J Med Microbiol International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jain, A.
Right arrow Articles by Verma, R. K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jain, A.
Right arrow Articles by Verma, R. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jain, A.
Right arrow Articles by Verma, R. K.
J Med Microbiol 57 (2008), 957-961; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47152-0
© 2008 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 1473-5644

Cefoxitin disc diffusion test for detection of meticillin-resistant staphylococci

Amita Jain, Astha Agarwal and Raj Kumar Verma

Department of Microbiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, UP, 226003, India

Correspondence
Amita Jain
amita602002{at}yahoo.com

Received 6 January 2007
Accepted 4 April 2008


Staphylococci are the main causative agents of nosocomial diseases. Over the last few years, the increase in the number of meticillin-resistant (MR) staphylococci has become a major clinical problem. Accuracy and promptness in the detection of meticillin resistance are of key importance in ensuring the correct antibiotic treatment in infected patients and control of MR staphylococci in the hospital environment. This study evaluated the accuracy of a cefoxitin disc diffusion (DD) test for the detection of meticillin resistance in staphylococci. A total of 144 clinical isolates [97 Staphylococcus aureus and 47 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS)] were tested using a mecA gene PCR, a DD test (oxacillin, 1 µg disc; cefoxitin, 30 µg disc), determination of oxacillin MIC by agar dilution (AD), and an oxacillin screen agar test at oxacillin concentrations of 4 and 6 µg ml–1. Of the 97 S. aureus and 47 CoNS isolates, 73 (75.26 %) and 30 (63.83 %), respectively, were mecA-positive. The sensitivity and specificity of the cefoxitin DD test were 94.44 and 95.83 %, respectively, for S. aureus and 80 and 100 %, respectively, for CoNS. The oxacillin DD method was 100 % sensitive and 58.33 % specific for S. aureus, and 86.67 % sensitive and 70.59 % specific for CoNS. The AD test was highly sensitive (98.63 %) and specific (98.53 %) for S. aureus and CoNS (83.33 % sensitive and 94.12 % specific). The cefoxitin DD test for meticillin-resistance detection was more specific but less sensitive than the oxacillin DD test. Use of DD tests for both cefoxitin and oxacillin can help in more accurate prediction of meticillin resistance. Centres that are not equipped to carry out PCR can use AD methods for confirmation of meticillin resistance, especially in oxacillin-resistant and cefoxitin-sensitive cases.


Abbreviations: AD, agar dilution; CoNS, coagulase-negative staphylococci; DD, disc diffusion; MR, meticillin-resistant; OSA, oxacillin screen agar; PBP2a, penicillin-binding protein 2a.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 Society for General Microbiology.