HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jmm.0.010587-0v1 58/7/878    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Google Scholar Articles by Habbal, W. Articles by Gärtner, B. C. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Habbal, W. Articles by Gärtner, B. C. Agricola Articles by Habbal, W. Articles by Gärtner, B. C.

Comparative evaluation of published cytomegalovirus primers for rapid real-time PCR: which are the most sensitive?

¹ Clinical Laboratories Department, Al-Assad University Hospital, Damascus University, PO Box 10769, Damascus, Syria

² Department of Virology, University of Saarland Medical School, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany

Correspondence
Barbara C. Gärtner
barbara.gaertner{at}uks.eu

Received February 25, 2009
Accepted March 16, 2009

Standardization of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) PCR is highly recommended. As primer design is essential for PCR sensitivity, this study evaluated all published CMV primer pairs to identify the most sensitive for single-round real-time PCR. PubMed (1993–2004) was searched for original papers aimed at CMV PCR. Fifty-seven papers were identified revealing 82 different primer pairs. Of these, 17 primer sets were selected for empirical study, as they were either used in real-time PCR or were evaluated comparatively by conventional PCR. After optimizing the PCR conditions, these primer sets were evaluated by real-time PCR using a SYBR Green format. Analytical sensitivities were assessed by testing the reference standard CMV strain AD169. A BLAST search was performed to identify mismatches with published sequences. Additionally, 60 clinical samples were tested with the three primer sets showing highest analytical sensitivity and the best match to all CMV strains. Three primer sets located in the glycoprotein B (UL55) gene region were found to be the most sensitive using strain AD169. However, two of these showed a considerable number of mismatches with clinical isolates in a BLAST search. Instead, two other pairs from the lower matrix phosphoprotein (UL83) gene and DNA polymerase (UL54) gene showed reasonable sensitivity and no mismatches with clinical isolates. These three pairs were further tested with clinical samples, which indicated that the two primer sets from UL55 and UL54 were the most sensitive. Interestingly, the analytical sensitivity of the PCR was inversely correlated with the size of the PCR product. In conclusion, these two primer pairs are recommended for a standardized, highly sensitive, real-time PCR.