J Med Microbiol International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van den Berg, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kuijper, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van den Berg, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kuijper, E. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by van den Berg, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kuijper, E. J.
J Med Microbiol 56 (2007), 36-42; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.46680-0
© 2007 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 1473-5644

Evaluation of real-time PCR and conventional diagnostic methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in a prospective multicentre study

Renate J. van den Berg1, Norbert Vaessen1, Hubert P. Endtz2, Tanja Schülin3, Eric R. van der Vorm4,{dagger} and Ed J. Kuijper1

1 Department of Medical Microbiology, E4-67, Centre of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

2 Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

3 Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

4 Department of Medical Microbiology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence
Ed J. Kuijper
e.j.kuijper{at}lumc.nl

Received 13 April 2006
Accepted 5 September 2006

In this prospective multicentre study, an enzyme-linked fluorescent assay (VIDAS CDA2; bioMérieux), an enzyme-linked assay [Premier Toxins A and B (PTAB); Meridian] and an in-house real-time PCR amplifying the tcdB gene were compared with the cell cytotoxicity assay used as the ‘gold standard’ for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD). Faecal samples from patients with a request for C. difficile diagnosis and samples from patients with diarrhoea hospitalized for at least 72 h were collected for 3 consecutive months from four university medical centres in The Netherlands. In total, 547 faecal samples were obtained from 450 patients. Of 540 samples available for all of the assays, 84 (15.6 %) showed a positive result in one or more assays. The cell cytotoxicity assay was positive in 31 samples (5.7 %) from 28 patients. A diagnosis of CDAD was not considered by the physician in 5 (23.8 %) of 21 patients with CDAD who were hospitalized for at least 72 h. Compared with the cell cytotoxicity assay, the sensitivity of VIDAS, PTAB and PCR was 83.9, 96.8 and 87.1 %, respectively. The specificity of VIDAS, PTAB and PCR was 97.1, 94.3 and 96.5 %, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values for VIDAS, PTAB and PCR were 63.4 and 99.0 %, 50.9 and 99.8 %, and 60.0 and 99.2 %, respectively. Of 61 samples that were positive in one, two or three of the assays, 56 were available for discordance analysis. Discordance analysis was performed by culture of toxinogenic strains. The concordance of VIDAS, PTAB and PCR with culture was 53.6 % (30/56), 55.4 % (31/56) and 71.4 % (40/56), respectively. It was concluded that real-time PCR had the highest concordance with toxinogenic culture and is therefore the preferred method for diagnosing CDAD in faecal samples. It was also concluded that diagnosis of patients with diarrhoea who have been hospitalized for more than 72 h should focus mainly on the detection of C. difficile, irrespective of the physician's request.

Abbreviations: CDAD, Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; NPV, negative predictive value; PMC, pseudomembranous colitis; PPV, positive predictive value; PTAB, Premier Toxins A and B; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

{dagger}Present address: Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
E. Aichinger, C. D. Schleck, W. S. Harmsen, L. M. Nyre, and R. Patel
Nonutility of Repeat Laboratory Testing for Detection of Clostridium difficile by Use of PCR or Enzyme Immunoassay
J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2008; 46(11): 3795 - 3797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
L. M. Sloan, B. J. Duresko, D. R. Gustafson, and J. E. Rosenblatt
Comparison of Real-Time PCR for Detection of the tcdC Gene with Four Toxin Immunoassays and Culture in Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2008; 46(6): 1996 - 2001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
P. H. Gilligan
Is a Two-Step Glutamate Dehyrogenase Antigen-Cytotoxicity Neutralization Assay Algorithm Superior to the Premier Toxin A and B Enzyme Immunoassay for Laboratory Detection of Clostridium difficile?
J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 2008; 46(4): 1523 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 Society for General Microbiology.