J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

IMMEDIATE OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Free Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Falagas, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bliziotis, I. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Falagas, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bliziotis, I. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Falagas, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bliziotis, I. A.
J Med Microbiol 57 (2008), 1-8; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47432-0
© 2008 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 1473-5644

Review

Comparison of utility of blood cultures from intravascular catheters and peripheral veins: a systematic review and decision analysis

Matthew E. Falagas1,2, Maria S. Kazantzi1 and Ioannis A. Bliziotis1

1 Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), Athens, Greece

2 Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

Correspondence
Matthew E. Falagas
m.falagas{at}aibs.gr


Blood cultures are sometimes obtained from intravascular catheters for convenience. However, there is controversy regarding this practice. The authors compared the diagnostic test characteristics of blood cultures obtained from intravascular catheters and peripheral veins. Relevant studies for inclusion in this review were identified through PubMed (January 1970–October 2005) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies that reported clear definitions of true bacteraemia were included in the analysis. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. Six studies were included in the analysis, providing data for 2677 pairs of blood cultures obtained from an intravascular catheter and a peripheral venipuncture. A culture obtained from an intravascular catheter was found to be a diagnostic test for bacteraemia with better sensitivity (OR 1.85, 95 % CI 1.14–2.99, fixed effects model) and better negative predictive value (almost with statistical significance) (OR 1.55, 95 % CI 0.999–2.39, fixed effects model) but with less specificity (OR 0.33, 95 % CI 0.18–0.59, random effects model) and lower positive predictive value (OR 0.41, 95 % CI 0.23–0.76, random effects model) compared to a culture taken by peripheral venipuncture. In a group of 1000 patients, eight additional patients with true bacteraemia would be identified and 59 falsely diagnosed as having bacteraemia by a blood culture obtained from an intravascular catheter compared to results of the peripheral blood culture. Given the consequences of undertreating patients with bacteraemia, the authors believe that, based on the available evidence, at least one blood culture should be obtained from the intravascular catheter.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 Society for General Microbiology.