J Med Microbiol Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jmm.0.009720-0v1
58/8/1067    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singh, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Singh, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, M.
J Med Microbiol 58 (2009), 1067-1073; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.009720-0
© 2009 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Role of persisters and small-colony variants in antibiotic resistance of planktonic and biofilm-associated Staphylococcus aureus: an in vitro study

Rachna Singh, Pallab Ray, Anindita Das and Meera Sharma

Department of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India

Correspondence
Pallab Ray
drpallabray{at}gmail.com

Received January 20, 2009
Accepted April 10, 2009

The presence of persister cells and small-colony variants (SCVs) has been associated with enhanced antibiotic resistance of many organisms in biofilms. This study investigated whether persisters and/or SCVs contribute to the antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. A detailed dose-dependent killing of biofilms and planktonic cells with five antibiotics (oxacillin, cefotaxime, amikacin, ciprofloxacin and vancomycin) was analysed by treating them with each antibiotic at a concentration of 0–100 µg ml–1 at 37 °C for 48 h. The killing of biofilm cells by all of the antibiotics showed the presence of persister cells – most cells in the population died, leaving a fraction that persisted, even at higher concentrations of the antibiotics. These persisters represented a transient resistant phenotype and reverted to a killing curve resembling that of the wild-type parent upon re-exposure to the antibiotics. SCVs were observed in biofilms only after treatment with ciprofloxacin, and these SCVs were of a transient nature. The treatment of planktonic cells with oxacillin, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and vancomycin killed the entire population and no persisters were detected. Transient SCVs, observed in planktonic cells following exposure to these antibiotics, were killed at higher antibiotic concentrations. The treatment of planktonic cells with amikacin yielded a small subpopulation of survivors that included persisters (at numbers significantly lower than for the biofilms) and highly resistant, stable SCVs with an increased biofilm-forming capacity in comparison with the wild-type parent. Thus the high resistance of S. aureus biofilms to multiple unrelated antibiotics is largely dependent on the presence of persister cells. Biofilms harbour a large number of persisters in comparison with planktonic cultures, which either do not harbour persisters or harbour only a small number. SCVs, although not specifically associated with S. aureus biofilms, have an increased biofilm-forming capacity and this may explain the frequent isolation of SCVs from biofilm-associated infections. The intrinsic resistance of these variants may in turn contribute to the enhanced antibiotic resistance of the biofilms thus formed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 Society for General Microbiology.