HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by SORLIN, P. Articles by STRUELENS, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by SORLIN, P. Articles by STRUELENS, M. J. Agricola Articles by SORLIN, P. Articles by STRUELENS, M. J.

Comparison of resin-containing BACTEC^TM Plus Aerobic/F* medium with conventional methods for culture of normally sterile body fluids

Service de Microbiologie, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

Corresponding author: Professor M. J. Struelens (e-mail: marc.struelens{at}ulb.ac.be).

Received 23 June 1999; revised version received 10 Feb. 2000; accepted 17 Feb. 2000.

Abstract

The sensitivity of culture in Bactec^TM Plus Aerobic/F* culture vials of body fluids from adult patients at a university hospital was compared with that of conventional culture methods, including enrichment in Schaedler broth. Previous antibiotic therapy was recorded at the time of sampling. Analysis of culture results took account of the clinical significance of isolates and impact on therapy. Of 336 specimens evaluated, 81 (24%) yielded positive cultures, of which 50 cultures (15%) were considered to be clinically significant (yielding 71 isolates) and 31 (9%) were considered contaminated. Of the 71 pathogens, 16 (23%) were isolated in the Bactec system only, whereas 13 (18%) grew in conventional media only; 12 of the latter were strict anaerobes. Among clinically significant positive specimens, 19 (38%) were from patients receiving antibiotic therapy. In 27 cases (8% of all specimens and 54% of significantly positive cultures), the isolation of a pathogen led to modification of therapy. Overall, culture in the Bactec system showed higher sensitivity for the isolation of aerobic micro-organisms than Schaedler broth. Most of the difference was due to a better recovery of Streptococcaceae. Additional pathogens found only in resin-containing Bactec media led to 30% of all culture-influenced modifications of empirical therapy. These data confirm that culture of normally sterile body fluids frequently yields results that are useful for guiding therapy. Although more costly than standard enrichment broth, the resin-containing Bactec Plus Aerobic/F* vial can be advantageous for culture of aerobic pathogens from these specimens, particularly in patients receiving antibiotic therapy.