Greening Unusual findings and diagnostic challenges in a child with Lemierre's disease BMJ Case Reports, August 11, 2009; 2009(aug11_1): bcr0420091818 - bcr0420091818. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhao, S. Park, B. N. Kreiswirth, C. C. Ginocchio, R. Veyret, A. Laayoun, A. Troesch, and D. S. Perlin Rapid Real-Time Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification-Molecular Beacon Platform To Detect Fungal and Bacterial Bloodstream Infections J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2009; 47(7): 2067 - 2078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kawanami, K. Fukuda, K. Yatera, T. Kido, C. Yoshii, H. Taniguchi, and M. Kido Severe Pneumonia with Leptotrichia sp. Detected Predominantly in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid by Use of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Analysis J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2009; 47(2): 496 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Kommedal, B. Karlsen, and O. Saebo Analysis of Mixed Sequencing Chromatograms and Its Application in Direct 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing of Polymicrobial Samples J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2008; 46(11): 3766 - 3771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Harris, P. Turner, E. A. Green, and J. C. Hartley Duplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Clinical Samples and Determination of Penicillin Susceptibility J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2008; 46(8): 2751 - 2758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Messer, S. O. Wagner, R. D. Baumwart, and C. M. Colitz A Case of Canine Streptococcal Meningoencephalitis Diagnosed Using Universal Bacterial Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., July 1, 2008; 44(4): 205 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Ramos-Vara, C. C. Wu, I. Mitsui, T. L. Lin, and M. A. Miller Metritis, Valvular Endocarditis, and Septicemia by Actinobacillus equuli in a Gilt in the United States Vet. Pathol., July 1, 2008; 45(4): 495 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Adderson, J. W. Boudreaux, J. R. Cummings, S. Pounds, D. A. Wilson, G. W. Procop, and R. T. Hayden Identification of Clinical Coryneform Bacterial Isolates: Comparison of Biochemical Methods and Sequence Analysis of 16S rRNA and rpoB Genes J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2008; 46(3): 921 - 927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Pingle, K. Granger, P. Feinberg, R. Shatsky, B. Sterling, M. Rundell, E. Spitzer, D. Larone, L. Golightly, and F. Barany Multiplexed Identification of Blood-Borne Bacterial Pathogens by Use of a Novel 16S rRNA Gene PCR-Ligase Detection Reaction-Capillary Electrophoresis Assay J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2007; 45(6): 1927 - 1935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. M. Williams, A. K. Nightingale, J. Hartley, M. Bramkamp, F. Ruggieri, M. Schneemann, D. Raoult, F. Fenollar, and X. Puechal Whipple's Disease N. Engl. J. Med., April 5, 2007; 356(14): 1479 - 1481. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Danaviah, S. Govender, M. L. Gordon, and S. Cassol Atypical mycobacterial spondylitis in HIV-negative patients identified by genotyping J Bone Joint Surg Br, March 1, 2007; 89-B(3): 346 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Gao, C.-h. Tseng, Z. Pei, and M. J. Blaser Molecular analysis of human forearm superficial skin bacterial biota PNAS, February 20, 2007; 104(8): 2927 - 2932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Besier, C. Smaczny, C. von Mallinckrodt, A. Krahl, H. Ackermann, V. Brade, and T. A. Wichelhaus Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Staphylococcus aureus Small-Colony Variants in Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2007; 45(1): 168 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Zucol, R. A. Ammann, C. Berger, C. Aebi, M. Altwegg, F. K. Niggli, and D. Nadal Real-Time Quantitative Broad-Range PCR Assay for Detection of the 16S rRNA Gene Followed by Sequencing for Species Identification. J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2006; 44(8): 2750 - 2759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Fenollar, V. Roux, A. Stein, M. Drancourt, and D. Raoult Analysis of 525 Samples To Determine the Usefulness of PCR Amplification and Sequencing of the 16S rRNA Gene for Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Infections. J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2006; 44(3): 1018 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. M. Roberts, D. A. Enoch, K. A. Harris, and J. A. Karas Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria bacteraemia with septic arthritis confirmed by 16S rDNA PCR in an immunocompetent adult J. Med. Microbiol., February 1, 2006; 55(2): 241 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Saglani, K A Harris, C Wallis, and J C Hartley Empyema: the use of broad range 16S rDNA PCR for pathogen detection Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2005; 90(1): 70 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chambers and K. McGovern Dental work as a cause of acute inflammation of a lymphoedematous limb Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2004; 18(7): 667 - 668. [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | J MED MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL | ALL SGM JOURNALS |