J Med Microbiol NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jmm.0.007906-0v1
58/8/1106    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wellinghausen, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gebert, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wellinghausen, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gebert, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wellinghausen, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gebert, S.
J Med Microbiol 58 (2009), 1106-1111; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.007906-0
© 2009 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Rapid diagnosis of candidaemia by real-time PCR detection of Candida DNA in blood samples

Nele Wellinghausen1,2, Dunja Siegel1, Juliane Winter1,{dagger} and Susanne Gebert1,{dagger}

1 Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

2 Dr Gaertner & Partner Laboratories, Ravensburg, Germany

Correspondence
Nele Wellinghausen
nele.wellinghausen{at}labor-gaertner.de

Received November 9, 2008
Accepted April 15, 2009

This study prospectively evaluated an 18S rRNA gene-targeted real-time PCR approach in comparison with standard blood culture (BC) diagnostics for rapid diagnosis of candidaemia in a large study population of 384 patients, including 902 whole blood samples from 468 infectious episodes (IEs) of 329 adults and 55 children with haematological malignancies and various forms of immunodeficiency, and intensive care unit patients. Seven out of eight BC-proven cases (87.5 %) of candidaemia and seven out of twelve BC-positive samples (58.3 %) were positive by the Candida-specific PCR. A positive PCR result was also obtained for 28/460 BC-negative samples from IEs, including 8 patients with culture-confirmed Candida infection at primary sterile body sites. Of the PCR-positive, culture-negative patients, more than 50 % received systemic antifungal therapy. In 432/460 BC-negative IEs, the Candida specific-PCR was negative, resulting in a negative predictive value of 99.8 %. In conclusion, the Candida specific-PCR approach facilitates rapid detection of Candida DNA in blood samples of patients at risk of candidaemia within a few hours. Although standard BC diagnostics appear to remain indispensable for the detection of all cases of candidaemia, this PCR assay allowed the detection of candidaemia at a mean of 3 days earlier than BC diagnostics. Thus, it enables earlier antifungal therapy for patients with suspected candidaemia and may prevent further complications.

{dagger}These authors contributed equally to this work.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 Society for General Microbiology.