J Med Microbiol International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, L. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, L. A.

The Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol 48, Issue 12 1075-1080, Copyright © 1999 by Society for General Microbiology

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Sex differences in antibody- and cell-mediated immune response to rubella re-immunisation

L. A. Mitchell
Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. leslie@wpog.childhosp.bc.ca

Antibody (AMI) and cell-mediated (CMI) immunity to rubella virus (RV) were evaluated in healthy adolescent males (n = 11) and females (n = 28) undergoing routine reimmunisation with RA27/3 strain RV as a component of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine. Blood samples were collected just before and at 2, 4 and 10 weeks after MMR. While there were no sex differences before MMR and at week 10 after vaccination, levels of specific IgG determined by whole RV enzyme immunoassay were found to be significantly higher in males at weeks 2 and 4, suggesting brisker onset of recall AMI. Analysis of RV protein-specific IgG by immunoblot assays also revealed that while there were no notable sex differences in the distribution of E1-specific antibodies, more males produced E2-specific antibodies whereas more females produced C-specific antibodies after immunisation. Analysis of CMI with whole inactivated RV and a panel of RV synthetic peptides in lymphocyte proliferation assays revealed a brisker onset of CMI in males which paralleled that observed for AMI. The numbers of RV antigens recognised by males were significantly higher at weeks 2 and 4. Also, mean and median stimulation indices measured at weeks 2 and 4 for certain peptides, including two known to contain overlapping antibody neutralisation domains and T-cell epitopes, E1(213-239) and E1(254-285), were also found to be significantly higher in male subjects. These observations suggest that there are hormonal influences on RV-specific immunity which might result in differential handling of RV and, hence, may partially explain why females are more predisposed to adverse outcomes of rubella infection and immunisation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. D. Lockshin
Genome and Hormones: Gender Differences in Physiology: Invited Review: Sex ratio and rheumatic disease
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2001; 91(5): 2366 - 2373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 Society for General Microbiology.