J Med Microbiol International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klink, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sulowska, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klink, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sulowska, Z.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Klink, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sulowska, Z.
J Med Microbiol 52 (2003), 303-308; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.04974-0
© 2003 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615


HOST REPONSE

Involvement of nitric oxide donor compounds in the bactericidal activity of human neutrophils in vitro

Magdalena Klink1, Maciej Cedzynski1, Anna St Swierzko1, Henryk Tchórzewski12 and Zofia Sulowska1

1Microbiology and Virology Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, 93-232 Lodz, Lodowa 106, Poland 2Department of Clinical Immunology, Institute of Polish Mothers’ Memorial Hospital, 93-338 Lodz, Rzgowska 281/289, Poland

Correspondence Magdalena Klink mklink{at}cmiwpan.lodz.pl


Received 20 May 2002 Accepted 21 November 2002

The bactericidal activity of human neutrophils against extracellular and facultatively intracellular bacteria was studied in the presence of the nitric oxide (NO) donors sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1), a molsidomine metabolite. SNP and molsidomine are drugs commonly used as nitrovasodilators in coronary heart disease. It is demonstrated here that the NO donor compounds themselves did not affect the viability and survival of the bacterial strains tested. Neither SNP nor SIN-1 had any effect on the process of bacteria ingestion. In contrast, NO donors enhanced the ability of neutrophils to kill Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris and Salmonella Anatum. However, strains differed in their susceptibility to SNP- and SIN-1-mediated killing by neutrophils. Removal of the superoxide anion reduced the bactericidal activity of SNP- and SIN-1-treated neutrophils against E. coli and S. Anatum. This suggests that the NO derivatives formed in the reaction of NO generated from donors with the reactive oxygen species released by phagocytosed neutrophils potentiate the bactericidal activity of human neutrophils in vitro. The above original observation discussed here suggests clinical significance for the treatment of patients with nitrovasodilators in the course of coronary heart disease therapy.


Abbreviations: CL, chemiluminescence; RNI, reactive nitrogen intermediate; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SIN-1, 3-morpholinosydnonimine; SNP, sodium nitroprusside.

Neutrophils play a key role in host defence against a wide variety of micro-organisms. They are able to kill micro-organisms by two distinct mechanisms, one of which is oxygen dependent, while the other is oxygen independent (Verhoef & Visser, 1993). The principal bactericidal agents derived from neutrophils are reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as the superoxide anion (O2) and hydroxyl radical (OHt.) as well as non-radical species such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (Umeki, 1994; Saran et al., 1999). They are produced during a complex series of reactions named the ‘respiratory burst'. The superoxide anion is converted into H2O2 spontaneously and/or via the action of superoxide dismutase (SOD). The interaction of O2 with H2O2 leads to the formation of the hydroxyl radical, which is a strongly bactericidal agent. In the reaction of H2O2 with Cl, catalysed by myeloperoxidase (MPO), highly toxic HOCl is formed (Babior, 1999; Jones et al., 2000).

In addition to the ROS, the nitric oxide molecule (NO) is considered an antimicrobial agent against various species of bacteria, viruses, yeasts and parasites (De Groote & Fang, 1995; Fang, 1997). The mechanism by which NO kills bacteria is controversial. Several reports have indicated that NO supports the toxicity of ROS by interaction with the superoxide anion to produce the highly reactive peroxynitrite anion (ONOO) (Fang, 1997; Zhu et al., 1992), which is subsequently decomposed into potent antimicrobial reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNIs) (Fang, 1997; Bogdan et al., 2000; Squadrito & Pryor, 1998). Nitrite, a major end product of NO metabolism, can be converted into nitryl chloride (NO2Cl) and nitrogen dioxide (t.NO2) through an MPO-dependent pathway (Dahlgren & Karlsson, 1999; Eiserich et al., 1998). The formation of ONOO, NO2Cl and t.NO2 in neutrophils may represent one of the important mechanisms of host defence (Eiserich et al., 1998).

NO donor compounds such as sodium nitroprusside (SNP) or 3-morpholinosydnonimine (SIN-1), a molsidomine metabolite, are drugs commonly used as nitrovasodilators in coronary heart disease (Yamamoto & Bing, 2000; Feelisch, 1991). In addition to their effect on vascular smooth muscle cells, NO donors affect circulating white blood cells by inhibiting adhesion and aggregation of neutrophils (Armstrong, 2001). In this study, we have investigated the effect of exogenously administrated SNP and SIN-1 on the bactericidal capacity of human neutrophils in vitro.

METHODS

Chemical reagents.

Polymorphprep was obtained from Nycomed. RPMI 1640 medium, Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS), sodium nitrite, sulfanilamide, naphthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride, phosphoric acid, 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,3-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), SNP, SIN-1, catalase (CAT), SOD, FITC, BSA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and saponin were purchased from Sigma. Luminol was from Serva. Calf serum was obtained from Gibco-BRL. McFarland Standard and CLED agar were from bioMérieux. PBS was purchased from BIOMED-Lublin.

Isolation of neutrophils.

Blood samples were drawn directly into heparinized tubes (5 U ml–1) from healthy volunteers. The 5 ml blood samples were layered onto 3 ml Polymorphprep and centrifuged at 450–500 g for 30 min. The top band, containing mononuclear cells, was removed, while the lower one, containing polymorphonuclear cells, was collected. The neutrophils were washed twice with PBS. Neutrophil viability (>95 %) and cell purity (>95 %) were assessed by Trypan blue exclusion and May–Grünwald–Giemsa staining, respectively. The Regional Commission approved the protocol of these studies for Ethics in Research.

Bacteria.

Escherichia coli strain LI1 was from the collection of the Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Lodz, Poland. Proteus vulgaris PrK48/57 was obtained from the Czech National Collection of Type Cultures. Salmonella enterica serotype Anatum (S. Anatum) KOS78 was a kind gift of Professor R. Glosnicka, Institute of Maritime and Tropical Medicine, Gdynia, Poland. Bacteria were grown in tryptic soy agar for 18 h at 37 °C and harvested and washed three times with PBS by centrifugation (2500 g, 15 min, 4 °C). The bacterial cell density was adjusted spectrophotometrically according to McFarland Standard (550 nm, ELISA reader Multiscan RC, Labsystem) to 1.5 x 109 cells ml–1.

Measurement of the generation of NO from NO donor compounds.

The amount of NO generated from SNP and SIN-1 in our systems was determined. Neutrophils (5 x 105 cells per well) were mixed with bacteria (5 x 106 cells per well) in the presence of SNP (10–1000 µM) or SIN-1 (10–1000 µM) in RPMI 1640 medium for 5 or 60 min at 37 °C. In some experiments, SNP (10–1000 µM) or SIN-1 (10–1000 µM) was added to RPMI medium alone (cell-free system) for 5 min at 37 °C. The generation of NO was measured by quantification of nitrite (NO2), a stable metabolite of NO, using the Griess reagent (1 % sulfanilamide mixed with 0.1 % naphthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride in 5 % phosphoric acid). Griess reagent (100 µl) was added to an equal volume of culture supernatant and the reaction mixture was incubated for 10 min at room temperature. The absorbance was determined at 550 nm in an ELISA reader (Multiscan RC). Nitrite concentrations were then calculated using a standard curve generated with a serial dilution of sodium nitrite from 0.5 to 100 µM (Green et al., 1982).

Effect of NO donors on bacterial survival.

SNP (100 or 1000 µM) or SIN-1 (100 or 1000 µM) was added to RPMI 1640 culture medium in a 96 well plate for 5 min to initiate NO generation. Bacteria (5 x 106 cells per well) were then added to RPMI 1640 medium with or without NO donors. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. MTT solution (0.5 mg ml–1) was then added to the bacteria and the plate was incubated for another hour at 37 °C. Live bacteria converted the yellow tetrazolium salt of MTT to the dark-blue formazan product. Formazan was solubilized with 2-propanol (200 µl per well) and the absorbance at 590 nm was measured in an ELISA reader (Multiscan RC). The absorption of formazan is directly related to the number of viable bacteria.

Labelling of bacteria.

Bacteria (1 x 109 cells ml–1) in PBS were heated for 1 h at 60 °C and then washed twice with PBS. Heat-killed bacteria were labelled with FITC (100 µg ml–1) in sodium carbonate buffer (SCB: 35 mM NaHCO3, 15 mM Na2CO3, pH 9.6) for 18 h at room temperature with gentle agitation. They were then washed three times with PBS and resuspended in SCB containing 4 % BSA and stored for 15 min at room temperature to bind unconjugated FITC to BSA. The cells were then washed once with SCB + 4 % BSA and once with PBS. Finally, the bacteria were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 20 % calf serum at a concentration of 1 x 109 cells ml–1 and stored at 4 °C (Chmiela et al., 1998).

Phagocytosis assay.

Neutrophils and FITC-labelled bacteria were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 20 % pooled human serum at respective concentrations of 1 x 106 and 1 x 108 cells ml–1. Equal volumes (100 µl) of the neutrophil suspension (1 x 105 cells) and the FITC-labelled bacteria suspension (1 x 107 cells) were mixed in the absence or presence of NO donors (100 and 1000 µM) in a 96 well plate. The plate was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with 5 % CO2. After that time, the plate was centrifuged (5 min, 300 g) and medium was removed. Extracellular fluorescence was quenched with 100 µl 0.1 % Trypan blue in PBS per well. The plate was placed in a Fluoroscan Ascent FL fluorometer (Labsystem) and the intensity of fluorescence was determined in relative fluorescence units (RFU) at 485 nm excitation and 530 nm emission wavelengths. The intensity of fluorescence is directly proportional to the number of bacteria ingested. In each experiment, a standard curve of FITC-labelled bacteria was prepared (Chmiela et al., 1998).

Neutrophil bactericidal activity assays Bacteria (1 x 108 ml–1) were opsonized with 20 % pooled human serum in RPMI 1640 medium (20 min, 37 °C). The bacteria were then washed with RPMI 1640 medium by centrifugation (2500 g, 15 min, 4 °C). The neutrophils and bacteria were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5 % calf serum. The MTT colorimetric microassay and counting of bacterial colonies were employed for quantification of the bactericidal activity of neutrophils.

MTT colorimetric microassay.

SNP (100 or 1000 µM) or SIN-1 (100 or 1000 µM) was added to RPMI 1640 culture medium in a 96 well plate for 5 min to initiate NO generation. Neutrophils (5 x 105 cells per well), cells of E. coli, P. vulgaris or S. Anatum (5 x 106 cells per well) and/or CAT (1000 U ml–1) and/or SOD (100 U ml–1) were then added to RPMI 1640 medium with or without NO donors. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C (OD sample). Control samples contained (i) neutrophils in culture medium (OD 90 % killing) or (ii) bacteria in culture medium (OD 0 % killing). Neutrophils were lysed by adding saponin (0.05 %) for 20 min at room temperature. MTT solution and 2-propanol were then added as described above. In each experiment, standard curves of bactericidal activity were prepared. Bacteria (5 x 106 cells) were diluted in RPMI medium with 5 % calf serum to 1 x 106 and 0.5 x 106 cells per well, corresponding to 50 and 100 % reductions in the number of cells, and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Saponin, MTT solution and 2-propanol were then added as described above. The A590 was then measured using an ELISA reader. The limit of error was calculated as 10 % and values obtained were reduced by 10 %. An OD corresponding to 5 x 106 was determined as 0 % of bacteria killed. The OD of lysed (saponin-treated) neutrophils in the medium was calculated as 90 % bacteria killed. The percentage of bacteria killed by neutrophils was calculated from the formula: 1–(OD sample–OD 90 % killing)/(OD 0 % killing–OD 90 % killing) x 90 % (Stevens & Olsen, 1993).

Colony counting (c.f.u. assay).

SNP (1000 µM) or SIN-1 (1000 µM) was added to RPMI 1640 culture medium for 5 min to initiate NO generation. Neutrophils (5 x 106 cells) and bacteria (5 x 107 cells) were then added to RPMI 1640 medium with or without NO donors. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Control samples contained bacteria only (5 x 107 cells) with or without NO donors. After 1 h of incubation, the neutrophils were lysed by adding saponin (0.05 %) for 20 min at room temperature. All samples were serially diluted and 0.1 ml aliquots were plated in triplicate on CLED agar plates. The agar plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C. Colonies were then counted and the number of colony-forming units (c.f.u.) was recorded. The percentage of bacteria killed by neutrophils was calculated from the formula: 1 – (c.f.u. neutrophils + bacteria/c.f.u. bacteria) x 100 %.

Chemiluminescence (CL) assay.

CL was measured in a 96 well plate with a Fluoroscan Ascent FL fluorometer. Neutrophils (1 x 105 cells per well in HBSS) were distributed into the 96 well plate and were untreated or treated with SNP or SIN-1 at concentrations of 100 or 1000 µM or with 0.1 µg PMA for 1–2 min. Luminol (10–5 M) was then added to the wells to enhance CL. The CL reading for all experiments was recorded for 30 min at 2 min intervals. The CL intensity was given in relative light units (RLU). The data were expressed as the area under the curve of CL versus time (RLU total).

Statistical analysis.

Data are presented as means ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Statistical significance was defined as P <= 0.05.

RESULTS

Generation of nitrite from NO donors

In a preliminary study, we checked the generation of nitrite from SNP and SIN-1 in RPMI medium in the absence of neutrophils and bacteria (cell-free medium). We found that, after 5 min incubation, SNP and SIN-1 respectively led to an increase in nitrite from 0 ± 0 to 4.3 ± 4.4 µM and from 1.1 ± 0.3 to 25.0 ± 9.2 µM. On the basis of these data, a 5 min pre-incubation time of NO donors in RPMI medium was considered sufficient to initiate nitrite generation and was used in subsequent experiments.

Fig. 1 shows that, in the presence of neutrophils and bacteria, SNP and SIN-1 respectively led to an increase in nitrite from 0.2 ± 0.2 to 16.5 ± 0.6 µM and from 0.6 ± 0.1 to 27.4 ± 1.8 µM during the first 5 min and from 5.4 ± 1.3 to 27.4 ± 0.7 µM and from 5.0 ± 0.5 to 153.8 ± 22.3 µM, respectively, after 60 min incubation. SNP and SIN-1 generated comparable amounts of nitrite during a 5 min incubation. In contrast, the amount of nitrite generated from SIN-1 after 60 min was statistically greater than from SNP (P <= 0.04). On the basis of these data, NO donor concentrations of 100 and 1000 µM were considered sufficient and were used in subsequent experiments.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Nitrite generation from NO donors in the presence of neutrophils and bacteria. SNP (open bars) or SIN-1 (filled bars) was added to a suspension of neutrophils (5 x 105) and bacteria (5 x 106) in RPMI 1640 medium for 5 or 60 min at 37 °C. The generation of nitrite from NO donors was measured using Griess reagent. Data are expressed as means ± SD of four independent experiments carried out with neutrophils from different individuals. Statistical significance: *, SNP versus SIN-1 (P <= 0•04).

 

Effect of NO donors on the survival of bacteria

In order to determine whether SNP and SIN-1 themselves have a direct effect on the viability of E. coli, P. vulgaris and S. Anatum in the absence of neutrophils, the bacteria were exposed to NO donors (100 and 1000 µM) for 1 h. We observed that there was no difference in the survival of any of the tested bacteria after exposure to NO donors in comparison to untreated bacteria (data for E. coli shown in Fig. 2). Prolonged exposure of bacteria to NO donors (18 h) had no significant effect on their survival (data not shown).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of NO donors on the survival of E. coli. SNP (open bars) or SIN-1 (filled bars) was added to RPMI 1640 culture medium in a 96 well plate for 5 min to initiate NO generation. Bacteria (5 x 106 cells per well) were then added to RPMI 1640 medium with or without NO donors. Reaction mixtures were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. The viability of bacteria was determined by MTT assay. Data are expressed as means ± SD of six independent experiments. P. vulgaris and S. Anatum gave similar results (not shown).

 

Effect of NO donors on the ingestion of bacteria by neutrophils

The data shown in Table 1 demonstrate that SNP and SIN-1 did not influence the degree of ingestion of different species of bacteria by neutrophils, independently of the concentration of NO donors used.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of NO donors on the ingestion of bacteria by neutrophils FITC-labelled bacteria (1 x 107) were incubated with neutrophils (1 x 105) for 1 h at 37 °C. Data are RFU expressed as means ± SD of six independent experiments carried out with neutrophils from different individuals.
 

Effect of NO donors on the bactericidal activity of neutrophils

As shown in Fig. 3 and Table 2, in the absence of NO donors, the percentages of E. coli, P. vulgaris and S. Anatum cells killed by neutrophils were respectively 20–25, 30–40 and 0–1 %. We found that both SNP and SIN-1 enhanced the bactericidal activity of neutrophils significantly, giving activities against E. coli of up to 30–40 %, P. vulgaris up to 60–70 % and S. Anatum up to 10–15 %, as determined with the MTT and c.f.u. assays. However, the bacteria differed in their susceptibility to NO donor-mediated killing by neutrophils. SNP enhanced the bactericidal activity of neutrophils against P. vulgaris at concentrations of 100 and 1000 µM and against E. coli at 1000 µM only and had no effect on killing of S. Anatum. SIN-1 induced neutrophils to kill P. vulgaris and S. Anatum at 1000 µM and to kill E. coli at 100 and 1000 µM (Fig. 3).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of NO donors on neutrophil-mediated bacteria killing. SNP (open bars) or SIN-1 (filled bars) was added to RPMI 1640 culture medium in the a 96 well plate for 5 min to initiate NO generation. Neutrophils (5 x 105 cells per well) and bacteria (5 x 106cells per well) were then added to RPMI 1640 medium with or without NO donors. Reaction mixtures were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. The viability of bacteria was determined by MTT assay. Data are expressed as means ± SD of six independent experiments carried out with neutrophils from different individuals. Statistical significance: *, bacteria without NO donors versus bacteria with NO donors (P <= 0•04).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of NO donors on neutrophil-mediated killing of bacteria SNP (1000 µM) or SIN-1 (1000 µM) was added to RPMI 1640 culture medium for 5 min to initiate NO generation. Neutrophils (5 x 106 cells) and bacteria (5 x 107 cells) were then added to RPMI 1640 medium with or without NO donors and the reaction mixtures were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Viability of bacteria was determined by the c.f.u. assay. Data are representative of four independent experiments carried out with neutrophils from different individuals.
 

For further analysis of the mechanisms by which NO donors enhanced the bactericidal activity of neutrophils, we eliminated oxygen agents from the reaction mixture by adding SOD and CAT as scavengers of O2 and H2O2, respectively. As demonstrated in Fig. 4, the addition of CAT did not affect NO donor-mediated bactericidal activity of neutrophils. The addition of SOD reduced the killing of E. coli and S. Anatum but not P. vulgaris by SNP- and SIN-1-treated neutrophils. CAT and SOD had no significant effect on the bactericidal activity of neutrophils in the absence of NO donors (data not shown).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Combined effect of NO donors and SOD and/or CAT on the bactericidal activity of neutrophils. SNP (open bars) or SIN-1 (filled bars) was added to RPMI 1640 culture medium in a 96 well plate for 5 min to initiate NO generation. Neutrophils (5 x 105 cells per well), bacteria (5 x 106 cells per well) and/or CAT (1000 U ml–1) and/or SOD (100 U ml–1) as indicated were added to RPMI 1640 medium with or without NO donors. None, neither CAT nor SOD added. Reaction mixtures were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Data are expressed as means ± SD of six independent experiments carried out with neutrophils from different individuals. Statistical significance: *, bacteria with NO donors versus bacteria with NO donors and SOD (P <= 0•05).

 

Effect of SNP and SIN-1 on ROS production by neutrophils

SNP and SIN-1 did not stimulate ROS production by neutrophils, as assayed by the CL method. CL values (in RLU) were as follows: untreated neutrophils, 9.8 ± 3.4; neutrophils + 100 µM SIN-1, 7.7 ± 2.8; neutrophils + 1000 µM SNP, 9.5 ± 1.7; neutrophils + 100 µM SIN-1, 8.3 ± 3.4; neutrophils + 1000 µM SIN-1, 7.3 ± 1.2; neutrophils + PMA (positive control), 230.4 ± 42.5 (n = 6).

DISCUSSION

Recognition of the role of NO donor compounds as antimicrobial agents and in other aspects of non-specific immunity is important with regard to their therapeutic usefulness. We found here that neither SNP nor SIN-1 alone showed a direct effect on the viability and survival of E. coli, P. vulgaris or S. Anatum in vitro (Fig. 2), although they were able to generate NO in the cell-free system. Similarly, other investigators have suggested that NO itself does not possess bactericidal activity for Salmonella species (De Groote et al., 1995) or E. coli (Pacelli et al., 1995). Although some authors have demonstrated that SIN-1 reduced the viability of Salmonella typhimurium (De Groote et al., 1995) or E. coli (Brunelli et al., 1995), this activity depended on the experimental conditions. It was shown that spontaneous decomposition of SIN-1 leads to the generation of equimolar quantities of NO and O2, which interact almost instantly to produce ONOO (Yamamoto & Bing, 2000), which is considered a bactericidal agent (Fang, 1997). However, the formation of ONOO during decomposition of SIN-1 depends strongly on the oxygen concentration in the reaction mixture and, under anaerobic conditions, SIN-1 did not show bactericidal activity (De Groote et al., 1995; Brunelli et al., 1995; Doulias et al., 2001).

The participation of endogenously produced NO in the bactericidal activity of neutrophils has been studied (Malawista et al., 1992; Fierro et al., 1996), while the contribution of exogenously administered NO donor compounds to the killing of bacteria by neutrophils has not been studied intensively. It is well known that human neutrophils appear to produce very little (Larfars & Gyllenhammar, 1998) or no (Yan et al., 1994) NO and, for some authors, the contribution of NO to the bactericidal activity of neutrophils is still uncertain (De Groote & Fang, 1995). It should be pointed out that NO produced by other cells (endothelial and epithelial cells and macrophages) (Clancy et al., 1998) or administered as a drug (Feelisch, 1991; Janero, 2000) may participate in the formation of RNIs in neutrophils and/or extracellularly. The possible contribution of nitrovasodilators to the antimicrobial defence of the host has been emphasized since it was noticed that molsidomine-pre-treated rodents showed reduced mortality in response to endotoxin (Cochran et al., 1999; Kumins et al., 1997).

In this study, we found that the bactericidal activity of NO donor-treated neutrophils was dependent on the species of microbe. SIN-1 significantly enhanced the antibacterial activity of neutrophils against all species of bacteria tested, while SNP potentiated the bactericidal activity of neutrophils against E. coli and P. vulgaris only. Additionally, E. coli was the most sensitive species to SIN-1-mediated killing, while P. vulgaris was most sensitive to SNP-mediated killing by neutrophils (Fig. 3). Our results confirm earlier observations of other investigators (Forslund & Sundqvist, 1995a, b) that SNP and SIN-1 do not stimulate neutrophils to generate ROS. This suggests that NO donors do not enhance neutrophil bactericidal activity mediated by O2. On the basis of the experiments with the addition of SOD, we can assume that, when O2 was scavenged from the reaction mixture, SNP and SIN-1 showed weaker ability to contribute to neutrophil-mediated killing of E. coli and S. Anatum but not P. vulgaris (Fig. 4). It is possible that peroxynitrite, formed when NO (generated from donors) combines with O2 derived from bacteria-phagocytosed neutrophils, participates in the elimination of E. coli and S. Anatum but not P. vulgaris. It should be noted that other nitrogen derivatives, such as ONOOH, NO2Cl and NO2, which cause nitration and chlorination of tyrosine residues in bacteria, can also contribute to the bactericidal activity of neutrophils (Bogdan et al., 2000; Squadrito & Pryor, 1998; Eiserich et al., 1998). We can assume that the participation of RNIs in killing of bacteria by neutrophils is dependent on the species of bacteria tested. It was suggested earlier that the main activity of RNIs is restricted to intracellular pathogens (e.g. Mycobacterium bovis, Leishmania major) (Miller & Britigan, 1997). However, it has been noticed that E. coli (Pacelli et al., 1995) and Salmonella species (De Groote et al., 1995) are also targets for RNIs.

We found that the degree of ingestion of bacteria by neutrophils in vitro was independent of the presence of NO donors (Table 1). In contrast, Forslund & Sundqvist (1997) have shown that an NO-releasing substance such as GEA-5171 decreased the phagocytosis of yeast particles by neutrophils.

Our results show that NO donors are involved in the bactericidal activity of human neutrophils in vitro. We conclude that exogenously administered SNP and SIN-1 demonstrate varied effects on neutrophil function associated with the elimination of extracellular and facultatively intracellular bacteria. They do not have any effect on the process of bacterial ingestion, but they enhance the process of bacterial killing by neutrophils. The mechanisms of potentiated bacterial killing by SNP- and SIN-1-treated neutrophils are not clear. We assume that NO released from SNP and SIN-1 and its derivatives formed in the course of the interaction between neutrophils and bacteria are responsible for the enhancement of neutrophil antibacterial activity.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by grant 4 P05A 034 18 from the State Committee for Scientific Research (KBN), Poland.

REFERENCES

  • Armstrong, R. (2001). The physiological role and pharmacological potential of nitric oxide in neutrophil activation. Int Immunopharmacol 1, 1501–1512.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Babior, B. M. (1999). NADPH oxidase: an update. Blood 93, 1464–1476.[Free Full Text]

  • Bogdan, C., Röllinghoff, M. & Diefenbach, A. (2000). Reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen intermediates in innate and specific immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 12, 64–76.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Brunelli, L., Crow, J. P. & Beckman, J. S. (1995). The comparative toxicity of nitric oxide and peroxynitrite to Escherichia coli. Arch Biochem Biophys 316, 327–334.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Chmiela, M., Wadstrom, T., Folkesson, H., Planeta Malecka, I., Czkwianianc, E., Rechcinski, T. & Rudnicka, W. (1998). Anti-Lewis X antibody and Lewis X–anti-Lewis X immune complexes in Helicobacter pylori infection. Immunol Lett 61, 119–125.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Clancy, R. M., Amin, A. R. & Abramson, S. B. (1998). The role of nitric oxide in inflammation and immunity. Arthritis Rheum 41, 1141–1151.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Cochran, J. B., Genovese, F., Ogura, S., Teti, G. & Cook, J. A. (1999). Effect of nitric oxide donors and nitric oxide synthase inhibitors in neonatal rat endotoxic shock. Biochem Pharmacol 58, 687–691.[Medline]

  • Dahlgren, C. & Karlsson, A. (1999). Respiratory burst in human neutrophils. J Immunol Methods 232, 3–14.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • De Groote, M. A. & Fang, F. C. (1995). NO inhibitions: antimicrobial properties of nitric oxide. Clin Infect Dis 21 (Suppl. 2), S162–S165.

  • De Groote, M. A., Granger, D., Xu, Y., Campbell, G., Prince, R. & Fang, F. C. (1995). Genetic and redox determinants of nitric oxide cytotoxicity in a Salmonella typhimurium model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92, 6399–6403.

  • Doulias, P. T., Barbouti, A., Galaris, D. & Ischiropoulos, H. (2001). SIN-1-induced DNA damage in isolated human peripheral blood lymphocytes as assessed by single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay). Free Radic Biol Med 30, 679–685.[Medline]

  • Eiserich, J. P., Hristova, M., Cross, C. E., Jones, A. D., Freeman, B. A., Halliwell, B. & van der Vliet, A. (1998). Formation of nitric oxide-derived inflammatory oxidants by myeloperoxidase in neutrophils. Nature 391, 393–397.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Fang, F. C. (1997). Mechanisms of nitric oxide-related antimicrobial activity. J Clin Invest 99, 2818–2825.[Medline]

  • Feelisch, M. J. (1991). The biochemical pathways of nitric oxide formation from nitrovasodilators: appropriate choice of exogenous NO donors and aspects of preparation and handling of aqueous solutions. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 17 (Suppl. 3), S25–S33.

  • Fierro, I. M., Barja-Fidalgo, C., Cunha, F. Q. & Ferreira, S. H. (1996). The involvement of nitric oxide in the anti-Candida albicans activity of rat neutrophils. Immunology 89, 295–300.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Forslund, T. & Sundqvist, T. (1995a). Nitric oxide regulates the chemiluminescence from stimulated human neutrophils. APMIS 103, 813–817.[Medline]

  • Forslund, T. & Sundqvist, T. (1995b). Nitric oxide reduces hydrogen peroxide production from human polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Eur J Clin Invest 25, 9–14.[Medline]

  • Forslund, T. & Sundqvist, T. (1997). Nitric oxide-releasing particles inhibit phagocytosis in human neutrophils. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 233, 492–495.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Green, L. C., Wagner, D. A., Glogowski, J., Skipper, P. L., Wishnok, J. S. & Tannenbaum, S. R. (1982). Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and [15N]nitrate in biological fluids. Anal Biochem 126, 131–138.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Janero, D. R. (2000). Nitric oxide (NO)-related pharmaceuticals: contemporary approaches to therapeutic NO modulation. Free Radic Biol Med 28, 1495–1506.[Medline]

  • Jones, R. D., Hancock, J. T. & Morice, A. H. (2000). NADPH oxidase: a universal oxygen sensor? Free Radic Biol Med 29, 416–424.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Kumins, N. H., Hunt, J., Gamelli, R. L. & Filkins, J. P. (1997). Molsidomine increases endotoxic survival and decreases cytokine production. Shock 7, 200–205.[Medline]

  • Larfars, G. & Gyllenhammar, H. (1998). Stimulus-dependent transduction mechanisms for nitric oxide release in human polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocytes. J Lab Clin Med 132, 54–60.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Malawista, S. E., Montgomery, R. R. & van Blaricom, G. (1992). Evidence for reactive nitrogen intermediates in killing of staphylococci by human neutrophil cytoplasts. A new microbicidal pathway for polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J Clin Invest 90, 631–636.

  • Miller, R. A. & Britigan, B. E. (1997). Role of oxidants in microbial pathophysiology. Clin Microbiol Rev 10, 1–18.[Abstract]

  • Pacelli, R., Wink, D. A., Cook, J. A., Krishna, M. C., DeGraff, W., Friedman, N., Tsokos, M., Samuni, A. & Mitchell, J. B. (1995). Nitric oxide potentiates hydrogen peroxide-induced killing of Escherichia coli. J Exp Med 182, 1469–1479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Saran, M., Beck-Speier, I., Fellerhoff, B. & Bauer, G. (1999). Phagocytic killing of microorganisms by radical processes: consequences of the reaction of hydroxyl radicals with chloride yielding chlorine atoms. Free Radic Biol Med 26, 482–490.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Squadrito, G. L. & Pryor, W. A. (1998). Oxidative chemistry of nitric oxide: the role of superoxide, peroxynitrite, and carbon dioxide. Free Radic Biol Med 25, 392–403.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Stevens, M. G. & Olsen, S. C. (1993). Comparative analysis of using MTT and XTT in colorimetric assays for quantitating bovine neutrophil bactericidal activity. J Immunol Methods 157, 225–231.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Umeki, S. (1994). Activation factors of neutrophil NADPH oxidase complex. Life Sci 55, 1–13.[CrossRef][Medline]

  • Verhoef, J. & Visser, M. R. (1993). Neutrophil phagocytosis and killing: normal function and microbial evasion. In The Neutrophils, pp. 109–137. Edited by J. S. Abramson & J. G. Wheeler. Oxford, New York & Tokyo: IRL Press.

  • Yamamoto, T. & Bing, R. J. (2000). Nitric oxide donors. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 225, 200–206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  • Yan, L., Vandivier, R. W., Suffredini, A. F. & Danner, R. L. (1994). Human polymorphonuclear leukocytes lack detectable nitric oxide synthase activity. J Immunol 153, 1825–1834.[Abstract]

  • Zhu, L., Gunn, C. & Beckman, J. S. (1992). Bactericidal activity of peroxynitrite. Arch Biochem Biophys 298, 452–457.[CrossRef][Medline]




    This article has been cited by other articles:


    Home page
    Infect. Immun.Home page
    A. Clauditz, A. Resch, K.-P. Wieland, A. Peschel, and F. Gotz
    Staphyloxanthin Plays a Role in the Fitness of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Ability To Cope with Oxidative Stress.
    Infect. Immun., August 1, 2006; 74(8): 4950 - 4953.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


    This Article
    Right arrow Abstract Freely available
    Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
    Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
    Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
    Right arrow Citation Map
    Services
    Right arrow Email this article to a friend
    Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
    Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
    Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
    Right arrow Download to citation manager
    Right arrow reprints & permissions
    Citing Articles
    Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
    Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
    Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
    Google Scholar
    Right arrow Articles by Klink, M.
    Right arrow Articles by Sulowska, Z.
    Right arrow Search for Related Content
    PubMed
    Right arrow PubMed Citation
    Right arrow Articles by Klink, M.
    Right arrow Articles by Sulowska, Z.
    Agricola
    Right arrow Articles by Klink, M.
    Right arrow Articles by Sulowska, Z.


    HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
    INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS