J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by al Saif, N.
Right arrow Articles by Brazier, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by al Saif, N.
Right arrow Articles by Brazier, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by al Saif, N.
Right arrow Articles by Brazier, J. S.

The Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol 45, Issue 2 133-137, Copyright © 1996 by Society for General Microbiology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

The distribution of Clostridium difficile in the environment of South Wales

N. al Saif and J. S. Brazier
Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff.

A large study of the distribution of Clostridium difficile in the environment of the Cardiff area of South Wales was performed with a methodology designed to maximise recovery. A total of 2580 samples was taken, with 184 (7.1%) yielding isolates. The highest yield for C. difficile was obtained from river waters, with 14 (87.5%) of 16 samples from four rivers positive, and from sea water samples with 7 (44%) of 15 positive from six beaches on the Bristol Channel. In addition, 7 (46.7%) of 15 samples of lake water were also positive. Twenty-two (21%) of 104 soil samples, taken from random sites in Cardiff, were positive, as were 20% of environmental samples from four Cardiff hospitals. C. difficile was also isolated from 50% of eight swimming pool waters examined and 1 (5.5%) of 18 of mains tap water. Carriage of C. difficile in 524 faecal samples of assorted farm animals was c. 1%, and was 10% in dogs and 2% in cats. In private residences, the organism was present in 12 (2.2%) of 550 samples. While 2.4% of 300 raw vegetable samples were positive, none of 107 assorted fish gut contents was. These findings indicate that C. difficile may be more widely distributed in the general environment, particularly water, than was previously thought.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. S. Payne, M. R. Hall, L. Sly, and D. G. Bourne
Microbial Diversity within Early-Stage Cultured Panulirus ornatus Phyllosomas
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 15, 2007; 73(6): 1940 - 1951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
S. Goh, T. V. Riley, and B. J. Chang
Isolation and Characterization of Temperate Bacteriophages of Clostridium difficile
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2005; 71(2): 1079 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
J. McCoubrey, J. Starr, H. Martin, and I. R. Poxton
Clostridium difficile in a geriatric unit: a prospective epidemiological study employing a novel S-layer typing method
J. Med. Microbiol., July 1, 2003; 52(7): 573 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1996 Society for General Microbiology.