J Med Microbiol NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online ahead of print on 15 October 2009 as doi:10.1099/jmm.0.013995-0
J Med Microbiol (2009), DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.013995-0
© 2009 Society for General Microbiology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Papers in Press[PDF])
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peltroche-Llacsahuanga, H.
Right arrow Articles by Haase, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peltroche-Llacsahuanga, H.
Right arrow Articles by Haase, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Peltroche-Llacsahuanga, H.
Right arrow Articles by Haase, G.

Rapid detection of Streptococcus agalactiae from swabs by Peptide Nucleic Acid Fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA FISH)

Heidrun Peltroche-Llacsahuanga1, Mark J. Fiandaca2, Sabine von Oy3, Rudolf Lütticken4 and Gerhard Haase1,5

1 Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany;

2 AdvanDx, Woburn, MA 01801-6208, USA;

3 Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany;

4 National Reference Center for Streptococci, Aachen, Germany

5 E-mail: ghaase{at}ukaachen.de

Received June 30, 2009
Accepted October 10, 2009

The applicability of the PNA FISH (peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization) method for detection of Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B streptococci - GBS) from swab samples was evaluated. Three swab sample processing protocols with different time-to-result (TTR) were compared, including (i) direct smearing of fresh swabs onto microscope slides (n = 153; TTR 2.5 h), (ii) further extraction and concentration of cells from these same swabs (n = 153; TTR 2.7 h), and (iii) short term LIM broth enrichment culture incubation (7 h, 37 °C) of fresh swabs (n = 120; TTR 9.5 h). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for GBS PNA FISH for sample processing procedures with TTR of 2.5 h, 2.7 h, and 9.5 h were 68%, 100%, 100%, 95%; 91% 100%, 100%, 98%; and 100%, 100%, 100%, 100% respectively. Improved test results were achieved by subjecting swabs to an extraction procedure or abbreviated LIM broth enrichment culture incubation prior to performing GBS PNA FISH.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 Society for General Microbiology.