J Med Microbiol 52 (2003), 1029-1030; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.05278-0
© 2003 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615
Susceptibility to antimicrobials and mechanisms of erythromycin resistance in clinical isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Rachel E.C. d'Oliveira,
Rosana R. Barros,
Cláudia R.V. Mendonça,
Lúcia M. Teixeira and
Angela C.D. Castro
Instituto de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Correspondence: Angela C. D. Castro (acastro{at}micro.ufrj.br)
Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus; GBS) is widely recognized as one of the major aetiological pathogens in neonatal sepsis and meningitis. It is also an important cause of pregnancy-related infections and invasive infections in non-pregnant adults (Muñoz et al., 1997).
Penicillin is recommended as the treatment of choice and is prophylactic for the prevention of group B streptococcal infections in neonates (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1996). Macrolides are a useful alternative therapy in penicillin-allergic patients; however, emergence of strains resistant to macrolides has been observed in several countries, at a frequency ranging from 2 to 46 % (Traub & Leonhard, 1997; Hsueh et al., 2001).
There have been no studies to investigate macrolide-resistance mechanisms in GBS from Brazil. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine susceptibility to antimicrobial agents among 92 S. agalactiae isolates that were recovered from various clinical specimens (mainly urine, blood, cerebrospinal fluid and endocervix) collected between 1994 and 1999 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in order to detect emerging resistance, to determine phenotypic and genotypic mechanisms of macrolide resistance and to study genetic relatedness among macrolide-resistant GBS strains. Isolates were identified by conventional methods and tested for susceptibility to antimicrobial agents by the agar disc-diffusion technique (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 2000a). GBS isolates were consistently susceptible to cefepime, chloramphenicol, penicillin and vancomycin.
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline resistance was common among GBS isolates (36 and 87 %, respectively). Erythromycin resistance was detected in four (4.3 %) of 92 isolates by the disc-diffusion assay. By agar-dilution assay for MIC determination (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 2000b), we observed that the results were similar to those of the disc-diffusion assay, except for one isolate that showed intermediate susceptibility to erythromycin by the disc-diffusion test and resistance by MIC determination. Similar discrepancy has been reported before (Traub & Leonhard, 1997). Total erythromycin resistance in the period of study was 5.4 %, which is similar to values reported recently in other countries (Fernandez et al., 1998; de Azavedo et al., 2001). For clindamycin, only one isolate (1.1 %) was resistant; this isolate showed high-level resistance. Among the erythromycin-resistant isolates that were subjected to the double-disc test, carried out as described by Seppälä et al. (1993), three isolates expressed the iMLSB phenotype, one isolate expressed the cMLSB phenotype and one isolate showed the M phenotype. The latter strain was recovered in 1997 and was the only strain that showed intermediate susceptibility by the disc-diffusion test.
As detected by a PCR assay that was described previously (d'Oliveira et al., 2003), erythromycin resistance in GBS isolates was associated mainly with the erm genes, predominantly the ermTR gene (ermA, amplified with the primer described by Seppälä et al., 1998), but the ermB and mefA/E genes [both amplified with primers suggested by Sutcliffe et al. (1996)] were also found in the cMLSB and M phenotype isolates, respectively, showing total correlation between erythromycin-resistance phenotypes and genetic mechanisms. None of the isolates carried both the erm and mef genes. Clonal relatedness, based on SmaI-digested DNA profiles by PFGE [determined according to d'Oliveira et al. (2003)], showed a high degree of genetic heterogeneity, suggesting the importance of epidemiological surveillance of GBS infections and of continuous monitoring of the resistance characters of these micro-organisms.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
|
|---|
This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP) and Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia (MCT/PRONEX), Brazil.
|
References
|
|---|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1996). Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: a public health perspective. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 45 (RR-7), 1–24.[Medline]
de Azavedo, J. C. S., McGavin, M., Duncan, C., Low, D. E. & McGeer, A. (2001). Prevalence and mechanisms of macrolide resistance in invasive and noninvasive group B Streptococcus isolates from Ontario, Canada. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45, 3504–3508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
d'Oliveira, R. E. C., Barros, R. R., Mendonça, C. R. V., Teixeira, L. M. & Castro, A. C. D. (2003). Antimicrobial susceptibility and survey of macrolide resistance mechanisms among Streptococcus pyogenes isolated in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Microb Drug Resist 9, 87–91.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fernandez, M., Hickman, M. E. & Baker, C. J. (1998). Antimicrobial susceptibilities of group B streptococci isolated between 1992 and 1996 from patients with bacteremia or meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42, 1517–1519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Hsueh, P.-R., Teng, L.-J., Lee, L.-N., Ho, S.-W., Yang, P.-C. & Luh, K.-T. (2001). High incidence of erythromycin resistance among clinical isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae in Taiwan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45, 3205–3208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Muñoz, P., Llancaqueo, A., Rodríguez-Créixems, M., Peláez, T., Martin, L. & Bouza, E. (1997). Group B streptococcus bacteremia in nonpregnant adults. Arch Intern Med 157, 213–216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2000a). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests, 7th edn. Approved standard M2-A7. Wayne, PA: NCCLS.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2000b). Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically, 5th edn. Approved standard M7-A5. Wayne, PA: NCCLS.
Seppälä, H., Nissinen, A., Yu, Q. & Huovinen, P. (1993). Three different phenotypes of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Finland. J Antimicrob Chemother 32, 885–891.[Free Full Text]
Seppälä, H., Skurnik, M., Soini, H., Roberts, M. C. & Huovinen, P. (1998). A novel erythromycin resistance methylase gene (ermTR) in Streptococcus pyogenes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42, 257–262.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Sutcliffe, J., Grebe, T., Tait-Kamradt, A. & Wondrack, L. (1996). Detection of erythromycin-resistant determinants by PCR. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40, 2562–2566.[Abstract]
Traub, W. H. & Leonhard, B. (1997). Comparative susceptibility of clinical group A, B, C, F, and G ß-hemolytic streptococcal isolates to 24 antimicrobial drugs. Chemotherapy 43, 10–20.[Medline]
TOP
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
References
