J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maukonen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Saarela, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maukonen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Saarela, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Maukonen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Saarela, M.
J Med Microbiol 57 (2008), 1560-1568; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47352-0
© 2008 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Intra-individual diversity and similarity of salivary and faecal microbiota

Johanna Maukonen, Jaana Mättö{dagger}, Maija-Liisa Suihko and Maria Saarela

VTT Technical Research Centre, PO Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Finland

CorrespondenceJohanna Maukonen
johanna.maukonen{at}vtt.fi

Received April 18, 2007
Accepted August 24, 2008

In the present study, polyphasic analysis [cultivation, combined with the fingerprinting of individual isolates, and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)] was applied to study whether similar features concerning the diversity and temporal stability of selected bacterial groups could be detected intra-individually in two different niches – the oral cavity and the colon – from ten adult volunteers consuming probiotics. The predominant bacterial microbiota, Clostridium coccoidesEubacterium rectale group and bifidobacterial populations, were generally stable in salivary and faecal samples, with the greater diversity seen in faeces. Furthermore, different species predominated at the two different sites. Lactobacillus group DGGE profiles were unstable, yet the intra-individual profiles from faecal and salivary samples collected at the same time resembled each other. The ingested probiotic product did not affect the stability of the bacterial groups studied. The culture-based analysis showed that most subjects harboured identical indigenous Lactobacillus genotypes in saliva and faeces (Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus paracasei and Lactobacillus plantarum group). Thus, identical indigenous lactobacilli were able to inhabit both ends of the orogastrointestinal tract, whereas the composition of the other bacterial groups studied varied between the two sites.


Abbreviations: DDGE, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis; Erec, Clostridium coccoidesEubacterium rectale; RAPD, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA.

{dagger}Present address: Finnish Red Cross Blood Service, Kivihaantie 7, 00310 Helsinki, Finland.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 Society for General Microbiology.