J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lovell, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Barrow, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lovell, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Barrow, P. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lovell, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Barrow, P. A.

The Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol 48, Issue 10 907-916, Copyright © 1999 by Society for General Microbiology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Intestinal colonisation of gnotobiotic pigs by Salmonella organisms: interaction between isogenic and unrelated strains

M. A. Lovell and P. A. Barrow
Division of Environmental Microbiology, Institute for Animal Health, Compton Laboratory, Newbury, Berkshire.

The effect of intestinal colonisation by a Salmonella strain on the establishment in the gut of an isogenic mutant administered orally 24 h after the first strain was studied in gnotobiotic pigs. Irrespective of the clinical outcome of the infection, the extensive colonisation of one Salmonella strain prevented a similar degree of colonisation by an otherwise isogenic antibiotic resistant strain; in some cases the second strain was hardly detectable. The poor colonisation of the challenge Salmonella strains was generally reflected in very low counts of organisms in the tissues. Colonisation by a strain of Escherichia coli reduced the rate of establishment of an isogenic E. coli, strain but did not prevent colonisation by an S. Typhimurium strain. S. Typhimurium with mutations in the tsr (serine chemotaxis receptor protein) or oxrA (transcriptional regulator of anaerobic metabolism) genes did not inhibit colonisation. Mutations in cya (adenylate cyclase), tar and trg (chemotaxis receptor proteins for aspartate and ribose respectively) genes were less inhibitory, while motB (non-motile) and cheR (impaired motility) mutants were fully inhibitory.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.Home page
R. Lux and W. Shi
CHEMOTAXIS-GUIDED MOVEMENTS IN BACTERIA
Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., July 1, 2004; 15(4): 207 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
S Hudault, J Guignot, and A L Servin
Escherichia coli strains colonising the gastrointestinal tract protect germfree mice against Salmonella typhimurium infection
Gut, July 1, 2001; 49(1): 47 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1999 Society for General Microbiology.