J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PRASHANTH, K.
Right arrow Articles by BADRINATH, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PRASHANTH, K.
Right arrow Articles by BADRINATH, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by PRASHANTH, K.
Right arrow Articles by BADRINATH, S.
J. Med. Microbiol. -- Vol. 49 (2000), 773-778
© 2000 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615


DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY

Simplified phenotypic tests for identification of Acinetobacter spp. and their antimicrobial susceptibility status

K. PRASHANTH and S. BADRINATH

Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India

Corresponding author: Dr S. Badrinath.

Received 4 Feb. 1999; revised version accepted 20 Dec. 1999.

Abstract

Acinetobacter spp. have been found to be responsible for an increasing number of nosocomial infections. During a 16-month period, 22 patients hospitalised mainly in the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU), paediatric and other medical wards were investigated either for infection or colonisation by Acinetobacter spp. Of the 45 isolates of Acinetobacter detected among the total of 425 non-fermenters encountered, 24 representative isolates were selected for extended phenotypic identification. Four environmental isolates were also included in the study. These 28 isolates were typed by biotyping and antibiotyping, which helped in delineating the Acinetobacter spp. into 12 phenotypes and two distinct antibiotypes respectively. A sudden increase of cases of acinetobacter infection suggested that three outbreaks during the study period were due to phenotypes 1 and 2 of A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex (Acb). Strains of Acb-complex showed multiple drug resistance and were sensitive only to netilmicin. A comparatively high proportion of resistance to amikacin (48%) was also detected among these strains by the agar dilution method. The RICU environment was recognised as an important reservoir for the resistant outbreak strain (Acb-1) which was probably leading to persistent colonisation and recurrent infections.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2000 Society for General Microbiology.