J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bisgaard, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bisgaard, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bisgaard, M.

The Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol 45, Issue 6 413-418, Copyright © 1996 by Society for General Microbiology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Genomic lineage of Salmonella enterica serotype Gallinarum

J. E. Olsen, M. N. Skov, J. P. Christensen and M. Bisgaard
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Forty-eight strains of Salmonella enterica serotype Gallinarum of biotypes Gallinarum and Pullorum were characterised by three chromosomally based typing methods. The patterns obtained were compared with those of strains of eight other serotypes of Salmonella of O serogroup D. The same PvuII and PstI IS200 patterns were commonly observed among strains of both biotypes and the three SmaI ribotypes of serotype Gallinarum strains differed in only one or two bands, supporting the view that members of these two biotypes are closely related. The same IS200 patterns were also commonly observed among strains of serotype Enteritidis, indicating its evolutionary relationship with serotype Gallinarum. NotI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns divided strains into 24 types. Based on a similarity analysis, two clusters were formed. One contained the majority of biotype Gallinarum strains and two atypical strains of Pullorum; the other contained strains of biotype Pullorum and an otherwise typical strain of biotype Gallinarum. Two atypical strains of biotype Pullorum remained unclustered by PFGE analysis. The grouping of strains differed according to the typing method used, but the majority of strains within each of the biotypes Gallinarum and Pullorum were very similar by the chromosomal markers analysed.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1996 Society for General Microbiology.