HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Guimarães, A. J. Articles by Zancopé-Oliveira, R. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Guimarães, A. J. Articles by Zancopé-Oliveira, R. M. Agricola Articles by Guimarães, A. J. Articles by Zancopé-Oliveira, R. M.

ELISA for early diagnosis of histoplasmosis

¹Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ²Instituto de Microbiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ³St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's Hospital, King's College, London, UK

Correspondence Rosely Maria Zancopé-Oliveira zancope{at}ipec.fiocruz.br

Received September 24, 2003
Accepted January 23, 2004

An ELISA was developed and evaluated as a method for detecting antibodies against glycosylated and deglycosylated histoplasmin (HMIN). Sera from patients with histoplasmosis, paracoccidioidomycosis, sporotrichosis, coccidioidomycosis, aspergillosis, cryptococcosis and healthy donors were tested by ELISA against purified, deglycosylated histoplasmin (ptHMIN) and compared with purified, native (i.e. glycosylated) histoplasmin (pHMIN). Although cross-reactivity was not abolished when ptHMIN was used in the test, it was reduced (pHMIN ELISA 93 % versus ptHMIN ELISA 96 %). However, there were statistically significant differences between the sensitivities of these two methods for the detection of antibodies (pHMIN ELISA 57 % versus ptHMIN ELISA 92 %; P < 0.001) and between the efficiency of the methods (pHMIN ELISA 83 % versus ptHMIN ELISA 95 %; P < 0.001). These parameters compare better than previously published data relating to the use of treated HMIN in diagnostic ELISAs. Some of the reactivities of serum samples were compared by immunoblotting using deglycosylated HMIN and by immunodiffusion using the crude antigen. The results demonstrated that cross-reactions with heterologous sera in both ELISAs could also be observed in immunoblotting and arose from shared protein epitopes. These data suggest that ELISA using deglycosylated HMIN is a very sensitive diagnostic method and, by using commercially available antigen, it can be easily standardized and performed faster than previous Western blot-based tests using the same antigen. It provides a useful adjunct to existing methods of diagnosis that could be applied even in situations where laboratory facilities were relatively limited.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Almeida-Paes, M. A. Pimenta, C. V. Pizzini, P. C. F. Monteiro, J. M. Peralta, J. D. Nosanchuk, and R. M. Zancope-Oliveira Use of Mycelial-Phase Sporothrix schenckii Exoantigens in an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Diagnosis of Sporotrichosis by Antibody Detection Clin. Vaccine Immunol., March 1, 2007; 14(3): 244 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]