| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Sexually Transmitted Bacteria Reference Laboratory, Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT, UK
Correspondence Sarah Alexander Sarah.Alexander{at}hpa.org.uk
Received April 3, 2005
Accepted June 1, 2005
Eight identification methods were evaluated against 100 isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and 21 non-gonococcal Neisseria strains. The methods examined included four commercial biochemical kits, API NH, RapID NH, Gonochek II and Neisseria Preformed Enzyme Test (PET), three immunological kits, Phadebact Monoclonal GC test, GonoGen II and MicroTrak, and one in-house carbohydrate-utilization method, cystine trypticase agar (CTA) sugars. The percentage of isolates unambiguously identified as N. gonorrhoeae by each of the methods was as follows: API NH, 66 %; RapID NH, 64 %; GonoChek II, 66 %; Neisseria PET, 66 %; Phadebact Monoclonal GC OMNI test, 99 %; GonoGen II, 100 %; MicroTrak, 100 %; and CTA sugars, 96 %. The low sensitivity of the biochemical kits for the identification of N. gonorrhoeae was due to a lack of the enzyme proline iminopeptidase (Pip) in 34 % of the isolates examined. All the biochemical kits utilized the presence of this enzyme as a marker for N. gonorrhoeae. The Phadebact Monoclonal GC kit, GonoGen II, MicroTrak, CTA sugars and the API NH kit all exhibited high specificity, but non-gonococcal Neisseria were misidentified as N. gonorrhoeae using RapID NH (two strains), Gonochek II (11 strains) and Neisseria PET (11 strains). Whilst the isolates examined in this study may not be truly representative, they do indicate that N. gonorrhoeae isolates lacking the enzyme Pip can give anomalous results when using commercially available biochemical tests and that some non-pathogenic Neisseria species are still being misidentified using some biochemical kits. This further reinforces the recommendation that any dubious biochemical result should be confirmed with an immunological test.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. P. Rennie, C. Brosnikoff, S. Shokoples, L. B. Reller, S. Mirrett, W. Janda, K. Ristow, and A. Krilcich Multicenter Evaluation of the New Vitek 2 Neisseria-Haemophilus Identification Card J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2008; 46(8): 2681 - 2685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Valenza, C. Ruoff, U. Vogel, M. Frosch, and M. Abele-Horn Microbiological Evaluation of the New VITEK 2 Neisseria-Haemophilus Identification Card J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2007; 45(11): 3493 - 3497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. M. C. Martin, E. Foreman, V. Hall, A. Nesbitt, G. Forster, and C. A. Ison Non-cultural detection and molecular genotyping of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from a piece of clothing J. Med. Microbiol., April 1, 2007; 56(4): 487 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M Unemo, H M Palmer, T Blackmore, G Herrera, H Fredlund, A Limnios, N Nguyen, and J Tapsall Global transmission of prolyliminopeptidase-negative Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains: implications for changes in diagnostic strategies Sex. Transm. Inf., February 1, 2007; 83(1): 47 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Otero, M Alvarez-Arguelles, H Villar, J Diaz-Gigante, F Carreno, and F Vazquez The prevalence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae negative for proline iminopeptidase in Asturias, Spain Sex. Transm. Inf., February 1, 2007; 83(1): 76 - 76. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Alexander, I M C Martin, K Fenton, and C A Ison The prevalence of proline iminopeptidase negative Neisseria gonorrhoeae throughout England and Wales. Sex. Transm. Inf., August 1, 2006; 82(4): 280 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | J MED MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL | ALL SGM JOURNALS |
