J Med Microbiol International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lucero, N. E
Right arrow Articles by Jacques, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lucero, N. E
Right arrow Articles by Jacques, I.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lucero, N. E
Right arrow Articles by Jacques, I.
J Med Microbiol 54 (2005), 505-508; DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.45928-0
© 2005 Society for General Microbiology
ISSN 0022-2615

Unusual clinical presentation of brucellosis caused by Brucella canis

Nidia E Lucero1, Nestor O Jacob2, Sandra M Ayala1, Gabriela I Escobar1, Patricia Tuccillo3 and Isabelle Jacques4

1Brucellosis Laboratory, Administración Nacional de Laboratorios e Institutos de Salud Dr C. G. Malbrán (ANLIS), Avda. Velez Sarsfield 563, 1281 Buenos Aires, Argentina 2Unidad de Transplante Renal, Hospital Cosme Argerich, Margall 750, 1155 Buenos Aires, Argentina 3Hospital Naval ‘Pedro Mallo', Patricias Argentinas 351, 1405 Buenos Aires, Argentina 4Laboratoire de Pathologie Infectieuse et Immunologie, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 37380 Nouzilly, France

Correspondence Nidia E. Lucero nidia{at}elsitio.net

Received October 13, 2004
Accepted January 13, 2005

Brucella canis is considered a rare cause of human brucellosis. The clinical importance of this infection may have been underestimated so far because of difficulties with presumptive diagnosis. The case described here presented symptoms compatible with brucellosis but the routine tests using Brucella abortus antigen were negative. The infection would have remained undiagnosed if culture had not been positive. This case illustrates the potential for a favourable outcome in Brucella canis diagnosis and supports recommendations for the use of B. canis serology. The infection should be suspected in patients with compatible symptoms and negative serology for B. abortus antigen.


Abbreviations: CELISA, competitive ELISA; CMV, cytomegalovirus; IELISA, indirect ELISA; RSAT, rapid screening agglutination test.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 Society for General Microbiology.