J Med Microbiol International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amar, C. F.L.
Right arrow Articles by McLauchlin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amar, C. F.L.
Right arrow Articles by McLauchlin, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Amar, C. F.L.
Right arrow Articles by McLauchlin, J.
J Med Microbiol 52 (2003), 681-683; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.05193-0
© 2003 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Detection and genotyping by real-time PCR/RFLP analyses of Giardia duodenalis from human faeces

Corinne F.L. Amar1, Paul H. Dear2 and Jim McLauchlin1

1Health Protection Agency, Food Safety Microbiology Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Infections, Central Public Health Laboratory, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT, UK 2Medical Research Council, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK

Correspondence Jim McLauchlin jim.mclauchlin{at}hpa.org.uk

Received January 24, 2003
Accepted April 15, 2003


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
A nested PCR assay (TPILC-PCR) was developed to detect and distinguish between Giardia duodenalis assemblages A and B from human faeces by analysis of the triose phosphate isomerase gene (tpi). The assay comprised an initial multiplexed block-based amplification. This was followed by two separate real-time PCR assays specific for assemblages A and B using a LightCycler and SYBR Green I to identify PCR products by melting-point analysis. RFLP analysis was applied to distinguish G. duodenalis assemblage A groups I and II. The real-time nested PCR was evaluated using DNA extracted from purified giardial trophozoites, Cryptosporidium oocysts, whole faeces containing a range of potential pathogens (including G. duodenalis), faecal smears and bacterial suspensions. The assay was specific, sensitive, reproducible and rapid.


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In humans, food-borne and water-borne giardiasis due to the protozoan Giardia duodenalis (synonym of Giardia intestinalis and Giardia lamblia) is a common cause of gastroenteritis and a major health concern worldwide (Farthing, 1995). Current methods for detection of this parasite from faeces are usually based on light microscopy (Isaac-Renton, 1991). However, these methods are unable to distinguish between genetically distinct parasites (Isaac-Renton, 1991; LeChevallier et al., 1995). We previously described a sensitive hemi-nested PCR that can detect and genotype G. duodenalis assemblages A and B (the two assemblages known to infect humans) from whole faeces and also from faecal smears (Amar et al., 2002). The aim of this study was the further development and evaluation of a simple, highly specific and sensitive real-time PCR technique applicable to whole faeces and stained faecal smears that is able to detect and genotype G. duodenalis assemblages A and B.


    Methods
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Faecal specimens.

Faeces that contained G. duodenalis assemblage A group II (eight samples); G. duodenalis assemblage B (14 samples); Cryptosporidium parvum genotypes 1 and 2 (four samples) and Cyclospora sp. (two samples) were collected from naturally infected humans (McLauchlin et al., 2000; Amar et al., 2002). All samples were stored at 4 °C without preservatives.

DNA samples.

DNA extracts containing 1 ng DNA µl-1 from cultured G. duodenalis trophozoites of reference strains VNB3 and AMC13 (assemblage A), AMC9 (assemblage B), 265KA1184 (hoofed farm animal) and DOG1 (dog type) were provided by W. Homan (Laboratory for Parasitology and Mycology, Bilthoven, The Netherlands) (Homan et al., 1998). DNA was also extracted from purified oocysts of Cryptosporidium parvum genotype 1 (MRC, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK), Cryptosporidium parvum genotype 2 (Iowa strain 1372; AIDS Research Reference Reagent Program, National Institutes of Health, USA), Cryptosporidium baileyi, Cryptosporidium muris and Eimeria tenella (Patel et al., 1999) and from in vitro-grown Escherichia coli strain N211 (PHLS Food External Quality Assessment Scheme, London, UK) and Clostridium perfringens type A NCTC 8239.

Microscopy.

Smears were produced from faecal samples (Amar et al., 2001) and examined by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy as described previously (Amar et al., 2002).

DNA extraction and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) treatment.

DNA extraction from whole faeces and from stained smears on glass microscope slides, including further DNA purification using PVP, was performed as described before (McLauchlin et al., 1999; Amar et al., 2001). DNA from purified oocysts and bacterial suspension was also prepared by a similar method.

Nested real-time PCR amplification for identification of G. duodenalis assemblages A and B (TPILC-PCR).

The tpi gene sequences of G. duodenalis assemblage A groups I and II (GenBank accession nos L02120 and U57897, respectively) and assemblage B (L02116 and AF069561) were aligned using the program BioEdit (Hall, 1999). Two sets of four primers (Table 1) were designed to amplify G. duodenalis assemblages A and B.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Primers used for amplification of fragments of the G. duodenalis tpi gene by TPILC-PCR Primer positions refer to sequences for G. duodenalis assemblages A and B respectively obtained from GenBank accession numbers L02120 and L02116.
 

Amplification was performed in two phases. A duplex phase-I PCR was performed using a conventional thermocycler (Biometra T3; Anachem) and primers designed to amplify fragments of the tpi gene of G. duodenalis of 576 bp from assemblage A (primers TPIA4F/TPIA4R) and 210 bp from assemblage B (primers TPIB4F/TPIB4R) (Table 1). The duplex reaction was performed in a 10 µl volume with 5 µl DNA in 1x PCR buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM of each dNTP, 0.3 µM of each primer and 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (all reagents from Invitrogen). Samples were subjected to an initial denaturation of 94 °C for 1 min, 25 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s, 50 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.

Two separate phase-II PCRs, with inner forward (IF) and reverse (IR) primers, were devised to amplify fragments of the G. duodenalis tpi gene of 452 bp from assemblage A (primers TPIA4IF/TPIA4IR) and 141 bp from assemblage B (primers TPIB4IF/TPIB4IR). Both phase-II reactions were performed as real-time hot-start PCRs using a LightCycler (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The reaction comprised 10 µl of the phase I duplex-PCR product diluted 10 times in nuclease-free water (Sigma), 2 mM MgCl2, 1 µM of each primer (IF/IR) and 2 µl Master Mix (FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I kit; Roche Molecular Biochemicals) in a volume of 20 µl. Cycling conditions were 95 °C for 8 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 58 °C for 3 s and 72 °C for 10 s, with a transition rate of 20 °C s-1. Fluorescence readings were taken after each extension step and as a final melting analysis by treatment at 95 °C for 0 s, 68 °C for 15 s followed by a transition at 0.1 °C s-1 to 95 °C. Melting temperatures (Tm) were derived from melting peaks using LightCycler software version 3.5. Each test batch contained a maximum of 30 samples plus one positive control (AMC13- or AMC9-derived DNA) and one negative control (water).

Gel electrophoresis and RFLP.

RsaI restriction sites were identified from an alignment of the tpi gene of G. duodenalis assemblage A to distinguish between subgenotypes groups I and II. The predicted restriction fragments were 437 and 15 bp for group I and 235, 202 and 15 bp for group II.

PCR products were recovered from LightCycler glass capillaries by centrifugation and RFLP analysis was performed by digesting 5 µl PCR product with 5 U restriction enzyme in 1x enzyme buffer (Invitrogen) in a final volume of 30 µl for at least 4 h at 37 °C. Restriction fragments were separated in 3.2 % agarose/ethidium bromide gels by horizontal electrophoresis and examined by UV transillumination.

DNA sequencing.

PCR products were purified using a StrataPrep PCR purification kit (Stratagene). Sequencing of PCR products (sense and antisense) was performed at the Advanced Biotechnology Centre, Imperial College, London, UK, using an ABI 377 automated DNA sequencer and appropriate IF and IR primers.


    Results and Discussion
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
DNA from all faeces, cyst, oocyst and bacterial suspensions was subjected to the TPILC-PCR/RFLP. Following TPIALC-PCR, melting peaks with a Tm of 90.63–91.74 °C (SD 1.0–1.2) were generated exclusively from DNA recovered from G. duodenalis strains VNB3 and AMC13 and eight faecal samples containing G. duodenalis assemblage A. RFLP results identified VNB3 as assemblage A group I and AMC13 plus all eight faecal samples as containing assemblage A group II. Following TPIBLC-PCR, melting peaks with a Tm of 87.80–88.44 °C (SD 1.1–1.3) were generated exclusively from DNA recovered from G. duodenalis strains AMC9 and VNB3 and 14 faecal samples containing G. duodenalis assemblage B. For both phase-II reactions, non-specific PCR products generated either no peaks or flatter peaks with low Tm values (Fig. 1). The sequence of the TPIALC-PCR product from VNB3 was 100 % identical to the G. duodenalis assemblage A group I sequence (L02120). Analysis of the products amplified from reference strain AMC13 and one faecal sample showed 100 % sequence identity to the G. duodenalis assemblage A group II sequence (U57897) and was therefore consistent with the results from RFLP analysis. TPIBLC-PCR products from AMC9 and VNB3 and one of the faecal samples showed sequences identical to the G. duodenalis assemblage B sequence (L02116 and AF069561). Sequencing analyses confirmed that the VNB3 DNA extract contained both assemblages A group I and B, and also confirmed the specificity of the PCR assays.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Sensitivity of real-time TPIALC-PCR (a) and TPIBLC-PCR (b) assays. The graphs show melting-curve analysis for products of amplification from samples containing various amounts of DNA per reaction (indicated for each curve in genome copy equivalents) from reference strains AMC13 (G. duodenalis assemblage A) (a) and AMC9 (G. duodenalis assemblage B) (b). Specific products have Tm values of approximately 91 °C (a) or 88 °C (b).

 

To estimate the limit of detection of the TPILC-PCR, DNA extracts of reference strains were serially diluted in sterile distilled water. The dilutions were subjected to TPIALC (AMC13) or TPIBLC (AMC9) PCR. Specific melting peaks could be observed (Fig. 1) when generated from the TPIALC and TPIBLC PCR amplifications using 0.005 and 0.05 pg of DNA per reaction, respectively, corresponding to 0.5 and 5 copies of the tpi gene, based on a genome size of 1.2 x 107 bp (Adam, 2000). The reproducibility of detection of G. duodenalis assemblages A and B using DNA extracted from purified AMC13 and AMC9 strains analysed five times by TPILC-PCR was 100 %.

Smears were produced from 20 faecal samples (described above) from which G. duodenalis assemblage A group II (seven samples) and assemblage B (13 samples) had previously been detected. All smears were stained by immunofluorescence and giardial cysts were confirmed in all samples: in eight samples, five or fewer cysts were detected per microscope field. DNA was extracted from all of the smears and analysed in triplicate by TPILC-PCR/RFLP. tpi gene fragments were amplified from 15 (75 %) of the samples and the assemblages recovered were the same as those previously detected from faeces. Of the 15 smears where the tpi fragment was amplified, 10 were positive in all three replicates, four in two replicates and one in one of the three replicates. There was no correlation between reproducibility in triplicate tests and the number of cysts detected by microscopy (data not shown). The number of cysts seen by microscopy may not be proportional to the amount of intact template DNA, since the contents of cysts may be degraded prior to extraction. Therefore, the reduced reproducibility was most likely due to sampling error because of the very low original template concentration.

Phase I of the TPILC-PCR was performed in a conventional thermocycler, and only the nested phase was adapted to the LightCycler system. This format retained the high specificity and sensitivity provided by a nested reaction, and the use of diluted phase-I PCR product avoided saturation of the fluorescence signal by double-stranded DNA recovered from faeces. The sensitivity of the fully nested reaction (0.5–5 copies of tpi) was similar to that described previously for a hemi-nested protocol using the same target (Amar et al., 2002). However, this LightCycler assay has a considerable advantage over the previously reported ‘block-based’ procedure (Amar et al., 2002) because of the speed of analysis. Excluding the RFLP analysis (which is identical for both procedures), the conventional hemi-nested TPI-PCR (Amar et al., 2002) took approximately 3 h and 15 min to perform, compared with 1 h and 50 min for the LightCycler assay described here. However, one disadvantage of using the LightCycler was that each batch was limited to 30 assays plus one positive and one negative control. The use of hybridization probes as a replacement for the RFLP analysis is currently being evaluated, which would further reduce the time required to perform these assays.


    Acknowledgements
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
We thank colleagues in clinical microbiology laboratories for the donation of specimens and Dr W. Homan (Laboratory for Parasitology and Mycology, Bilthoven, The Netherlands) for purified giardial DNA. C. F. L. A. is funded by a PHLS PhD studentship.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  • Adam, R. D. (2000). The Giardia lamblia genome. Int J Parasitol 30, 475–484.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Amar, C., Pedraza-Diaz, S. & McLauchlin, J. (2001). Extraction and genotyping of Cryptosporidium parvum DNA from fecal smears on glass slides stained conventionally for direct microscope examination. J Clin Microbiol 39, 401–403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Amar, C. F., Dear, P. H., Pedraza-Diaz, S., Looker, N., Linnane, E. & McLauchlin, J. (2002). Sensitive PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay for detection and genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in human feces. J Clin Microbiol 40, 446–452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Farthing, M. J. G. (1995). Giardia lamblia. In Infections of the Gastrointestinal Tract, pp. 1081–1106. Edited by M. J. Blaser, P. D. Smith, J. I. Ravdin, H. B. Greenberg & R. L. Guerrant. New York: Raven Press.

  • Hall, T. A. (1999). BioEdit: a friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Window 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41, 95–98.

  • Homan, W. L., Gilsing, M., Bentala, H., Limper, L. & van Knapen, F. (1998). Characterization of Giardia duodenalis by polymerase-chain-reaction fingerprinting. Parasitol Res 84, 707–714.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Isaac-Renton, J. L. (1991). Laboratory diagnosis of giardiasis. Clin Lab Med 11, 811–827.

  • LeChevallier, M. W., Norton, W. D., Siegel, J. E. & Abbaszadegan, M. (1995). Evaluation of the immunofluorescence procedure for detection of Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts in water. Appl Environ Microbiol 61, 690–697.[Abstract]

  • McLauchlin, J., Pedraza-Díaz, S., Amar-Hoetzeneder, C. & Nichols, G. L. (1999). Genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium strains from 218 patients with diarrhea diagnosed as having sporadic cryptosporidiosis. J Clin Microbiol 37, 3153–3158.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • McLauchlin, J., Amar, C., Pedraza-Díaz, S. & Nichols, G. L. (2000). Molecular epidemiological analysis of Cryptosporidium spp.in the United Kingdom: results of genotyping Cryptosporidium spp. in 1,705 fecal samples from humans and 105 fecal samples from livestock animals. J Clin Microbiol 38, 3984–3990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Patel, S., Pedraza-Díaz, S. & McLauchlin, J. (1999). The identification of Cryptosporidium species and Cryptosporidium parvum directly from whole faeces by analysis of a multiplex PCR of the 18S rRNA gene and by PCR/RFLP of the Cryptosporidium outer wall protein (COWP) gene. Int J Parasitol 29, 1241–1247.[CrossRef][Medline]




    This article has been cited by other articles:


    Home page
    Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
    D. Stark, J. L. N. Barratt, S. van Hal, D. Marriott, J. Harkness, and J. T. Ellis
    Clinical Significance of Enteric Protozoa in the Immunosuppressed Human Population
    Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2009; 22(4): 634 - 650.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    Am J Trop Med HygHome page
    A. Singh, L. Janaki, W. A. Petri Jr, and E. R. Houpt
    Giardia intestinalis Assemblages A and B Infections in Nepal
    Am J Trop Med Hyg, September 1, 2009; 81(3): 538 - 539.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    Am J Trop Med HygHome page
    S. S. R. Ajjampur, P. Sankaran, A. Kannan, K. Sathyakumar, R. Sarkar, B. P. Gladstone, and G. Kang
    Giardia duodenalis Assemblages Associated with Diarrhea in Children in South India Identified by PCR-RFLP
    Am J Trop Med Hyg, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 16 - 19.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    Am J Trop Med HygHome page
    R. HAQUE, S. ROY, A. SIDDIQUE, U. MONDAL, S. M. M. RAHMAN, D. MONDAL, E. HOUPT, and W. A. PETRI JR
    MULTIPLEX REAL-TIME PCR ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF ENTAMOEBA HISTOLYTICA, GIARDIA INTESTINALIS, AND CRYPTOSPORIDIUM SPP.
    Am J Trop Med Hyg, April 1, 2007; 76(4): 713 - 717.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
    S. L. Erlandsen, E. Jarroll, P. Wallis, and H. van Keulen
    Development of Species-specific rDNA Probes for Giardia by Multiple Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Combined with Immunocytochemical Identification of Cyst Wall Antigens
    J. Histochem. Cytochem., August 1, 2005; 53(8): 917 - 927.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
    C. T. Ng, C. A. Gilchrist, A. Lane, S. Roy, R. Haque, and E. R. Houpt
    Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay Using Scorpion Probes and DNA Capture for Genotype-Specific Detection of Giardia lamblia on Fecal Samples
    J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2005; 43(3): 1256 - 1260.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
    Z. Wang, G. J. Vora, and D. A. Stenger
    Detection and Genotyping of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, Giardia lamblia, and Cryptosporidium parvum by Oligonucleotide Microarray
    J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2004; 42(7): 3262 - 3271.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
    R. A. Guy, C. Xiao, and P. A. Horgen
    Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection and Genotype Differentiation of Giardia lamblia in Stool Specimens
    J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2004; 42(7): 3317 - 3320.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    Home page
    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
    T. N. Bennett, M. Paguio, B. Gligorijevic, C. Seudieu, A. D. Kosar, E. Davidson, and P. D. Roepe
    Novel, Rapid, and Inexpensive Cell-Based Quantification of Antimalarial Drug Efficacy
    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2004; 48(5): 1807 - 1810.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    This Article
    Right arrow Abstract Freely available
    Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
    Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
    Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
    Right arrow Citation Map
    Services
    Right arrow Email this article to a friend
    Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
    Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
    Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
    Right arrow Download to citation manager
    Right arrow reprints & permissions
    Citing Articles
    Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
    Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
    Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
    Google Scholar
    Right arrow Articles by Amar, C. F.L.
    Right arrow Articles by McLauchlin, J.
    Right arrow Search for Related Content
    PubMed
    Right arrow PubMed Citation
    Right arrow Articles by Amar, C. F.L.
    Right arrow Articles by McLauchlin, J.
    Agricola
    Right arrow Articles by Amar, C. F.L.
    Right arrow Articles by McLauchlin, J.


    HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
    INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS