J Med Microbiol International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

IMMEDIATE OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
This Article
Free via Open Access: OA
Right arrow OA Free Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inglis, T. J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Inglis, T. J. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Inglis, T. J. J.
J Med Microbiol 56 (2007), 1419-1422; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.47179-0
© 2007 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 1473-5644

Review

Principia ætiologica: taking causality beyond Koch's postulates

Timothy J. J. Inglis

Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, QEII Medical Centre, and School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6909, Australia

Correspondence
Timothy J. J. Inglis
tim.inglis{at}health.wa.gov.au


There is no single accepted method to establish a causal relationship between an infective agent and its corresponding infectious disease. Different biomedical disciplines use a patchwork of distinct but overlapping approaches. To a greater or lesser extent these are based on criteria known as the Koch–Henle postulates, or ‘Koch's postulates' for short. Deficiencies in Koch's postulates were recognized by their principal author shortly after their formulation. Now, over a century later, a more rigorous method to test causality has still to be finalized. One contender is a method that uses molecular methods to establish a causal relationship (‘molecular Koch's postulates'). Recognizing the wider range of contemporary approaches used to build an argument for a causal relationship, the use of a more inclusive approach to establish proof of causality is proposed. This method uses an argument built from a series of assertions. Assertion 1: congruence or reproducible correlation of a taxonomically defined life form with the clinico-pathological and epidemiological features of infection. Assertion 2: consistency of the demonstrable biological response in the subject to an encounter with the prospective infective agent. Assertion 3: progressive or cumulative dissonance as an explanation for pathophysiological processes at every known level of biological organization in the subject. Assertion 4: curtailment of that pathophysiological process on the deliberate introduction of a specified biomedical intervention. Evidence to implicate the candidate biological entity as an initiator of or primer for cumulative dissonance places it in a subcategory of micro-organisms to be known as ‘priobes’. A priobe is the sufficient and necessary antecedent cause of a pathophysiological process evident as an infectious disease.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
C. Schaudinn, A. Gorur, D. Keller, P. P. Sedghizadeh, and J. W. Costerton
Periodontitis: An Archetypical Biofilm Disease
J Am Dent Assoc, August 1, 2009; 140(8): 978 - 986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 Society for General Microbiology.