J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teanpaisan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teanpaisan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, C. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Teanpaisan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, C. W.

The Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol 48, Issue 8 741-749, Copyright © 1999 by Society for General Microbiology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Molecular fingerprinting of Porphyromonas gingivalis by PCR of repetitive extragenic palindromic (REP) sequences and comparison with other fingerprinting methods

R. Teanpaisan and C. W. Douglas
Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

Knowledge of the genetic structure of populations of potentially pathogenic bacteria is important in understanding the epidemiology of diseases. Porphyromonas gingivalis is thought to be an important aetiological agent in periodontal diseases and several methods have been used for typing strains of this species. Here, PCR with primers to repetitive extragenic palindromic sequences (REP-PCR) was compared with three other widely used molecular fingerprinting techniques -- restriction endonuclease analysis (REA), ribotyping and PCR with arbitrary primers (AP-PCR) -- to type P. gingivalis isolates from healthy and diseased periodontal sites. The data obtained with all four methods were in broad agreement and, with one exception, each subject harboured a single unique genotype of P. gingivalis. REP-PCR of P. gingivalis resulted in the production of 5-10 amplicons, which gave unique electrophoretic patterns in each individual (10 REP-PCR types in 10 patients) and similar results were obtained with AP-PCR. Two isolates from one subject appeared identical by REP-PCR and AP-PCR, but could be differentiated by ribotyping, although there was only minor polymorphism. Thus, ribotyping and REA were the most discriminating methods; however, these are time-consuming and expensive relative to the PCR-based techniques. REP-PCR has the advantage that the same pair of primers is used for all species, whereas AP-PCR needs to be optimised by screening a range of primers. These results show that REP-PCR is a useful and rapid technique for typing P. gingivalis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
O.-J. Park, K.-M. Min, S.-J. Choe, B.-K. Choi, and K.-K. Kim
Use of Insertion Sequence Element IS1126 in a Genotyping and Transmission Study of Porphyromonas gingivalis
J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2004; 42(2): 535 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
S. Choi, S. Ohta, and E. Ohtsubo
A Novel IS Element, IS621, of the IS110/IS492 Family Transposes to a Specific Site in Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic Sequences in Escherichia coli
J. Bacteriol., August 15, 2003; 185(16): 4891 - 4900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 Society for General Microbiology.