|
|
||||||||
The Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol 47, Issue 4 341-351, Copyright © 1998 by Society for General Microbiology
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
F. J. Schmitz, M. Steiert, H. V. Tichy, B. Hofmann, J. Verhoef, H. P. Heinz, K. Kohrer and M. E. Jones
Institute for Medical Microbiology and Virology, Heinrich-Heine-Universitat Dusseldorf, Germany.
Nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) represent an increasing problem in hospitals. Quick and reliable typing methods are required to obtain information about the relatedness of MRSA isolates and to allow faster implementation of appropriate infection control measures. This investigation describes the distribution of MRSA isolates from 11 hospitals in the Dusseldorf region of Germany, and the ability of six different genotypic typing techniques -- pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), 16S-23S rDNA spacer amplification, protein A-gene PCR, PCR characterisation of the hypervariable region (HVR) adjacent to mecA, and coagulase gene-PCR -- to detect different unrelated types. Of 7814 S. aureus isolates tested, 489 (6.3%) were MRSA, of which 183 were selected for subsequent molecular analyses on the basis of being the first MRSA isolated from colonised or infected patients. Larger hospitals had a higher incidence of MRSA and a greater variability in genotypes than smaller hospitals. All methods confirmed the presence of two main clonal types. The ability of techniques to detect different unrelated types was found to be as follows: PFGE, 28 types; 16S-23S rDNA spacer-amplification, 10 types; RAPD, nine types; protein A-gene PCR, five types; HVR-PCR, five types; and coa gene-PCR, two types. Combination of PFGE and one other PCR-based method (spacer-amplification, RAPD or protein-A gene PCR) provided the best resolution of types and allowed the identification of subtypes. Similar molecular types were identified with international MRSA isolates. Although PCR-based techniques have the advantage of rapid performance and easy handling, their discriminatory capacity is inferior compared to the more labour intensive PFGE.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Montesinos, E. Salido, T. Delgado, M. Cuervo, and A. Sierra Epidemiologic Genotyping of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis at a University Hospital and Comparison with Antibiotyping and Protein A and Coagulase Gene Polymorphisms J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2002; 40(6): 2119 - 2125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. M. Senna, C. A. Pinto, L. P. S. Carvalho, and D. S. Santos Comparison of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis and PCR Analysis of Polymorphisms on the mec Hypervariable Region for Typing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2002; 40(6): 2254 - 2256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-J. Schmitz, J. Petridou, H. Jagusch, N. Astfalk, S. Scheuring, and S. Schwarz Molecular characterization of ketolide-resistant erm(A)-carrying Staphylococcus aureus isolates selected in vitro by telithromycin, ABT-773, quinupristin and clindamycin J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2002; 49(4): 611 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Couto, S. Pereira, M. Miragaia, I. S. Sanches, and H. de Lencastre Identification of Clinical Staphylococcal Isolates from Humans by Internal Transcribed Spacer PCR J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2001; 39(9): 3099 - 3103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Salmenlinna and J. Vuopio-Varkila Recognition of Two Groups of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Based on Epidemiology, Antimicrobial Susceptibility, Hypervariable-Region Type, and Ribotype in Finland J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2001; 39(6): 2243 - 2247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.-J. Schmitz, A. C. Fluit, D. Hafner, A. Beeck, M. Perdikouli, M. Boos, S. Scheuring, J. Verhoef, K. Köhrer, and C. Von Eiff Development of Resistance to Ciprofloxacin, Rifampin, and Mupirocin in Methicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., November 1, 2000; 44(11): 3229 - 3231. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F.-J. Schmitz, R. Sadurski, J. Verhoef, D. Milatovic, and A. C. Fluit Typing of 154 clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and determination of the in vitro susceptibilities of these strains to 28 antibiotics J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 2000; 45(6): 921 - 923. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Enright, N. P. J. Day, C. E. Davies, S. J. Peacock, and B. G. Spratt Multilocus Sequence Typing for Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Clones of Staphylococcus aureus J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2000; 38(3): 1008 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F.-J. Schmitz, R. Sadurski, A. Stattfeld, A. Kray, J. Verhoef, and A. C. Fluit Cross-resistance analyses and molecular typing of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus spp. isolates resistant to quinupristin/dalfopristin J. Antimicrob. Chemother., December 1, 1999; 44(6): 847 - 849. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Fukui, N. Kato, H. Kato, K. Watanabe, and N. Tatematsu Incidence of Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens Carriage among Family Members with Subclinical Periodontal Disease J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 1999; 37(10): 3141 - 3145. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
O. Melter, I. Santos Sanches, J. Schindler, M. Aires de Sousa, R. Mato, V. Kovárova, H. Zemlicková, and H. de Lencastre Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clonal Types in the Czech Republic J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 1999; 37(9): 2798 - 2803. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. Geisel, F.-J. Schmitz, L. Thomas, G. Berns, O. Zetsche, B. Ulrich, A. C. Fluit, H. Labischinsky, and W. Witte Emergence of heterogeneous intermediate vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates in the Dusseldorf area J. Antimicrob. Chemother., June 1, 1999; 43(6): 846 - 848. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Jones, M. R. Visser, M. Klootwijk, P. Heisig, J. Verhoef, and F.-J. Schmitz Comparative Activities of Clinafloxacin, Grepafloxacin, Levofloxacin, Moxifloxacin, Ofloxacin, Sparfloxacin, and Trovafloxacin and Nonquinolones Linozelid, Quinupristin-Dalfopristin, Gentamicin, and Vancomycin against Clinical Isolates of Ciprofloxacin-Resistant and -Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Strains Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 1999; 43(2): 421 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | J MED MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL | ALL SGM JOURNALS |