J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wootipoom, N.
Right arrow Articles by Vuddhakul, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wootipoom, N.
Right arrow Articles by Vuddhakul, V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wootipoom, N.
Right arrow Articles by Vuddhakul, V.
J Med Microbiol 56 (2007), 1630-1638; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47439-0
© 2007 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 1473-5644

A decrease in the proportion of infections by pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Hat Yai Hospital, southern Thailand

Nutthakul Wootipoom1, Phuangthip Bhoopong2, Rattanaruji Pomwised1, Mitsuaki Nishibuchi3, Masanori Ishibashi4 and Varaporn Vuddhakul1

1 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand

2 Institute of Allied Health Science and Public Health, Walailuk University, Nakhonsithammarat, Thailand

3 Center for Southeast Asian Study, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

4 Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Higashinari-ku, Osaka, Japan

Correspondence
Varaporn Vuddhakul
varaporn.v{at}psu.ac.th

Received 9 June 2007
Accepted 9 August 2007


Infection by the pandemic clone of Vibrio parahaemolyticus is prevalent in southern Thailand. This study actively surveyed the incidence of V. parahaemolyticus infection in this area. A total of 865 isolates of V. parahaemolyticus was obtained from patients at Hat Yai Hospital, the main public hospital in Songkhla Province, Thailand, from 2000 to 2005. The isolates were examined by group-specific PCR (GS-PCR) specific for the pandemic clone, and for the presence of two major virulence genes, tdh and trh, and the O : K serotype. Representative isolates were also examined by antibiogram pattern and DNA fingerprinting using an arbitrarily primed PCR method to determine the clonal relationships between isolates. The total number of isolates was less in 2000 and more in 2004 and 2005 than in the years 2001–2003. The increase in the numbers of infections in 2004 and 2005 was not due to the emergence of a particular clone having unique characteristics, but was probably due to climate change. From 2000 to 2003, the percentages of pandemic strains of V. parahaemolyticus, defined as GS-PCR-positive tdh+ trh, was stable at 64.1, 67.5, 69.7 and 67.7 % of the total isolates each year, respectively. However, in 2004 and 2005, the percentages decreased to 56.1 and 55.5 %, respectively. The O : K serotypes of the pandemic isolates remained unchanged. The proportional decrease in infections caused by the pandemic strains are probably due to the population in this area gradually developing immunity to the pandemic clone whilst continuing to be susceptible to other strains.


Abbreviations: AP-PCR, arbitrarily primed PCR; GS-PCR, group-specific PCR; KP, Kanagawa phenomenon; TDH, thermostable direct haemolysin; TMP/SMX, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 Society for General Microbiology.