J Med Microbiol NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jmm.0.011379-0v1
58/9/1207    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harkinezhad, T.
Right arrow Articles by Vanrompay, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harkinezhad, T.
Right arrow Articles by Vanrompay, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Harkinezhad, T.
Right arrow Articles by Vanrompay, D.
J Med Microbiol 58 (2009), 1207-1212; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.011379-0
© 2009 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Prevalence of Chlamydophila psittaci infections in a human population in contact with domestic and companion birds

Taher Harkinezhad1,{dagger}, Kristel Verminnen1, Marc De Buyzere2, Ernst Rietzschel3,4, Sofie Bekaert1 and Daisy Vanrompay1

1 Ghent University, Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

2 Heart Center, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

3 Ghent University, Department of Internal Medicine, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

4 Ghent University, Department of Public Health, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium

Correspondence
Daisy Vanrompay
daisy.vanrompay{at}ugent.be

Received March 27, 2009
Accepted May 12, 2009

Chlamydophila psittaci infections in humans are underestimated. We investigated the occurrence of C. psittaci in a Belgian population of 540 individuals. Data were from a population survey (n=2524) of apparently healthy community-dwelling subjects aged 35–55 years. Pharyngeal swabs and blood were taken. Individuals completed a questionnaire on professional and nonprofessional activities, smoking habits, medical history and contact frequency with different bird species. Swabs were analysed by a C. psittaci-specific and a Chlamydophila pneumoniae-specific PCR. Sera were tested by a recombinant C. psittaci major outer-membrane protein-based ELISA, a C. psittaci whole organism-based ELISA (Serion) and a micro-immunofluorescence test (Focus Diagnostics). Results confirmed our suspicion about the underestimation of psittacosis in Belgium. Psittaciformes and racing pigeons were the main infection source. Women with excessive alcohol intake defined as a mean intake of >2 units daily were more frequently infected than men. We analysed the effect of seropositivity and/or PCR positivity on inflammation (white blood cell count, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fibrinogen). In general, seropositivity showed a trend to slightly higher levels of inflammatory variables (all non-significant), whilst PCR positivity showed a trend to no effect or even lower inflammatory levels.

{dagger}Present address: Pajuheshkadeh, University of Zanjan, PO Box 45195-313, Zanjan, Iran.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 Society for General Microbiology.