|
|
||||||||
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS |
Division of Infection and Immunity, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
Corresponding author: Dr L. J. Douglas (e-mail: J.Douglas{at}bio.gla.ac.uk).
Received 4 Sept. 2001; revised version accepted 28 Oct. 2001.
Abstract
A simple catheter disk model system was used to study the development in vitro of mixed species biofilms of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus epidermidis, two organisms commonly found in catheter-associated infections. Two strains of S. epidermidis were used: a slime-producing wild type (strain RP62A) and a slime-negative mutant (strain M7). In mixed fungal-bacterial biofilms, both staphylococcal strains showed extensive interactions with C. albicans. The susceptibility of 48-h biofilms to fluconazole, vancomycin and mixtures of the drugs was determined colorimetrically. The results indicated that the extracellular polymer produced by S. epidermidis RP62A could inhibit fluconazole penetration in mixed fungal-bacterial biofilms. Conversely, the presence of C. albicans in a biofilm appeared to protect the slime-negative staphylococcus against vancomycin. Overall, the findings suggest that fungal cells can modulate the action of antibiotics, and that bacteria can affect antifungal activity in mixed fungal-bacterial biofilms.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Kawarai, S. Furukawa, H. Ogihara, and M. Yamasaki Mixed-Species Biofilm Formation by Lactic Acid Bacteria and Rice Wine Yeasts Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 15, 2007; 73(14): 4673 - 4676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Venkatesh, D. Pham, M. Fein, L. Kong, and L. E. Weisman Neonatal Coinfection Model of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus (Staphylococcus epidermidis) and Candida albicans: Fluconazole Prophylaxis Enhances Survival and Growth Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2007; 51(4): 1240 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Al-Fattani and L. J. Douglas Biofilm matrix of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis: chemical composition and role in drug resistance. J. Med. Microbiol., August 1, 2006; 55(Pt 8): 999 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Jabra-Rizk, T. F. Meiller, C. E. James, and M. E. Shirtliff Effect of Farnesol on Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2006; 50(4): 1463 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Pettit, C. A. Weber, M. J. Kean, H. Hoffmann, G. R. Pettit, R. Tan, K. S. Franks, and M. L. Horton Microplate Alamar Blue Assay for Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm Susceptibility Testing Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., July 1, 2005; 49(7): 2612 - 2617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ramage, S. P. Saville, D. P. Thomas, and J. L. Lopez-Ribot Candida Biofilms: an Update Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2005; 4(4): 633 - 638. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Theraud, Y. Bedouin, C. Guiguen, and J. -P. Gangneux Efficacy of antiseptics and disinfectants on clinical and environmental yeast isolates in planktonic and biofilm conditions J. Med. Microbiol., October 1, 2004; 53(10): 1013 - 1018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Al-Fattani and L. J. Douglas Penetration of Candida Biofilms by Antifungal Agents Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., September 1, 2004; 48(9): 3291 - 3297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kaufman and K. D. Fairchild Clinical Microbiology of Bacterial and Fungal Sepsis in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2004; 17(3): 638 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Li, Z. Yan, and J. Xu Quantitative variation of biofilms among strains in natural populations of Candida albicans Microbiology, February 1, 2003; 149(2): 353 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | J MED MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL | ALL SGM JOURNALS |