HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Obata, Y. Articles by Ogihara, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Obata, Y. Articles by Ogihara, A. Agricola Articles by Obata, Y. Articles by Ogihara, A.

Diagnostic accuracy of serological kits for Helicobacter pylori infection with the same assay system but different antigens in a Japanese patient population

¹Department of Public Health, Aichi Medical University, School of Medicine, 21, Karimata, Yazako, Nagakute-cho, Aichi-Gun, Aichi 480-1195, Japan ²Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University, School of Medicine, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan ³Faculty of Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, Yamaguchi, 1-1-1, Daigakudori, Onoda, Yamaguchi 756-0884, Japan

Correspondence Shogo Kikuchi kikuchis{at}aichi-med-u.ac.jp

Received March 28, 2003
Accepted July 7, 2003

Helicobacter pylori infection is thought to be a causal risk factor for gastric carcinoma. Recently, diagnostic accuracy of serological kits for H. pylori infection that were made in Western countries has been reported to be lower when used among Oriental populations. Diagnostic accuracy of two serological kits [HM-CAP and HM-CAP with antigens extracted from clinically isolated Japanese H. pylori strains (J-HM-CAP)] was investigated in 440 samples from a Japanese patient population by using the ¹³C-urea breath test as gold standard. According to the original optimal cut-off value, HM-CAP provided 87.5 % sensitivity and 84.8 % specificity with 86.8 % accuracy and J-HM-CAP provided 95.5 % sensitivity and 81.9 % specificity with 92.3 % accuracy. This study suggests that antigens from HM-CAP are satisfactory for examining a Japanese patient population, but that using local antigens improves accuracy.

	Introduction

TOP Introduction Methods Results and Discussion ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS References

 
Helicobacter pylori infection is thought to be a causal risk factor for gastric carcinoma (Nomura et al., 1991; Shimizu et al., 1999). Many ELISA kits for detection of H. pylori antibodies are available and have reportedly provided highly reliable results in Western countries (Evans et al., 1989; Crabtree et al., 1991; Jensen et al., 1993; Schembri et al., 1993; Marchildon et al., 1996; Wilcox et al., 1996; Meijer et al., 1997; Leung et al., 1999; Raymond et al., 1999). However, diagnostic accuracy of kits made in Western countries has been reported to be lower in Chinese patients (Leung et al., 1999). We also found that imported serological kits yielded many intermediate results for Japanese patients; therefore, their effectiveness seems somewhat limited in a Japanese patient population (Miwa et al., 2000).

To gain a better understanding of the variation in performance of these kits in a non-Western patient population, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of two serological kits [HM-CAP and HM-CAP with antigen extracted from clinically isolated Japanese H. pylori strains (J-HM-CAP)] in our Japanese patient population.

	Methods

TOP Introduction Methods Results and Discussion ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS References

 
Patients.

We measured H. pylori IgG antibody in 440 stock serum samples frozen at -80 °C, which were obtained from patients admitted to Juntendo University Hospital for dyspeptic symptoms. These conserved serum samples were included in a previous study (Miwa et al., 2000).

Urea breath test.

In these 440 patients, the ¹³C-urea breath test and blood-draw for serological antibodies to H. pylori were performed. The sample included 305 males and 135 females, with a mean age of 47.2 ± 14.0 (range, 19–85) years. They were confirmed not to have used a proton-pump inhibitor or antimicrobials that might affect the ¹³C-urea breath-test value. In addition, they had not undergone any previous H. pylori eradication therapy. All patients provided informed consent before the ¹³C-urea breath-test procedure. The blood draw and ¹³C-urea breath test were performed before treatment drugs were prescribed to eradicate the bacteria; both procedures were carried out within 1 month. We used a modified ¹³C-urea breath-test method that involved the following procedures: overnight fasting, 100 mg dosage of ¹³C-urea, maintaining patients in a sitting position, tooth-brushing and mouth-washing before and immediately after undergoing a 20 min point breath sampling and a 5 cut-off value. This modified breath test provided 96.7 % specificity and 96.5 % sensitivity (Miwa et al., 1997, 1998).

ELISA assay.

In this study, we evaluated and compared the diagnostic accuracy of imported and domestic ELISA kits for detection of IgG antibodies to H. pylori: HM-CAP (Enteric Products, Westbury, NY, USA) and J-HM-CAP (Kyowa Medex, Japan). J-HM-CAP uses the same assay system as HM-CAP, except for the antigens: those used in HM-CAP are derived from American H. pylori strains, but J-HM-CAP uses mixed antigens derived from four Japanese strains. Two strains were from gastric ulcer patients, one from a gastric carcinoma patient and one from a non-ulcer dyspepsia patient (Marchildon et al., 2003). The assay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. According to the recommended cut-off value [2.3 ELISA value (EV)] of HM-CAP, results were determined to be positive, negative or intermediate. Results were also determined to be positive or negative according to the appropriate cut-off value estimated from the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for each kit. All samples were assayed simultaneously in a blind fashion in terms of accompanying clinical information on patients.

Statistics.

For statistical analysis, S² testing and a 95 % confidence interval were used, with a P-value of < 0.05 being regarded as statistically significant.

	Results and Discussion

TOP Introduction Methods Results and Discussion ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS References

 
Three hundred and thirty-five of 440 patients were diagnosed as H. pylori-infected, and the remaining 105 patients as infection-negative, by the ¹³C-urea breath test. By using these results as gold standard, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the two serological kits.

First of all, we used the recommended cut-off value (2.3 EV) of the imported serological kit to analyse serology results. We determined results as positive, negative or intermediate according to the recommended cut-off value and calculated the diagnostic accuracy of serology after excluding patients with intermediate values (Table 1). Sensitivity of J-HM-CAP (97.0 %) was higher than that of HM-CAP (94.0 %). Specificities of J-HM-CAP and HM-CAP were 76.6 and 82.4 %, respectively. The intermediate result of J-HM-CAP was 3.0 % (13/440), which was better than that of HM-CAP [4.3 % (19/440)]. With this cut-off value, there were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy between the kits.

We then plotted original ROC curves for J-HM-CAP and HM-CAP to establish the appropriate cut-off value of each kit for our patient population (Figs 1 and 2). The ROC curve for J-HM-CAP is shown in Fig. 1; the graph depicts the optimal cut-off value of J-HM-CAP in our patient population to be 2.7 EV, showing that the specificity of this kit had improved from 76.6 to 81.9 % with little decline in sensitivity (Table 2). The optimal cut-off value of HM-CAP in our patient population was 2.5 EV (Fig. 2). Under each optimal cut-off value, the sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy of J-HM-CAP were significantly different (P < 0.01) from those of HM-CAP (Table 2).

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. ROC curve for J-HM-CAP. Italicized numbers represent cut-off values. Table indicates sensitivity and specificity with cut-off value at 2.0, 2.3, 2.5, 2.7, 3.0 and 3.5 EV.

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. ROC curve for HM-CAP. Italicized numbers represent cut-off values.

Numerous reports have indicated differing performance for these serological kits in various populations. For example, sensitivity and specificity of HM-CAP in the USA have been reported to be respectively 98.7 and 100 % (Evans et al., 1989) and 98.4 and 96.4 % (Marchildon et al., 1996), but in Denmark, they have been reported to be 81 and 71 % (Jensen et al., 1993) and in China, 72.7 and 68.4 % (Leung et al., 1999). Our study also showed the sensitivity and specificity values of HM-CAP in Japan to be lower than those in the USA.

There may be several reasons for these differences, such as the presence of strain heterogeneity in different geographic regions (Ohtsuka et al., 1997), geographic variation in cross-reactivity to other intestinal pathogens (Graham et al., 1996) and various immunological responses to H. pylori antigens in different patient populations (Khanna et al., 1998).

Marchildon et al. (2003) also tested ¹³C-urea breath test-characterized serum samples from Japanese patients by using both J-HM-CAP and HM-CAP kits. Compared with their results, specificity and accuracy of both J-HM-CAP and HM-CAP were lower in our study. This may be because the diseases in their subjects were different or because we adopted a higher ¹³C-urea breath test cut-off value.

In conclusion, we found that J-HM-CAP was more suitable for use in a Japanese patient population and that although HM-CAP proved to be satisfactory for use in this population, changing its cut-off value or using local antigens served to improve its accuracy. Our study suggests that using local antigens may improve the diagnostic accuracy of serological kits for H. pylori infection.

	ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

TOP Introduction Methods Results and Discussion ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS References

 
We would like to thank Ms Oikawa and Ms Endo for technical assistance with this study.

	References

TOP Introduction Methods Results and Discussion ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS References