J Med Microbiol International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hogasen, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gaustad, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hogasen, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gaustad, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hogasen, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Gaustad, P.

The Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol 42, Issue 4 291-298, Copyright © 1995 by Society for General Microbiology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Various Candida and Torulopsis species differ in their ability to induce the production of C3, factor B and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in human monocyte cultures

A. K. Hogasen, T. G. Abrahamsen and P. Gaustad
Department of Pediatric Research, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.

The incidence of infections with Candida albicans and also with non-albicans yeast species is increasing rapidly, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Eight Candida and Torulopsis species were compared for their ability to stimulate production of complement components C3 and factor B by monocytes. In addition, the release of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) was determined, because this cytokine affects monocyte complement production. The highest ranked pathogenic yeasts, i.e., C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis, were the most effective inducers of C3, factor B and GM-CSF production. C. krusei and T. glabrata showed intermediate activity, whereas C. kefyr, C. guilliermondii and T. candida had only a moderate stimulatory effect on C3 production and did not affect either factor B or GM-CSF release. The stimulated cytokine and complement production in response to the yeasts was highly variable in monocytes from different donors, but there was a consistent inverse relationship between C3 and GM-CSF concentrations in the monocyte supernates. This is in agreement with the previously described suppressive effect of GM-CSF on yeast-induced C3, but not factor B production. The monocyte responses elicited by a specific yeast species may be linked to its pathogenicity, and may also explain the predilection of some yeasts for particular underlying diseases.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 Society for General Microbiology.