J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Nakkas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, S. G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Al-Nakkas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, S. G
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Al-Nakkas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, S. G
J Med Microbiol 54 (2005), 727-730; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.45772-0
© 2005 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Large-scale evaluation of a single-tube nested PCR for the laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis in Kuwait

Aref Al-Nakkas1,2, Abu Salim Mustafa2 and Stephen G Wright1,3

1Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK 2Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, PO Box 24923, Safat 13110, Kuwait 3Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, Mortimer Market, London WC1E 6AU, UK

Correspondence Stephen G. Wright stephen.wright{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Received June 11, 2004
Accepted April 28, 2005

A single-tube nested PCR assay identifying a 52 bp fragment from the genus-specific Brucella IS711 gene was used prospectively in clinical practice for the diagnosis of human brucellosis in Kuwait. Patients with suspected brucellosis and with other infections were investigated as clinically indicated but in all of them culture, serology and PCR for Brucella were carried out. Out of 263 suspected cases of brucellosis, diagnostic tests were positive in 199, serology was positive in 199 and culture in 89, while the Brucella PCR was positive in 193 (sensitivity 96.98 %, 95 % confidence interval 94.5–99.5 %). Chronic brucellosis, involving symptoms for more than 1 year, was diagnosed in 49 out of these 193 patients. Diagnoses in four out of the six patients with positive serology but negative PCR and culture were non-Brucella bacterial meningitis and viral meningitis. False-negative PCR results were possible in the remaining two; both had been on long-term antibiotics for previously diagnosed brucellosis but their adherence may have been questionable, allowing a relapse. The PCR was negative in 244 patients with other infections (specificity 100 %) and in 180 control subjects with negative Brucella culture and serology. PCR results were available within 24 h of sample receipt, providing diagnostic information rapidly. The PCR is expensive and technically demanding and may not be appropriate for all cases. Future studies will help define how it may best be used. For example Brucella and tuberculous meningitides can be very similar, Brucella PCR may allow prompt distinction between the two, avoiding the need for prolonged empirical treatment for both.


Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 Society for General Microbiology.