|
|
||||||||
1Health Protection Agency, Food Safety Microbiology Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Infections, Central Public Health Laboratory, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT, UK 2Medical Research Council, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 2QH, UK
Correspondence Jim McLauchlin jim.mclauchlin{at}hpa.org.uk
Received January 24, 2003
Accepted April 15, 2003
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DNA samples.
DNA extracts containing 1 ng DNA µl-1 from cultured G. duodenalis trophozoites of reference strains VNB3 and AMC13 (assemblage A), AMC9 (assemblage B), 265KA1184 (hoofed farm animal) and DOG1 (dog type) were provided by W. Homan (Laboratory for Parasitology and Mycology, Bilthoven, The Netherlands) (Homan et al., 1998). DNA was also extracted from purified oocysts of Cryptosporidium parvum genotype 1 (MRC, Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK), Cryptosporidium parvum genotype 2 (Iowa strain 1372; AIDS Research Reference Reagent Program, National Institutes of Health, USA), Cryptosporidium baileyi, Cryptosporidium muris and Eimeria tenella (Patel et al., 1999) and from in vitro-grown Escherichia coli strain N211 (PHLS Food External Quality Assessment Scheme, London, UK) and Clostridium perfringens type A NCTC 8239.
Microscopy.
Smears were produced from faecal samples (Amar et al., 2001) and examined by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy as described previously (Amar et al., 2002).
DNA extraction and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) treatment.
DNA extraction from whole faeces and from stained smears on glass microscope slides, including further DNA purification using PVP, was performed as described before (McLauchlin et al., 1999; Amar et al., 2001). DNA from purified oocysts and bacterial suspension was also prepared by a similar method.
Nested real-time PCR amplification for identification of G. duodenalis assemblages A and B (TPILC-PCR).
The tpi gene sequences of G. duodenalis assemblage A groups I and II (GenBank accession nos L02120 and U57897, respectively) and assemblage B (L02116 and AF069561) were aligned using the program BioEdit (Hall, 1999). Two sets of four primers (Table 1) were designed to amplify G. duodenalis assemblages A and B.
|
Amplification was performed in two phases. A duplex phase-I PCR was performed using a conventional thermocycler (Biometra T3; Anachem) and primers designed to amplify fragments of the tpi gene of G. duodenalis of 576 bp from assemblage A (primers TPIA4F/TPIA4R) and 210 bp from assemblage B (primers TPIB4F/TPIB4R) (Table 1). The duplex reaction was performed in a 10 µl volume with 5 µl DNA in 1x PCR buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM of each dNTP, 0.3 µM of each primer and 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (all reagents from Invitrogen). Samples were subjected to an initial denaturation of 94 °C for 1 min, 25 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s, 50 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.
Two separate phase-II PCRs, with inner forward (IF) and reverse (IR) primers, were devised to amplify fragments of the G. duodenalis tpi gene of 452 bp from assemblage A (primers TPIA4IF/TPIA4IR) and 141 bp from assemblage B (primers TPIB4IF/TPIB4IR). Both phase-II reactions were performed as real-time hot-start PCRs using a LightCycler (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The reaction comprised 10 µl of the phase I duplex-PCR product diluted 10 times in nuclease-free water (Sigma), 2 mM MgCl2, 1 µM of each primer (IF/IR) and 2 µl Master Mix (FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I kit; Roche Molecular Biochemicals) in a volume of 20 µl. Cycling conditions were 95 °C for 8 min followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 58 °C for 3 s and 72 °C for 10 s, with a transition rate of 20 °C s-1. Fluorescence readings were taken after each extension step and as a final melting analysis by treatment at 95 °C for 0 s, 68 °C for 15 s followed by a transition at 0.1 °C s-1 to 95 °C. Melting temperatures (Tm) were derived from melting peaks using LightCycler software version 3.5. Each test batch contained a maximum of 30 samples plus one positive control (AMC13- or AMC9-derived DNA) and one negative control (water).
Gel electrophoresis and RFLP.
RsaI restriction sites were identified from an alignment of the tpi gene of G. duodenalis assemblage A to distinguish between subgenotypes groups I and II. The predicted restriction fragments were 437 and 15 bp for group I and 235, 202 and 15 bp for group II.
PCR products were recovered from LightCycler glass capillaries by centrifugation and RFLP analysis was performed by digesting 5 µl PCR product with 5 U restriction enzyme in 1x enzyme buffer (Invitrogen) in a final volume of 30 µl for at least 4 h at 37 °C. Restriction fragments were separated in 3.2 % agarose/ethidium bromide gels by horizontal electrophoresis and examined by UV transillumination.
DNA sequencing.
PCR products were purified using a StrataPrep PCR purification kit (Stratagene). Sequencing of PCR products (sense and antisense) was performed at the Advanced Biotechnology Centre, Imperial College, London, UK, using an ABI 377 automated DNA sequencer and appropriate IF and IR primers.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To estimate the limit of detection of the TPILC-PCR, DNA extracts of reference strains were serially diluted in sterile distilled water. The dilutions were subjected to TPIALC (AMC13) or TPIBLC (AMC9) PCR. Specific melting peaks could be observed (Fig. 1) when generated from the TPIALC and TPIBLC PCR amplifications using 0.005 and 0.05 pg of DNA per reaction, respectively, corresponding to 0.5 and 5 copies of the tpi gene, based on a genome size of 1.2 x 107 bp (Adam, 2000). The reproducibility of detection of G. duodenalis assemblages A and B using DNA extracted from purified AMC13 and AMC9 strains analysed five times by TPILC-PCR was 100 %.
Smears were produced from 20 faecal samples (described above) from which G. duodenalis assemblage A group II (seven samples) and assemblage B (13 samples) had previously been detected. All smears were stained by immunofluorescence and giardial cysts were confirmed in all samples: in eight samples, five or fewer cysts were detected per microscope field. DNA was extracted from all of the smears and analysed in triplicate by TPILC-PCR/RFLP. tpi gene fragments were amplified from 15 (75 %) of the samples and the assemblages recovered were the same as those previously detected from faeces. Of the 15 smears where the tpi fragment was amplified, 10 were positive in all three replicates, four in two replicates and one in one of the three replicates. There was no correlation between reproducibility in triplicate tests and the number of cysts detected by microscopy (data not shown). The number of cysts seen by microscopy may not be proportional to the amount of intact template DNA, since the contents of cysts may be degraded prior to extraction. Therefore, the reduced reproducibility was most likely due to sampling error because of the very low original template concentration.
Phase I of the TPILC-PCR was performed in a conventional thermocycler, and only the nested phase was adapted to the LightCycler system. This format retained the high specificity and sensitivity provided by a nested reaction, and the use of diluted phase-I PCR product avoided saturation of the fluorescence signal by double-stranded DNA recovered from faeces. The sensitivity of the fully nested reaction (0.55 copies of tpi) was similar to that described previously for a hemi-nested protocol using the same target (Amar et al., 2002). However, this LightCycler assay has a considerable advantage over the previously reported block-based procedure (Amar et al., 2002) because of the speed of analysis. Excluding the RFLP analysis (which is identical for both procedures), the conventional hemi-nested TPI-PCR (Amar et al., 2002) took approximately 3 h and 15 min to perform, compared with 1 h and 50 min for the LightCycler assay described here. However, one disadvantage of using the LightCycler was that each batch was limited to 30 assays plus one positive and one negative control. The use of hybridization probes as a replacement for the RFLP analysis is currently being evaluated, which would further reduce the time required to perform these assays.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Stark, J. L. N. Barratt, S. van Hal, D. Marriott, J. Harkness, and J. T. Ellis Clinical Significance of Enteric Protozoa in the Immunosuppressed Human Population Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2009; 22(4): 634 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Singh, L. Janaki, W. A. Petri Jr, and E. R. Houpt Giardia intestinalis Assemblages A and B Infections in Nepal Am J Trop Med Hyg, September 1, 2009; 81(3): 538 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. R. Ajjampur, P. Sankaran, A. Kannan, K. Sathyakumar, R. Sarkar, B. P. Gladstone, and G. Kang Giardia duodenalis Assemblages Associated with Diarrhea in Children in South India Identified by PCR-RFLP Am J Trop Med Hyg, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 16 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. HAQUE, S. ROY, A. SIDDIQUE, U. MONDAL, S. M. M. RAHMAN, D. MONDAL, E. HOUPT, and W. A. PETRI JR MULTIPLEX REAL-TIME PCR ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF ENTAMOEBA HISTOLYTICA, GIARDIA INTESTINALIS, AND CRYPTOSPORIDIUM SPP. Am J Trop Med Hyg, April 1, 2007; 76(4): 713 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Erlandsen, E. Jarroll, P. Wallis, and H. van Keulen Development of Species-specific rDNA Probes for Giardia by Multiple Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Combined with Immunocytochemical Identification of Cyst Wall Antigens J. Histochem. Cytochem., August 1, 2005; 53(8): 917 - 927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. Ng, C. A. Gilchrist, A. Lane, S. Roy, R. Haque, and E. R. Houpt Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay Using Scorpion Probes and DNA Capture for Genotype-Specific Detection of Giardia lamblia on Fecal Samples J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2005; 43(3): 1256 - 1260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Wang, G. J. Vora, and D. A. Stenger Detection and Genotyping of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, Giardia lamblia, and Cryptosporidium parvum by Oligonucleotide Microarray J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2004; 42(7): 3262 - 3271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Guy, C. Xiao, and P. A. Horgen Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection and Genotype Differentiation of Giardia lamblia in Stool Specimens J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2004; 42(7): 3317 - 3320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. N. Bennett, M. Paguio, B. Gligorijevic, C. Seudieu, A. D. Kosar, E. Davidson, and P. D. Roepe Novel, Rapid, and Inexpensive Cell-Based Quantification of Antimalarial Drug Efficacy Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2004; 48(5): 1807 - 1810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | J MED MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL | ALL SGM JOURNALS |