J Med Microbiol International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Ahmad, A.
Right arrow Articles by Arweiler, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al-Ahmad, A.
Right arrow Articles by Arweiler, N. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Al-Ahmad, A.
Right arrow Articles by Arweiler, N. B.
J Med Microbiol 55 (2006), 109-113; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.46280-0
© 2006 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Overestimation of Streptococcus mutans prevalence by nested PCR detection of the 16S rRNA gene

Ali Al-Ahmad, Thorsten Mathias Auschill, Gabriele Braun, Elmar Hellwig and Nicole Birgit Arweiler

Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Albert Ludwigs University, Hugstetter Strasse 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany

Correspondence
Ali Al-Ahmad
ali.al-ahmad{at}uniklinik-freiburg.de

Received 4 August 2005
Accepted 9 September 2005


This study was carried out in order to compare two PCR-based methods in the detection of Streptococcus mutans. The first PCR method was based on primers for the 16S rRNA gene and the second method was based on specific primers that targeted the glucosyltransferase gene (gtfB). Each PCR was performed with eight different streptococci from the viridans group, five other streptococci and 17 different non-streptococcal bacterial strains. Direct use of the S. mutans 16S rRNA gene-specific primers revealed that Streptococcus gordonii and Streptococcus infantis were also detected. After amplifying the 16S rRNA gene with universal primers and subsequently performing nested PCR, the S. mutans-specific nested primers based on the 16S rRNA gene detected all tested streptococci. There was no cross-reaction of the gtfB primers after direct PCR. Our results indicate that direct PCR and nested PCR based on 16S rRNA genes can reveal false-positive results for oral streptococci and lead to an overestimation of the prevalence of S. mutans with regards to its role as the most prevalent causative agent of dental caries.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 Society for General Microbiology.