J Med Microbiol Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allen, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cockroft, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allen, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cockroft, P. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Allen, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cockroft, P. M.

The Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol 40, Issue 2 98-101, Copyright © 1994 by Society for General Microbiology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

A comparison of three semi-selective media for the isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

J. L. Allen, M. E. Cowan and P. M. Cockroft
Infection Control Department, St Mary's General Hospital, Portsmouth, Hants.

During the 1980s the emergence of multiple antibiotic-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus posed new problems for infection control worldwide, many of which still remain. In investigations of outbreaks of infection, the laboratory has a key role in identifying infected or colonised patients and staff. The rapid isolation and accurate identification of the causative organisms are essential for the implementation of appropriate control measures. Speed and accuracy in identification, by colonial morphology, is often difficult to achieve in the presence of a mixed population of commensal bacteria. To this end, the sensitivity of three media for the isolation of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) from simulated clinical specimens was compared. Initial colonial recognition of MRSA was enhanced on methicillin-milk agar when compared with that on other media.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
N. Safdar, L. Narans, B. Gordon, and D. G. Maki
Comparison of Culture Screening Methods for Detection of Nasal Carriage of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a Prospective Study Comparing 32 Methods
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2003; 41(7): 3163 - 3166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
N. Mir, M. Sánchez, F. Baquero, B. López, C. Calderón, and R. Cantón
Soft Salt-Mannitol Agar-Cloxacillin Test: a Highly Specific Bedside Screening Test for Detection of Colonization with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 1998; 36(4): 986 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1994 Society for General Microbiology.